TEO
Telecom Argentina S.A.
Telecommunications Services
Market Cap$5.16B
5Y Perf.+39.6%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
TEO vs NFLX
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
NFLX
Netflix, Inc.
Entertainment
Market Cap$374.00B
5Y Perf.+110.3%
TEO vs NFLX — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | TEO | NFLX |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Telecommunications Services | Entertainment |
| Market Cap | $5.16B | $374.00B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $6.63T | $45.18B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-215.75B | $10.98B |
| Gross Margin | 74.7% | 48.5% |
| Operating Margin | 11.7% | 29.5% |
| Forward P/E | 0.0x | 24.8x |
| Total Debt | $3.09T | $14.46B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $318.32B | $9.03B |
TEO vs NFLX — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
TEO
NFLX
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Telecom Argentina S… (TEO) | 100 | 139.6 | +39.6% |
| Netflix, Inc. (NFLX) | 100 | 210.3 | +110.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: TEO vs NFLX
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: TEO and NFLX are tied at the top with 3 categories each — the right choice depends on your priorities. Netflix, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for profitability and margin quality and capital preservation and lower volatility. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
TEO
Telecom Argentina S.A.
The Growth Play
TEO has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in growth exposure.
- Rev growth 100.9%, EPS growth 280.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 17.0%
- 100.9% revenue growth vs NFLX's 15.9%
- Lower P/E (0.0x vs 24.8x)
Best for: growth exposure
NFLX
Netflix, Inc.
The Income Pick
NFLX is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and long-term compounding.
- beta 0.39
- 8.8% 10Y total return vs TEO's 5.2%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.39, Low D/E 54.3%, current ratio 1.19x
Best for: income & stability and long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | TEO | 100.9% revenue growth vs NFLX's 15.9% |
| Value | TEO | Lower P/E (0.0x vs 24.8x) |
| Quality / Margins | NFLX | 24.3% margin vs TEO's -3.3% |
| Stability / Safety | NFLX | Beta 0.39 vs TEO's 1.51, lower leverage |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | TEO | +22.3% vs NFLX's -23.6% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | NFLX | 19.8% ROA vs TEO's -1.6%, ROIC 29.8% vs -1.2% |
TEO vs NFLX — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FY 2022
FY 2024
TEO vs NFLX — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLNFLXLAGGINGTEO
TEOTelecom Argentina S.A.
1leads
NFLXNetflix, Inc.
2leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs TEOMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
NFLX4/6
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
TEO6/6
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
NFLX9/9
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
Tied
—
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
Tied
—
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
—
—
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NFLX leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TEO is the larger business by revenue, generating $6.63T annually — 146.6x NFLX's $45.2B. NFLX is the more profitable business, keeping 24.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to TEO's -3.3%. On growth, TEO holds the edge at +110.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | TEOTelecom Argentina… | NFLXNetflix, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $6.63T | $45.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $2.46T | $30.1B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$215.7B | $11.0B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$441.3B | $9.5B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +74.7% | +48.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +11.7% | +29.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -3.3% | +24.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -6.7% | +20.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +110.1% | +17.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -11.2% | +31.1% |
NFLX leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
TEO leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 7.1x trailing earnings, TEO trades at a 80% valuation discount to NFLX's 34.9x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, TEO's 8.5x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than NFLX's 12.6x.
| Metric | TEOTelecom Argentina… | NFLXNetflix, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $5.2B | $374.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $7.2B | $379.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 7.08x | 34.89x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 0.01x | 24.80x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.06x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 8.53x | 12.61x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.73x | 8.28x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.30x | 14.32x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 17.18x | 39.53x |
TEO leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
NFLX leads this category, winning 9 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
NFLX delivers a 41.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $41 in annual profit, vs $-4 for TEO. NFLX carries lower financial leverage with a 0.54x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to TEO's 0.56x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), NFLX scores 7/9 vs TEO's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | TEOTelecom Argentina… | NFLXNetflix, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -3.5% | +41.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -1.6% | +19.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -1.2% | +29.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -1.6% | +30.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.56x | 0.54x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $2.77T | $5.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $318.3B | $9.0B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $3.09T | $14.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -571.01x | 17.33x |
NFLX leads this category, winning 9 of 9 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — TEO and NFLX each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in TEO five years ago would be worth $28,610 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $17,519 for NFLX. Over the past 12 months, TEO leads with a +22.3% total return vs NFLX's -23.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NFLX at 38.6% vs TEO's 35.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | TEOTelecom Argentina… | NFLXNetflix, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +3.9% | -3.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +22.3% | -23.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +149.8% | +166.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +186.1% | +75.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +5.2% | +875.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +35.7% | +38.6% |
Evenly matched — TEO and NFLX each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — TEO and NFLX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
NFLX is the less volatile stock with a 0.39 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than TEO's 1.51 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. TEO currently trades 86.8% from its 52-week high vs NFLX's 65.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | TEOTelecom Argentina… | NFLXNetflix, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.51x | 0.39x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $13.81 | $134.12 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $6.43 | $75.01 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +86.8% | +65.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 58.2 | 35.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 258K | 44.0M |
Evenly matched — TEO and NFLX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates TEO as "Sell" and NFLX as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 31.8% upside for NFLX (target: $116) vs 6.8% for TEO (target: $13).
| Metric | TEOTelecom Argentina… | NFLXNetflix, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Sell | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $12.80 | $116.29 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 12 | 99 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +2.4% |
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway
NFLX leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). TEO leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
Best OverallNetflix, Inc. (NFLX)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
TEO vs NFLX: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is TEO or NFLX a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Telecom Argentina S.
A. (TEO) is the stronger pick with 100. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 15. 9% for Netflix, Inc. (NFLX). Telecom Argentina S. A. (TEO) offers the better valuation at 7. 1x trailing P/E (0. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Netflix, Inc. (NFLX) a "Buy" — based on 99 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — TEO or NFLX?
On trailing P/E, Telecom Argentina S.
A. (TEO) is the cheapest at 7. 1x versus Netflix, Inc. at 34. 9x. On forward P/E, Telecom Argentina S. A. is actually cheaper at 0. 0x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — TEO or NFLX?
Over the past 5 years, Telecom Argentina S.
A. (TEO) delivered a total return of +186. 1%, compared to +75. 2% for Netflix, Inc. (NFLX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NFLX returned +875. 3% versus TEO's +5. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — TEO or NFLX?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Netflix, Inc.
(NFLX) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 39β versus Telecom Argentina S. A. 's 1. 51β — meaning TEO is approximately 289% more volatile than NFLX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Netflix, Inc. (NFLX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 54% versus 56% for Telecom Argentina S. A. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — TEO or NFLX?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Telecom Argentina S.
A. (TEO) is pulling ahead at 100. 9% versus 15. 9% for Netflix, Inc. (NFLX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Telecom Argentina S. A. grew EPS 280. 4% year-over-year, compared to 27. 6% for Netflix, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, TEO leads at 17. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — TEO or NFLX?
Telecom Argentina S.
A. (TEO) is the more profitable company, earning 24. 5% net margin versus 24. 3% for Netflix, Inc. — meaning it keeps 24. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NFLX leads at 29. 5% versus -3. 5% for TEO. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TEO leads at 73. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is TEO or NFLX more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Telecom Argentina S.
A. (TEO) trades at 0. 0x forward P/E versus 24. 8x for Netflix, Inc. — 24. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for NFLX: 31. 8% to $116. 29.
08Which pays a better dividend — TEO or NFLX?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is TEO or NFLX better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Netflix, Inc.
(NFLX) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 39), +875. 3% 10Y return). Telecom Argentina S. A. (TEO) carries a higher beta of 1. 51 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (NFLX: +875. 3%, TEO: +5. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between TEO and NFLX?
Both stocks operate in the Communication Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
- Sector: Communication Services
- Market Cap > $100B
- Revenue Growth > 55%
- Gross Margin > 44%
Revenue Growth>
%
(TEO: 110.1% · NFLX: 17.6%)P/E Ratio<
x
(TEO: 7.1x · NFLX: 34.9x)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.