Media & Entertainment
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
TGE vs WMT vs COST vs SYY
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Specialty Retail
Discount Stores
Food Distribution
TGE vs WMT vs COST vs SYY — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Media & Entertainment | Specialty Retail | Discount Stores | Food Distribution |
| Market Cap | $29M | $1.04T | $447.13B | $34.69B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $869M | $703.06B | $286.26B | $83.57B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $249M | $22.91B | $8.55B | $1.74B |
| Gross Margin | 77.7% | 24.9% | 12.9% | 18.5% |
| Operating Margin | 40.6% | 4.1% | 3.8% | 3.6% |
| Forward P/E | 1.8x | 44.8x | 49.4x | 15.8x |
| Total Debt | $220M | $67.09B | $8.17B | $14.49B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $20M | $10.73B | $14.16B | $1.07B |
TGE vs WMT vs COST vs SYY — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 25 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Generation Essentia… (TGE) | 100 | 12.6 | -87.4% |
| Walmart Inc. (WMT) | 100 | 133.4 | +33.4% |
| Costco Wholesale Co… (COST) | 100 | 101.9 | +1.9% |
| Sysco Corporation (SYY) | 100 | 95.6 | -4.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: TGE vs WMT vs COST vs SYY
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
TGE is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if value and quality is your priority.
- Lower P/E (1.8x vs 49.4x)
- 28.6% margin vs SYY's 2.1%
WMT is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.
- Dividend streak 37 yrs, beta 0.11, yield 0.7%
- +35.1% vs TGE's -90.0%
COST carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 8.2%, EPS growth 10.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 6.6%
- 6.2% 10Y total return vs WMT's 5.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.10, Low D/E 28.0%, current ratio 1.03x
- 8.2% revenue growth vs TGE's -36.9%
SYY is the clearest fit if your priority is valuation efficiency and defensive.
- PEG 0.29 vs WMT's 4.07
- Beta 0.46, yield 2.8%, current ratio 1.21x
- 2.8% yield, 37-year raise streak, vs COST's 0.5%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 8.2% revenue growth vs TGE's -36.9% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (1.8x vs 49.4x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 28.6% margin vs SYY's 2.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.10 vs TGE's 2.03, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 2.8% yield, 37-year raise streak, vs COST's 0.5%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +35.1% vs TGE's -90.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 10.7% ROA vs SYY's 6.4%, ROIC 34.5% vs 15.7% |
TGE vs WMT vs COST vs SYY — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
TGE vs WMT vs COST vs SYY — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
TGE leads in 2 of 6 categories
COST leads 1 • WMT leads 1 • SYY leads 1 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TGE leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
WMT is the larger business by revenue, generating $703.1B annually — 809.5x TGE's $869M. TGE is the more profitable business, keeping 28.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SYY's 2.1%. On growth, COST holds the edge at +9.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $869M | $703.1B | $286.3B | $83.6B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $488M | $42.8B | $13.5B | $4.0B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $249M | $22.9B | $8.5B | $1.7B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $454M | $15.3B | $9.1B | $2.0B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +77.7% | +24.9% | +12.9% | +18.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +40.6% | +4.1% | +3.8% | +3.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +28.6% | +3.3% | +3.0% | +2.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +52.2% | +2.2% | +3.2% | +2.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +5.8% | +5.8% | +9.2% | +4.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -18.9% | +35.1% | -2.1% | -13.4% |
Valuation Metrics
TGE leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 1.8x trailing earnings, TGE trades at a 97% valuation discount to COST's 55.4x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), SYY offers better value at 0.35x vs WMT's 4.34x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $29M | $1.04T | $447.1B | $34.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $229M | $1.10T | $441.1B | $48.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 1.75x | 47.76x | 55.40x | 19.42x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 44.77x | 49.35x | 15.78x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 4.34x | 3.67x | 0.35x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 5.15x | 24.88x | 34.44x | 11.53x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.58x | 1.46x | 1.62x | 0.43x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.06x | 10.47x | 15.39x | 19.11x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 6.40x | 25.00x | 57.05x | 19.48x |
Profitability & Efficiency
COST leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
SYY delivers a 80.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $81 in annual profit, vs $14 for TGE. COST carries lower financial leverage with a 0.28x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SYY's 7.81x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), COST scores 7/9 vs TGE's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +13.8% | +22.3% | +28.8% | +80.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +6.5% | +7.9% | +10.7% | +6.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +3.8% | +14.7% | +34.5% | +15.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +4.3% | +17.5% | +27.9% | +19.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 6 | 7 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.29x | 0.67x | 0.28x | 7.81x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $200M | $56.4B | -$6.0B | $13.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $20M | $10.7B | $14.2B | $1.1B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $220M | $67.1B | $8.2B | $14.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 3.48x | 11.85x | 77.52x | 4.35x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
WMT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in WMT five years ago would be worth $28,660 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $996 for TGE. Over the past 12 months, WMT leads with a +35.1% total return vs TGE's -90.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors WMT at 37.7% vs TGE's -53.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -6.6% | +16.1% | +18.4% | +1.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -90.0% | +35.1% | +0.6% | +4.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -90.0% | +161.3% | +108.0% | +3.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -90.0% | +186.6% | +174.0% | -3.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -95.4% | +501.4% | +622.8% | +81.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -53.6% | +37.7% | +27.7% | +1.1% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — WMT and COST each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
COST is the less volatile stock with a 0.10 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than TGE's 2.03 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. WMT currently trades 96.8% from its 52-week high vs TGE's 2.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.03x | 0.11x | 0.10x | 0.46x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $37.02 | $134.69 | $1067.08 | $91.69 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.78 | $91.89 | $846.80 | $68.19 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +2.7% | +96.8% | +94.5% | +79.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 43.3 | 56.2 | 54.2 | 40.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 53K | 17.1M | 1.6M | 4.7M |
Analyst Outlook
SYY leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: WMT as "Buy", COST as "Buy", SYY as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 24.8% upside for SYY (target: $90) vs 5.2% for WMT (target: $137). For income investors, SYY offers the higher dividend yield at 2.82% vs COST's 0.49%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $137.22 | $1070.13 | $90.44 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 64 | 58 | 30 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.7% | +0.5% | +2.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 37 | 0 | 37 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.94 | $4.91 | $2.04 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.8% | +0.2% | +3.6% |
TGE leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). COST leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 1 tied.
TGE vs WMT vs COST vs SYY: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is TGE or WMT or COST or SYY a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST) is the stronger pick with 8.
2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -36. 9% for Generation Essentials Group (TGE). Generation Essentials Group (TGE) offers the better valuation at 1. 8x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Walmart Inc. (WMT) a "Buy" — based on 64 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — TGE or WMT or COST or SYY?
On trailing P/E, Generation Essentials Group (TGE) is the cheapest at 1.
8x versus Costco Wholesale Corporation at 55. 4x. On forward P/E, Sysco Corporation is actually cheaper at 15. 8x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Sysco Corporation wins at 0. 29x versus Walmart Inc. 's 4. 07x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — TGE or WMT or COST or SYY?
Over the past 5 years, Walmart Inc.
(WMT) delivered a total return of +186. 6%, compared to -90. 0% for Generation Essentials Group (TGE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: COST returned +622. 8% versus TGE's -95. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — TGE or WMT or COST or SYY?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
10β versus Generation Essentials Group's 2. 03β — meaning TGE is approximately 1946% more volatile than COST relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 28% versus 8% for Sysco Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — TGE or WMT or COST or SYY?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST) is pulling ahead at 8.
2% versus -36. 9% for Generation Essentials Group (TGE). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Generation Essentials Group grew EPS 235. 3% year-over-year, compared to -4. 1% for Sysco Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, COST leads at 6. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — TGE or WMT or COST or SYY?
Generation Essentials Group (TGE) is the more profitable company, earning 54.
8% net margin versus 2. 2% for Sysco Corporation — meaning it keeps 54. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TGE leads at 64. 7% versus 3. 8% for COST. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TGE leads at 46. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is TGE or WMT or COST or SYY more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Sysco Corporation (SYY) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 29x versus Walmart Inc. 's 4. 07x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Sysco Corporation (SYY) trades at 15. 8x forward P/E versus 49. 4x for Costco Wholesale Corporation — 33. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SYY: 24. 8% to $90. 44.
08Which pays a better dividend — TGE or WMT or COST or SYY?
In this comparison, SYY (2.
8% yield), WMT (0. 7% yield), COST (0. 5% yield) pay a dividend. TGE does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is TGE or WMT or COST or SYY better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Walmart Inc.
(WMT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 11), 0. 7% yield, +501. 4% 10Y return). Generation Essentials Group (TGE) carries a higher beta of 2. 03 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (WMT: +501. 4%, TGE: -95. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between TGE and WMT and COST and SYY?
These companies operate in different sectors (TGE (Technology) and WMT (Consumer Defensive) and COST (Consumer Defensive) and SYY (Consumer Defensive)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: TGE is a small-cap deep-value stock; WMT is a mega-cap quality compounder stock; COST is a large-cap quality compounder stock; SYY is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. WMT, SYY pay a dividend while TGE, COST do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.