TG vs SLGN

For growth investors, Tredegar Corporation (TG) is the stronger pick with 20.

9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 10. 7% for Silgan Holdings Inc. (SLGN). Tredegar Corporation (TG) offers the better valuation at 14. 8x trailing P/E (4. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Silgan Holdings Inc. (SLGN) a "Buy" — based on 21 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, Tredegar Corporation (TG) is the cheapest at 14.

8x versus Silgan Holdings Inc. at 14. 9x. On forward P/E, Tredegar Corporation is actually cheaper at 4. 8x.

Over the past 5 years, Silgan Holdings Inc.

(SLGN) delivered a total return of +1. 4%, compared to -25. 2% for Tredegar Corporation (TG). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SLGN returned +80. 8% versus TG's -15. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Silgan Holdings Inc.

(SLGN) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 66β versus Tredegar Corporation's 1. 38β — meaning TG is approximately 109% more volatile than SLGN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Tredegar Corporation (TG) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 22% versus 2% for Silgan Holdings Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Tredegar Corporation (TG) is pulling ahead at 20.

9% versus 10. 7% for Silgan Holdings Inc. (SLGN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Tredegar Corporation grew EPS 136. 7% year-over-year, compared to 4. 7% for Silgan Holdings Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, SLGN leads at 0. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Silgan Holdings Inc.

(SLGN) is the more profitable company, earning 4. 4% net margin versus 3. 3% for Tredegar Corporation — meaning it keeps 4. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SLGN leads at 10. 2% versus 3. 7% for TG. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SLGN leads at 17. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

On forward earnings alone, Tredegar Corporation (TG) trades at 4.

8x forward P/E versus 10. 6x for Silgan Holdings Inc. — 5. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis.

In this comparison, SLGN (2.

0% yield) pays a dividend. TG does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, Silgan Holdings Inc.

(SLGN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 66), 2. 0% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (SLGN: +80. 8%, TG: -15. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

These companies operate in different sectors (TG (Industrials) and SLGN (Consumer Cyclical)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: TG is a small-cap high-growth stock; SLGN is a small-cap deep-value stock. SLGN pays a dividend while TG does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.