Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
TGTX vs VRTX vs RARE vs ABBV vs CRL
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Drug Manufacturers - General
Medical - Diagnostics & Research
TGTX vs VRTX vs RARE vs ABBV vs CRL — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Drug Manufacturers - General | Medical - Diagnostics & Research |
| Market Cap | $6.87B | $108.10B | $2.57B | $358.42B | $8.98B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $700M | $12.26B | $669M | $61.16B | $4.03B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $462M | $4.34B | $-609M | $4.23B | $-185M |
| Gross Margin | 83.0% | 86.3% | 83.6% | 70.2% | 24.9% |
| Operating Margin | 21.3% | 39.0% | -83.9% | 26.7% | 11.8% |
| Forward P/E | 32.3x | 22.2x | — | 14.3x | 16.4x |
| Total Debt | $261M | $3.88B | $1.28B | $69.07B | $3.07B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $79M | $5.09B | $434M | $5.23B | $214M |
TGTX vs VRTX vs RARE vs ABBV vs CRL — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| TG Therapeutics, In… (TGTX) | 100 | 230.7 | +130.7% |
| Vertex Pharmaceutic… (VRTX) | 100 | 147.6 | +47.6% |
| Ultragenyx Pharmace… (RARE) | 100 | 38.2 | -61.8% |
| AbbVie Inc. (ABBV) | 100 | 218.7 | +118.7% |
| Charles River Labor… (CRL) | 100 | 101.3 | +1.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: TGTX vs VRTX vs RARE vs ABBV vs CRL
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
TGTX carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 87.3%, EPS growth 17.5%, 3Y rev CAGR 5.0%
- 436.5% 10Y total return vs VRTX's 382.6%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.77, Low D/E 40.2%, current ratio 4.10x
- Beta 0.77, current ratio 4.10x
VRTX lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
Among these 5 stocks, RARE doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
ABBV is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability is your priority.
- Dividend streak 13 yrs, beta 0.34, yield 3.2%
- Better valuation composite
- Beta 0.34 vs CRL's 1.52
- 3.2% yield; 13-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
CRL ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.
- +32.8% vs RARE's -21.8%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 87.3% revenue growth vs CRL's -0.9% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 66.0% margin vs RARE's -91.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.34 vs CRL's 1.52 | |
| Dividends | 3.2% yield; 13-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +32.8% vs RARE's -21.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 42.8% ROA vs RARE's -45.8%, ROIC 16.4% vs -89.4% |
TGTX vs VRTX vs RARE vs ABBV vs CRL — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
TGTX vs VRTX vs RARE vs ABBV vs CRL — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
ABBV leads in 2 of 6 categories
CRL leads 1 • VRTX leads 1 • TGTX leads 0 • RARE leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — TGTX and VRTX and ABBV each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ABBV is the larger business by revenue, generating $61.2B annually — 91.4x RARE's $669M. TGTX is the more profitable business, keeping 66.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to RARE's -91.0%. On growth, TGTX holds the edge at +69.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $700M | $12.3B | $669M | $61.2B | $4.0B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $150M | $4.9B | -$536M | $24.5B | $757M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $462M | $4.3B | -$609M | $4.2B | -$185M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$14M | $3.7B | -$487M | $18.7B | $391M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +83.0% | +86.3% | +83.6% | +70.2% | +24.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +21.3% | +39.0% | -83.9% | +26.7% | +11.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +66.0% | +35.4% | -91.0% | +6.9% | -4.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -2.0% | +30.3% | -72.8% | +30.6% | +9.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +69.6% | +7.8% | -2.4% | +10.0% | +1.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.9% | +61.4% | -17.2% | +57.4% | -160.0% |
Valuation Metrics
CRL leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 15.5x trailing earnings, TGTX trades at a 82% valuation discount to ABBV's 85.5x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, CRL's 13.0x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than TGTX's 57.1x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $6.9B | $108.1B | $2.6B | $358.4B | $9.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $7.1B | $106.9B | $3.4B | $422.3B | $11.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 15.53x | 27.74x | -4.48x | 85.50x | -62.52x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 32.25x | 22.18x | — | 14.28x | 16.42x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 3.35x | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 57.07x | 21.52x | — | 14.96x | 12.98x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 11.15x | 8.95x | 3.82x | 5.86x | 2.24x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 10.72x | 5.87x | — | — | 2.81x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 33.85x | — | 20.12x | 17.31x |
Profitability & Efficiency
VRTX leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ABBV delivers a 62.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $62 in annual profit, vs $-6 for RARE. VRTX carries lower financial leverage with a 0.21x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CRL's 0.95x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ABBV scores 6/9 vs CRL's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +87.4% | +23.9% | -6.1% | +62.1% | -5.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +42.8% | +17.1% | -45.8% | +3.1% | -2.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +16.4% | +23.0% | -89.4% | +23.9% | +6.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +17.7% | +23.1% | -46.4% | +21.5% | +8.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 6 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.40x | 0.21x | — | — | 0.95x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $182M | -$1.2B | $842M | $63.8B | $2.9B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $79M | $5.1B | $434M | $5.2B | $214M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $261M | $3.9B | $1.3B | $69.1B | $3.1B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 5.67x | 488.09x | -14.49x | 3.28x | 6.38x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ABBV leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ABBV five years ago would be worth $20,131 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,281 for RARE. Over the past 12 months, CRL leads with a +32.8% total return vs RARE's -21.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ABBV at 14.6% vs RARE's -17.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +46.9% | -6.0% | +10.7% | -10.1% | -10.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +23.5% | -2.3% | -21.8% | +11.3% | +32.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +30.0% | +23.5% | -44.5% | +50.4% | -4.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +7.0% | +97.7% | -77.2% | +101.3% | -46.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +436.5% | +382.6% | -59.4% | +295.5% | +119.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +9.1% | +7.3% | -17.8% | +14.6% | -1.4% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — TGTX and ABBV each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ABBV is the less volatile stock with a 0.34 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CRL's 1.52 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. TGTX currently trades 97.8% from its 52-week high vs RARE's 61.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.77x | 0.82x | 1.42x | 0.34x | 1.52x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $44.00 | $507.92 | $42.37 | $244.81 | $228.88 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $25.28 | $362.50 | $18.29 | $176.57 | $131.30 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +97.8% | +83.7% | +61.7% | +82.8% | +79.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 74.2 | 43.2 | 66.6 | 46.8 | 57.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2.1M | 1.2M | 1.8M | 5.8M | 806K |
Analyst Outlook
ABBV leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: TGTX as "Buy", VRTX as "Buy", RARE as "Buy", ABBV as "Buy", CRL as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 97.1% upside for RARE (target: $52) vs -9.4% for TGTX (target: $39). ABBV is the only dividend payer here at 3.24% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $39.00 | $552.27 | $51.50 | $256.64 | $205.43 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 13 | 56 | 33 | 41 | 36 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | +3.2% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | — | 1 | 13 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | $6.57 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.3% | +1.9% | 0.0% | +0.3% | +4.0% |
ABBV leads in 2 of 6 categories (Total Returns, Analyst Outlook). CRL leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
TGTX vs VRTX vs RARE vs ABBV vs CRL: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is TGTX or VRTX or RARE or ABBV or CRL a better buy right now?
For growth investors, TG Therapeutics, Inc.
(TGTX) is the stronger pick with 87. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -0. 9% for Charles River Laboratories International, Inc. (CRL). TG Therapeutics, Inc. (TGTX) offers the better valuation at 15. 5x trailing P/E (32. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate TG Therapeutics, Inc. (TGTX) a "Buy" — based on 13 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — TGTX or VRTX or RARE or ABBV or CRL?
On trailing P/E, TG Therapeutics, Inc.
(TGTX) is the cheapest at 15. 5x versus AbbVie Inc. at 85. 5x. On forward P/E, AbbVie Inc. is actually cheaper at 14. 3x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — TGTX or VRTX or RARE or ABBV or CRL?
Over the past 5 years, AbbVie Inc.
(ABBV) delivered a total return of +101. 3%, compared to -77. 2% for Ultragenyx Pharmaceutical Inc. (RARE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TGTX returned +436. 5% versus RARE's -59. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — TGTX or VRTX or RARE or ABBV or CRL?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), AbbVie Inc.
(ABBV) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 34β versus Charles River Laboratories International, Inc. 's 1. 52β — meaning CRL is approximately 349% more volatile than ABBV relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Vertex Pharmaceuticals Incorporated (VRTX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 21% versus 95% for Charles River Laboratories International, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — TGTX or VRTX or RARE or ABBV or CRL?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), TG Therapeutics, Inc.
(TGTX) is pulling ahead at 87. 3% versus -0. 9% for Charles River Laboratories International, Inc. (CRL). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: TG Therapeutics, Inc. grew EPS 1747% year-over-year, compared to -1555. 0% for Charles River Laboratories International, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, TGTX leads at 504. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — TGTX or VRTX or RARE or ABBV or CRL?
TG Therapeutics, Inc.
(TGTX) is the more profitable company, earning 72. 6% net margin versus -85. 4% for Ultragenyx Pharmaceutical Inc. — meaning it keeps 72. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: VRTX leads at 39. 4% versus -79. 5% for RARE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — VRTX leads at 85. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is TGTX or VRTX or RARE or ABBV or CRL more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, AbbVie Inc.
(ABBV) trades at 14. 3x forward P/E versus 32. 3x for TG Therapeutics, Inc. — 18. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for RARE: 97. 1% to $51. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — TGTX or VRTX or RARE or ABBV or CRL?
In this comparison, ABBV (3.
2% yield) pays a dividend. TGTX, VRTX, RARE, CRL do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is TGTX or VRTX or RARE or ABBV or CRL better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, AbbVie Inc.
(ABBV) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 34), 3. 2% yield, +295. 5% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (ABBV: +295. 5%, RARE: -59. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between TGTX and VRTX and RARE and ABBV and CRL?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: TGTX is a small-cap high-growth stock; VRTX is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; RARE is a small-cap high-growth stock; ABBV is a large-cap income-oriented stock; CRL is a small-cap quality compounder stock. ABBV pays a dividend while TGTX, VRTX, RARE, CRL do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.