TITN vs HLLY vs RUSHA vs FOXF

For growth investors, Fox Factory Holding Corp.

(FOXF) is the stronger pick with 5. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -10. 2% for Titan Machinery Inc. (TITN). Holley Inc. (HLLY) offers the better valuation at 17. 6x trailing P/E (8. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Holley Inc. (HLLY) a "Buy" — based on 11 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, Holley Inc.

(HLLY) is the cheapest at 17. 6x versus Rush Enterprises, Inc. at 22. 1x. On forward P/E, Holley Inc. is actually cheaper at 8. 9x.

Over the past 5 years, Rush Enterprises, Inc.

(RUSHA) delivered a total return of +125. 5%, compared to -88. 6% for Fox Factory Holding Corp. (FOXF). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: RUSHA returned +824. 6% versus HLLY's -71. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Rush Enterprises, Inc.

(RUSHA) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 98β versus Holley Inc. 's 1. 90β — meaning HLLY is approximately 93% more volatile than RUSHA relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Titan Machinery Inc. (TITN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 20% versus 116% for Holley Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Fox Factory Holding Corp.

(FOXF) is pulling ahead at 5. 3% versus -10. 2% for Titan Machinery Inc. (TITN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Holley Inc. grew EPS 180. 0% year-over-year, compared to -82. 5% for Fox Factory Holding Corp.. Over a 3-year CAGR, TITN leads at 3. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Rush Enterprises, Inc.

(RUSHA) is the more profitable company, earning 3. 5% net margin versus -37. 1% for Fox Factory Holding Corp. — meaning it keeps 3. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: HLLY leads at 14. 3% versus -35. 6% for FOXF. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — HLLY leads at 41. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

On forward earnings alone, Holley Inc.

(HLLY) trades at 8. 9x forward P/E versus 19. 5x for Rush Enterprises, Inc. — 10. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for HLLY: 95. 0% to $5. 50.

In this comparison, RUSHA (1.

0% yield) pays a dividend. TITN, HLLY, FOXF do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, Rush Enterprises, Inc.

(RUSHA) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 98), 1. 0% yield, +824. 6% 10Y return). Holley Inc. (HLLY) carries a higher beta of 1. 90 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (RUSHA: +824. 6%, HLLY: -71. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

These companies operate in different sectors (TITN (Industrials) and HLLY (Consumer Cyclical) and RUSHA (Consumer Cyclical) and FOXF (Consumer Cyclical)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: TITN is a small-cap quality compounder stock; HLLY is a small-cap deep-value stock; RUSHA is a small-cap quality compounder stock; FOXF is a small-cap quality compounder stock. RUSHA pays a dividend while TITN, HLLY, FOXF do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.