Media & Entertainment
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
TGE vs SYY vs JPM vs USFD vs PFGC vs KO
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Food Distribution
Banks - Diversified
Food Distribution
Food Distribution
Beverages - Non-Alcoholic
TGE vs SYY vs JPM vs USFD vs PFGC vs KO — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Media & Entertainment | Food Distribution | Banks - Diversified | Food Distribution | Food Distribution | Beverages - Non-Alcoholic |
| Market Cap | $36M | $37.69B | $908.57B | $20.24B | $16.28B | $341.71B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $869M | $83.57B | $280.33B | $39.68B | $66.75B | $49.28B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $249M | $1.74B | $57.05B | $677M | $329M | $13.70B |
| Gross Margin | 77.7% | 18.5% | 60.0% | 17.4% | 11.9% | 61.7% |
| Operating Margin | 40.6% | 3.6% | 25.9% | 3.1% | 1.2% | 29.3% |
| Forward P/E | 2.2x | 17.2x | 14.6x | 19.5x | 22.4x | 24.3x |
| Total Debt | $220M | $14.49B | $942.38B | $5.72B | $8.00B | $45.49B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $20M | $1.07B | $343.34B | $41M | $79M | $10.27B |
TGE vs SYY vs JPM vs USFD vs PFGC vs KO — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 25 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Generation Essentia… (TGE) | 100 | 15.7 | -84.3% |
| Sysco Corporation (SYY) | 100 | 103.9 | +3.9% |
| JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) | 100 | 112.2 | +12.2% |
| US Foods Holding Co… (USFD) | 100 | 119.3 | +19.3% |
| Performance Food Gr… (PFGC) | 100 | 118.5 | +18.5% |
| The Coca-Cola Compa… (KO) | 100 | 112.2 | +12.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: TGE vs SYY vs JPM vs USFD vs PFGC vs KO
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
TGE has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in value and quality.
- Lower P/E (2.2x vs 24.3x)
- 28.6% margin vs PFGC's 0.5%
SYY ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability and valuation efficiency.
- Dividend streak 10 yrs, beta 0.30, yield 2.6%
- PEG 0.31 vs KO's 2.17
- Beta 0.30, yield 2.6%, current ratio 1.21x
- 2.6% yield, 10-year raise streak, vs KO's 2.6%, (3 stocks pay no dividend)
JPM is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 481.2% 10Y total return vs USFD's 290.1%
USFD is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Rev growth 4.1%, EPS growth 45.5%, 3Y rev CAGR 5.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.26, current ratio 1.16x
- Beta 0.26 vs TGE's 2.21
- +22.1% vs TGE's -85.5%
PFGC is the clearest fit if your priority is growth.
- 8.6% revenue growth vs TGE's -36.9%
KO is the clearest fit if your priority is efficiency.
- 13.1% ROA vs JPM's 1.3%, ROIC 15.8% vs 4.5%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 8.6% revenue growth vs TGE's -36.9% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (2.2x vs 24.3x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 28.6% margin vs PFGC's 0.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.26 vs TGE's 2.21 | |
| Dividends | 2.6% yield, 10-year raise streak, vs KO's 2.6%, (3 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +22.1% vs TGE's -85.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 13.1% ROA vs JPM's 1.3%, ROIC 15.8% vs 4.5% |
TGE vs SYY vs JPM vs USFD vs PFGC vs KO — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
TGE vs SYY vs JPM vs USFD vs PFGC vs KO — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 6 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
TGE leads in 2 of 6 categories
KO leads 1 • SYY leads 0 • JPM leads 0 • USFD leads 0 • PFGC leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TGE leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
JPM is the larger business by revenue, generating $280.3B annually — 322.8x TGE's $869M. TGE is the more profitable business, keeping 28.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to PFGC's 0.5%. On growth, KO holds the edge at +12.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $869M | $83.6B | $280.3B | $39.7B | $66.7B | $49.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $488M | $4.0B | $81.4B | $1.6B | $1.0B | $15.5B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $249M | $1.7B | $57.0B | $677M | $329M | $13.7B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $454M | $2.0B | $100.9B | $848M | $1.0B | $12.6B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +77.7% | +18.5% | +60.0% | +17.4% | +11.9% | +61.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +40.6% | +3.6% | +25.9% | +3.1% | +1.2% | +29.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +28.6% | +2.1% | +20.4% | +1.7% | +0.5% | +27.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +52.2% | +2.4% | +36.0% | +2.1% | +1.5% | +25.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +5.8% | +4.7% | — | +2.8% | +6.4% | +12.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -18.9% | -13.4% | +16.0% | +6.1% | -27.0% | +18.2% |
Valuation Metrics
TGE leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 2.2x trailing earnings, TGE trades at a 95% valuation discount to PFGC's 47.5x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), SYY offers better value at 0.39x vs KO's 2.34x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $36M | $37.7B | $908.6B | $20.2B | $16.3B | $341.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $236M | $51.1B | $1.51T | $25.9B | $24.2B | $376.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 2.18x | 21.10x | 16.22x | 31.26x | 47.53x | 26.12x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 17.16x | 14.60x | 19.49x | 22.44x | 24.27x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.39x | 0.92x | — | — | 2.34x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 5.31x | 12.25x | 18.52x | 15.30x | 15.77x | 25.45x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.71x | 0.46x | 3.25x | 0.51x | 0.26x | 7.13x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.08x | 20.76x | 2.51x | 4.91x | 3.62x | 9.99x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 7.94x | 21.16x | 9.01x | 21.11x | 23.12x | 64.52x |
Profitability & Efficiency
KO leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
SYY delivers a 80.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $81 in annual profit, vs $7 for PFGC. TGE carries lower financial leverage with a 0.29x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SYY's 7.81x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), USFD scores 7/9 vs PFGC's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +13.8% | +80.7% | +15.9% | +15.3% | +7.1% | +41.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +6.5% | +6.4% | +1.3% | +4.8% | +1.8% | +13.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +3.8% | +15.7% | +4.5% | +9.3% | +5.7% | +15.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +4.3% | +19.0% | +8.9% | +12.0% | +7.1% | +17.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 7 | 4 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.29x | 7.81x | 2.60x | 1.33x | 1.79x | 1.33x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $200M | $13.4B | $599.0B | $5.7B | $7.9B | $35.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $20M | $1.1B | $343.3B | $41M | $79M | $10.3B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $220M | $14.5B | $942.4B | $5.7B | $8.0B | $45.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 3.48x | 4.35x | 0.74x | 3.94x | 1.69x | 10.70x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — JPM and USFD each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in USFD five years ago would be worth $25,174 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,235 for TGE. Over the past 12 months, USFD leads with a +22.1% total return vs TGE's -85.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors JPM at 33.7% vs TGE's -50.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +15.9% | +9.9% | +0.8% | +23.1% | +17.7% | +16.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -85.5% | +9.3% | +20.9% | +22.1% | +21.9% | +17.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -87.6% | +17.1% | +138.8% | +117.5% | +89.0% | +39.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -87.6% | +18.8% | +135.5% | +151.7% | +120.0% | +65.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -94.3% | +93.0% | +481.2% | +290.1% | +306.2% | +115.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -50.2% | +5.4% | +33.7% | +29.6% | +23.6% | +11.7% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — JPM and KO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
KO is the less volatile stock with a -0.23 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than TGE's 2.21 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. JPM currently trades 96.2% from its 52-week high vs TGE's 12.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.21x | 0.30x | 0.87x | 0.26x | 0.46x | -0.23x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $9.71 | $91.69 | $338.09 | $102.13 | $109.05 | $84.04 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.78 | $68.19 | $269.72 | $69.88 | $80.82 | $65.35 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +12.8% | +85.8% | +96.2% | +90.0% | +95.0% | +94.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 57.0 | 61.8 | 72.1 | 70.7 | 67.2 | 49.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 262K | 3.7M | 7.4M | 2.4M | 1.6M | 13.6M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — SYY and KO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: SYY as "Buy", JPM as "Buy", USFD as "Buy", PFGC as "Buy", KO as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 15.4% upside for USFD (target: $106) vs 4.5% for JPM (target: $340). For income investors, SYY offers the higher dividend yield at 2.59% vs JPM's 1.83%.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $90.44 | $339.75 | $106.11 | $117.25 | $86.13 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 30 | 61 | 25 | 25 | 48 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +2.6% | +1.8% | — | — | +2.6% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 10 | 15 | 0 | 1 | 56 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $2.04 | $5.95 | — | — | $2.04 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +3.3% | +3.8% | +4.8% | +0.5% | +0.2% |
TGE leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). KO leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 3 tied.
TGE vs SYY vs JPM vs USFD vs PFGC vs KO: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is TGE or SYY or JPM or USFD or PFGC or KO a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Performance Food Group Company (PFGC) is the stronger pick with 8.
6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -36. 9% for Generation Essentials Group (TGE). Generation Essentials Group (TGE) offers the better valuation at 2. 2x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Sysco Corporation (SYY) a "Buy" — based on 30 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — TGE or SYY or JPM or USFD or PFGC or KO?
On trailing P/E, Generation Essentials Group (TGE) is the cheapest at 2.
2x versus Performance Food Group Company at 47. 5x. On forward P/E, JPMorgan Chase & Co. is actually cheaper at 14. 6x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Sysco Corporation wins at 0. 31x versus The Coca-Cola Company's 2. 17x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — TGE or SYY or JPM or USFD or PFGC or KO?
Over the past 5 years, US Foods Holding Corp.
(USFD) delivered a total return of +151. 7%, compared to -87. 6% for Generation Essentials Group (TGE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: JPM returned +481. 2% versus TGE's -94. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — TGE or SYY or JPM or USFD or PFGC or KO?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the lower-risk stock at -0.
23β versus Generation Essentials Group's 2. 21β — meaning TGE is approximately -1048% more volatile than KO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Generation Essentials Group (TGE) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 29% versus 8% for Sysco Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — TGE or SYY or JPM or USFD or PFGC or KO?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Performance Food Group Company (PFGC) is pulling ahead at 8.
6% versus -36. 9% for Generation Essentials Group (TGE). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Generation Essentials Group grew EPS 235. 3% year-over-year, compared to -21. 9% for Performance Food Group Company. Over a 3-year CAGR, PFGC leads at 7. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — TGE or SYY or JPM or USFD or PFGC or KO?
Generation Essentials Group (TGE) is the more profitable company, earning 54.
8% net margin versus 0. 5% for Performance Food Group Company — meaning it keeps 54. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TGE leads at 64. 7% versus 1. 3% for PFGC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — KO leads at 61. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is TGE or SYY or JPM or USFD or PFGC or KO more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Sysco Corporation (SYY) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 31x versus The Coca-Cola Company's 2. 17x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) trades at 14. 6x forward P/E versus 24. 3x for The Coca-Cola Company — 9. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for USFD: 15. 4% to $106. 11.
08Which pays a better dividend — TGE or SYY or JPM or USFD or PFGC or KO?
In this comparison, SYY (2.
6% yield), KO (2. 6% yield), JPM (1. 8% yield) pay a dividend. TGE, USFD, PFGC do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is TGE or SYY or JPM or USFD or PFGC or KO better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.
23), 2. 6% yield, +115. 0% 10Y return). Generation Essentials Group (TGE) carries a higher beta of 2. 21 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (KO: +115. 0%, TGE: -94. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between TGE and SYY and JPM and USFD and PFGC and KO?
These companies operate in different sectors (TGE (Technology) and SYY (Consumer Defensive) and JPM (Financial Services) and USFD (Consumer Defensive) and PFGC (Consumer Defensive) and KO (Consumer Defensive)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: TGE is a small-cap deep-value stock; SYY is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; JPM is a large-cap deep-value stock; USFD is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; PFGC is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; KO is a large-cap quality compounder stock. SYY, JPM, KO pay a dividend while TGE, USFD, PFGC do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.