Specialty Retail
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
TLF vs AMZN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Specialty Retail
TLF vs AMZN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Specialty Retail | Specialty Retail |
| Market Cap | $20M | $2.92T |
| Revenue (TTM) | $76M | $742.78B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $9M | $90.80B |
| Gross Margin | 57.0% | 50.6% |
| Operating Margin | -1.3% | 11.5% |
| Forward P/E | 2.2x | 34.8x |
| Total Debt | $27M | $152.99B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $16M | $86.81B |
TLF vs AMZN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tandy Leather Facto… (TLF) | 100 | 70.2 | -29.8% |
| Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN) | 100 | 222.1 | +122.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: TLF vs AMZN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
TLF is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.11, yield 62.9%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.11, Low D/E 52.1%, current ratio 5.16x
- Beta 0.11, yield 62.9%, current ratio 5.16x
AMZN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 12.4%, EPS growth 29.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 11.7%
- 7.0% 10Y total return vs TLF's -22.4%
- 12.4% revenue growth vs TLF's 2.6%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 12.4% revenue growth vs TLF's 2.6% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (2.2x vs 34.8x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 12.2% margin vs TLF's 11.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.11 vs AMZN's 1.51 | |
| Dividends | 62.9% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +43.7% vs TLF's +39.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 11.5% ROA vs TLF's 10.5%, ROIC 14.7% vs -1.2% |
TLF vs AMZN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
TLF vs AMZN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AMZN leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AMZN is the larger business by revenue, generating $742.8B annually — 9731.9x TLF's $76M. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 12.2% (AMZN) to 11.9% (TLF). On growth, AMZN holds the edge at +16.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $76M | $742.8B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $5M | $155.9B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $9M | $90.8B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$8M | -$2.5B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +57.0% | +50.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -1.3% | +11.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +11.9% | +12.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -10.6% | -0.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +8.7% | +16.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -5.6% | +74.8% |
Valuation Metrics
TLF leads this category, winning 4 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 2.2x trailing earnings, TLF trades at a 94% valuation discount to AMZN's 37.8x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, TLF's 6.0x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than AMZN's 20.5x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $20M | $2.92T |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $31M | $2.98T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 2.23x | 37.82x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 34.77x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.35x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 5.98x | 20.47x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.26x | 4.07x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.39x | 7.14x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 378.98x |
Profitability & Efficiency
AMZN leads this category, winning 6 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
AMZN delivers a 23.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $23 in annual profit, vs $17 for TLF. AMZN carries lower financial leverage with a 0.37x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to TLF's 0.52x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), AMZN scores 6/9 vs TLF's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +17.3% | +23.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +10.5% | +11.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -1.2% | +14.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -1.4% | +15.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.52x | 0.37x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $11M | $66.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $16M | $86.8B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $27M | $153.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 39.96x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
AMZN leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in AMZN five years ago would be worth $16,476 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $13,293 for TLF. Over the past 12 months, AMZN leads with a +43.7% total return vs TLF's +39.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors AMZN at 36.8% vs TLF's 8.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +45.8% | +19.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +39.6% | +43.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +27.0% | +156.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +32.9% | +64.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -22.4% | +697.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +8.3% | +36.8% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — TLF and AMZN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
TLF is the less volatile stock with a 0.11 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AMZN's 1.51 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. AMZN currently trades 97.3% from its 52-week high vs TLF's 64.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.11x | 1.51x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $3.78 | $278.56 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $2.21 | $185.01 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +64.8% | +97.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 59.5 | 81.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 30K | 45.5M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
TLF is the only dividend payer here at 62.95% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $306.77 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 94 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +62.9% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.54 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +6.9% | 0.0% |
AMZN leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). TLF leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
TLF vs AMZN: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is TLF or AMZN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Amazon.
com, Inc. (AMZN) is the stronger pick with 12. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 2. 6% for Tandy Leather Factory, Inc. (TLF). Tandy Leather Factory, Inc. (TLF) offers the better valuation at 2. 2x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Amazon. com, Inc. (AMZN) a "Buy" — based on 94 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — TLF or AMZN?
On trailing P/E, Tandy Leather Factory, Inc.
(TLF) is the cheapest at 2. 2x versus Amazon. com, Inc. at 37. 8x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — TLF or AMZN?
Over the past 5 years, Amazon.
com, Inc. (AMZN) delivered a total return of +64. 8%, compared to +32. 9% for Tandy Leather Factory, Inc. (TLF). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: AMZN returned +697. 8% versus TLF's -22. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — TLF or AMZN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Tandy Leather Factory, Inc.
(TLF) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 11β versus Amazon. com, Inc. 's 1. 51β — meaning AMZN is approximately 1256% more volatile than TLF relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Amazon. com, Inc. (AMZN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 37% versus 52% for Tandy Leather Factory, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — TLF or AMZN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Amazon.
com, Inc. (AMZN) is pulling ahead at 12. 4% versus 2. 6% for Tandy Leather Factory, Inc. (TLF). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Tandy Leather Factory, Inc. grew EPS 1068% year-over-year, compared to 29. 7% for Amazon. com, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, AMZN leads at 11. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — TLF or AMZN?
Tandy Leather Factory, Inc.
(TLF) is the more profitable company, earning 11. 9% net margin versus 10. 8% for Amazon. com, Inc. — meaning it keeps 11. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: AMZN leads at 11. 2% versus -1. 3% for TLF. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TLF leads at 57. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Which pays a better dividend — TLF or AMZN?
In this comparison, TLF (62.
9% yield) pays a dividend. AMZN does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
08Is TLF or AMZN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Tandy Leather Factory, Inc.
(TLF) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 11), 62. 9% yield). Amazon. com, Inc. (AMZN) carries a higher beta of 1. 51 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (TLF: -22. 4%, AMZN: +697. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between TLF and AMZN?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: TLF is a small-cap deep-value stock; AMZN is a mega-cap quality compounder stock. TLF pays a dividend while AMZN does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.