TEO
Telecom Argentina S.A.
Telecommunications Services
Market Cap$5.16B
5Y Perf.+39.6%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
TEO vs PHI
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
PHI
PLDT Inc.
Telecommunications Services
Market Cap$4.40B
5Y Perf.-16.7%
TEO vs PHI — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | TEO | PHI |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Telecommunications Services | Telecommunications Services |
| Market Cap | $5.16B | $4.40B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $6.63T | $218.49B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-215.75B | $30.02B |
| Gross Margin | 74.7% | 71.6% |
| Operating Margin | 11.7% | 29.3% |
| Forward P/E | 0.0x | 0.1x |
| Total Debt | $3.09T | $359.04B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $318.32B | $11.86B |
TEO vs PHI — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
TEO
PHI
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Telecom Argentina S… (TEO) | 100 | 139.6 | +39.6% |
| PLDT Inc. (PHI) | 100 | 83.3 | -16.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: TEO vs PHI
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: PHI leads in 4 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for profitability and margin quality and capital preservation and lower volatility. Telecom Argentina S.A. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
TEO
Telecom Argentina S.A.
The Income Pick
TEO is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 1.51
- Rev growth 100.9%, EPS growth 280.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 17.0%
- 100.9% revenue growth vs PHI's 3.0%
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
PHI
PLDT Inc.
The Long-Run Compounder
PHI carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 7.8% 10Y total return vs TEO's 5.2%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.21, current ratio 0.44x
- Beta 0.21, yield 7.9%, current ratio 0.44x
Best for: long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | TEO | 100.9% revenue growth vs PHI's 3.0% |
| Value | TEO | Lower P/E (0.0x vs 0.1x) |
| Quality / Margins | PHI | 13.7% margin vs TEO's -3.3% |
| Stability / Safety | PHI | Beta 0.21 vs TEO's 1.51 |
| Dividends | PHI | 7.9% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | TEO | +22.3% vs PHI's -7.0% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | PHI | 4.8% ROA vs TEO's -1.6%, ROIC 9.1% vs -1.2% |
TEO vs PHI — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FY 2022
FY 2024
TEO vs PHI — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLPHILAGGINGTEO
TEOTelecom Argentina S.A.
1leads
PHIPLDT Inc.
2leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs TEOMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
PHI4/6
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
Tied
—
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
PHI6/8
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
TEO5/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
Tied
—
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
—
—
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PHI leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TEO is the larger business by revenue, generating $6.63T annually — 30.3x PHI's $218.5B. PHI is the more profitable business, keeping 13.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to TEO's -3.3%. On growth, TEO holds the edge at +110.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | TEOTelecom Argentina… | PHIPLDT Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $6.63T | $218.5B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $2.46T | $108.8B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$215.7B | $30.0B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$441.3B | $35.7B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +74.7% | +71.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +11.7% | +29.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -3.3% | +13.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -6.7% | +16.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +110.1% | -1.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -11.2% | +17.3% |
PHI leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — TEO and PHI each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 7.1x trailing earnings, TEO trades at a 19% valuation discount to PHI's 8.7x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, PHI's 5.3x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than TEO's 8.5x.
| Metric | TEOTelecom Argentina… | PHIPLDT Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $5.2B | $4.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $7.2B | $10.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 7.08x | 8.72x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 0.01x | 0.13x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.82x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 8.53x | 5.28x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.73x | 1.20x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.30x | 2.09x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 17.18x | 11.19x |
Evenly matched — TEO and PHI each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
PHI leads this category, winning 6 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
PHI delivers a 24.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $24 in annual profit, vs $-4 for TEO. TEO carries lower financial leverage with a 0.56x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to PHI's 2.80x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), TEO scores 6/9 vs PHI's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | TEOTelecom Argentina… | PHIPLDT Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -3.5% | +24.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -1.6% | +4.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -1.2% | +9.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -1.6% | +12.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.56x | 2.80x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $2.77T | $347.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $318.3B | $11.9B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $3.09T | $359.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -571.01x | — |
PHI leads this category, winning 6 of 8 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
TEO leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in TEO five years ago would be worth $28,610 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $11,163 for PHI. Over the past 12 months, TEO leads with a +22.3% total return vs PHI's -7.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TEO at 35.7% vs PHI's 5.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | TEOTelecom Argentina… | PHIPLDT Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +3.9% | -3.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +22.3% | -7.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +149.8% | +16.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +186.1% | +11.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +5.2% | +7.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +35.7% | +5.2% |
TEO leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — TEO and PHI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
PHI is the less volatile stock with a 0.21 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than TEO's 1.51 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. TEO currently trades 86.8% from its 52-week high vs PHI's 83.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | TEOTelecom Argentina… | PHIPLDT Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.51x | 0.21x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $13.81 | $24.51 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $6.43 | $18.61 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +86.8% | +83.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 58.2 | 45.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 258K | 137K |
Evenly matched — TEO and PHI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates TEO as "Sell" and PHI as "Hold". PHI is the only dividend payer here at 7.87% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | TEOTelecom Argentina… | PHIPLDT Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Sell | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $12.80 | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 12 | 4 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +7.9% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $97.25 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway
PHI leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). TEO leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.
Best OverallPLDT Inc. (PHI)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
TEO vs PHI: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is TEO or PHI a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Telecom Argentina S.
A. (TEO) is the stronger pick with 100. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 3. 0% for PLDT Inc. (PHI). Telecom Argentina S. A. (TEO) offers the better valuation at 7. 1x trailing P/E (0. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate PLDT Inc. (PHI) a "Hold" — based on 4 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — TEO or PHI?
On trailing P/E, Telecom Argentina S.
A. (TEO) is the cheapest at 7. 1x versus PLDT Inc. at 8. 7x. On forward P/E, Telecom Argentina S. A. is actually cheaper at 0. 0x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — TEO or PHI?
Over the past 5 years, Telecom Argentina S.
A. (TEO) delivered a total return of +186. 1%, compared to +11. 6% for PLDT Inc. (PHI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PHI returned +7. 8% versus TEO's +5. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — TEO or PHI?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), PLDT Inc.
(PHI) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 21β versus Telecom Argentina S. A. 's 1. 51β — meaning TEO is approximately 616% more volatile than PHI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Telecom Argentina S. A. (TEO) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 56% versus 3% for PLDT Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — TEO or PHI?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Telecom Argentina S.
A. (TEO) is pulling ahead at 100. 9% versus 3. 0% for PLDT Inc. (PHI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Telecom Argentina S. A. grew EPS 280. 4% year-over-year, compared to -5. 1% for PLDT Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, TEO leads at 17. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — TEO or PHI?
Telecom Argentina S.
A. (TEO) is the more profitable company, earning 24. 5% net margin versus 13. 7% for PLDT Inc. — meaning it keeps 24. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PHI leads at 24. 9% versus -3. 5% for TEO. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TEO leads at 73. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is TEO or PHI more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Telecom Argentina S.
A. (TEO) trades at 0. 0x forward P/E versus 0. 1x for PLDT Inc. — 0. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis.
08Which pays a better dividend — TEO or PHI?
In this comparison, PHI (7.
9% yield) pays a dividend. TEO does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is TEO or PHI better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, PLDT Inc.
(PHI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 21), 7. 9% yield). Telecom Argentina S. A. (TEO) carries a higher beta of 1. 51 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (PHI: +7. 8%, TEO: +5. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between TEO and PHI?
Both stocks operate in the Communication Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: TEO is a small-cap high-growth stock; PHI is a small-cap deep-value stock. PHI pays a dividend while TEO does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
- Sector: Communication Services
- Market Cap > $100B
- Revenue Growth > 55%
- Gross Margin > 44%
Revenue Growth>
%
(TEO: 110.1% · PHI: -1.2%)P/E Ratio<
x
(TEO: 7.1x · PHI: 8.7x)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.