Industrial Materials
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
TECK vs FCX vs SCCO vs HBM
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Copper
Copper
Copper
TECK vs FCX vs SCCO vs HBM — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Industrial Materials | Copper | Copper | Copper |
| Market Cap | $29.86B | $87.51B | $151.92B | $9.52B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $12.41B | $26.42B | $13.42B | $2.22B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $1.85B | $2.73B | $4.33B | $570M |
| Gross Margin | 30.3% | 27.8% | 56.7% | 32.5% |
| Operating Margin | 23.9% | 27.8% | 52.2% | 41.4% |
| Forward P/E | 13.3x | 22.5x | 26.0x | 15.4x |
| Total Debt | $10.39B | $11.50B | $7.41B | $1.09B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $5.01B | $3.35B | $4.30B | $568M |
TECK vs FCX vs SCCO vs HBM — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Teck Resources Limi… (TECK) | 100 | 653.4 | +553.4% |
| Freeport-McMoRan In… (FCX) | 100 | 671.3 | +571.3% |
| Southern Copper Cor… (SCCO) | 100 | 532.3 | +432.3% |
| Hudbay Minerals Inc. (HBM) | 100 | 888.9 | +788.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: TECK vs FCX vs SCCO vs HBM
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
TECK carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 18.6%, EPS growth 262.8%, 3Y rev CAGR -14.7%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.73, Low D/E 40.0%, current ratio 2.54x
- 18.6% revenue growth vs FCX's 1.1%
- Lower P/E (13.3x vs 15.4x)
FCX is the clearest fit if your priority is valuation efficiency.
- PEG 0.75 vs SCCO's 1.25
- 1.0% yield, 5-year raise streak, vs SCCO's 1.6%
SCCO is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 1.78, yield 1.6%
- 6.6% 10Y total return vs TECK's 5.3%
- Beta 1.78, yield 1.6%, current ratio 3.89x
- 32.3% margin vs FCX's 10.3%
HBM is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +212.7% vs FCX's +62.2%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 18.6% revenue growth vs FCX's 1.1% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (13.3x vs 15.4x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 32.3% margin vs FCX's 10.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.73 vs HBM's 1.91 | |
| Dividends | 1.0% yield, 5-year raise streak, vs SCCO's 1.6% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +212.7% vs FCX's +62.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 21.4% ROA vs TECK's 4.1%, ROIC 38.6% vs 4.4% |
TECK vs FCX vs SCCO vs HBM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
TECK vs FCX vs SCCO vs HBM — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
SCCO leads in 2 of 6 categories
HBM leads 1 • TECK leads 1 • FCX leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SCCO leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FCX is the larger business by revenue, generating $26.4B annually — 11.9x HBM's $2.2B. SCCO is the more profitable business, keeping 32.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to FCX's 10.3%. On growth, TECK holds the edge at +72.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $12.4B | $26.4B | $13.4B | $2.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $4.8B | $9.6B | $7.9B | $1.4B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $1.8B | $2.7B | $4.3B | $570M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $482M | $6.2B | $3.4B | $215M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +30.3% | +27.8% | +56.7% | +32.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +23.9% | +27.8% | +52.2% | +41.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +14.9% | +10.3% | +32.3% | +25.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +3.9% | +23.6% | +25.5% | +9.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +72.2% | +12.2% | +39.0% | +26.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +128.8% | +154.2% | +54.5% | +5.1% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — TECK and FCX and HBM each lead in 2 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 16.4x trailing earnings, HBM trades at a 59% valuation discount to FCX's 40.1x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), FCX offers better value at 1.34x vs SCCO's 1.68x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $29.9B | $87.5B | $151.9B | $9.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $33.8B | $95.7B | $155.0B | $10.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 29.77x | 40.06x | 35.10x | 16.44x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 13.25x | 22.51x | 26.01x | 15.41x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.34x | 1.68x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 12.51x | 11.21x | 19.70x | 9.83x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.77x | 3.40x | 11.32x | 4.33x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.61x | 2.86x | 13.88x | 2.95x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 78.41x | 44.33x | 48.13x |
Profitability & Efficiency
SCCO leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
SCCO delivers a 42.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $42 in annual profit, vs $7 for TECK. HBM carries lower financial leverage with a 0.34x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SCCO's 0.67x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SCCO scores 8/9 vs HBM's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +7.1% | +8.9% | +42.0% | +19.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +4.1% | +4.7% | +21.4% | +9.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +4.4% | +12.8% | +38.6% | +12.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +4.2% | +12.4% | +39.2% | +11.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 5 | 8 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.40x | 0.37x | 0.67x | 0.34x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $5.4B | $8.1B | $3.1B | $524M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $5.0B | $3.4B | $4.3B | $568M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $10.4B | $11.5B | $7.4B | $1.1B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 4.16x | 17.68x | 19.33x | 13.44x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
HBM leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in SCCO five years ago would be worth $28,852 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $15,151 for FCX. Over the past 12 months, HBM leads with a +212.7% total return vs FCX's +62.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors HBM at 65.5% vs TECK's 12.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +29.3% | +17.8% | +24.4% | +19.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +77.7% | +62.2% | +108.2% | +212.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +43.4% | +71.5% | +156.8% | +353.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +163.0% | +51.5% | +188.5% | +178.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +530.4% | +444.7% | +657.5% | +490.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +12.8% | +19.7% | +36.9% | +65.5% |
Risk & Volatility
TECK leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
TECK is the less volatile stock with a 1.73 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than HBM's 1.91 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. TECK currently trades 98.0% from its 52-week high vs SCCO's 82.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.73x | 1.79x | 1.78x | 1.91x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $63.27 | $70.97 | $223.89 | $28.74 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $30.98 | $35.15 | $85.72 | $7.40 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +98.0% | +85.8% | +82.1% | +83.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 53.5 | 41.5 | 43.4 | 45.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 3.9M | 15.4M | 1.6M | 5.4M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — FCX and SCCO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: TECK as "Buy", FCX as "Buy", SCCO as "Hold", HBM as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 10.0% upside for FCX (target: $67) vs -56.9% for HBM (target: $10). For income investors, SCCO offers the higher dividend yield at 1.61% vs TECK's 0.59%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $64.50 | $67.00 | $156.40 | $10.34 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 26 | 41 | 30 | 20 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.6% | +1.0% | +1.6% | +0.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 5 | 1 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.50 | $0.60 | $2.96 | $0.01 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +2.5% | +0.1% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
SCCO leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). HBM leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.
TECK vs FCX vs SCCO vs HBM: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is TECK or FCX or SCCO or HBM a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Teck Resources Limited (TECK) is the stronger pick with 18.
6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 1. 1% for Freeport-McMoRan Inc. (FCX). Hudbay Minerals Inc. (HBM) offers the better valuation at 16. 4x trailing P/E (15. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Teck Resources Limited (TECK) a "Buy" — based on 26 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — TECK or FCX or SCCO or HBM?
On trailing P/E, Hudbay Minerals Inc.
(HBM) is the cheapest at 16. 4x versus Freeport-McMoRan Inc. at 40. 1x. On forward P/E, Teck Resources Limited is actually cheaper at 13. 3x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Freeport-McMoRan Inc. wins at 0. 75x versus Southern Copper Corporation's 1. 25x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — TECK or FCX or SCCO or HBM?
Over the past 5 years, Southern Copper Corporation (SCCO) delivered a total return of +188.
5%, compared to +51. 5% for Freeport-McMoRan Inc. (FCX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SCCO returned +657. 5% versus FCX's +444. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — TECK or FCX or SCCO or HBM?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Teck Resources Limited (TECK) is the lower-risk stock at 1.
73β versus Hudbay Minerals Inc. 's 1. 91β — meaning HBM is approximately 10% more volatile than TECK relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Hudbay Minerals Inc. (HBM) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 34% versus 67% for Southern Copper Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — TECK or FCX or SCCO or HBM?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Teck Resources Limited (TECK) is pulling ahead at 18.
6% versus 1. 1% for Freeport-McMoRan Inc. (FCX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Hudbay Minerals Inc. grew EPS 630. 0% year-over-year, compared to 16. 9% for Freeport-McMoRan Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, HBM leads at 14. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — TECK or FCX or SCCO or HBM?
Southern Copper Corporation (SCCO) is the more profitable company, earning 32.
3% net margin versus 8. 6% for Freeport-McMoRan Inc. — meaning it keeps 32. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SCCO leads at 52. 2% versus 16. 5% for TECK. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SCCO leads at 56. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is TECK or FCX or SCCO or HBM more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Freeport-McMoRan Inc. (FCX) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 75x versus Southern Copper Corporation's 1. 25x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Teck Resources Limited (TECK) trades at 13. 3x forward P/E versus 26. 0x for Southern Copper Corporation — 12. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FCX: 10. 0% to $67. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — TECK or FCX or SCCO or HBM?
In this comparison, SCCO (1.
6% yield), FCX (1. 0% yield), TECK (0. 6% yield) pay a dividend. HBM does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is TECK or FCX or SCCO or HBM better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Southern Copper Corporation (SCCO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (1.
6% yield, +657. 5% 10Y return). Hudbay Minerals Inc. (HBM) carries a higher beta of 1. 91 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (SCCO: +657. 5%, HBM: +490. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between TECK and FCX and SCCO and HBM?
Both stocks operate in the Basic Materials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: TECK is a mid-cap high-growth stock; FCX is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; SCCO is a mid-cap high-growth stock; HBM is a small-cap deep-value stock. TECK, FCX, SCCO pay a dividend while HBM does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.