Entertainment
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
TKO vs LYV vs MSGE vs NFLX
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Entertainment
Entertainment
Entertainment
TKO vs LYV vs MSGE vs NFLX — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Entertainment | Entertainment | Entertainment | Entertainment |
| Market Cap | $36.50B | $38.65B | $3.15B | $374.00B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $5.06B | $25.61B | $1.16B | $45.18B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $385M | $84M | $42M | $10.98B |
| Gross Margin | 34.5% | 40.3% | 31.5% | 48.5% |
| Operating Margin | 20.0% | 3.4% | 10.1% | 29.5% |
| Forward P/E | 38.1x | 115.8x | 56.8x | 24.8x |
| Total Debt | $4.06B | $12.44B | $1.20B | $14.46B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $831M | $7.11B | $43M | $9.03B |
TKO vs LYV vs MSGE vs NFLX — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| TKO Group Holdings,… (TKO) | 100 | 405.3 | +305.3% |
| Live Nation Enterta… (LYV) | 100 | 338.3 | +238.3% |
| Madison Square Gard… (MSGE) | 100 | 84.2 | -15.8% |
| Netflix, Inc. (NFLX) | 100 | 210.3 | +110.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: TKO vs LYV vs MSGE vs NFLX
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
TKO is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and growth exposure is your priority.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.64, yield 1.8%
- Rev growth 68.9%, EPS growth 40.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 60.7%
- 10.6% 10Y total return vs NFLX's 8.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.64, Low D/E 43.9%, current ratio 1.26x
LYV lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
MSGE is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +83.6% vs NFLX's -23.6%
NFLX carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for valuation efficiency and defensive.
- PEG 0.75 vs TKO's 31.98
- Beta 0.39, current ratio 1.19x
- Lower P/E (24.8x vs 56.8x)
- 24.3% margin vs LYV's 0.3%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 68.9% revenue growth vs MSGE's -1.7% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (24.8x vs 56.8x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 24.3% margin vs LYV's 0.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.39 vs MSGE's 0.94 | |
| Dividends | 1.8% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +83.6% vs NFLX's -23.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 19.8% ROA vs LYV's 0.4%, ROIC 29.8% vs 19.7% |
TKO vs LYV vs MSGE vs NFLX — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
TKO vs LYV vs MSGE vs NFLX — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
NFLX leads in 3 of 6 categories
TKO leads 0 • LYV leads 0 • MSGE leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NFLX leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NFLX is the larger business by revenue, generating $45.2B annually — 39.0x MSGE's $1.2B. NFLX is the more profitable business, keeping 24.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to LYV's 0.3%. On growth, MSGE holds the edge at +59.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $5.1B | $25.6B | $1.2B | $45.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $1.5B | $1.6B | $245M | $30.1B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $385M | $84M | $42M | $11.0B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $1.8B | $1.2B | $289M | $9.5B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +34.5% | +40.3% | +31.5% | +48.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +20.0% | +3.4% | +10.1% | +29.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +7.6% | +0.3% | +3.6% | +24.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +35.0% | +4.8% | +25.0% | +20.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +25.9% | +12.1% | +59.4% | +17.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +62.3% | -4.8% | -123.5% | +31.1% |
Valuation Metrics
NFLX leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 34.9x trailing earnings, NFLX trades at a 60% valuation discount to MSGE's 86.6x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), NFLX offers better value at 1.06x vs TKO's 69.62x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $36.5B | $38.6B | $3.2B | $374.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $39.7B | $44.0B | $4.3B | $379.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 82.98x | -692.98x | 86.64x | 34.89x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 38.12x | 115.80x | 56.83x | 24.80x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 69.62x | — | — | 1.06x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 27.47x | 19.89x | 23.97x | 12.61x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 7.71x | 1.53x | 3.35x | 8.28x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 3.93x | 21.20x | — | 14.32x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 31.50x | 115.84x | 33.88x | 39.53x |
Profitability & Efficiency
NFLX leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
NFLX delivers a 41.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $41 in annual profit, vs $4 for TKO. TKO carries lower financial leverage with a 0.44x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to LYV's 6.84x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), NFLX scores 7/9 vs LYV's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +4.1% | +4.4% | +7.7% | +41.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +2.5% | +0.4% | +1.8% | +19.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +6.1% | +19.7% | +8.5% | +29.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +7.5% | +13.4% | +11.0% | +30.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.44x | 6.84x | — | 0.54x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $3.2B | $5.3B | $1.2B | $5.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $831M | $7.1B | $43M | $9.0B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $4.1B | $12.4B | $1.2B | $14.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 6.00x | 3.68x | 4.43x | 17.33x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — TKO and MSGE and NFLX each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in TKO five years ago would be worth $35,640 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $7,384 for MSGE. Over the past 12 months, MSGE leads with a +83.6% total return vs NFLX's -23.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NFLX at 38.6% vs TKO's 22.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -9.0% | +14.5% | +22.8% | -3.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +12.1% | +24.0% | +83.6% | -23.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +83.0% | +113.7% | +94.8% | +166.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +256.4% | +108.0% | -26.2% | +75.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +1060.3% | +622.5% | -24.6% | +875.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +22.3% | +28.8% | +24.9% | +38.6% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — MSGE and NFLX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
NFLX is the less volatile stock with a 0.39 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than MSGE's 0.94 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MSGE currently trades 95.5% from its 52-week high vs NFLX's 65.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.64x | 0.80x | 0.94x | 0.39x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $226.94 | $175.25 | $69.86 | $134.12 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $152.29 | $125.34 | $35.31 | $75.01 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +82.6% | +94.9% | +95.5% | +65.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 50.5 | 63.6 | 67.6 | 35.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.3M | 2.8M | 312K | 44.0M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: TKO as "Buy", LYV as "Buy", MSGE as "Buy", NFLX as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 31.8% upside for NFLX (target: $116) vs -0.6% for MSGE (target: $66). TKO is the only dividend payer here at 1.76% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $236.67 | $181.00 | $66.29 | $116.29 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 19 | 44 | 12 | 99 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.8% | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 1 | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $3.30 | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +2.4% | +0.1% | +1.3% | +2.4% |
NFLX leads in 3 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Valuation Metrics. 2 categories are tied.
TKO vs LYV vs MSGE vs NFLX: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is TKO or LYV or MSGE or NFLX a better buy right now?
For growth investors, TKO Group Holdings, Inc.
(TKO) is the stronger pick with 68. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -1. 7% for Madison Square Garden Entertainment Corp. (MSGE). Netflix, Inc. (NFLX) offers the better valuation at 34. 9x trailing P/E (24. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate TKO Group Holdings, Inc. (TKO) a "Buy" — based on 19 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — TKO or LYV or MSGE or NFLX?
On trailing P/E, Netflix, Inc.
(NFLX) is the cheapest at 34. 9x versus Madison Square Garden Entertainment Corp. at 86. 6x. On forward P/E, Netflix, Inc. is actually cheaper at 24. 8x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Netflix, Inc. wins at 0. 75x versus TKO Group Holdings, Inc. 's 31. 98x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — TKO or LYV or MSGE or NFLX?
Over the past 5 years, TKO Group Holdings, Inc.
(TKO) delivered a total return of +256. 4%, compared to -26. 2% for Madison Square Garden Entertainment Corp. (MSGE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TKO returned +1060% versus MSGE's -24. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — TKO or LYV or MSGE or NFLX?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Netflix, Inc.
(NFLX) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 39β versus Madison Square Garden Entertainment Corp. 's 0. 94β — meaning MSGE is approximately 141% more volatile than NFLX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, TKO Group Holdings, Inc. (TKO) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 44% versus 7% for Live Nation Entertainment, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — TKO or LYV or MSGE or NFLX?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), TKO Group Holdings, Inc.
(TKO) is pulling ahead at 68. 9% versus -1. 7% for Madison Square Garden Entertainment Corp. (MSGE). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: TKO Group Holdings, Inc. grew EPS 40. 3% year-over-year, compared to -108. 8% for Live Nation Entertainment, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, TKO leads at 60. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — TKO or LYV or MSGE or NFLX?
Netflix, Inc.
(NFLX) is the more profitable company, earning 24. 3% net margin versus 2. 0% for Live Nation Entertainment, Inc. — meaning it keeps 24. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NFLX leads at 29. 5% versus 5. 9% for LYV. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TKO leads at 49. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is TKO or LYV or MSGE or NFLX more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Netflix, Inc. (NFLX) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 75x versus TKO Group Holdings, Inc. 's 31. 98x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Netflix, Inc. (NFLX) trades at 24. 8x forward P/E versus 115. 8x for Live Nation Entertainment, Inc. — 91. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for NFLX: 31. 8% to $116. 29.
08Which pays a better dividend — TKO or LYV or MSGE or NFLX?
In this comparison, TKO (1.
8% yield) pays a dividend. LYV, MSGE, NFLX do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is TKO or LYV or MSGE or NFLX better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, TKO Group Holdings, Inc.
(TKO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 64), 1. 8% yield, +1060% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (TKO: +1060%, MSGE: -24. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between TKO and LYV and MSGE and NFLX?
Both stocks operate in the Communication Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: TKO is a mid-cap high-growth stock; LYV is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; MSGE is a small-cap quality compounder stock; NFLX is a large-cap high-growth stock. TKO pays a dividend while LYV, MSGE, NFLX do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
- Sector: Communication Services
- Market Cap > $100B
- Revenue Growth > 6%
- Gross Margin > 24%
- Sector: Communication Services
- Market Cap > $100B
- Revenue Growth > 29%
- Gross Margin > 18%
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.