Software - Infrastructure
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
TGHL vs NVDA
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Semiconductors
TGHL vs NVDA — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Infrastructure | Semiconductors |
| Market Cap | $5M | $5.14T |
| Revenue (TTM) | $237K | $215.94B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-2M | $120.07B |
| Gross Margin | 29.7% | 71.1% |
| Operating Margin | -9.7% | 60.4% |
| Forward P/E | — | 25.6x |
| Total Debt | $6M | $11.41B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $546K | $10.61B |
Quick Verdict: TGHL vs NVDA
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
TGHL is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 84.4%, EPS growth -33.0%
- 84.4% revenue growth vs NVDA's 65.5%
NVDA carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 239.0% 10Y total return vs TGHL's -89.9%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.73, Low D/E 7.3%, current ratio 3.91x
- Beta 1.73, yield 0.0%, current ratio 3.91x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 84.4% revenue growth vs NVDA's 65.5% | |
| Quality / Margins | 55.6% margin vs TGHL's -9.9% | |
| Dividends | 0.0% yield; 2-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +80.7% vs TGHL's -89.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 58.1% ROA vs TGHL's -68.9%, ROIC 81.8% vs -68.3% |
TGHL vs NVDA — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
TGHL vs NVDA — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NVDA leads this category, winning 4 of 4 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NVDA is the larger business by revenue, generating $215.9B annually — 911077.0x TGHL's $237,014. NVDA is the more profitable business, keeping 55.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to TGHL's -9.9%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $237,014 | $215.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | — | $133.2B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | — | $120.1B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | — | $96.7B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +29.7% | +71.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -9.7% | +60.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -9.9% | +55.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -14.0% | +44.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +73.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +97.8% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — TGHL and NVDA each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $5M | $5.14T |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $9M | $5.14T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -4.63x | 43.16x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 25.55x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.45x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 38.59x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 27.04x | 23.80x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 32.85x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 53.17x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — TGHL and NVDA each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), TGHL scores 5/9 vs NVDA's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | +76.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -68.9% | +58.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -68.3% | +81.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | — | +97.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.07x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $5M | $807M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $546,288 | $10.6B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $6M | $11.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -14.49x | 545.03x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
NVDA leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in NVDA five years ago would be worth $142,893 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,006 for TGHL. Over the past 12 months, NVDA leads with a +80.7% total return vs TGHL's -89.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NVDA at 93.6% vs TGHL's -53.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -2.8% | +12.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -89.9% | +80.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -89.9% | +625.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -89.9% | +1328.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -89.9% | +23902.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -53.5% | +93.6% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — TGHL and NVDA each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
TGHL is the less volatile stock with a -0.08 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NVDA's 1.73 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NVDA currently trades 97.6% from its 52-week high vs TGHL's 8.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | -0.08x | 1.73x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $4.25 | $216.80 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.27 | $112.28 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +8.0% | +97.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 49.3 | 60.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 33K | 164.5M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $278.83 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 79 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.04 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.8% |
NVDA leads in 2 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Total Returns. 3 categories are tied.
TGHL vs NVDA: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is TGHL or NVDA a better buy right now?
For growth investors, The GrowHub Limited Class A Ordinary Shares (TGHL) is the stronger pick with 84.
4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 65. 5% for NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA). NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) offers the better valuation at 43. 2x trailing P/E (25. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) a "Buy" — based on 79 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — TGHL or NVDA?
Over the past 5 years, NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) delivered a total return of +1329%, compared to -89.
9% for The GrowHub Limited Class A Ordinary Shares (TGHL). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NVDA returned +239. 0% versus TGHL's -89. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — TGHL or NVDA?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The GrowHub Limited Class A Ordinary Shares (TGHL) is the lower-risk stock at -0.
08β versus NVIDIA Corporation's 1. 73β — meaning NVDA is approximately -2287% more volatile than TGHL relative to the S&P 500.
04Which is growing faster — TGHL or NVDA?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), The GrowHub Limited Class A Ordinary Shares (TGHL) is pulling ahead at 84.
4% versus 65. 5% for NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: NVIDIA Corporation grew EPS 66. 7% year-over-year, compared to -33. 0% for The GrowHub Limited Class A Ordinary Shares. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — TGHL or NVDA?
NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) is the more profitable company, earning 55.
6% net margin versus -995. 0% for The GrowHub Limited Class A Ordinary Shares — meaning it keeps 55. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NVDA leads at 60. 4% versus -974. 7% for TGHL. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NVDA leads at 71. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — TGHL or NVDA?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is TGHL or NVDA better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, The GrowHub Limited Class A Ordinary Shares (TGHL) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.
08)). NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) carries a higher beta of 1. 73 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (TGHL: -89. 9%, NVDA: +239. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between TGHL and NVDA?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.