Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
TLSA vs MEDP vs CRL vs DOCS vs NVCR
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Medical - Diagnostics & Research
Medical - Diagnostics & Research
Medical - Healthcare Information Services
Medical - Instruments & Supplies
TLSA vs MEDP vs CRL vs DOCS vs NVCR — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Medical - Diagnostics & Research | Medical - Diagnostics & Research | Medical - Healthcare Information Services | Medical - Instruments & Supplies |
| Market Cap | $192M | $12.24B | $8.98B | $5.24B | $1.92B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $2.68B | $4.03B | $638M | $674M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-34M | $460M | $-185M | $239M | $-173M |
| Gross Margin | — | 29.1% | 24.9% | 89.7% | 75.2% |
| Operating Margin | — | 21.0% | 11.8% | 37.4% | -27.2% |
| Forward P/E | — | 25.2x | 16.4x | 16.8x | — |
| Total Debt | $106K | $250M | $3.07B | $12M | $290M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $4M | $497M | $214M | $210M | $103M |
TLSA vs MEDP vs CRL vs DOCS vs NVCR — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tiziana Life Scienc… (TLSA) | 100 | 64.3 | -35.7% |
| Medpace Holdings, I… (MEDP) | 100 | 242.7 | +142.7% |
| Charles River Labor… (CRL) | 100 | 49.2 | -50.8% |
| Doximity, Inc. (DOCS) | 100 | 44.7 | -55.3% |
| NovoCure Limited (NVCR) | 100 | 7.6 | -92.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: TLSA vs MEDP vs CRL vs DOCS vs NVCR
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
TLSA ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability.
- beta 0.74
- Beta 0.74 vs NVCR's 2.20, lower leverage
MEDP has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in long-term compounding.
- 14.4% 10Y total return vs CRL's 119.2%
- +42.9% vs DOCS's -55.4%
- 24.8% ROA vs TLSA's -303.2%, ROIC 154.9% vs -481.7%
CRL is the clearest fit if your priority is value.
- Better valuation composite
DOCS is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Rev growth 20.0%, EPS growth 54.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 18.4%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.03, Low D/E 1.1%, current ratio 6.97x
- PEG 0.21 vs MEDP's 0.79
- Beta 1.03, current ratio 6.97x
Among these 5 stocks, NVCR doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 20.0% revenue growth vs TLSA's -57.8% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 37.5% margin vs NVCR's -25.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.74 vs NVCR's 2.20, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +42.9% vs DOCS's -55.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 24.8% ROA vs TLSA's -303.2%, ROIC 154.9% vs -481.7% |
TLSA vs MEDP vs CRL vs DOCS vs NVCR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
TLSA vs MEDP vs CRL vs DOCS vs NVCR — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
MEDP leads in 2 of 6 categories
DOCS leads 1 • CRL leads 1 • TLSA leads 0 • NVCR leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
DOCS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CRL and TLSA operate at a comparable scale, with $4.0B and $0 in trailing revenue. DOCS is the more profitable business, keeping 37.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to NVCR's -25.7%. On growth, MEDP holds the edge at +26.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $2.7B | $4.0B | $638M | $674M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$40M | $577M | $757M | $250M | -$165M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$34M | $460M | -$185M | $239M | -$173M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$14M | $745M | $391M | $314M | -$48M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | +29.1% | +24.9% | +89.7% | +75.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | +21.0% | +11.8% | +37.4% | -27.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | +17.2% | -4.6% | +37.5% | -25.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | +27.8% | +9.7% | +49.2% | -7.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +26.5% | +1.2% | +9.8% | +12.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +27.8% | +16.6% | -160.0% | -16.2% | -100.0% |
Valuation Metrics
CRL leads this category, winning 6 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 23.5x trailing earnings, DOCS trades at a 16% valuation discount to MEDP's 28.1x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), DOCS offers better value at 0.30x vs MEDP's 0.88x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $192M | $12.2B | $9.0B | $5.2B | $1.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $189M | $12.0B | $11.8B | $5.0B | $2.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -6.86x | 28.06x | -62.52x | 23.45x | -13.80x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 25.24x | 16.42x | 16.83x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.88x | — | 0.30x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 21.31x | 12.98x | 21.14x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 4.84x | 2.24x | 9.18x | 2.92x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 20.46x | 27.57x | 2.81x | 4.84x | 5.51x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 17.96x | 17.31x | 19.64x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
MEDP leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MEDP delivers a 120.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $121 in annual profit, vs $-9 for TLSA. DOCS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CRL's 0.95x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), DOCS scores 9/9 vs TLSA's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -8.7% | +120.9% | -5.7% | +24.4% | -50.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -3.0% | +24.8% | -2.5% | +20.7% | -16.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -4.8% | +154.9% | +6.3% | +20.0% | -16.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -3.3% | +65.7% | +8.1% | +22.3% | -28.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 6 | 4 | 9 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.03x | 0.55x | 0.95x | 0.01x | 0.85x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$4M | -$247M | $2.9B | -$197M | $187M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $4M | $497M | $214M | $210M | $103M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $106,000 | $250M | $3.1B | $12M | $290M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -2622.00x | — | 6.38x | — | -96.80x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
MEDP leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in MEDP five years ago would be worth $25,938 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $875 for NVCR. Over the past 12 months, MEDP leads with a +42.9% total return vs DOCS's -55.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MEDP at 27.0% vs NVCR's -37.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -5.6% | -24.9% | -10.1% | -39.9% | +28.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -3.8% | +42.9% | +32.8% | -55.4% | +1.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +88.7% | +104.6% | -4.2% | -24.2% | -75.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -36.6% | +159.4% | -46.9% | -50.9% | -91.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -63.8% | +1442.7% | +119.2% | -50.9% | +30.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +23.6% | +27.0% | -1.4% | -8.8% | -37.6% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — TLSA and NVCR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
TLSA is the less volatile stock with a 0.74 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NVCR's 2.20 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NVCR currently trades 83.9% from its 52-week high vs DOCS's 34.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.74x | 1.26x | 1.52x | 1.03x | 2.20x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $2.60 | $628.92 | $228.88 | $76.51 | $20.06 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.14 | $284.48 | $131.30 | $20.55 | $9.82 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +58.1% | +68.2% | +79.5% | +34.0% | +83.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 66.4 | 40.6 | 57.2 | 60.1 | 69.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 149K | 371K | 806K | 2.7M | 1.5M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: TLSA as "Buy", MEDP as "Hold", CRL as "Buy", DOCS as "Buy", NVCR as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 99.0% upside for NVCR (target: $34) vs 12.9% for CRL (target: $205).
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $498.86 | $205.43 | $42.79 | $33.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 3 | 19 | 36 | 22 | 15 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | 1 | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +7.5% | +4.0% | +2.3% | 0.0% |
MEDP leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). DOCS leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 1 tied.
TLSA vs MEDP vs CRL vs DOCS vs NVCR: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is TLSA or MEDP or CRL or DOCS or NVCR a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Doximity, Inc.
(DOCS) is the stronger pick with 20. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -0. 9% for Charles River Laboratories International, Inc. (CRL). Doximity, Inc. (DOCS) offers the better valuation at 23. 5x trailing P/E (16. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Tiziana Life Sciences Ltd (TLSA) a "Buy" — based on 3 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — TLSA or MEDP or CRL or DOCS or NVCR?
On trailing P/E, Doximity, Inc.
(DOCS) is the cheapest at 23. 5x versus Medpace Holdings, Inc. at 28. 1x. On forward P/E, Charles River Laboratories International, Inc. is actually cheaper at 16. 4x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Doximity, Inc. wins at 0. 21x versus Medpace Holdings, Inc. 's 0. 79x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — TLSA or MEDP or CRL or DOCS or NVCR?
Over the past 5 years, Medpace Holdings, Inc.
(MEDP) delivered a total return of +159. 4%, compared to -91. 3% for NovoCure Limited (NVCR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MEDP returned +1443% versus TLSA's -63. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — TLSA or MEDP or CRL or DOCS or NVCR?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Tiziana Life Sciences Ltd (TLSA) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
74β versus NovoCure Limited's 2. 20β — meaning NVCR is approximately 199% more volatile than TLSA relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Doximity, Inc. (DOCS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 95% for Charles River Laboratories International, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — TLSA or MEDP or CRL or DOCS or NVCR?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Doximity, Inc.
(DOCS) is pulling ahead at 20. 0% versus -0. 9% for Charles River Laboratories International, Inc. (CRL). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Doximity, Inc. grew EPS 54. 2% year-over-year, compared to -1555. 0% for Charles River Laboratories International, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, MEDP leads at 20. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — TLSA or MEDP or CRL or DOCS or NVCR?
Doximity, Inc.
(DOCS) is the more profitable company, earning 39. 1% net margin versus -20. 8% for NovoCure Limited — meaning it keeps 39. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: DOCS leads at 39. 9% versus -23. 5% for NVCR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — DOCS leads at 90. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is TLSA or MEDP or CRL or DOCS or NVCR more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Doximity, Inc. (DOCS) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 21x versus Medpace Holdings, Inc. 's 0. 79x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Charles River Laboratories International, Inc. (CRL) trades at 16. 4x forward P/E versus 25. 2x for Medpace Holdings, Inc. — 8. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for NVCR: 99. 0% to $33. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — TLSA or MEDP or CRL or DOCS or NVCR?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is TLSA or MEDP or CRL or DOCS or NVCR better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Medpace Holdings, Inc.
(MEDP) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 26), +1443% 10Y return). NovoCure Limited (NVCR) carries a higher beta of 2. 20 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (MEDP: +1443%, NVCR: +30. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between TLSA and MEDP and CRL and DOCS and NVCR?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: TLSA is a small-cap quality compounder stock; MEDP is a mid-cap high-growth stock; CRL is a small-cap quality compounder stock; DOCS is a small-cap high-growth stock; NVCR is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.