Software - Services
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
TCGL vs BTBT vs NVDA vs AMD vs INTC
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Financial - Capital Markets
Semiconductors
Semiconductors
Semiconductors
TCGL vs BTBT vs NVDA vs AMD vs INTC — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Services | Financial - Capital Markets | Semiconductors | Semiconductors | Semiconductors |
| Market Cap | $3.09B | $631M | $5.37T | $730.87B | $605.58B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $3M | $164M | $215.94B | $37.45B | $53.76B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-1M | $137M | $120.07B | $4.99B | $-3.17B |
| Gross Margin | 28.8% | 61.9% | 71.1% | 50.3% | 35.4% |
| Operating Margin | -28.0% | 16.8% | 60.4% | 11.7% | -9.4% |
| Forward P/E | — | 9.8x | 26.7x | 61.4x | 112.5x |
| Total Debt | $847K | $14M | $11.41B | $4.47B | $46.59B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1M | $95M | $10.61B | $5.54B | $14.27B |
TCGL vs BTBT vs NVDA vs AMD vs INTC — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bit Digital, Inc. (BTBT) | 100 | 205.2 | +105.2% |
| NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) | 100 | 2487.7 | +2387.7% |
| Advanced Micro Devi… (AMD) | 100 | 833.3 | +733.3% |
| Intel Corporation (INTC) | 100 | 191.7 | +91.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: TCGL vs BTBT vs NVDA vs AMD vs INTC
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
TCGL ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.
- +34.1% vs BTBT's -8.8%
BTBT is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 264.6%, EPS growth 225.0%
- 264.6% NII/revenue growth vs INTC's -0.5%
- 0.3% yield, vs NVDA's 0.0%, (3 stocks pay no dividend)
NVDA carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 1.74, yield 0.0%
- 247.6% 10Y total return vs TCGL's 34.1%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.74, Low D/E 7.3%, current ratio 3.91x
- PEG 0.28 vs AMD's 11.89
AMD lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
Among these 5 stocks, INTC doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 264.6% NII/revenue growth vs INTC's -0.5% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (26.7x vs 112.5x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 55.6% margin vs TCGL's -32.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.74 vs BTBT's 3.41 | |
| Dividends | 0.3% yield, vs NVDA's 0.0%, (3 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +34.1% vs BTBT's -8.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 58.1% ROA vs TCGL's -38.8%, ROIC 81.8% vs -5.8% |
TCGL vs BTBT vs NVDA vs AMD vs INTC — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
TCGL vs BTBT vs NVDA vs AMD vs INTC — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
NVDA leads in 3 of 6 categories
TCGL leads 1 • BTBT leads 0 • AMD leads 0 • INTC leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NVDA leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NVDA is the larger business by revenue, generating $215.9B annually — 69560.4x TCGL's $3M. NVDA is the more profitable business, keeping 55.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to TCGL's -32.6%. On growth, NVDA holds the edge at +73.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $3M | $164M | $215.9B | $37.5B | $53.8B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | — | $166M | $133.2B | $6.6B | $4.0B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | — | $137M | $120.1B | $5.0B | -$3.2B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | — | -$448M | $96.7B | $8.6B | -$3.1B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +28.8% | +61.9% | +71.1% | +50.3% | +35.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -28.0% | +16.8% | +60.4% | +11.7% | -9.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -32.6% | +17.3% | +55.6% | +13.3% | -5.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -41.7% | -65.3% | +44.8% | +22.9% | -5.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | +73.2% | +37.8% | +7.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +2.8% | +97.8% | +90.9% | -2.8% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — BTBT and NVDA each lead in 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 9.8x trailing earnings, BTBT trades at a 94% valuation discount to AMD's 169.2x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), NVDA offers better value at 0.47x vs AMD's 32.75x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $3.1B | $631M | $5.37T | $730.9B | $605.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $3.1B | $550M | $5.37T | $729.8B | $637.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | — | 9.80x | 45.08x | 169.17x | -2047.71x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | 26.69x | 61.44x | 112.48x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 0.47x | 32.75x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 9.19x | 40.31x | 108.96x | 54.60x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1270.17x | 3.86x | 24.86x | 21.10x | 11.46x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 0.60x | 34.31x | 11.64x | 4.63x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | 55.54x | 108.52x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
NVDA leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
NVDA delivers a 76.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $76 in annual profit, vs $-133 for TCGL. BTBT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.03x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to TCGL's 0.97x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), AMD scores 8/9 vs TCGL's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -132.7% | +21.4% | +76.3% | +8.1% | -2.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -38.8% | +19.0% | +58.1% | +6.5% | -1.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -5.8% | +6.5% | +81.8% | +4.7% | -0.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -70.8% | +8.5% | +97.2% | +5.7% | -0.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 6 | 4 | 8 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.97x | 0.03x | 0.07x | 0.07x | 0.37x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$358,773 | -$81M | $807M | -$1.1B | $32.3B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1M | $95M | $10.6B | $5.5B | $14.3B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $847,178 | $14M | $11.4B | $4.5B | $46.6B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -20.71x | — | 545.03x | 33.19x | 3.71x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
TCGL leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in TCGL five years ago would be worth $350,588 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,019 for BTBT. Over the past 12 months, TCGL leads with a +3405.9% total return vs BTBT's -8.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TCGL at 2.3% vs BTBT's -0.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +3155.0% | -3.9% | +17.0% | +100.6% | +206.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +3405.9% | -8.8% | +79.6% | +314.6% | +443.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +3405.9% | -1.0% | +679.8% | +370.6% | +318.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +3405.9% | -79.8% | +1506.4% | +500.6% | +131.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +3405.9% | -57.6% | +24763.7% | +12387.2% | +336.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +2.3% | -0.3% | +98.3% | +67.6% | +61.2% |
Risk & Volatility
NVDA leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
NVDA is the less volatile stock with a 1.74 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BTBT's 3.41 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NVDA currently trades 98.7% from its 52-week high vs BTBT's 43.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | — | 3.41x | 1.74x | 2.52x | 2.27x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $355.00 | $4.55 | $223.75 | $469.21 | $132.75 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $3.95 | $1.25 | $120.28 | $106.98 | $18.97 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +48.7% | +43.1% | +98.7% | +95.5% | +90.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 99.6 | 71.4 | 68.5 | 81.1 | 86.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 0 | 19.6M | 155.9M | 37.2M | 117.8M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — BTBT and NVDA each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: BTBT as "Buy", NVDA as "Buy", AMD as "Buy", INTC as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 155.1% upside for BTBT (target: $5) vs -34.0% for INTC (target: $80). BTBT is the only dividend payer here at 0.29% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $5.00 | $275.74 | $401.65 | $79.55 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 2 | 79 | 70 | 84 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.3% | +0.0% | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.01 | $0.04 | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.7% | +0.2% | 0.0% |
NVDA leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). TCGL leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.
TCGL vs BTBT vs NVDA vs AMD vs INTC: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is TCGL or BTBT or NVDA or AMD or INTC a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Bit Digital, Inc.
(BTBT) is the stronger pick with 264. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -0. 5% for Intel Corporation (INTC). Bit Digital, Inc. (BTBT) offers the better valuation at 9. 8x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Bit Digital, Inc. (BTBT) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — TCGL or BTBT or NVDA or AMD or INTC?
On trailing P/E, Bit Digital, Inc.
(BTBT) is the cheapest at 9. 8x versus Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. at 169. 2x. On forward P/E, NVIDIA Corporation is actually cheaper at 26. 7x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: NVIDIA Corporation wins at 0. 28x versus Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. 's 11. 89x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — TCGL or BTBT or NVDA or AMD or INTC?
Over the past 5 years, TechCreate Group Ltd.
(TCGL) delivered a total return of +34. 1%, compared to -79. 8% for Bit Digital, Inc. (BTBT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NVDA returned +247. 6% versus BTBT's -57. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — TCGL or BTBT or NVDA or AMD or INTC?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) is the lower-risk stock at 1.
74β versus Bit Digital, Inc. 's 3. 41β — meaning BTBT is approximately 96% more volatile than NVDA relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Bit Digital, Inc. (BTBT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 97% for TechCreate Group Ltd. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — TCGL or BTBT or NVDA or AMD or INTC?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Bit Digital, Inc.
(BTBT) is pulling ahead at 264. 6% versus -0. 5% for Intel Corporation (INTC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Bit Digital, Inc. grew EPS 225. 0% year-over-year, compared to 66. 7% for NVIDIA Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, NVDA leads at 100. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — TCGL or BTBT or NVDA or AMD or INTC?
NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) is the more profitable company, earning 55.
6% net margin versus -32. 6% for TechCreate Group Ltd. — meaning it keeps 55. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NVDA leads at 60. 4% versus -28. 0% for TCGL. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NVDA leads at 71. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is TCGL or BTBT or NVDA or AMD or INTC more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 28x versus Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. 's 11. 89x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) trades at 26. 7x forward P/E versus 112. 5x for Intel Corporation — 85. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for BTBT: 155. 1% to $5. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — TCGL or BTBT or NVDA or AMD or INTC?
In this comparison, BTBT (0.
3% yield) pays a dividend. TCGL, NVDA, AMD, INTC do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is TCGL or BTBT or NVDA or AMD or INTC better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+247.
6% 10Y return). Bit Digital, Inc. (BTBT) carries a higher beta of 3. 41 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (NVDA: +247. 6%, BTBT: -57. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between TCGL and BTBT and NVDA and AMD and INTC?
These companies operate in different sectors (TCGL (Technology) and BTBT (Financial Services) and NVDA (Technology) and AMD (Technology) and INTC (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: TCGL is a small-cap quality compounder stock; BTBT is a small-cap high-growth stock; NVDA is a mega-cap high-growth stock; AMD is a large-cap high-growth stock; INTC is a large-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.