Specialty Retail
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
TLF vs BOOT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Apparel - Retail
TLF vs BOOT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Specialty Retail | Apparel - Retail |
| Market Cap | $20M | $5.23B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $76M | $1.92B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $9M | $171M |
| Gross Margin | 57.0% | 37.5% |
| Operating Margin | -1.3% | 11.8% |
| Forward P/E | 2.2x | 23.4x |
| Total Debt | $27M | $563M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $16M | $70M |
TLF vs BOOT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tandy Leather Facto… (TLF) | 100 | 69.6 | -30.4% |
| Boot Barn Holdings,… (BOOT) | 100 | 800.3 | +700.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: TLF vs BOOT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
TLF carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.11, yield 63.5%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.11, Low D/E 52.1%, current ratio 5.16x
- Beta 0.11, yield 63.5%, current ratio 5.16x
BOOT is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 14.6%, EPS growth 22.5%, 3Y rev CAGR 8.7%
- 21.5% 10Y total return vs TLF's -22.6%
- 14.6% revenue growth vs TLF's 2.6%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 14.6% revenue growth vs TLF's 2.6% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (2.2x vs 23.4x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 11.9% margin vs BOOT's 8.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.11 vs BOOT's 1.68 | |
| Dividends | 63.5% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +54.5% vs TLF's +41.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 10.5% ROA vs BOOT's 7.6%, ROIC -1.2% vs 12.1% |
TLF vs BOOT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BOOT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BOOT is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.9B annually — 25.1x TLF's $76M. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 11.9% (TLF) to 8.9% (BOOT). On growth, BOOT holds the edge at +18.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $76M | $1.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $5M | $297M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $9M | $171M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$8M | -$141M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +57.0% | +37.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -1.3% | +11.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +11.9% | +8.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -10.6% | -7.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +8.7% | +18.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -5.6% | +44.2% |
Valuation Metrics
TLF leads this category, winning 4 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 2.2x trailing earnings, TLF trades at a 92% valuation discount to BOOT's 29.2x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, TLF's 5.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than BOOT's 19.0x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $20M | $5.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $31M | $5.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 2.21x | 29.23x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 23.42x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.00x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 5.95x | 18.96x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.26x | 2.74x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.38x | 4.68x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
TLF leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
TLF delivers a 17.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $17 in annual profit, vs $14 for BOOT. BOOT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.50x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to TLF's 0.52x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +17.3% | +14.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +10.5% | +7.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -1.2% | +12.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -1.4% | +15.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.52x | 0.50x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $11M | $493M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $16M | $70M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $27M | $563M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 159.63x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
BOOT leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in BOOT five years ago would be worth $23,429 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $12,687 for TLF. Over the past 12 months, BOOT leads with a +54.5% total return vs TLF's +41.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors BOOT at 33.9% vs TLF's 8.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +45.0% | -7.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +41.4% | +54.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +26.6% | +139.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +26.9% | +134.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -22.6% | +2147.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +8.2% | +33.9% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — TLF and BOOT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
TLF is the less volatile stock with a 0.11 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BOOT's 1.68 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BOOT currently trades 81.8% from its 52-week high vs TLF's 64.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.11x | 1.68x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $3.78 | $210.25 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $2.21 | $108.32 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +64.3% | +81.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 49.2 | 51.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 35K | 610K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
TLF is the only dividend payer here at 63.47% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $231.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 29 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +63.5% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.54 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +6.9% | 0.0% |
BOOT leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). TLF leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). 1 tied.
TLF vs BOOT: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is TLF or BOOT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Boot Barn Holdings, Inc.
(BOOT) is the stronger pick with 14. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 2. 6% for Tandy Leather Factory, Inc. (TLF). Tandy Leather Factory, Inc. (TLF) offers the better valuation at 2. 2x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Boot Barn Holdings, Inc. (BOOT) a "Buy" — based on 29 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — TLF or BOOT?
On trailing P/E, Tandy Leather Factory, Inc.
(TLF) is the cheapest at 2. 2x versus Boot Barn Holdings, Inc. at 29. 2x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — TLF or BOOT?
Over the past 5 years, Boot Barn Holdings, Inc.
(BOOT) delivered a total return of +134. 3%, compared to +26. 9% for Tandy Leather Factory, Inc. (TLF). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BOOT returned +21. 5% versus TLF's -22. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — TLF or BOOT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Tandy Leather Factory, Inc.
(TLF) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 11β versus Boot Barn Holdings, Inc. 's 1. 68β — meaning BOOT is approximately 1404% more volatile than TLF relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Boot Barn Holdings, Inc. (BOOT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 50% versus 52% for Tandy Leather Factory, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — TLF or BOOT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Boot Barn Holdings, Inc.
(BOOT) is pulling ahead at 14. 6% versus 2. 6% for Tandy Leather Factory, Inc. (TLF). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Tandy Leather Factory, Inc. grew EPS 1068% year-over-year, compared to 22. 5% for Boot Barn Holdings, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, BOOT leads at 8. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — TLF or BOOT?
Tandy Leather Factory, Inc.
(TLF) is the more profitable company, earning 11. 9% net margin versus 9. 5% for Boot Barn Holdings, Inc. — meaning it keeps 11. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BOOT leads at 12. 5% versus -1. 3% for TLF. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TLF leads at 57. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Which pays a better dividend — TLF or BOOT?
In this comparison, TLF (63.
5% yield) pays a dividend. BOOT does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
08Is TLF or BOOT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Tandy Leather Factory, Inc.
(TLF) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 11), 63. 5% yield). Boot Barn Holdings, Inc. (BOOT) carries a higher beta of 1. 68 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (TLF: -22. 6%, BOOT: +21. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between TLF and BOOT?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: TLF is a small-cap deep-value stock; BOOT is a small-cap quality compounder stock. TLF pays a dividend while BOOT does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.