Entertainment
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
TDIC vs NFLX
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Entertainment
TDIC vs NFLX — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Entertainment | Entertainment |
| Market Cap | $8M | $374.03B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $46M | $45.18B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $6M | $10.98B |
| Gross Margin | 26.1% | 48.5% |
| Operating Margin | 1.7% | 29.5% |
| Forward P/E | 9.5x | 24.8x |
| Total Debt | $14M | $14.46B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $17M | $9.03B |
Quick Verdict: TDIC vs NFLX
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
TDIC is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 124.1%, EPS growth -8.7%
- 124.1% revenue growth vs NFLX's 15.9%
- Lower P/E (9.5x vs 24.8x)
NFLX carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- beta 0.39
- 8.7% 10Y total return vs TDIC's -94.2%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.39, Low D/E 54.3%, current ratio 1.19x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 124.1% revenue growth vs NFLX's 15.9% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (9.5x vs 24.8x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 24.3% margin vs TDIC's 14.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.39 vs TDIC's 2.49, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | -22.4% vs TDIC's -94.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 19.8% ROA vs TDIC's 17.9%, ROIC 29.8% vs 12.2% |
TDIC vs NFLX — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
TDIC vs NFLX — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NFLX leads this category, winning 4 of 4 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NFLX is the larger business by revenue, generating $45.2B annually — 986.4x TDIC's $46M. NFLX is the more profitable business, keeping 24.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to TDIC's 14.0%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $46M | $45.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | — | $30.1B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | — | $11.0B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | — | $9.5B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +26.1% | +48.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +1.7% | +29.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +14.0% | +24.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -55.2% | +20.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +17.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +31.1% |
Valuation Metrics
TDIC leads this category, winning 3 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 9.5x trailing earnings, TDIC trades at a 73% valuation discount to NFLX's 34.9x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, NFLX's 12.6x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than TDIC's 15.4x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $8M | $374.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $7M | $379.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 9.48x | 34.89x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 24.80x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.06x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 15.39x | 12.61x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.33x | 8.28x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 6.91x | 14.32x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 39.53x |
Profitability & Efficiency
NFLX leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
TDIC delivers a 112.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $112 in annual profit, vs $41 for NFLX. NFLX carries lower financial leverage with a 0.54x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to TDIC's 1.62x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), NFLX scores 7/9 vs TDIC's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +112.5% | +41.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +17.9% | +19.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +12.2% | +29.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +7.3% | +30.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.62x | 0.54x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$3M | $5.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $17M | $9.0B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $14M | $14.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 12.46x | 17.33x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
NFLX leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in NFLX five years ago would be worth $17,668 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $580 for TDIC. Over the past 12 months, NFLX leads with a -22.4% total return vs TDIC's -94.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NFLX at 38.6% vs TDIC's -61.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +25.7% | -3.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -94.2% | -22.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -94.2% | +166.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -94.2% | +76.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -94.2% | +872.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -61.3% | +38.6% |
Risk & Volatility
NFLX leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
NFLX is the less volatile stock with a 0.39 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than TDIC's 2.49 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NFLX currently trades 65.8% from its 52-week high vs TDIC's 3.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.49x | 0.39x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $39.50 | $134.12 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.18 | $75.01 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +3.2% | +65.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 57.3 | 34.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 5.0M | 44.9M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $116.29 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 99 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +2.4% |
NFLX leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). TDIC leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics).
TDIC vs NFLX: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is TDIC or NFLX a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Dreamland Limited Class A Ordinary Shares (TDIC) is the stronger pick with 124.
1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 15. 9% for Netflix, Inc. (NFLX). Dreamland Limited Class A Ordinary Shares (TDIC) offers the better valuation at 9. 5x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Netflix, Inc. (NFLX) a "Buy" — based on 99 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — TDIC or NFLX?
On trailing P/E, Dreamland Limited Class A Ordinary Shares (TDIC) is the cheapest at 9.
5x versus Netflix, Inc. at 34. 9x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — TDIC or NFLX?
Over the past 5 years, Netflix, Inc.
(NFLX) delivered a total return of +76. 7%, compared to -94. 2% for Dreamland Limited Class A Ordinary Shares (TDIC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NFLX returned +872. 1% versus TDIC's -94. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — TDIC or NFLX?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Netflix, Inc.
(NFLX) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 39β versus Dreamland Limited Class A Ordinary Shares's 2. 49β — meaning TDIC is approximately 540% more volatile than NFLX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Netflix, Inc. (NFLX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 54% versus 162% for Dreamland Limited Class A Ordinary Shares — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — TDIC or NFLX?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Dreamland Limited Class A Ordinary Shares (TDIC) is pulling ahead at 124.
1% versus 15. 9% for Netflix, Inc. (NFLX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Netflix, Inc. grew EPS 27. 6% year-over-year, compared to -8. 7% for Dreamland Limited Class A Ordinary Shares. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — TDIC or NFLX?
Netflix, Inc.
(NFLX) is the more profitable company, earning 24. 3% net margin versus 14. 0% for Dreamland Limited Class A Ordinary Shares — meaning it keeps 24. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NFLX leads at 29. 5% versus 1. 7% for TDIC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NFLX leads at 48. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Which pays a better dividend — TDIC or NFLX?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
08Is TDIC or NFLX better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Netflix, Inc.
(NFLX) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 39), +872. 1% 10Y return). Dreamland Limited Class A Ordinary Shares (TDIC) carries a higher beta of 2. 49 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (NFLX: +872. 1%, TDIC: -94. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between TDIC and NFLX?
Both stocks operate in the Communication Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.