Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

TBCH vs KOSS vs LOGI vs SONO vs AMZN

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
TBCH
Turtle Beach Corporation

Consumer Electronics

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$246M
5Y Perf.+17.2%
KOSS
Koss Corporation

Consumer Electronics

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$40M
5Y Perf.+270.1%
LOGI
Logitech International S.A.

Computer Hardware

TechnologyNASDAQ • CH
Market Cap$14.81B
5Y Perf.+73.6%
SONO
Sonos, Inc.

Consumer Electronics

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$1.80B
5Y Perf.+37.1%
AMZN
Amazon.com, Inc.

Specialty Retail

Consumer CyclicalNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$2.92T
5Y Perf.+122.1%

TBCH vs KOSS vs LOGI vs SONO vs AMZN — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
TBCH logoTBCH
KOSS logoKOSS
LOGI logoLOGI
SONO logoSONO
AMZN logoAMZN
IndustryConsumer ElectronicsConsumer ElectronicsComputer HardwareConsumer ElectronicsSpecialty Retail
Market Cap$246M$40M$14.81B$1.80B$2.92T
Revenue (TTM)$320M$13M$4.84B$1.46B$742.78B
Net Income (TTM)$16M$-871K$711M$-41M$90.80B
Gross Margin36.7%36.4%43.2%44.8%50.6%
Operating Margin6.9%-15.8%16.0%2.0%11.5%
Forward P/E14.4x18.6x47.3x34.8x
Total Debt$84M$3M$0.00$60M$152.99B
Cash & Equiv.$17M$3M$1.75B$175M$86.81B

TBCH vs KOSS vs LOGI vs SONO vs AMZNLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

TBCH
KOSS
LOGI
SONO
AMZN
StockMay 20May 26Return
Turtle Beach Corpor… (TBCH)100117.2+17.2%
Koss Corporation (KOSS)100370.1+270.1%
Logitech Internatio… (LOGI)100173.6+73.6%
Sonos, Inc. (SONO)100137.1+37.1%
Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN)100222.1+122.1%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: TBCH vs KOSS vs LOGI vs SONO vs AMZN

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: LOGI leads in 4 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for profitability and margin quality and capital preservation and lower volatility. Turtle Beach Corporation is the stronger pick specifically for valuation and capital efficiency. SONO and AMZN also each lead in at least one category. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
TBCH
Turtle Beach Corporation
The Value Play

TBCH is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if value is your priority.

  • Lower P/E (14.4x vs 34.8x)
Best for: value
KOSS
Koss Corporation
The Defensive Pick

KOSS is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.

  • Lower volatility, beta 1.62, Low D/E 8.3%, current ratio 11.65x
Best for: sleep-well-at-night
LOGI
Logitech International S.A.
The Income Pick

LOGI carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and defensive.

  • Dividend streak 12 yrs, beta 1.36, yield 1.5%
  • Beta 1.36, yield 1.5%, current ratio 2.22x
  • 14.7% margin vs KOSS's -6.8%
  • Beta 1.36 vs SONO's 1.75
Best for: income & stability and defensive
SONO
Sonos, Inc.
The Momentum Pick

SONO ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.

  • +66.0% vs KOSS's -10.6%
Best for: momentum
AMZN
Amazon.com, Inc.
The Growth Play

AMZN is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.

  • Rev growth 12.4%, EPS growth 29.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 11.7%
  • 7.0% 10Y total return vs LOGI's 6.4%
  • 12.4% revenue growth vs TBCH's -14.2%
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthAMZN logoAMZN12.4% revenue growth vs TBCH's -14.2%
ValueTBCH logoTBCHLower P/E (14.4x vs 34.8x)
Quality / MarginsLOGI logoLOGI14.7% margin vs KOSS's -6.8%
Stability / SafetyLOGI logoLOGIBeta 1.36 vs SONO's 1.75
DividendsLOGI logoLOGI1.5% yield; 12-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)SONO logoSONO+66.0% vs KOSS's -10.6%
Efficiency (ROA)LOGI logoLOGI18.5% ROA vs SONO's -4.8%, ROIC 97.8% vs -13.4%

TBCH vs KOSS vs LOGI vs SONO vs AMZN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

TBCHTurtle Beach Corporation

Segment breakdown not available.

KOSSKoss Corporation

Segment breakdown not available.

LOGILogitech International S.A.
FY 2025
Retail Gaming
29.4%$1.3B
Retail Keyboards Desktops
19.4%$883M
Retail Pointing Devices
17.3%$789M
Retail Video Collaboration
13.7%$626M
Retail Video
6.9%$316M
Retail Tablet And Other Accessories
6.6%$300M
Retail Headsets
3.9%$180M
Other (1)
2.7%$124M
SONOSonos, Inc.
FY 2025
Sonos Speakers
77.7%$1.1B
Sonos System Products
17.3%$249M
Partner Products And Other Revenue
5.0%$72M
AMZNAmazon.com, Inc.
FY 2025
Online Stores
37.6%$269.3B
Third-Party Seller Services
24.0%$172.2B
Amazon Web Services
18.0%$128.7B
Advertising Services
9.6%$68.6B
Subscription Services
6.9%$49.6B
Physical Stores
3.1%$22.6B
Other Services
0.8%$5.9B

TBCH vs KOSS vs LOGI vs SONO vs AMZN — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLLOGILAGGINGSONO

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

Evenly matched — LOGI and AMZN each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

AMZN is the larger business by revenue, generating $742.8B annually — 58041.3x KOSS's $13M. LOGI is the more profitable business, keeping 14.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to KOSS's -6.8%. On growth, AMZN holds the edge at +16.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricTBCH logoTBCHTurtle Beach Corp…KOSS logoKOSSKoss CorporationLOGI logoLOGILogitech Internat…SONO logoSONOSonos, Inc.AMZN logoAMZNAmazon.com, Inc.
RevenueTrailing 12 months$320M$13M$4.8B$1.5B$742.8B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$34M-$2M$855M$61M$155.9B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$16M-$871,116$711M-$41M$90.8B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$34M-$546,651$976M$118M-$2.5B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+36.7%+36.4%+43.2%+44.8%+50.6%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+6.9%-15.8%+16.0%+2.0%+11.5%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+4.9%-6.8%+14.7%-2.8%+12.2%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+10.6%-4.3%+20.2%+8.1%-0.3%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-18.7%-19.6%+7.4%+8.4%+16.6%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-8.4%+2.1%-29.3%+74.8%
Evenly matched — LOGI and AMZN each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

TBCH leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 16.1x trailing earnings, TBCH trades at a 57% valuation discount to AMZN's 37.8x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, TBCH's 9.8x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than SONO's 142.1x.

MetricTBCH logoTBCHTurtle Beach Corp…KOSS logoKOSSKoss CorporationLOGI logoLOGILogitech Internat…SONO logoSONOSonos, Inc.AMZN logoAMZNAmazon.com, Inc.
Market CapShares × price$246M$40M$14.8B$1.8B$2.92T
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$313M$39M$13.1B$1.7B$2.98T
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS16.10x-44.78x21.50x-29.20x37.82x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.14.39x18.60x47.27x34.77x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate1.35x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple9.80x16.85x142.14x20.47x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue0.77x3.14x3.06x1.25x4.07x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share1.97x1.28x6.88x5.06x7.14x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF7.23x15.18x16.64x378.98x
TBCH leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

LOGI leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

LOGI delivers a 32.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $32 in annual profit, vs $-10 for SONO. KOSS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.08x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to TBCH's 0.66x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), TBCH scores 7/9 vs SONO's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricTBCH logoTBCHTurtle Beach Corp…KOSS logoKOSSKoss CorporationLOGI logoLOGILogitech Internat…SONO logoSONOSonos, Inc.AMZN logoAMZNAmazon.com, Inc.
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+13.2%-2.8%+32.2%-10.4%+23.3%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+6.1%-2.3%+18.5%-4.8%+11.5%
ROICReturn on invested capital+7.2%-4.2%+97.8%-13.4%+14.7%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+11.0%-4.9%+31.1%-9.9%+15.3%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–975546
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.66x0.08x0.17x0.37x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$67M-$266,063-$1.8B-$115M$66.2B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$17M$3M$1.8B$175M$86.8B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$84M$3M$0$60M$153.0B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense2.77x-1972.72x2587.88x39.96x
LOGI leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

AMZN leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in AMZN five years ago would be worth $16,476 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,429 for KOSS. Over the past 12 months, SONO leads with a +66.0% total return vs KOSS's -10.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors AMZN at 36.8% vs SONO's -11.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricTBCH logoTBCHTurtle Beach Corp…KOSS logoKOSSKoss CorporationLOGI logoLOGILogitech Internat…SONO logoSONOSonos, Inc.AMZN logoAMZNAmazon.com, Inc.
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-11.6%-3.6%+2.9%-14.9%+19.7%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+33.5%-10.6%+35.0%+66.0%+43.7%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+8.2%+5.3%+66.3%-31.6%+156.2%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-53.3%-75.7%-4.6%-60.4%+64.8%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+248.3%+91.0%+640.3%-25.2%+697.8%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+2.7%+1.7%+18.5%-11.9%+36.8%
AMZN leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — LOGI and AMZN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

LOGI is the less volatile stock with a 1.36 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SONO's 1.75 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. AMZN currently trades 97.3% from its 52-week high vs KOSS's 48.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricTBCH logoTBCHTurtle Beach Corp…KOSS logoKOSSKoss CorporationLOGI logoLOGILogitech Internat…SONO logoSONOSonos, Inc.AMZN logoAMZNAmazon.com, Inc.
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.70x1.62x1.36x1.75x1.51x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$17.39$8.59$123.01$19.82$278.56
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$9.16$3.50$76.81$8.73$185.01
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+71.3%+48.7%+83.9%+75.1%+97.3%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10068.355.265.056.181.1
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded257K23K1.0M1.3M45.5M
Evenly matched — LOGI and AMZN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

LOGI leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.

Analyst consensus: TBCH as "Buy", LOGI as "Hold", SONO as "Buy", AMZN as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 61.3% upside for TBCH (target: $20) vs 5.6% for LOGI (target: $109). LOGI is the only dividend payer here at 1.52% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.

MetricTBCH logoTBCHTurtle Beach Corp…KOSS logoKOSSKoss CorporationLOGI logoLOGILogitech Internat…SONO logoSONOSonos, Inc.AMZN logoAMZNAmazon.com, Inc.
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyHoldBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$20.00$109.00$19.50$306.77
# AnalystsCovering analysts619994
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+1.5%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises012
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$1.57
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+7.7%0.0%0.0%+4.5%0.0%
LOGI leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway

LOGI leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Analyst Outlook). TBCH leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.

Best OverallLogitech International S.A. (LOGI)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

TBCH vs KOSS vs LOGI vs SONO vs AMZN: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is TBCH or KOSS or LOGI or SONO or AMZN a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Amazon.

com, Inc. (AMZN) is the stronger pick with 12. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -14. 2% for Turtle Beach Corporation (TBCH). Turtle Beach Corporation (TBCH) offers the better valuation at 16. 1x trailing P/E (14. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Turtle Beach Corporation (TBCH) a "Buy" — based on 6 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — TBCH or KOSS or LOGI or SONO or AMZN?

On trailing P/E, Turtle Beach Corporation (TBCH) is the cheapest at 16.

1x versus Amazon. com, Inc. at 37. 8x. On forward P/E, Turtle Beach Corporation is actually cheaper at 14. 4x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — TBCH or KOSS or LOGI or SONO or AMZN?

Over the past 5 years, Amazon.

com, Inc. (AMZN) delivered a total return of +64. 8%, compared to -75. 7% for Koss Corporation (KOSS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: AMZN returned +697. 8% versus SONO's -25. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — TBCH or KOSS or LOGI or SONO or AMZN?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Logitech International S.

A. (LOGI) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 36β versus Sonos, Inc. 's 1. 75β — meaning SONO is approximately 29% more volatile than LOGI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Koss Corporation (KOSS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 8% versus 66% for Turtle Beach Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — TBCH or KOSS or LOGI or SONO or AMZN?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Amazon.

com, Inc. (AMZN) is pulling ahead at 12. 4% versus -14. 2% for Turtle Beach Corporation (TBCH). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Amazon. com, Inc. grew EPS 29. 7% year-over-year, compared to -64. 5% for Sonos, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, AMZN leads at 11. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — TBCH or KOSS or LOGI or SONO or AMZN?

Logitech International S.

A. (LOGI) is the more profitable company, earning 14. 7% net margin versus -6. 9% for Koss Corporation — meaning it keeps 14. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: LOGI leads at 16. 0% versus -13. 8% for KOSS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AMZN leads at 50. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is TBCH or KOSS or LOGI or SONO or AMZN more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Turtle Beach Corporation (TBCH) trades at 14.

4x forward P/E versus 47. 3x for Sonos, Inc. — 32. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for TBCH: 61. 3% to $20. 00.

08

Which pays a better dividend — TBCH or KOSS or LOGI or SONO or AMZN?

In this comparison, LOGI (1.

5% yield) pays a dividend. TBCH, KOSS, SONO, AMZN do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is TBCH or KOSS or LOGI or SONO or AMZN better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Logitech International S.

A. (LOGI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (1. 5% yield, +640. 3% 10Y return). Sonos, Inc. (SONO) carries a higher beta of 1. 75 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (LOGI: +640. 3%, SONO: -25. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between TBCH and KOSS and LOGI and SONO and AMZN?

These companies operate in different sectors (TBCH (Technology) and KOSS (Technology) and LOGI (Technology) and SONO (Technology) and AMZN (Consumer Cyclical)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: TBCH is a small-cap deep-value stock; KOSS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; LOGI is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; SONO is a small-cap quality compounder stock; AMZN is a mega-cap quality compounder stock. LOGI pays a dividend while TBCH, KOSS, SONO, AMZN do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

TBCH

Quality Business

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 21%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

KOSS

Quality Business

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 21%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

LOGI

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Net Margin > 8%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

SONO

Quality Business

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Gross Margin > 26%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

AMZN

High-Growth Compounder

  • Sector: Consumer Cyclical
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 8%
  • Net Margin > 7%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform TBCH and KOSS and LOGI and SONO and AMZN on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(TBCH: -18.7% · KOSS: -19.6%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.