Specialty Retail
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
TBHC vs IPG
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Advertising Agencies
TBHC vs IPG — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Specialty Retail | Advertising Agencies |
| Market Cap | $12M | $8.93B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $410M | $10.21B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-28M | $552M |
| Gross Margin | 24.1% | 18.2% |
| Operating Margin | -5.4% | 9.7% |
| Forward P/E | — | 7.8x |
| Total Debt | $194M | $4.25B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $4M | $2.19B |
TBHC vs IPG — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | Apr 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| The Brand House Col… (TBHC) | 100 | 83.2 | -16.8% |
| The Interpublic Gro… (IPG) | 100 | 150.0 | +50.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: TBHC vs IPG
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
In this particular matchup, TBHC is outpaced on most metrics by others in the set.
IPG carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 16 yrs, beta 0.65, yield 5.4%
- Rev growth -1.8%, EPS growth -35.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 1.4%
- 45.7% 10Y total return vs TBHC's -93.9%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | -1.8% revenue growth vs TBHC's -5.8% | |
| Quality / Margins | 5.4% margin vs TBHC's -6.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.65 vs TBHC's 1.84 | |
| Dividends | 5.4% yield; 16-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +1.0% vs TBHC's -19.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 3.2% ROA vs TBHC's -12.1%, ROIC 14.7% vs -6.1% |
TBHC vs IPG — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
TBHC vs IPG — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
IPG leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
IPG is the larger business by revenue, generating $10.2B annually — 24.9x TBHC's $410M. IPG is the more profitable business, keeping 5.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to TBHC's -6.8%. On growth, IPG holds the edge at -5.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $410M | $10.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$14M | $1.2B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$28M | $552M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$19M | $807M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +24.1% | +18.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -5.4% | +9.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -6.8% | +5.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -4.6% | +7.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -9.6% | -5.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +72.9% | +5.4% |
Valuation Metrics
TBHC leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $12M | $8.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $202M | $11.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.53x | 13.43x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 7.78x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 7.78x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 7.52x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.03x | 0.83x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 2.37x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 9.77x |
Profitability & Efficiency
IPG leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), IPG scores 8/9 vs TBHC's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | +14.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -12.1% | +3.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -6.1% | +14.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -12.2% | +13.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 1.09x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $190M | $2.1B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $4M | $2.2B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $194M | $4.3B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -3.49x | 4.90x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
IPG leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in IPG five years ago would be worth $8,990 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $293 for TBHC. Over the past 12 months, IPG leads with a +1.0% total return vs TBHC's -19.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors IPG at -8.4% vs TBHC's -31.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -20.3% | — |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -19.0% | +1.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -67.7% | -23.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -97.1% | -10.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -93.9% | +45.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -31.4% | -8.4% |
Risk & Volatility
IPG leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
IPG is the less volatile stock with a 0.65 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than TBHC's 1.84 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. IPG currently trades 86.5% from its 52-week high vs TBHC's 39.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.84x | 0.65x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $2.40 | $28.42 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.86 | $22.55 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +39.2% | +86.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 40.7 | 45.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 70K | 81.3M |
Analyst Outlook
IPG leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
IPG is the only dividend payer here at 5.35% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $36.57 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 34 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +5.4% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 3 | 16 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $1.31 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +2.6% |
IPG leads in 5 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). TBHC leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics).
TBHC vs IPG: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is TBHC or IPG a better buy right now?
For growth investors, The Interpublic Group of Companies, Inc.
(IPG) is the stronger pick with -1. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -5. 8% for The Brand House Collective, Inc. (TBHC). The Interpublic Group of Companies, Inc. (IPG) offers the better valuation at 13. 4x trailing P/E (7. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate The Interpublic Group of Companies, Inc. (IPG) a "Hold" — based on 34 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — TBHC or IPG?
Over the past 5 years, The Interpublic Group of Companies, Inc.
(IPG) delivered a total return of -10. 1%, compared to -97. 1% for The Brand House Collective, Inc. (TBHC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: IPG returned +45. 7% versus TBHC's -93. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — TBHC or IPG?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Interpublic Group of Companies, Inc.
(IPG) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 65β versus The Brand House Collective, Inc. 's 1. 84β — meaning TBHC is approximately 180% more volatile than IPG relative to the S&P 500.
04Which is growing faster — TBHC or IPG?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), The Interpublic Group of Companies, Inc.
(IPG) is pulling ahead at -1. 8% versus -5. 8% for The Brand House Collective, Inc. (TBHC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: The Brand House Collective, Inc. grew EPS 18. 1% year-over-year, compared to -35. 8% for The Interpublic Group of Companies, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, IPG leads at 1. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — TBHC or IPG?
The Interpublic Group of Companies, Inc.
(IPG) is the more profitable company, earning 6. 4% net margin versus -5. 2% for The Brand House Collective, Inc. — meaning it keeps 6. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: IPG leads at 11. 3% versus -3. 2% for TBHC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TBHC leads at 27. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — TBHC or IPG?
In this comparison, IPG (5.
4% yield) pays a dividend. TBHC does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
07Is TBHC or IPG better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, The Interpublic Group of Companies, Inc.
(IPG) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 65), 5. 4% yield). The Brand House Collective, Inc. (TBHC) carries a higher beta of 1. 84 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (IPG: +45. 7%, TBHC: -93. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between TBHC and IPG?
These companies operate in different sectors (TBHC (Consumer Cyclical) and IPG (Communication Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: TBHC is a small-cap quality compounder stock; IPG is a small-cap deep-value stock. IPG pays a dividend while TBHC does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.