TEL vs BDC vs APH vs GLW vs EMR

For growth investors, Amphenol Corporation (APH) is the stronger pick with 51.

7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 3. 0% for Emerson Electric Co. (EMR). Belden Inc. (BDC) offers the better valuation at 19. 0x trailing P/E (14. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate TE Connectivity Ltd. (TEL) a "Buy" — based on 29 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, Belden Inc.

(BDC) is the cheapest at 19. 0x versus Corning Incorporated at 98. 6x. On forward P/E, Belden Inc. is actually cheaper at 14. 2x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Belden Inc. wins at 0. 38x versus Emerson Electric Co. 's 4. 81x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

Over the past 5 years, Amphenol Corporation (APH) delivered a total return of +308.

8%, compared to +59. 5% for Emerson Electric Co. (EMR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: GLW returned +944. 3% versus BDC's +91. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Belden Inc.

(BDC) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 41β versus Corning Incorporated's 1. 90β — meaning GLW is approximately 35% more volatile than BDC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, TE Connectivity Ltd. (TEL) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 51% versus 117% for Belden Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Amphenol Corporation (APH) is pulling ahead at 51.

7% versus 3. 0% for Emerson Electric Co. (EMR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Corning Incorporated grew EPS 219. 0% year-over-year, compared to -40. 4% for TE Connectivity Ltd.. Over a 3-year CAGR, APH leads at 22. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Amphenol Corporation (APH) is the more profitable company, earning 18.

5% net margin versus 8. 7% for Belden Inc. — meaning it keeps 18. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: APH leads at 25. 9% versus 12. 2% for BDC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — EMR leads at 52. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Belden Inc. (BDC) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 38x versus Emerson Electric Co. 's 4. 81x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Belden Inc. (BDC) trades at 14. 2x forward P/E versus 57. 8x for Corning Incorporated — 43. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for BDC: 33. 7% to $150. 00.

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Emerson Electric Co. (EMR) offers the highest yield at 1. 5%, versus 0. 2% for Belden Inc. (BDC).

For long-horizon retirement investors, Corning Incorporated (GLW) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (0.

6% yield, +944. 3% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (GLW: +944. 3%, BDC: +91. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

These companies operate in different sectors (TEL (Technology) and BDC (Technology) and APH (Technology) and GLW (Technology) and EMR (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: TEL is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; BDC is a small-cap quality compounder stock; APH is a mid-cap high-growth stock; GLW is a mid-cap high-growth stock; EMR is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. TEL, GLW, EMR pay a dividend while BDC, APH do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.