TK
Teekay Corporation
Oil & Gas Midstream
Market Cap$1.14B
5Y Perf.+364.8%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
TK vs XOM
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
XOM
Exxon Mobil Corporation
Oil & Gas Integrated
Market Cap$629.60B
5Y Perf.+226.7%
TK vs XOM — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | TK | XOM |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Oil & Gas Midstream | Oil & Gas Integrated |
| Market Cap | $1.14B | $629.60B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $993M | $323.90B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $79M | $28.84B |
| Gross Margin | 28.1% | 21.7% |
| Operating Margin | 24.8% | 10.5% |
| Forward P/E | 61.9x | 15.0x |
| Total Debt | $66M | $43.54B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $685M | $10.68B |
TK vs XOM — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
TK
XOM
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Teekay Corporation (TK) | 100 | 464.8 | +364.8% |
| Exxon Mobil Corpora… (XOM) | 100 | 326.7 | +226.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: TK vs XOM
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: XOM leads in 4 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. Teekay Corporation is the stronger pick specifically for capital preservation and lower volatility and dividend income and shareholder returns. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
TK
Teekay Corporation
The Income Pick
TK is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta 0.38, yield 6.7%
- Rev growth -16.7%, EPS growth -7.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 21.4%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.38, Low D/E 3.4%, current ratio 6.99x
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
XOM
Exxon Mobil Corporation
The Long-Run Compounder
XOM carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding.
- 107.4% 10Y total return vs TK's 87.8%
- -4.5% revenue growth vs TK's -16.7%
- Lower P/E (15.0x vs 61.9x)
Best for: long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | XOM | -4.5% revenue growth vs TK's -16.7% |
| Value | XOM | Lower P/E (15.0x vs 61.9x) |
| Quality / Margins | XOM | 8.9% margin vs TK's 7.9% |
| Stability / Safety | TK | Lower D/E ratio (3.4% vs 16.3%) |
| Dividends | TK | 6.7% yield, 3-year raise streak, vs XOM's 2.7% |
| Momentum (1Y) | TK | +87.7% vs XOM's +45.7% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | XOM | 6.4% ROA vs TK's 3.5%, ROIC 8.6% vs 19.1% |
TK vs XOM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FY 2024
FY 2025
TK vs XOM — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLTKLAGGINGXOM
XOMExxon Mobil Corporati…
0leads
TKTeekay Corporation
3leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs XOMMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
Tied
—
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
TK5/6
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
TK6/9
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
TK5/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
Tied
—
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
Tied
—
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — TK and XOM each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
XOM is the larger business by revenue, generating $323.9B annually — 326.3x TK's $993M. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 8.9% (XOM) to 7.9% (TK). On growth, XOM holds the edge at -1.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | TKTeekay Corporation | XOMExxon Mobil Corpo… |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $993M | $323.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $334M | $59.9B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $79M | $28.8B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $241M | $23.6B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +28.1% | +21.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +24.8% | +10.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +7.9% | +8.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +24.2% | +7.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -29.0% | -1.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -2.4% | -11.0% |
Evenly matched — TK and XOM each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
TK leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 9.6x trailing earnings, TK trades at a 57% valuation discount to XOM's 22.2x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, TK's 1.1x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than XOM's 11.1x.
| Metric | TKTeekay Corporation | XOMExxon Mobil Corpo… |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.1B | $629.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $525M | $662.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 9.59x | 22.17x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 61.91x | 15.00x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 1.14x | 11.05x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.94x | 1.94x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.66x | 2.40x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 2.92x | 26.66x |
TK leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
TK leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
XOM delivers a 10.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $11 in annual profit, vs $4 for TK. TK carries lower financial leverage with a 0.03x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to XOM's 0.16x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), TK scores 6/9 vs XOM's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | TKTeekay Corporation | XOMExxon Mobil Corpo… |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +4.0% | +10.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +3.5% | +6.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +19.1% | +8.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +18.1% | +8.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.03x | 0.16x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$620M | $32.9B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $685M | $10.7B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $66M | $43.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 69.29x | 69.44x |
TK leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
TK leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in TK five years ago would be worth $52,251 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $27,178 for XOM. Over the past 12 months, TK leads with a +87.7% total return vs XOM's +45.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TK at 49.8% vs XOM's 13.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | TKTeekay Corporation | XOMExxon Mobil Corpo… |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +54.4% | +22.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +87.7% | +45.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +235.9% | +46.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +422.5% | +171.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +87.8% | +107.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +49.8% | +13.7% |
TK leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — TK and XOM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
XOM is the less volatile stock with a -0.15 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than TK's 0.38 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. TK currently trades 95.8% from its 52-week high vs XOM's 84.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | TKTeekay Corporation | XOMExxon Mobil Corpo… |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.38x | -0.15x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $14.22 | $176.41 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $7.12 | $101.19 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +95.8% | +84.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 69.5 | 53.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 518K | 18.8M |
Evenly matched — TK and XOM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — TK and XOM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates TK as "Buy" and XOM as "Hold". For income investors, TK offers the higher dividend yield at 6.69% vs XOM's 2.69%.
| Metric | TKTeekay Corporation | XOMExxon Mobil Corpo… |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $160.43 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 14 | 55 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +6.7% | +2.7% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 3 | 26 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.91 | $4.00 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +10.2% | +3.2% |
Evenly matched — TK and XOM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway
TK leads in 3 of 6 categories — strongest in Valuation Metrics and Profitability & Efficiency. 3 categories are tied.
Best OverallTeekay Corporation (TK)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
TK vs XOM: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is TK or XOM a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM) is the stronger pick with -4.
5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -16. 7% for Teekay Corporation (TK). Teekay Corporation (TK) offers the better valuation at 9. 6x trailing P/E (61. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Teekay Corporation (TK) a "Buy" — based on 14 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — TK or XOM?
On trailing P/E, Teekay Corporation (TK) is the cheapest at 9.
6x versus Exxon Mobil Corporation at 22. 2x. On forward P/E, Exxon Mobil Corporation is actually cheaper at 15. 0x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — TK or XOM?
Over the past 5 years, Teekay Corporation (TK) delivered a total return of +422.
5%, compared to +171. 8% for Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: XOM returned +107. 4% versus TK's +87. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — TK or XOM?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM) is the lower-risk stock at -0.
15β versus Teekay Corporation's 0. 38β — meaning TK is approximately -360% more volatile than XOM relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Teekay Corporation (TK) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 16% for Exxon Mobil Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — TK or XOM?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM) is pulling ahead at -4.
5% versus -16. 7% for Teekay Corporation (TK). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Teekay Corporation grew EPS -7. 8% year-over-year, compared to -14. 5% for Exxon Mobil Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, TK leads at 21. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — TK or XOM?
Teekay Corporation (TK) is the more profitable company, earning 11.
0% net margin versus 8. 9% for Exxon Mobil Corporation — meaning it keeps 11. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TK leads at 29. 9% versus 10. 5% for XOM. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TK leads at 32. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is TK or XOM more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM) trades at 15.
0x forward P/E versus 61. 9x for Teekay Corporation — 46. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis.
08Which pays a better dividend — TK or XOM?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Teekay Corporation (TK) offers the highest yield at 6. 7%, versus 2. 7% for Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM).
09Is TK or XOM better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.
15), 2. 7% yield, +107. 4% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (XOM: +107. 4%, TK: +87. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between TK and XOM?
Both stocks operate in the Energy sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: TK is a small-cap deep-value stock; XOM is a large-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
Revenue Growth>
%
(TK: -29.0% · XOM: -1.3%)Net Margin>
%
(TK: 7.9% · XOM: 8.9%)P/E Ratio<
x
(TK: 9.6x · XOM: 22.2x)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.