Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
TECX vs PRTA vs RCUS vs ARQT vs KYMR
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
TECX vs PRTA vs RCUS vs ARQT vs KYMR — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $505M | $567M | $2.50B | $2.58B | $6.91B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $58M | $236M | $416M | $51M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-83M | $-151M | $-369M | $-2M | $-315M |
| Gross Margin | — | -39.7% | 90.7% | 90.9% | 33.2% |
| Operating Margin | — | -210.6% | -168.6% | 0.8% | -7.0% |
| Forward P/E | — | 43.2x | — | 106.5x | — |
| Total Debt | $1M | $14M | $99M | $6M | $82M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $254M | $308M | $222M | $43M | $357M |
TECX vs PRTA vs RCUS vs ARQT vs KYMR — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Aug 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tectonic Therapeuti… (TECX) | 100 | 14.0 | -86.0% |
| Prothena Corporatio… (PRTA) | 100 | 82.8 | -17.2% |
| Arcus Biosciences, … (RCUS) | 100 | 106.6 | +6.6% |
| Arcutis Biotherapeu… (ARQT) | 100 | 84.4 | -15.6% |
| Kymera Therapeutics… (KYMR) | 100 | 269.8 | +169.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: TECX vs PRTA vs RCUS vs ARQT vs KYMR
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
TECX ranks third and is worth considering specifically for quality.
- 4.3% margin vs KYMR's -6.1%
PRTA has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- beta 0.96
- Lower volatility, beta 0.96, Low D/E 4.9%, current ratio 7.72x
- Beta 0.96, current ratio 7.72x
- Better valuation composite
RCUS is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +209.6% vs TECX's +41.6%
ARQT is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 91.3%, EPS growth 88.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 367.3%
- 91.3% revenue growth vs PRTA's -92.8%
- -0.6% ROA vs PRTA's -42.3%, ROIC -5.2% vs -21.0%
KYMR is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 154.4% 10Y total return vs RCUS's 45.9%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 91.3% revenue growth vs PRTA's -92.8% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 4.3% margin vs KYMR's -6.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.96 vs RCUS's 1.95, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +209.6% vs TECX's +41.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -0.6% ROA vs PRTA's -42.3%, ROIC -5.2% vs -21.0% |
TECX vs PRTA vs RCUS vs ARQT vs KYMR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
TECX vs PRTA vs RCUS vs ARQT vs KYMR — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
ARQT leads in 3 of 6 categories
TECX leads 1 • PRTA leads 1 • RCUS leads 0 • KYMR leads 0
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ARQT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ARQT and TECX operate at a comparable scale, with $416M and $0 in trailing revenue. ARQT is the more profitable business, keeping -0.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to KYMR's -6.1%. On growth, PRTA holds the edge at +17.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $58M | $236M | $416M | $51M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$89M | -$121M | -$391M | $6M | -$352M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$83M | -$151M | -$369M | -$2M | -$315M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$66M | -$85M | -$489M | $27M | -$244M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | -39.7% | +90.7% | +90.9% | +33.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | -2.1% | -168.6% | +0.8% | -7.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | -2.6% | -156.4% | -0.6% | -6.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | -147.2% | -2.1% | +6.5% | -4.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +17.1% | -39.3% | +60.1% | +55.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -44.1% | +153.6% | +10.5% | +55.0% | +13.4% |
Valuation Metrics
ARQT leads this category, winning 2 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $505M | $567M | $2.5B | $2.6B | $6.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $252M | $273M | $2.4B | $2.5B | $6.6B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -6.63x | -2.32x | -7.54x | -158.92x | -22.93x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 43.21x | — | 106.49x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | — | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 58.54x | 10.11x | 6.87x | 176.26x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.96x | 2.02x | 4.22x | 13.87x | 4.52x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
ARQT leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ARQT delivers a -1.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-1 in annual profit, vs $-69 for RCUS. TECX carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to RCUS's 0.16x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), TECX scores 4/9 vs RCUS's 0/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -32.3% | -49.9% | -69.0% | -1.4% | -25.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -30.9% | -42.3% | -35.3% | -0.6% | -22.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -76.5% | -21.0% | -64.1% | -5.2% | -24.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -42.8% | -47.0% | -42.1% | -4.3% | -27.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.01x | 0.05x | 0.16x | 0.03x | 0.05x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$253M | -$294M | -$123M | -$37M | -$275M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $254M | $308M | $222M | $43M | $357M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1M | $14M | $99M | $6M | $82M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -1627.77x | — | -13.38x | 2.08x | -2119.53x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
TECX leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in KYMR five years ago would be worth $19,212 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,604 for TECX. Over the past 12 months, RCUS leads with a +209.6% total return vs TECX's +41.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TECX at 46.6% vs PRTA's -48.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +28.5% | +14.5% | +6.5% | -28.8% | +16.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +41.6% | +44.4% | +209.6% | +50.8% | +190.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +215.4% | -86.3% | +24.9% | +44.9% | +205.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -74.0% | -57.2% | -18.6% | -39.5% | +92.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -92.8% | -73.0% | +45.9% | -5.2% | +154.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +46.6% | -48.5% | +7.7% | +13.2% | +45.0% |
Risk & Volatility
PRTA leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
PRTA is the less volatile stock with a 0.96 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than RCUS's 1.95 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. PRTA currently trades 90.1% from its 52-week high vs ARQT's 65.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.58x | 0.96x | 1.84x | 1.50x | 1.03x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $36.02 | $11.69 | $28.72 | $31.77 | $103.00 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $14.39 | $4.32 | $7.06 | $12.42 | $28.06 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +74.6% | +90.1% | +86.3% | +65.0% | +82.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 50.4 | 60.3 | 60.5 | 54.3 | 54.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 249K | 474K | 1.2M | 1.3M | 602K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: TECX as "Buy", PRTA as "Buy", RCUS as "Buy", ARQT as "Buy", KYMR as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 151.2% upside for TECX (target: $68) vs 21.0% for RCUS (target: $30).
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $67.50 | $19.00 | $30.00 | $35.50 | $118.06 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 4 | 28 | 18 | 12 | 26 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
ARQT leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). TECX leads in 1 (Total Returns).
TECX vs PRTA vs RCUS vs ARQT vs KYMR: Key Questions Answered
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is TECX or PRTA or RCUS or ARQT or KYMR a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Arcutis Biotherapeutics, Inc.
(ARQT) is the stronger pick with 91. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -92. 8% for Prothena Corporation plc (PRTA). Analysts rate Tectonic Therapeutic, Inc. (TECX) a "Buy" — based on 4 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — TECX or PRTA or RCUS or ARQT or KYMR?
Over the past 5 years, Kymera Therapeutics, Inc.
(KYMR) delivered a total return of +92. 1%, compared to -74. 0% for Tectonic Therapeutic, Inc. (TECX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: KYMR returned +158. 8% versus TECX's -92. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — TECX or PRTA or RCUS or ARQT or KYMR?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Prothena Corporation plc (PRTA) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
96β versus Arcus Biosciences, Inc. 's 1. 84β — meaning RCUS is approximately 92% more volatile than PRTA relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Tectonic Therapeutic, Inc. (TECX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 16% for Arcus Biosciences, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — TECX or PRTA or RCUS or ARQT or KYMR?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Arcutis Biotherapeutics, Inc.
(ARQT) is pulling ahead at 91. 3% versus -92. 8% for Prothena Corporation plc (PRTA). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Arcutis Biotherapeutics, Inc. grew EPS 88. 8% year-over-year, compared to -99. 6% for Prothena Corporation plc. Over a 3-year CAGR, ARQT leads at 367. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — TECX or PRTA or RCUS or ARQT or KYMR?
Tectonic Therapeutic, Inc.
(TECX) is the more profitable company, earning 0. 0% net margin versus -25. 2% for Prothena Corporation plc — meaning it keeps 0. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TECX leads at 0. 0% versus -1905. 8% for PRTA. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — KYMR leads at 100. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is TECX or PRTA or RCUS or ARQT or KYMR more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Prothena Corporation plc (PRTA) trades at 43.
2x forward P/E versus 106. 5x for Arcutis Biotherapeutics, Inc. — 63. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for TECX: 151. 2% to $67. 50.
07Which pays a better dividend — TECX or PRTA or RCUS or ARQT or KYMR?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
08Is TECX or PRTA or RCUS or ARQT or KYMR better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Kymera Therapeutics, Inc.
(KYMR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 03), +158. 8% 10Y return). Arcus Biosciences, Inc. (RCUS) carries a higher beta of 1. 84 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (KYMR: +158. 8%, RCUS: +49. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between TECX and PRTA and RCUS and ARQT and KYMR?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: TECX is a small-cap quality compounder stock; PRTA is a small-cap quality compounder stock; RCUS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ARQT is a small-cap high-growth stock; KYMR is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.