Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

TIC vs ULS vs TISI vs YSXT vs SMX

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
TIC
TIC Solutions, Inc.

Specialty Business Services

IndustrialsNYSE • US
Market Cap$2.21B
5Y Perf.-19.0%
ULS
UL Solutions Inc.

Specialty Business Services

IndustrialsNYSE • US
Market Cap$19.96B
5Y Perf.+86.8%
TISI
Team, Inc.

Specialty Business Services

IndustrialsNYSE • US
Market Cap$78M
5Y Perf.+5.6%
YSXT
YSX Tech. Co., Ltd

Specialty Business Services

IndustrialsNASDAQ • CN
Market Cap$23M
5Y Perf.-62.5%
SMX
SMX (Security Matters) Public Limited Company

Specialty Business Services

IndustrialsNASDAQ • IE
Market Cap$497.00
5Y Perf.-100.0%

TIC vs ULS vs TISI vs YSXT vs SMX — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
TIC logoTIC
ULS logoULS
TISI logoTISI
YSXT logoYSXT
SMX logoSMX
IndustrySpecialty Business ServicesSpecialty Business ServicesSpecialty Business ServicesSpecialty Business ServicesSpecialty Business Services
Market Cap$2.21B$19.96B$78M$23M$497.00
Revenue (TTM)$1.78B$3.11B$885M$71M$0.00
Net Income (TTM)$-103M$349M$-53M$4M$-4M
Gross Margin31.8%49.6%26.1%10.3%
Operating Margin-0.6%17.8%1.1%6.7%
Forward P/E70.4x45.5x5.7x
Total Debt$1.71B$832M$369M$6M$6M
Cash & Equiv.$440M$295M$36M$7M$2M

TIC vs ULS vs TISI vs YSXT vs SMXLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

TIC
ULS
TISI
YSXT
SMX
StockFeb 25May 26Return
TIC Solutions, Inc. (TIC)10081.0-19.0%
UL Solutions Inc. (ULS)100186.8+86.8%
Team, Inc. (TISI)100105.6+5.6%
YSX Tech. Co., Ltd (YSXT)10037.5-62.5%
SMX (Security Matte… (SMX)1000.0-100.0%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: TIC vs ULS vs TISI vs YSXT vs SMX

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: ULS leads in 4 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for profitability and margin quality and dividend income and shareholder returns. YSX Tech. Co., Ltd is the stronger pick specifically for valuation and capital efficiency and capital preservation and lower volatility. TIC also leads in specific categories worth noting. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
TIC
TIC Solutions, Inc.
The Income Pick

TIC ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability.

  • Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 1.65
  • 39.4% revenue growth vs TISI's -1.2%
Best for: income & stability
ULS
UL Solutions Inc.
The Long-Run Compounder

ULS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding.

  • 187.3% 10Y total return vs TIC's -16.6%
  • 11.2% margin vs SMX's -17.3%
  • 0.5% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
  • +42.7% vs SMX's -100.0%
Best for: long-term compounding
TISI
Team, Inc.
The Lower-Volatility Pick

TISI lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.

Best for: industrials exposure
YSXT
YSX Tech. Co., Ltd
The Growth Play

YSXT is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.

  • Rev growth 22.0%, EPS growth -13.5%, 3Y rev CAGR 33.3%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.01, Low D/E 22.3%, current ratio 3.35x
  • Beta 0.01, current ratio 3.35x
  • Better valuation composite
Best for: growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night
SMX
SMX (Security Matters) Public Limited Company
The Industrials Pick

Among these 5 stocks, SMX doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: industrials exposure
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthTIC logoTIC39.4% revenue growth vs TISI's -1.2%
ValueYSXT logoYSXTBetter valuation composite
Quality / MarginsULS logoULS11.2% margin vs SMX's -17.3%
Stability / SafetyYSXT logoYSXTBeta 0.01 vs SMX's 4.47, lower leverage
DividendsULS logoULS0.5% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)ULS logoULS+42.7% vs SMX's -100.0%
Efficiency (ROA)ULS logoULS11.9% ROA vs TISI's -9.9%, ROIC 23.1% vs 2.2%

TIC vs ULS vs TISI vs YSXT vs SMX — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

TICTIC Solutions, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

ULSUL Solutions Inc.
FY 2025
Software
100.0%$285M
TISITeam, Inc.
FY 2024
Other Services
100.0%$29M
YSXTYSX Tech. Co., Ltd
FY 2025
Service, Other
100.0%$7M
SMXSMX (Security Matters) Public Limited Company

Segment breakdown not available.

TIC vs ULS vs TISI vs YSXT vs SMX — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLULSLAGGINGSMX

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

ULS leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

ULS and SMX operate at a comparable scale, with $3.1B and $0 in trailing revenue. ULS is the more profitable business, keeping 11.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to TISI's -5.9%. On growth, TIC holds the edge at +108.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricTIC logoTICTIC Solutions, In…ULS logoULSUL Solutions Inc.TISI logoTISITeam, Inc.YSXT logoYSXTYSX Tech. Co., LtdSMX logoSMXSMX (Security Mat…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$1.8B$3.1B$885M$71M$0
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$197M$742M$44M-$4M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$103M$349M-$53M-$4M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$945,100$300M-$16M-$1M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+31.8%+49.6%+26.1%+10.3%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-0.6%+17.8%+1.1%+6.7%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-5.8%+11.2%-5.9%+5.6%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-0.1%+9.7%-1.8%-9.3%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+108.4%+7.5%+6.7%+28.7%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+9.5%+36.4%-6.3%-20.4%-647.6%
ULS leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

TISI leads this category, winning 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 5.7x trailing earnings, YSXT trades at a 91% valuation discount to ULS's 62.1x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, YSXT's 4.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than ULS's 27.0x.

MetricTIC logoTICTIC Solutions, In…ULS logoULSUL Solutions Inc.TISI logoTISITeam, Inc.YSXT logoYSXTYSX Tech. Co., LtdSMX logoSMXSMX (Security Mat…
Market CapShares × price$2.2B$20.0B$78M$23M$497
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$3.5B$20.5B$411M$22M$4M
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-16.97x62.09x-2.00x5.72x0.00x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.70.44x45.49x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate9.35x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple18.66x27.04x8.85x4.42x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue1.45x6.54x0.09x0.32x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share0.72x15.58x44.06x0.82x0.00x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF36.12x49.53x5.85x
TISI leads this category, winning 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

ULS leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

ULS delivers a 28.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $28 in annual profit, vs $-164 for TISI. YSXT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.22x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to TISI's 212.04x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ULS scores 7/9 vs YSXT's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricTIC logoTICTIC Solutions, In…ULS logoULSUL Solutions Inc.TISI logoTISITeam, Inc.YSXT logoYSXTYSX Tech. Co., LtdSMX logoSMXSMX (Security Mat…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-5.5%+28.1%-164.5%+17.4%-3.0%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-2.7%+11.9%-9.9%+11.7%-2.8%
ROICReturn on invested capital+0.2%+23.1%+2.2%+16.1%-40.5%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+0.3%+24.8%+2.7%+19.3%-60.1%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–947523
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.79x0.64x212.04x0.22x0.27x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$1.3B$537M$333M-$952,737$4M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$440M$295M$36M$7M$2M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$1.7B$832M$369M$6M$6M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense0.01x25.46x0.21x30.13x-1.24x
ULS leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

ULS leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in ULS five years ago would be worth $28,729 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $0 for SMX. Over the past 12 months, ULS leads with a +42.7% total return vs SMX's -100.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TISI at 54.7% vs SMX's -99.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricTIC logoTICTIC Solutions, In…ULS logoULSUL Solutions Inc.TISI logoTISITeam, Inc.YSXT logoYSXTYSX Tech. Co., LtdSMX logoSMXSMX (Security Mat…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+1.2%+23.0%+21.5%-18.3%-98.8%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-1.5%+42.7%-19.0%-77.1%-100.0%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-16.6%+187.3%+270.2%-76.1%-100.0%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-16.6%+187.3%-80.6%-76.1%-100.0%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-16.6%+187.3%-93.7%-76.1%+1200.0%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-5.9%+42.2%+54.7%-37.9%-99.0%
ULS leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — ULS and YSXT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

YSXT is the less volatile stock with a 0.01 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SMX's 4.47 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ULS currently trades 92.4% from its 52-week high vs SMX's 0.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricTIC logoTICTIC Solutions, In…ULS logoULSUL Solutions Inc.TISI logoTISITeam, Inc.YSXT logoYSXTYSX Tech. Co., LtdSMX logoSMXSMX (Security Mat…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.65x0.73x0.47x0.01x4.47x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$14.94$107.54$24.25$9.96$20528.69
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$6.36$61.64$12.34$0.93$1.02
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+67.0%+92.4%+71.3%+10.3%+0.0%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10076.676.555.933.330.1
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded3.1M704K6K202K2.8M
Evenly matched — ULS and YSXT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — TIC and ULS each lead in 1 of 1 comparable metric.

Analyst consensus: TIC as "Hold", ULS as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 49.9% upside for TIC (target: $15) vs -10.0% for ULS (target: $89). ULS is the only dividend payer here at 0.52% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.

MetricTIC logoTICTIC Solutions, In…ULS logoULSUL Solutions Inc.TISI logoTISITeam, Inc.YSXT logoYSXTYSX Tech. Co., LtdSMX logoSMXSMX (Security Mat…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHoldBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$15.00$89.40
# AnalystsCovering analysts28
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+0.5%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises110
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.51
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%
Evenly matched — TIC and ULS each lead in 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway

ULS leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). TISI leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.

Best OverallUL Solutions Inc. (ULS)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

TIC vs ULS vs TISI vs YSXT vs SMX: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is TIC or ULS or TISI or YSXT or SMX a better buy right now?

For growth investors, TIC Solutions, Inc.

(TIC) is the stronger pick with 39. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -1. 2% for Team, Inc. (TISI). YSX Tech. Co. , Ltd (YSXT) offers the better valuation at 5. 7x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate UL Solutions Inc. (ULS) a "Buy" — based on 8 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — TIC or ULS or TISI or YSXT or SMX?

On trailing P/E, YSX Tech.

Co. , Ltd (YSXT) is the cheapest at 5. 7x versus UL Solutions Inc. at 62. 1x. On forward P/E, UL Solutions Inc. is actually cheaper at 45. 5x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — TIC or ULS or TISI or YSXT or SMX?

Over the past 5 years, UL Solutions Inc.

(ULS) delivered a total return of +187. 3%, compared to -100. 0% for SMX (Security Matters) Public Limited Company (SMX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SMX returned +1200% versus TISI's -93. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — TIC or ULS or TISI or YSXT or SMX?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), YSX Tech.

Co. , Ltd (YSXT) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 01β versus SMX (Security Matters) Public Limited Company's 4. 47β — meaning SMX is approximately 78353% more volatile than YSXT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, YSX Tech. Co. , Ltd (YSXT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 22% versus 212% for Team, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — TIC or ULS or TISI or YSXT or SMX?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), TIC Solutions, Inc.

(TIC) is pulling ahead at 39. 4% versus -1. 2% for Team, Inc. (TISI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: SMX (Security Matters) Public Limited Company grew EPS 94. 3% year-over-year, compared to -353. 8% for TIC Solutions, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, YSXT leads at 33. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — TIC or ULS or TISI or YSXT or SMX?

UL Solutions Inc.

(ULS) is the more profitable company, earning 10. 6% net margin versus -5. 7% for TIC Solutions, Inc. — meaning it keeps 10. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ULS leads at 17. 1% versus 0. 0% for SMX. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ULS leads at 49. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is TIC or ULS or TISI or YSXT or SMX more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, UL Solutions Inc.

(ULS) trades at 45. 5x forward P/E versus 70. 4x for TIC Solutions, Inc. — 25. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for TIC: 49. 9% to $15. 00.

08

Which pays a better dividend — TIC or ULS or TISI or YSXT or SMX?

In this comparison, ULS (0.

5% yield) pays a dividend. TIC, TISI, YSXT, SMX do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is TIC or ULS or TISI or YSXT or SMX better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, UL Solutions Inc.

(ULS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 73), 0. 5% yield, +187. 3% 10Y return). TIC Solutions, Inc. (TIC) carries a higher beta of 1. 65 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (ULS: +187. 3%, TIC: -16. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between TIC and ULS and TISI and YSXT and SMX?

Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: TIC is a small-cap high-growth stock; ULS is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; TISI is a small-cap quality compounder stock; YSXT is a small-cap high-growth stock; SMX is a small-cap quality compounder stock. ULS pays a dividend while TIC, TISI, YSXT, SMX do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

TIC

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 54%
  • Gross Margin > 19%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

ULS

Stable Dividend Mega-Cap

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Net Margin > 6%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

TISI

Quality Business

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Gross Margin > 15%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

YSXT

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 14%
  • Net Margin > 5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

SMX

Quality Business

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $500M
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform TIC and ULS and TISI and YSXT and SMX on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(TIC: 108.4% · ULS: 7.5%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.