Compare Stocks

2 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

TITN vs RUSHA

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
TITN
Titan Machinery Inc.

Industrial - Distribution

IndustrialsNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$500M
5Y Perf.+104.3%
RUSHA
Rush Enterprises, Inc.

Auto - Dealerships

Consumer CyclicalNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$5.58B
5Y Perf.+289.1%

TITN vs RUSHA — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
TITN logoTITN
RUSHA logoRUSHA
IndustryIndustrial - DistributionAuto - Dealerships
Market Cap$500M$5.58B
Revenue (TTM)$2.43B$7.43B
Net Income (TTM)$-54M$264M
Gross Margin15.8%19.4%
Operating Margin-0.1%5.3%
Forward P/E19.4x
Total Debt$114M$1.55B
Cash & Equiv.$28M$213M

TITN vs RUSHALong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

TITN
RUSHA
StockMay 20May 26Return
Titan Machinery Inc. (TITN)100204.3+104.3%
Rush Enterprises, I… (RUSHA)100389.1+289.1%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: TITN vs RUSHA

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: RUSHA leads in 6 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. Titan Machinery Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for valuation and capital efficiency. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
TITN
Titan Machinery Inc.
The Defensive Pick

TITN is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.

  • Lower volatility, beta 1.59, Low D/E 19.6%, current ratio 1.41x
  • Better valuation composite
Best for: sleep-well-at-night
RUSHA
Rush Enterprises, Inc.
The Income Pick

RUSHA carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.

  • Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta 0.98, yield 1.0%
  • Rev growth -4.7%, EPS growth -12.1%, 3Y rev CAGR 1.5%
  • 8.0% 10Y total return vs TITN's 76.1%
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthRUSHA logoRUSHA-4.7% revenue growth vs TITN's -10.2%
ValueTITN logoTITNBetter valuation composite
Quality / MarginsRUSHA logoRUSHA3.5% margin vs TITN's -2.2%
Stability / SafetyRUSHA logoRUSHABeta 0.98 vs TITN's 1.59
DividendsRUSHA logoRUSHA1.0% yield; 3-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)RUSHA logoRUSHA+51.4% vs TITN's +20.5%
Efficiency (ROA)RUSHA logoRUSHA5.7% ROA vs TITN's -3.1%, ROIC 8.2% vs -0.2%

TITN vs RUSHA — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

TITNTitan Machinery Inc.
FY 2025
Sales of Equipment
74.9%$2.1B
Sales of Parts
15.6%$428M
Service Sales
6.6%$180M
Other Revenue
1.6%$43M
Rental Revenue
1.3%$36M
RUSHARush Enterprises, Inc.
FY 2025
Commercial Vehicle
63.7%$4.5B
Parts
21.0%$1.5B
Commercial Vehicle Repair Service
14.7%$1.0B
Product and Service, Other
0.2%$17M
Insurance
0.2%$12M
Financial Service
0.1%$9M

TITN vs RUSHA — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLRUSHALAGGINGTITN

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

RUSHA leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

RUSHA is the larger business by revenue, generating $7.4B annually — 3.1x TITN's $2.4B. RUSHA is the more profitable business, keeping 3.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to TITN's -2.2%. On growth, RUSHA holds the edge at -11.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricTITN logoTITNTitan Machinery I…RUSHA logoRUSHARush Enterprises,…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$2.4B$7.4B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$35M$555M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$54M$264M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$240M$212M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+15.8%+19.4%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-0.1%+5.3%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-2.2%+3.5%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+9.9%+2.9%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-15.5%-11.8%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+17.6%-11.0%
RUSHA leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

TITN leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.

On an enterprise value basis, RUSHA's 14.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than TITN's 16.8x.

MetricTITN logoTITNTitan Machinery I…RUSHA logoRUSHARush Enterprises,…
Market CapShares × price$500M$5.6B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$585M$6.9B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-8.99x22.01x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.19.40x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate2.13x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple16.78x14.90x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue0.21x0.75x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share0.84x2.61x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF4.34x9.74x
TITN leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

RUSHA leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

RUSHA delivers a 12.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $12 in annual profit, vs $-9 for TITN. TITN carries lower financial leverage with a 0.20x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to RUSHA's 0.70x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), TITN scores 6/9 vs RUSHA's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricTITN logoTITNTitan Machinery I…RUSHA logoRUSHARush Enterprises,…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-9.0%+12.0%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-3.1%+5.7%
ROICReturn on invested capital-0.2%+8.2%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-0.3%+13.3%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–965
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.20x0.70x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$86M$1.3B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$28M$213M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$114M$1.6B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-0.06x8.49x
RUSHA leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

RUSHA leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in RUSHA five years ago would be worth $22,503 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $8,372 for TITN. Over the past 12 months, RUSHA leads with a +51.4% total return vs TITN's +20.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors RUSHA at 29.4% vs TITN's -12.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricTITN logoTITNTitan Machinery I…RUSHA logoRUSHARush Enterprises,…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+43.0%+33.4%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+20.5%+51.4%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-34.0%+116.8%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-16.3%+125.0%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+76.1%+803.1%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-12.9%+29.4%
RUSHA leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

RUSHA leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

RUSHA is the less volatile stock with a 0.98 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than TITN's 1.59 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.

MetricTITN logoTITNTitan Machinery I…RUSHA logoRUSHARush Enterprises,…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.59x0.98x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$23.41$76.99
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$13.35$45.67
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+91.4%+93.5%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10063.048.6
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded148K429K
RUSHA leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

RUSHA leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.

Wall Street rates TITN as "Hold" and RUSHA as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 13.9% upside for RUSHA (target: $82) vs -1.8% for TITN (target: $21). RUSHA is the only dividend payer here at 1.00% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.

MetricTITN logoTITNTitan Machinery I…RUSHA logoRUSHARush Enterprises,…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHoldHold
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$21.00$82.00
# AnalystsCovering analysts1717
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+1.0%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises13
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.72
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+3.5%
RUSHA leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway

RUSHA leads in 5 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). TITN leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics).

Best OverallRush Enterprises, Inc. (RUSHA)Leads 5 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

TITN vs RUSHA: Frequently Asked Questions

9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is TITN or RUSHA a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Rush Enterprises, Inc.

(RUSHA) is the stronger pick with -4. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -10. 2% for Titan Machinery Inc. (TITN). Rush Enterprises, Inc. (RUSHA) offers the better valuation at 22. 0x trailing P/E (19. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Titan Machinery Inc. (TITN) a "Hold" — based on 17 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which is the better long-term investment — TITN or RUSHA?

Over the past 5 years, Rush Enterprises, Inc.

(RUSHA) delivered a total return of +125. 0%, compared to -16. 3% for Titan Machinery Inc. (TITN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: RUSHA returned +803. 1% versus TITN's +76. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

03

Which is safer — TITN or RUSHA?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Rush Enterprises, Inc.

(RUSHA) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 98β versus Titan Machinery Inc. 's 1. 59β — meaning TITN is approximately 63% more volatile than RUSHA relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Titan Machinery Inc. (TITN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 20% versus 70% for Rush Enterprises, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

04

Which is growing faster — TITN or RUSHA?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Rush Enterprises, Inc.

(RUSHA) is pulling ahead at -4. 7% versus -10. 2% for Titan Machinery Inc. (TITN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Rush Enterprises, Inc. grew EPS -12. 1% year-over-year, compared to -46. 0% for Titan Machinery Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, TITN leads at 3. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

05

Which has better profit margins — TITN or RUSHA?

Rush Enterprises, Inc.

(RUSHA) is the more profitable company, earning 3. 5% net margin versus -2. 2% for Titan Machinery Inc. — meaning it keeps 3. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: RUSHA leads at 5. 3% versus -0. 1% for TITN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — RUSHA leads at 18. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

06

Is TITN or RUSHA more undervalued right now?

Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for RUSHA: 13.

9% to $82. 00.

07

Which pays a better dividend — TITN or RUSHA?

In this comparison, RUSHA (1.

0% yield) pays a dividend. TITN does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

08

Is TITN or RUSHA better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Rush Enterprises, Inc.

(RUSHA) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 98), 1. 0% yield, +803. 1% 10Y return). Titan Machinery Inc. (TITN) carries a higher beta of 1. 59 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (RUSHA: +803. 1%, TITN: +76. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

09

What are the main differences between TITN and RUSHA?

These companies operate in different sectors (TITN (Industrials) and RUSHA (Consumer Cyclical)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

RUSHA pays a dividend while TITN does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.

Stocks Like

TITN

Quality Business

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

RUSHA

Stable Dividend Mega-Cap

  • Sector: Consumer Cyclical
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Dividend Yield > 0.5%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform TITN and RUSHA on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(TITN: -15.5% · RUSHA: -11.8%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.