Software - Services
Compare Stocks
3 / 10Stock Comparison
TCGL vs CODA vs GFAI
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Aerospace & Defense
Security & Protection Services
TCGL vs CODA vs GFAI — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Services | Aerospace & Defense | Security & Protection Services |
| Market Cap | $3.09B | $133M | $10M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $3M | $28M | $72M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-1M | $4M | $-24M |
| Gross Margin | 28.8% | 66.3% | 15.1% |
| Operating Margin | -28.0% | 17.4% | -27.4% |
| Forward P/E | — | 22.3x | — |
| Total Debt | $847K | $395K | $3M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1M | $29M | $22M |
TCGL vs CODA vs GFAI — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jan 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coda Octopus Group,… (CODA) | 100 | 193.0 | +93.0% |
| Guardforce AI Co., … (GFAI) | 100 | 0.5 | -99.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: TCGL vs CODA vs GFAI
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
TCGL is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 34.1% 10Y total return vs CODA's 7.4%
- +34.1% vs GFAI's -58.2%
CODA carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.99
- Rev growth 30.7%, EPS growth 15.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 6.1%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.99, Low D/E 0.7%, current ratio 8.86x
GFAI plays a supporting role in this comparison — it may shine differently against other peers.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 30.7% revenue growth vs GFAI's 0.2% | |
| Quality / Margins | 14.8% margin vs GFAI's -32.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.99 vs GFAI's 2.36, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 3 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +34.1% vs GFAI's -58.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 6.6% ROA vs GFAI's -50.2%, ROIC 11.2% vs -41.6% |
TCGL vs CODA vs GFAI — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
TCGL vs CODA vs GFAI — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 3 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CODA leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GFAI is the larger business by revenue, generating $72M annually — 23.3x TCGL's $3M. CODA is the more profitable business, keeping 14.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to GFAI's -32.9%. On growth, CODA holds the edge at +28.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $3M | $28M | $72M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | — | $6M | -$12M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | — | $4M | -$24M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | — | $7M | -$6M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +28.8% | +66.3% | +15.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -28.0% | +17.4% | -27.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -32.6% | +14.8% | -32.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -41.7% | +24.6% | -8.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +28.8% | +3.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +3.0% | +38.9% |
Valuation Metrics
GFAI leads this category, winning 3 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $3.1B | $133M | $10M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $3.1B | $105M | -$9M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | — | 31.97x | -0.87x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 22.32x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 7.46x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 17.72x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1270.17x | 5.02x | 0.28x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 2.29x | 0.16x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 22.07x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
CODA leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CODA delivers a 7.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $7 in annual profit, vs $-133 for TCGL. CODA carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to TCGL's 0.97x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CODA scores 7/9 vs TCGL's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -132.7% | +7.2% | -69.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -38.8% | +6.6% | -50.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -5.8% | +11.2% | -41.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -70.8% | +8.1% | -19.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 7 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.97x | 0.01x | 0.08x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$358,773 | -$28M | -$19M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1M | $29M | $22M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $847,178 | $394,932 | $3M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -20.71x | — | -167.24x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
TCGL leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in TCGL five years ago would be worth $350,588 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $45 for GFAI. Over the past 12 months, TCGL leads with a +3405.9% total return vs GFAI's -58.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TCGL at 2.3% vs GFAI's -55.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +3155.0% | +24.4% | -28.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +3405.9% | +75.8% | -58.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +3405.9% | +36.6% | -91.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +3405.9% | +52.6% | -99.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +3405.9% | +745.0% | -99.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +2.3% | +11.0% | -55.4% |
Risk & Volatility
CODA leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CODA is the less volatile stock with a 0.99 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than GFAI's 2.36 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CODA currently trades 68.5% from its 52-week high vs GFAI's 30.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | — | 0.99x | 2.36x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $355.00 | $17.28 | $1.50 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $3.95 | $5.98 | $0.38 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +48.7% | +68.5% | +30.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 99.6 | 50.9 | 45.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 0 | 253K | 305K |
Analyst Outlook
TCGL leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | — |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $14.00 | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 1 | — |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 0 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
CODA leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). TCGL leads in 2 (Total Returns, Analyst Outlook).
TCGL vs CODA vs GFAI: Key Questions Answered
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is TCGL or CODA or GFAI a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Coda Octopus Group, Inc.
(CODA) is the stronger pick with 30. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 0. 2% for Guardforce AI Co. , Limited (GFAI). Coda Octopus Group, Inc. (CODA) offers the better valuation at 32. 0x trailing P/E (22. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Coda Octopus Group, Inc. (CODA) a "Buy" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — TCGL or CODA or GFAI?
Over the past 5 years, TechCreate Group Ltd.
(TCGL) delivered a total return of +34. 1%, compared to -99. 5% for Guardforce AI Co. , Limited (GFAI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TCGL returned +34. 1% versus GFAI's -99. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — TCGL or CODA or GFAI?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Coda Octopus Group, Inc.
(CODA) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 99β versus Guardforce AI Co. , Limited's 2. 36β — meaning GFAI is approximately 138% more volatile than CODA relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Coda Octopus Group, Inc. (CODA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 97% for TechCreate Group Ltd. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — TCGL or CODA or GFAI?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Coda Octopus Group, Inc.
(CODA) is pulling ahead at 30. 7% versus 0. 2% for Guardforce AI Co. , Limited (GFAI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: TechCreate Group Ltd. grew EPS 100. 0% year-over-year, compared to 15. 6% for Coda Octopus Group, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, CODA leads at 6. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — TCGL or CODA or GFAI?
Coda Octopus Group, Inc.
(CODA) is the more profitable company, earning 15. 5% net margin versus -32. 6% for TechCreate Group Ltd. — meaning it keeps 15. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CODA leads at 17. 1% versus -28. 0% for TCGL. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CODA leads at 66. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — TCGL or CODA or GFAI?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is TCGL or CODA or GFAI better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Coda Octopus Group, Inc.
(CODA) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 99), +745. 0% 10Y return). Guardforce AI Co. , Limited (GFAI) carries a higher beta of 2. 36 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (CODA: +745. 0%, GFAI: -99. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between TCGL and CODA and GFAI?
These companies operate in different sectors (TCGL (Technology) and CODA (Industrials) and GFAI (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: TCGL is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CODA is a small-cap high-growth stock; GFAI is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.