TBB
AT&T Inc. 5.35% GLB NTS 66
Telecommunications Services
Market Cap$133.05B
5Y Perf.-17.4%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
TBB vs TMUS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
TMUS
T-Mobile US, Inc.
Telecommunications Services
Market Cap$210.16B
5Y Perf.+94.1%
TBB vs TMUS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | TBB | TMUS |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Telecommunications Services | Telecommunications Services |
| Market Cap | $133.05B | $210.16B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $126.52B | $90.53B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $21.41B | $10.54B |
| Gross Margin | 79.7% | 54.3% |
| Operating Margin | 19.4% | 20.4% |
| Forward P/E | 9.5x | 18.5x |
| Total Debt | $173.99B | $122.27B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $18.23B | $5.60B |
TBB vs TMUS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
TBB
TMUS
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| AT&T Inc. 5.35% GLB… (TBB) | 100 | 82.6 | -17.4% |
| T-Mobile US, Inc. (TMUS) | 100 | 194.1 | +94.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: TBB vs TMUS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: TBB leads in 6 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. T-Mobile US, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
TBB
AT&T Inc. 5.35% GLB NTS 66
The Income Pick
TBB carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 0.78, yield 5.3%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.78, current ratio 0.91x
- Beta 0.78, yield 5.3%, current ratio 0.91x
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
TMUS
T-Mobile US, Inc.
The Growth Play
TMUS is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 8.5%, EPS growth 0.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 3.5%
- 407.2% 10Y total return vs TBB's 30.8%
- 8.5% revenue growth vs TBB's 2.7%
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | TMUS | 8.5% revenue growth vs TBB's 2.7% |
| Value | TBB | Lower P/E (9.5x vs 18.5x) |
| Quality / Margins | TBB | 16.9% margin vs TMUS's 11.6% |
| Stability / Safety | TBB | Lower D/E ratio (135.4% vs 206.5%) |
| Dividends | TBB | 5.3% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs TMUS's 1.9% |
| Momentum (1Y) | TBB | +1.3% vs TMUS's -21.2% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | TBB | 5.1% ROA vs TMUS's 4.9%, ROIC 6.7% vs 8.1% |
TBB vs TMUS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FY 2025
FY 2025
TBB vs TMUS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLTMUSLAGGINGTBB
TBBAT&T Inc. 5.35% GLB N…
1leads
TMUST-Mobile US, Inc.
2leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs TBBMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
Tied
—
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
TBB6/6
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
TMUS6/9
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
TMUS4/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
Tied
—
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
Tied
—
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — TBB and TMUS each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TBB and TMUS operate at a comparable scale, with $126.5B and $90.5B in trailing revenue. TBB is the more profitable business, keeping 16.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to TMUS's 11.6%. On growth, TMUS holds the edge at +10.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | TBBAT&T Inc. 5.35% G… | TMUST-Mobile US, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $126.5B | $90.5B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $45.1B | $29.9B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $21.4B | $10.5B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $10.6B | $10.7B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +79.7% | +54.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +19.4% | +20.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +16.9% | +11.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +8.4% | +11.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.9% | +10.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -11.5% | -12.0% |
Evenly matched — TBB and TMUS each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
TBB leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 7.1x trailing earnings, TBB trades at a 64% valuation discount to TMUS's 20.0x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, TBB's 6.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than TMUS's 10.1x.
| Metric | TBBAT&T Inc. 5.35% G… | TMUST-Mobile US, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $133.0B | $210.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $288.8B | $326.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 7.13x | 19.98x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 9.49x | 18.45x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.67x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 6.41x | 10.13x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.06x | 2.38x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.21x | 3.71x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 6.84x | 20.32x |
TBB leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
TMUS leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
TMUS delivers a 17.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $18 in annual profit, vs $17 for TBB. TBB carries lower financial leverage with a 1.35x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to TMUS's 2.07x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), TBB scores 7/9 vs TMUS's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | TBBAT&T Inc. 5.35% G… | TMUST-Mobile US, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +16.8% | +17.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +5.1% | +4.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +6.7% | +8.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +6.8% | +9.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.35x | 2.07x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $155.8B | $116.7B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $18.2B | $5.6B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $174.0B | $122.3B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 4.97x | 5.33x |
TMUS leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
TMUS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in TMUS five years ago would be worth $14,546 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $10,721 for TBB. Over the past 12 months, TBB leads with a +1.3% total return vs TMUS's -21.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TMUS at 12.0% vs TBB's 3.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | TBBAT&T Inc. 5.35% G… | TMUST-Mobile US, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -1.0% | -2.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +1.3% | -21.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +9.9% | +40.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +7.2% | +45.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +30.8% | +407.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +3.2% | +12.0% |
TMUS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — TBB and TMUS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
TMUS is the less volatile stock with a -0.28 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than TBB's 0.78 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. TBB currently trades 89.9% from its 52-week high vs TMUS's 74.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | TBBAT&T Inc. 5.35% G… | TMUST-Mobile US, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.78x | -0.28x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $24.10 | $261.56 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $5.92 | $181.36 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +89.9% | +74.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 63.7 | 45.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 94K | 5.6M |
Evenly matched — TBB and TMUS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — TBB and TMUS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates TBB as "Hold" and TMUS as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 30.8% upside for TMUS (target: $254) vs -1.8% for TBB (target: $21). For income investors, TBB offers the higher dividend yield at 5.26% vs TMUS's 1.88%.
| Metric | TBBAT&T Inc. 5.35% G… | TMUST-Mobile US, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $21.29 | $254.08 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 9 | 54 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +5.3% | +1.9% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 2 | 3 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.14 | $3.64 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +3.4% | +4.7% |
Evenly matched — TBB and TMUS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway
TMUS leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). TBB leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 3 tied.
Best OverallT-Mobile US, Inc. (TMUS)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
TBB vs TMUS: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is TBB or TMUS a better buy right now?
For growth investors, T-Mobile US, Inc.
(TMUS) is the stronger pick with 8. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 2. 7% for AT&T Inc. 5. 35% GLB NTS 66 (TBB). AT&T Inc. 5. 35% GLB NTS 66 (TBB) offers the better valuation at 7. 1x trailing P/E (9. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate T-Mobile US, Inc. (TMUS) a "Buy" — based on 54 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — TBB or TMUS?
On trailing P/E, AT&T Inc.
5. 35% GLB NTS 66 (TBB) is the cheapest at 7. 1x versus T-Mobile US, Inc. at 20. 0x. On forward P/E, AT&T Inc. 5. 35% GLB NTS 66 is actually cheaper at 9. 5x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — TBB or TMUS?
Over the past 5 years, T-Mobile US, Inc.
(TMUS) delivered a total return of +45. 5%, compared to +7. 2% for AT&T Inc. 5. 35% GLB NTS 66 (TBB). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TMUS returned +407. 2% versus TBB's +30. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — TBB or TMUS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), T-Mobile US, Inc.
(TMUS) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 28β versus AT&T Inc. 5. 35% GLB NTS 66's 0. 78β — meaning TBB is approximately -378% more volatile than TMUS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, AT&T Inc. 5. 35% GLB NTS 66 (TBB) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 135% versus 2% for T-Mobile US, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — TBB or TMUS?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), T-Mobile US, Inc.
(TMUS) is pulling ahead at 8. 5% versus 2. 7% for AT&T Inc. 5. 35% GLB NTS 66 (TBB). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: AT&T Inc. 5. 35% GLB NTS 66 grew EPS 104. 0% year-over-year, compared to 0. 6% for T-Mobile US, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, TMUS leads at 3. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — TBB or TMUS?
AT&T Inc.
5. 35% GLB NTS 66 (TBB) is the more profitable company, earning 17. 4% net margin versus 12. 4% for T-Mobile US, Inc. — meaning it keeps 17. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TMUS leads at 21. 2% versus 19. 2% for TBB. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TBB leads at 79. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is TBB or TMUS more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, AT&T Inc.
5. 35% GLB NTS 66 (TBB) trades at 9. 5x forward P/E versus 18. 5x for T-Mobile US, Inc. — 9. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for TMUS: 30. 8% to $254. 08.
08Which pays a better dividend — TBB or TMUS?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
AT&T Inc. 5. 35% GLB NTS 66 (TBB) offers the highest yield at 5. 3%, versus 1. 9% for T-Mobile US, Inc. (TMUS).
09Is TBB or TMUS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, T-Mobile US, Inc.
(TMUS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0. 28), 1. 9% yield, +407. 2% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (TMUS: +407. 2%, TBB: +30. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between TBB and TMUS?
Both stocks operate in the Communication Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: TBB is a mid-cap deep-value stock; TMUS is a large-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
- Sector: Communication Services
- Market Cap > $100B
- Net Margin > 10%
- Dividend Yield > 2.1%
Revenue Growth>
%
(TBB: 2.9% · TMUS: 10.6%)Net Margin>
%
(TBB: 16.9% · TMUS: 11.6%)P/E Ratio<
x
(TBB: 7.1x · TMUS: 20.0x)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.