Industrial - Machinery
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
TAYD vs NN vs TWIN vs TRMB vs AIXI
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Internet Content & Information
Industrial - Machinery
Hardware, Equipment & Parts
Software - Application
TAYD vs NN vs TWIN vs TRMB vs AIXI — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Industrial - Machinery | Internet Content & Information | Industrial - Machinery | Hardware, Equipment & Parts | Software - Application |
| Market Cap | $218M | $2.64B | $266M | $14.65B | $8M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $48M | $5M | $348M | $3.69B | $115M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $10M | $-189M | $22M | $456M | $-53M |
| Gross Margin | 46.1% | -256.2% | 27.9% | 68.8% | 64.3% |
| Operating Margin | 21.5% | -15.4% | 3.3% | 17.7% | -44.2% |
| Forward P/E | 16.6x | — | 26.3x | 19.7x | — |
| Total Debt | $0.00 | $15M | $49M | $1.39B | $46M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1M | $45M | $16M | $253M | $847K |
TAYD vs NN vs TWIN vs TRMB vs AIXI — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Mar 23 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Taylor Devices, Inc. (TAYD) | 100 | 259.3 | +159.3% |
| NextNav Inc. (NN) | 100 | 974.9 | +874.9% |
| Twin Disc, Incorpor… (TWIN) | 100 | 201.8 | +101.8% |
| Trimble Inc. (TRMB) | 100 | 116.0 | +16.0% |
| Xiao-I Corporation (AIXI) | 100 | 1.0 | -99.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: TAYD vs NN vs TWIN vs TRMB vs AIXI
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
TAYD carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 225.2% 10Y total return vs NN's 100.1%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.66, current ratio 5.88x
- PEG 0.62 vs TRMB's 8.00
- Beta 0.66, current ratio 5.88x
NN lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
TWIN is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability is your priority.
- Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta 1.04, yield 0.9%
- 0.9% yield; 3-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
- +156.5% vs AIXI's -79.2%
Among these 5 stocks, TRMB doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
AIXI ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 18.8%, EPS growth 52.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 29.3%
- 18.8% revenue growth vs NN's -19.3%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 18.8% revenue growth vs NN's -19.3% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 20.8% margin vs NN's -41.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.66 vs TRMB's 1.46 | |
| Dividends | 0.9% yield; 3-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +156.5% vs AIXI's -79.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 13.9% ROA vs NN's -73.1% |
TAYD vs NN vs TWIN vs TRMB vs AIXI — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
TAYD vs NN vs TWIN vs TRMB vs AIXI — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
TAYD leads in 2 of 6 categories
TWIN leads 2 • NN leads 0 • TRMB leads 0 • AIXI leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TAYD leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TRMB is the larger business by revenue, generating $3.7B annually — 806.2x NN's $5M. TAYD is the more profitable business, keeping 20.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to NN's -41.4%. On growth, TAYD holds the edge at +198.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $48M | $5M | $348M | $3.7B | $115M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $12M | -$62M | $27M | $785M | -$49M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $10M | -$189M | $22M | $456M | -$53M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $9M | -$51M | -$70,000 | $253M | -$2M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +46.1% | -2.6% | +27.9% | +68.8% | +64.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +21.5% | -15.4% | +3.3% | +17.7% | -44.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +20.8% | -41.4% | +6.3% | +12.4% | -45.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +19.6% | -11.2% | -0.0% | +6.9% | -2.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +198.6% | -50.5% | +0.3% | +11.8% | -64.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +88.2% | -85.2% | +22.7% | +55.6% | -29.9% |
Valuation Metrics
TWIN leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 18.1x trailing earnings, TAYD trades at a 49% valuation discount to TRMB's 35.3x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), TAYD offers better value at 0.67x vs TRMB's 14.39x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $218M | $2.6B | $266M | $14.7B | $8M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $217M | $2.6B | $299M | $15.8B | $53M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 18.14x | -13.74x | -131.50x | 35.34x | -0.45x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 16.60x | — | 26.34x | 19.67x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.67x | — | — | 14.39x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 19.13x | — | 12.05x | 20.05x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 4.72x | 577.54x | 0.78x | 4.08x | 0.11x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.75x | — | 1.55x | 2.54x | — |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 44.86x | — | 30.10x | 110.00x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
TAYD leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
TAYD delivers a 14.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $15 in annual profit, vs $8 for TRMB. TRMB carries lower financial leverage with a 0.24x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to TWIN's 0.30x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), TWIN scores 5/9 vs NN's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +14.7% | — | +13.2% | +8.0% | — |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +13.9% | -73.1% | +6.1% | +5.0% | -65.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +13.2% | — | +3.9% | +6.8% | -34.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +17.0% | -36.6% | +4.5% | +7.8% | -3.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 3 | 5 | 5 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | — | 0.30x | 0.24x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$1M | -$30M | $33M | $1.1B | $45M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1M | $45M | $16M | $253M | $846,593 |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $15M | $49M | $1.4B | $46M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | -5.64x | 1.82x | 12.26x | -14.13x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — TAYD and NN each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in TAYD five years ago would be worth $42,498 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $138 for AIXI. Over the past 12 months, TWIN leads with a +156.5% total return vs AIXI's -79.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NN at 109.2% vs AIXI's -75.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -19.0% | +20.3% | +13.9% | -21.0% | +68.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +48.5% | +41.4% | +156.5% | -6.7% | -79.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +138.5% | +816.0% | +55.3% | +30.1% | -98.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +325.0% | +96.1% | +47.5% | -22.0% | -98.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +225.2% | +100.1% | +87.2% | +166.8% | -98.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +33.6% | +109.2% | +15.8% | +9.2% | -75.9% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — TAYD and TWIN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
TAYD is the less volatile stock with a 0.66 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than TRMB's 1.46 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. TWIN currently trades 93.8% from its 52-week high vs AIXI's 18.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.60x | 1.36x | 1.16x | 1.35x | 0.71x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $90.37 | $24.19 | $19.63 | $87.50 | $4.02 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $33.67 | $10.84 | $6.80 | $61.63 | $0.08 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +57.6% | +80.7% | +93.8% | +70.7% | +18.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 35.6 | 55.2 | 58.3 | 36.8 | 49.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 48K | 2.2M | 49K | 1.7M | 60.6M |
Analyst Outlook
TWIN leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: TAYD as "Hold", NN as "Buy", TWIN as "Hold", TRMB as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 51.2% upside for TRMB (target: $94) vs 35.0% for NN (target: $26). TWIN is the only dividend payer here at 0.90% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | Hold | Buy | — |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $26.33 | — | $93.50 | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 2 | 3 | 4 | 28 | — |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +0.9% | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | — | 3 | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $0.16 | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.1% | 0.0% | +0.5% | +5.9% | 0.0% |
TAYD leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). TWIN leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook). 2 tied.
TAYD vs NN vs TWIN vs TRMB vs AIXI: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is TAYD or NN or TWIN or TRMB or AIXI a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Xiao-I Corporation (AIXI) is the stronger pick with 18.
8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -19. 3% for NextNav Inc. (NN). Taylor Devices, Inc. (TAYD) offers the better valuation at 18. 1x trailing P/E (16. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate NextNav Inc. (NN) a "Buy" — based on 3 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — TAYD or NN or TWIN or TRMB or AIXI?
On trailing P/E, Taylor Devices, Inc.
(TAYD) is the cheapest at 18. 1x versus Trimble Inc. at 35. 3x. On forward P/E, Taylor Devices, Inc. is actually cheaper at 16. 6x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Taylor Devices, Inc. wins at 0. 62x versus Trimble Inc. 's 8. 00x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — TAYD or NN or TWIN or TRMB or AIXI?
Over the past 5 years, Taylor Devices, Inc.
(TAYD) delivered a total return of +325. 0%, compared to -98. 6% for Xiao-I Corporation (AIXI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TAYD returned +224. 5% versus AIXI's -98. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — TAYD or NN or TWIN or TRMB or AIXI?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Taylor Devices, Inc.
(TAYD) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 60β versus NextNav Inc. 's 1. 36β — meaning NN is approximately 125% more volatile than TAYD relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Trimble Inc. (TRMB) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 24% versus 30% for Twin Disc, Incorporated — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — TAYD or NN or TWIN or TRMB or AIXI?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Xiao-I Corporation (AIXI) is pulling ahead at 18.
8% versus -19. 3% for NextNav Inc. (NN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Xiao-I Corporation grew EPS 52. 7% year-over-year, compared to -117. 7% for Twin Disc, Incorporated. Over a 3-year CAGR, AIXI leads at 29. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — TAYD or NN or TWIN or TRMB or AIXI?
Taylor Devices, Inc.
(TAYD) is the more profitable company, earning 20. 3% net margin versus -41. 4% for NextNav Inc. — meaning it keeps 20. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TAYD leads at 20. 8% versus -1535. 8% for NN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AIXI leads at 68. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is TAYD or NN or TWIN or TRMB or AIXI more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Taylor Devices, Inc. (TAYD) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 62x versus Trimble Inc. 's 8. 00x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Taylor Devices, Inc. (TAYD) trades at 16. 6x forward P/E versus 26. 3x for Twin Disc, Incorporated — 9. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for TRMB: 51. 2% to $93. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — TAYD or NN or TWIN or TRMB or AIXI?
In this comparison, TWIN (0.
9% yield) pays a dividend. TAYD, NN, TRMB, AIXI do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is TAYD or NN or TWIN or TRMB or AIXI better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Taylor Devices, Inc.
(TAYD) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 60), +224. 5% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (TAYD: +224. 5%, NN: +103. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between TAYD and NN and TWIN and TRMB and AIXI?
These companies operate in different sectors (TAYD (Industrials) and NN (Communication Services) and TWIN (Industrials) and TRMB (Technology) and AIXI (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: TAYD is a small-cap quality compounder stock; NN is a small-cap quality compounder stock; TWIN is a small-cap high-growth stock; TRMB is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; AIXI is a small-cap high-growth stock. TWIN pays a dividend while TAYD, NN, TRMB, AIXI do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.