Software - Services
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
TCGL vs GFAI
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Security & Protection Services
TCGL vs GFAI — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Services | Security & Protection Services |
| Market Cap | $3.09B | $11M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $3M | $72M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-1M | $-24M |
| Gross Margin | 28.8% | 15.1% |
| Operating Margin | -28.0% | -27.4% |
| Total Debt | $847K | $3M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1M | $22M |
Quick Verdict: TCGL vs GFAI
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
TCGL carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 7.8%, EPS growth 100.0%
- 34.1% 10Y total return vs GFAI's -99.5%
- 7.8% revenue growth vs GFAI's 0.2%
GFAI is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 2.31, Low D/E 8.1%, current ratio 4.92x
- Beta 2.31, current ratio 4.92x
- Lower D/E ratio (8.1% vs 96.9%)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 7.8% revenue growth vs GFAI's 0.2% | |
| Quality / Margins | -32.6% margin vs GFAI's -32.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Lower D/E ratio (8.1% vs 96.9%) | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +34.1% vs GFAI's -52.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -38.8% ROA vs GFAI's -50.2%, ROIC -5.8% vs -41.6% |
TCGL vs GFAI — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — TCGL and GFAI each lead in 2 of 4 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GFAI is the larger business by revenue, generating $72M annually — 23.3x TCGL's $3M. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from -32.6% (TCGL) to -32.9% (GFAI).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $3M | $72M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | — | -$12M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | — | -$24M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | — | -$6M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +28.8% | +15.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -28.0% | -27.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -32.6% | -32.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -41.7% | -8.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +3.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +38.9% |
Valuation Metrics
GFAI leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $3.1B | $11M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $3.1B | -$8M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | — | -0.94x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1270.17x | 0.30x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 0.17x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
GFAI leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
GFAI delivers a -69.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-70 in annual profit, vs $-133 for TCGL. GFAI carries lower financial leverage with a 0.08x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to TCGL's 0.97x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), GFAI scores 6/9 vs TCGL's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -132.7% | -69.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -38.8% | -50.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -5.8% | -41.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -70.8% | -19.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.97x | 0.08x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$358,773 | -$19M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1M | $22M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $847,178 | $3M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -20.71x | -167.24x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
TCGL leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in TCGL five years ago would be worth $350,588 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $49 for GFAI. Over the past 12 months, TCGL leads with a +3405.9% total return vs GFAI's -52.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TCGL at 2.3% vs GFAI's -59.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +3155.0% | -22.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +3405.9% | -52.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +3405.9% | -93.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +3405.9% | -99.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +3405.9% | -99.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +2.3% | -59.7% |
Risk & Volatility
TCGL leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Risk & Volatility
TCGL currently trades 48.7% from its 52-week high vs GFAI's 33.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | — | 2.31x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $355.00 | $1.50 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $3.95 | $0.38 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +48.7% | +33.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 99.6 | 51.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 0 | 405K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | — |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | — |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
GFAI leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). TCGL leads in 2 (Total Returns, Risk & Volatility). 1 tied.
TCGL vs GFAI: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is TCGL or GFAI a better buy right now?
For growth investors, TechCreate Group Ltd.
(TCGL) is the stronger pick with 7. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 0. 2% for Guardforce AI Co. , Limited (GFAI). The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — TCGL or GFAI?
Over the past 5 years, TechCreate Group Ltd.
(TCGL) delivered a total return of +34. 1%, compared to -99. 5% for Guardforce AI Co. , Limited (GFAI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TCGL returned +34. 1% versus GFAI's -99. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — TCGL or GFAI?
On balance sheet safety, Guardforce AI Co.
, Limited (GFAI) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 8% versus 97% for TechCreate Group Ltd. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — TCGL or GFAI?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), TechCreate Group Ltd.
(TCGL) is pulling ahead at 7. 8% versus 0. 2% for Guardforce AI Co. , Limited (GFAI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: TechCreate Group Ltd. grew EPS 100. 0% year-over-year, compared to 88. 3% for Guardforce AI Co. , Limited. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — TCGL or GFAI?
Guardforce AI Co.
, Limited (GFAI) is the more profitable company, earning -16. 1% net margin versus -32. 6% for TechCreate Group Ltd. — meaning it keeps -16. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: GFAI leads at -18. 5% versus -28. 0% for TCGL. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TCGL leads at 28. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — TCGL or GFAI?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is TCGL or GFAI better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, TechCreate Group Ltd.
(TCGL) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding. Guardforce AI Co. , Limited (GFAI) carries a higher beta of 2. 31 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (TCGL: +34. 1%, GFAI: -99. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between TCGL and GFAI?
These companies operate in different sectors (TCGL (Technology) and GFAI (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.