Specialty Business Services
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
TIC vs ULS vs TISI vs YSXT vs SMX
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Specialty Business Services
Specialty Business Services
Specialty Business Services
Specialty Business Services
TIC vs ULS vs TISI vs YSXT vs SMX — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Specialty Business Services | Specialty Business Services | Specialty Business Services | Specialty Business Services | Specialty Business Services |
| Market Cap | $2.21B | $19.96B | $78M | $23M | $497.00 |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.78B | $3.11B | $885M | $71M | $0.00 |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-103M | $349M | $-53M | $4M | $-4M |
| Gross Margin | 31.8% | 49.6% | 26.1% | 10.3% | — |
| Operating Margin | -0.6% | 17.8% | 1.1% | 6.7% | — |
| Forward P/E | 70.4x | 45.5x | — | 5.7x | — |
| Total Debt | $1.71B | $832M | $369M | $6M | $6M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $440M | $295M | $36M | $7M | $2M |
TIC vs ULS vs TISI vs YSXT vs SMX — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Feb 25 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| TIC Solutions, Inc. (TIC) | 100 | 81.0 | -19.0% |
| UL Solutions Inc. (ULS) | 100 | 186.8 | +86.8% |
| Team, Inc. (TISI) | 100 | 105.6 | +5.6% |
| YSX Tech. Co., Ltd (YSXT) | 100 | 37.5 | -62.5% |
| SMX (Security Matte… (SMX) | 100 | 0.0 | -100.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: TIC vs ULS vs TISI vs YSXT vs SMX
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
TIC ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 1.65
- 39.4% revenue growth vs TISI's -1.2%
ULS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding.
- 187.3% 10Y total return vs TIC's -16.6%
- 11.2% margin vs SMX's -17.3%
- 0.5% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
- +42.7% vs SMX's -100.0%
TISI lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
YSXT is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Rev growth 22.0%, EPS growth -13.5%, 3Y rev CAGR 33.3%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.01, Low D/E 22.3%, current ratio 3.35x
- Beta 0.01, current ratio 3.35x
- Better valuation composite
Among these 5 stocks, SMX doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 39.4% revenue growth vs TISI's -1.2% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 11.2% margin vs SMX's -17.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.01 vs SMX's 4.47, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 0.5% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +42.7% vs SMX's -100.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 11.9% ROA vs TISI's -9.9%, ROIC 23.1% vs 2.2% |
TIC vs ULS vs TISI vs YSXT vs SMX — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
TIC vs ULS vs TISI vs YSXT vs SMX — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
ULS leads in 3 of 6 categories
TISI leads 1 • TIC leads 0 • YSXT leads 0 • SMX leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ULS leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ULS and SMX operate at a comparable scale, with $3.1B and $0 in trailing revenue. ULS is the more profitable business, keeping 11.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to TISI's -5.9%. On growth, TIC holds the edge at +108.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.8B | $3.1B | $885M | $71M | $0 |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $197M | $742M | $44M | — | -$4M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$103M | $349M | -$53M | — | -$4M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$945,100 | $300M | -$16M | — | -$1M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +31.8% | +49.6% | +26.1% | +10.3% | — |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -0.6% | +17.8% | +1.1% | +6.7% | — |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -5.8% | +11.2% | -5.9% | +5.6% | — |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -0.1% | +9.7% | -1.8% | -9.3% | — |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +108.4% | +7.5% | +6.7% | +28.7% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +9.5% | +36.4% | -6.3% | -20.4% | -647.6% |
Valuation Metrics
TISI leads this category, winning 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 5.7x trailing earnings, YSXT trades at a 91% valuation discount to ULS's 62.1x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, YSXT's 4.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than ULS's 27.0x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2.2B | $20.0B | $78M | $23M | $497 |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $3.5B | $20.5B | $411M | $22M | $4M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -16.97x | 62.09x | -2.00x | 5.72x | 0.00x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 70.44x | 45.49x | — | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 9.35x | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 18.66x | 27.04x | 8.85x | 4.42x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.45x | 6.54x | 0.09x | 0.32x | — |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.72x | 15.58x | 44.06x | 0.82x | 0.00x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 36.12x | 49.53x | 5.85x | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
ULS leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ULS delivers a 28.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $28 in annual profit, vs $-164 for TISI. YSXT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.22x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to TISI's 212.04x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ULS scores 7/9 vs YSXT's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -5.5% | +28.1% | -164.5% | +17.4% | -3.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -2.7% | +11.9% | -9.9% | +11.7% | -2.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +0.2% | +23.1% | +2.2% | +16.1% | -40.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +0.3% | +24.8% | +2.7% | +19.3% | -60.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 7 | 5 | 2 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.79x | 0.64x | 212.04x | 0.22x | 0.27x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1.3B | $537M | $333M | -$952,737 | $4M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $440M | $295M | $36M | $7M | $2M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.7B | $832M | $369M | $6M | $6M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.01x | 25.46x | 0.21x | 30.13x | -1.24x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ULS leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ULS five years ago would be worth $28,729 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $0 for SMX. Over the past 12 months, ULS leads with a +42.7% total return vs SMX's -100.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TISI at 54.7% vs SMX's -99.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +1.2% | +23.0% | +21.5% | -18.3% | -98.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -1.5% | +42.7% | -19.0% | -77.1% | -100.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -16.6% | +187.3% | +270.2% | -76.1% | -100.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -16.6% | +187.3% | -80.6% | -76.1% | -100.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -16.6% | +187.3% | -93.7% | -76.1% | +1200.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -5.9% | +42.2% | +54.7% | -37.9% | -99.0% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — ULS and YSXT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
YSXT is the less volatile stock with a 0.01 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SMX's 4.47 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ULS currently trades 92.4% from its 52-week high vs SMX's 0.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.65x | 0.73x | 0.47x | 0.01x | 4.47x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $14.94 | $107.54 | $24.25 | $9.96 | $20528.69 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $6.36 | $61.64 | $12.34 | $0.93 | $1.02 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +67.0% | +92.4% | +71.3% | +10.3% | +0.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 76.6 | 76.5 | 55.9 | 33.3 | 30.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 3.1M | 704K | 6K | 202K | 2.8M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — TIC and ULS each lead in 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: TIC as "Hold", ULS as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 49.9% upside for TIC (target: $15) vs -10.0% for ULS (target: $89). ULS is the only dividend payer here at 0.52% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | — | — | — |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $15.00 | $89.40 | — | — | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 2 | 8 | — | — | — |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.5% | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 1 | 0 | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.51 | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
ULS leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). TISI leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
TIC vs ULS vs TISI vs YSXT vs SMX: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is TIC or ULS or TISI or YSXT or SMX a better buy right now?
For growth investors, TIC Solutions, Inc.
(TIC) is the stronger pick with 39. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -1. 2% for Team, Inc. (TISI). YSX Tech. Co. , Ltd (YSXT) offers the better valuation at 5. 7x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate UL Solutions Inc. (ULS) a "Buy" — based on 8 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — TIC or ULS or TISI or YSXT or SMX?
On trailing P/E, YSX Tech.
Co. , Ltd (YSXT) is the cheapest at 5. 7x versus UL Solutions Inc. at 62. 1x. On forward P/E, UL Solutions Inc. is actually cheaper at 45. 5x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — TIC or ULS or TISI or YSXT or SMX?
Over the past 5 years, UL Solutions Inc.
(ULS) delivered a total return of +187. 3%, compared to -100. 0% for SMX (Security Matters) Public Limited Company (SMX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SMX returned +1200% versus TISI's -93. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — TIC or ULS or TISI or YSXT or SMX?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), YSX Tech.
Co. , Ltd (YSXT) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 01β versus SMX (Security Matters) Public Limited Company's 4. 47β — meaning SMX is approximately 78353% more volatile than YSXT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, YSX Tech. Co. , Ltd (YSXT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 22% versus 212% for Team, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — TIC or ULS or TISI or YSXT or SMX?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), TIC Solutions, Inc.
(TIC) is pulling ahead at 39. 4% versus -1. 2% for Team, Inc. (TISI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: SMX (Security Matters) Public Limited Company grew EPS 94. 3% year-over-year, compared to -353. 8% for TIC Solutions, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, YSXT leads at 33. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — TIC or ULS or TISI or YSXT or SMX?
UL Solutions Inc.
(ULS) is the more profitable company, earning 10. 6% net margin versus -5. 7% for TIC Solutions, Inc. — meaning it keeps 10. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ULS leads at 17. 1% versus 0. 0% for SMX. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ULS leads at 49. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is TIC or ULS or TISI or YSXT or SMX more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, UL Solutions Inc.
(ULS) trades at 45. 5x forward P/E versus 70. 4x for TIC Solutions, Inc. — 25. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for TIC: 49. 9% to $15. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — TIC or ULS or TISI or YSXT or SMX?
In this comparison, ULS (0.
5% yield) pays a dividend. TIC, TISI, YSXT, SMX do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is TIC or ULS or TISI or YSXT or SMX better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, UL Solutions Inc.
(ULS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 73), 0. 5% yield, +187. 3% 10Y return). TIC Solutions, Inc. (TIC) carries a higher beta of 1. 65 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (ULS: +187. 3%, TIC: -16. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between TIC and ULS and TISI and YSXT and SMX?
Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: TIC is a small-cap high-growth stock; ULS is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; TISI is a small-cap quality compounder stock; YSXT is a small-cap high-growth stock; SMX is a small-cap quality compounder stock. ULS pays a dividend while TIC, TISI, YSXT, SMX do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.