Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

TLSI vs ANGO vs NVCR vs ATRC vs ABT

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
TLSI
TriSalus Life Sciences, Inc.

Medical - Devices

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$139M
5Y Perf.-56.9%
ANGO
AngioDynamics, Inc.

Medical - Instruments & Supplies

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$466M
5Y Perf.-46.5%
NVCR
NovoCure Limited

Medical - Instruments & Supplies

HealthcareNASDAQ • JE
Market Cap$2.04B
5Y Perf.-88.0%
ATRC
AtriCure, Inc.

Medical - Instruments & Supplies

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$1.33B
5Y Perf.-59.7%
ABT
Abbott Laboratories

Medical - Devices

HealthcareNYSE • US
Market Cap$146.59B
5Y Perf.-29.6%

TLSI vs ANGO vs NVCR vs ATRC vs ABT — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
TLSI logoTLSI
ANGO logoANGO
NVCR logoNVCR
ATRC logoATRC
ABT logoABT
IndustryMedical - DevicesMedical - Instruments & SuppliesMedical - Instruments & SuppliesMedical - Instruments & SuppliesMedical - Devices
Market Cap$139M$466M$2.04B$1.33B$146.59B
Revenue (TTM)$45M$307M$674M$552M$43.84B
Net Income (TTM)$-39M$-28M$-173M$-5M$13.98B
Gross Margin84.6%53.7%75.2%75.5%54.0%
Operating Margin-59.7%-9.4%-27.2%-0.4%17.8%
Forward P/E428.7x15.4x
Total Debt$34M$0.00$290M$88M$15.28B
Cash & Equiv.$20M$56M$103M$167M$7.62B

TLSI vs ANGO vs NVCR vs ATRC vs ABTLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

TLSI
ANGO
NVCR
ATRC
ABT
StockFeb 21May 26Return
TriSalus Life Scien… (TLSI)10043.1-56.9%
AngioDynamics, Inc. (ANGO)10053.5-46.5%
NovoCure Limited (NVCR)10012.0-88.0%
AtriCure, Inc. (ATRC)10040.3-59.7%
Abbott Laboratories (ABT)10070.4-29.6%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: TLSI vs ANGO vs NVCR vs ATRC vs ABT

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: ABT leads in 5 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. TriSalus Life Sciences, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion. ANGO also leads in specific categories worth noting. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
TLSI
TriSalus Life Sciences, Inc.
The Growth Play

TLSI is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.

  • Rev growth 53.4%, EPS growth -47.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 53.9%
  • 53.4% revenue growth vs ANGO's -3.8%
Best for: growth exposure
ANGO
AngioDynamics, Inc.
The Momentum Pick

ANGO ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.

  • +20.7% vs ABT's -35.3%
Best for: momentum
NVCR
NovoCure Limited
The Healthcare Pick

NVCR lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.

Best for: healthcare exposure
ATRC
AtriCure, Inc.
The Defensive Pick

ATRC is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and defensive.

  • Lower volatility, beta 0.95, Low D/E 17.9%, current ratio 3.96x
  • Beta 0.95, current ratio 3.96x
Best for: sleep-well-at-night and defensive
ABT
Abbott Laboratories
The Income Pick

ABT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.

  • Dividend streak 11 yrs, beta 0.22, yield 2.6%
  • 166.6% 10Y total return vs ATRC's 84.4%
  • Lower P/E (15.4x vs 428.7x)
  • 31.9% margin vs TLSI's -86.9%
Best for: income & stability and long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthTLSI logoTLSI53.4% revenue growth vs ANGO's -3.8%
ValueABT logoABTLower P/E (15.4x vs 428.7x)
Quality / MarginsABT logoABT31.9% margin vs TLSI's -86.9%
Stability / SafetyABT logoABTBeta 0.22 vs NVCR's 2.15, lower leverage
DividendsABT logoABT2.6% yield; 11-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)ANGO logoANGO+20.7% vs ABT's -35.3%
Efficiency (ROA)ABT logoABT16.6% ROA vs TLSI's -110.7%

TLSI vs ANGO vs NVCR vs ATRC vs ABT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

TLSITriSalus Life Sciences, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

ANGOAngioDynamics, Inc.
FY 2024
Med Device
65.0%$198M
Med Tech
35.0%$106M
NVCRNovoCure Limited

Segment breakdown not available.

ATRCAtriCure, Inc.
FY 2025
Shipping and Handling
100.0%$2M
ABTAbbott Laboratories
FY 2024
Medical Devices
45.3%$19.0B
Diagnostic Products
22.3%$9.3B
Nutritional Products
20.1%$8.4B
Established Pharmaceutical Products
12.4%$5.2B

TLSI vs ANGO vs NVCR vs ATRC vs ABT — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLABTLAGGINGATRC

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

ABT leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

ABT is the larger business by revenue, generating $43.8B annually — 971.0x TLSI's $45M. ABT is the more profitable business, keeping 31.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to TLSI's -86.9%. On growth, TLSI holds the edge at +59.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricTLSI logoTLSITriSalus Life Sci…ANGO logoANGOAngioDynamics, In…NVCR logoNVCRNovoCure LimitedATRC logoATRCAtriCure, Inc.ABT logoABTAbbott Laboratori…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$45M$307M$674M$552M$43.8B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$26M-$5M-$165M$13M$10.9B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$39M-$28M-$173M-$5M$14.0B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$19M-$9M-$48M$54M$6.9B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+84.6%+53.7%+75.2%+75.5%+54.0%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-59.7%-9.4%-27.2%-0.4%+17.8%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-86.9%-9.0%-25.7%-0.8%+31.9%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-41.9%-3.0%-7.1%+9.7%+15.8%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+59.8%+9.0%+12.3%+14.3%+6.9%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+48.8%+42.3%-100.0%+101.6%0.0%
ABT leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

ABT leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

On an enterprise value basis, ABT's 15.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than ATRC's 73.2x.

MetricTLSI logoTLSITriSalus Life Sci…ANGO logoANGOAngioDynamics, In…NVCR logoNVCRNovoCure LimitedATRC logoATRCAtriCure, Inc.ABT logoABTAbbott Laboratori…
Market CapShares × price$139M$466M$2.0B$1.3B$146.6B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$153M$410M$2.2B$1.3B$154.2B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-2.41x-13.49x-14.66x-109.50x11.03x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.428.71x15.40x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate0.37x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple73.24x15.36x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue3.07x1.59x3.11x2.49x3.49x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share2.51x5.86x2.55x3.08x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF27.56x23.08x
ABT leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

ABT leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

ABT delivers a 27.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $27 in annual profit, vs $-51 for NVCR. ATRC carries lower financial leverage with a 0.18x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to NVCR's 0.85x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ABT scores 7/9 vs TLSI's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricTLSI logoTLSITriSalus Life Sci…ANGO logoANGOAngioDynamics, In…NVCR logoNVCRNovoCure LimitedATRC logoATRCAtriCure, Inc.ABT logoABTAbbott Laboratori…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-15.7%-50.8%-1.0%+27.3%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-110.7%-10.3%-16.5%-0.7%+16.6%
ROICReturn on invested capital-22.9%-16.4%-0.6%+9.9%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-143.4%-18.6%-28.9%-0.6%+10.8%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–945557
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.85x0.18x0.32x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$14M-$56M$187M-$79M$7.7B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$20M$56M$103M$167M$7.6B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$34M$0$290M$88M$15.3B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-9.61x-258.19x-96.80x0.47x19.22x
ABT leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

ANGO leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in ABT five years ago would be worth $7,982 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $983 for NVCR. Over the past 12 months, ANGO leads with a +20.7% total return vs ABT's -35.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ANGO at 7.7% vs NVCR's -36.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricTLSI logoTLSITriSalus Life Sci…ANGO logoANGOAngioDynamics, In…NVCR logoNVCRNovoCure LimitedATRC logoATRCAtriCure, Inc.ABT logoABTAbbott Laboratori…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-27.4%-11.7%+36.4%-33.1%-31.1%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-14.6%+20.7%+2.6%-15.7%-35.3%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-57.0%+25.0%-74.2%-45.0%-17.8%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-54.3%-51.6%-90.2%-64.2%-20.2%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-57.9%-9.7%+38.5%+84.4%+166.6%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-24.5%+7.7%-36.4%-18.1%-6.3%
ANGO leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — NVCR and ABT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

ABT is the less volatile stock with a 0.22 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NVCR's 2.15 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NVCR currently trades 89.2% from its 52-week high vs TLSI's 55.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricTLSI logoTLSITriSalus Life Sci…ANGO logoANGOAngioDynamics, In…NVCR logoNVCRNovoCure LimitedATRC logoATRCAtriCure, Inc.ABT logoABTAbbott Laboratori…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.36x1.26x2.15x0.95x0.22x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$7.95$13.99$20.06$43.18$139.06
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$3.42$8.36$9.82$26.10$84.08
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+55.7%+80.1%+89.2%+60.9%+60.6%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10051.457.570.944.026.3
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded165K397K1.4M678K10.6M
Evenly matched — NVCR and ABT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.

Analyst consensus: TLSI as "Buy", ANGO as "Hold", NVCR as "Buy", ATRC as "Buy", ABT as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 137.0% upside for TLSI (target: $11) vs 47.3% for ANGO (target: $17). ABT is the only dividend payer here at 2.60% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.

MetricTLSI logoTLSITriSalus Life Sci…ANGO logoANGOAngioDynamics, In…NVCR logoNVCRNovoCure LimitedATRC logoATRCAtriCure, Inc.ABT logoABTAbbott Laboratori…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyHoldBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$10.50$16.50$33.50$51.33$128.71
# AnalystsCovering analysts211151941
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+2.6%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises11
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$2.19
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+0.3%+0.4%0.0%+0.8%+0.9%
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway

ABT leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). ANGO leads in 1 (Total Returns). 1 tied.

Best OverallAbbott Laboratories (ABT)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

TLSI vs ANGO vs NVCR vs ATRC vs ABT: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is TLSI or ANGO or NVCR or ATRC or ABT a better buy right now?

For growth investors, TriSalus Life Sciences, Inc.

(TLSI) is the stronger pick with 53. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -3. 8% for AngioDynamics, Inc. (ANGO). Abbott Laboratories (ABT) offers the better valuation at 11. 0x trailing P/E (15. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate TriSalus Life Sciences, Inc. (TLSI) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — TLSI or ANGO or NVCR or ATRC or ABT?

On forward P/E, Abbott Laboratories is actually cheaper at 15.

4x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — TLSI or ANGO or NVCR or ATRC or ABT?

Over the past 5 years, Abbott Laboratories (ABT) delivered a total return of -20.

2%, compared to -90. 2% for NovoCure Limited (NVCR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ABT returned +166. 6% versus TLSI's -57. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — TLSI or ANGO or NVCR or ATRC or ABT?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Abbott Laboratories (ABT) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

22β versus NovoCure Limited's 2. 15β — meaning NVCR is approximately 894% more volatile than ABT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, AtriCure, Inc. (ATRC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 18% versus 85% for NovoCure Limited — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — TLSI or ANGO or NVCR or ATRC or ABT?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), TriSalus Life Sciences, Inc.

(TLSI) is pulling ahead at 53. 4% versus -3. 8% for AngioDynamics, Inc. (ANGO). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Abbott Laboratories grew EPS 133. 6% year-over-year, compared to -47. 2% for TriSalus Life Sciences, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, TLSI leads at 53. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — TLSI or ANGO or NVCR or ATRC or ABT?

Abbott Laboratories (ABT) is the more profitable company, earning 31.

9% net margin versus -154. 3% for TriSalus Life Sciences, Inc. — meaning it keeps 31. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ABT leads at 16. 3% versus -59. 7% for TLSI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TLSI leads at 84. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is TLSI or ANGO or NVCR or ATRC or ABT more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Abbott Laboratories (ABT) trades at 15.

4x forward P/E versus 428. 7x for AtriCure, Inc. — 413. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for TLSI: 137. 0% to $10. 50.

08

Which pays a better dividend — TLSI or ANGO or NVCR or ATRC or ABT?

In this comparison, ABT (2.

6% yield) pays a dividend. TLSI, ANGO, NVCR, ATRC do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is TLSI or ANGO or NVCR or ATRC or ABT better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Abbott Laboratories (ABT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

22), 2. 6% yield, +166. 6% 10Y return). NovoCure Limited (NVCR) carries a higher beta of 2. 15 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (ABT: +166. 6%, NVCR: +38. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between TLSI and ANGO and NVCR and ATRC and ABT?

Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: TLSI is a small-cap high-growth stock; ANGO is a small-cap quality compounder stock; NVCR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ATRC is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ABT is a mid-cap deep-value stock. ABT pays a dividend while TLSI, ANGO, NVCR, ATRC do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

TLSI

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 29%
  • Gross Margin > 50%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

ANGO

Quality Business

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Gross Margin > 32%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

NVCR

Quality Business

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 6%
  • Gross Margin > 45%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

ATRC

Quality Business

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 7%
  • Gross Margin > 45%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

ABT

Dividend Mega-Cap Quality

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Net Margin > 19%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform TLSI and ANGO and NVCR and ATRC and ABT on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(TLSI: 59.8% · ANGO: 9.0%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.