Medical - Devices
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
TLSI vs NVCR vs ANGO vs IRTC vs INVA
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Medical - Instruments & Supplies
Medical - Instruments & Supplies
Medical - Devices
Biotechnology
TLSI vs NVCR vs ANGO vs IRTC vs INVA — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Medical - Devices | Medical - Instruments & Supplies | Medical - Instruments & Supplies | Medical - Devices | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $140M | $1.92B | $469M | $4.10B | $1.93B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $45M | $674M | $307M | $788M | $424M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-39M | $-173M | $-28M | $-28M | $504M |
| Gross Margin | 84.6% | 75.2% | 53.7% | 71.0% | 76.2% |
| Operating Margin | -59.7% | -27.2% | -9.4% | -3.3% | 14.8% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | — | — | 11.9x |
| Total Debt | $34M | $290M | $0.00 | $731M | $269M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $20M | $103M | $56M | $236M | $551M |
TLSI vs NVCR vs ANGO vs IRTC vs INVA — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Feb 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| TriSalus Life Scien… (TLSI) | 100 | 43.4 | -56.6% |
| NovoCure Limited (NVCR) | 100 | 11.3 | -88.7% |
| AngioDynamics, Inc. (ANGO) | 100 | 53.8 | -46.2% |
| iRhythm Technologie… (IRTC) | 100 | 77.6 | -22.4% |
| Innoviva, Inc. (INVA) | 100 | 199.5 | +99.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: TLSI vs NVCR vs ANGO vs IRTC vs INVA
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
TLSI is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 53.4%, EPS growth -47.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 53.9%
- 53.4% revenue growth vs ANGO's -3.8%
NVCR lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
ANGO ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.
- +28.5% vs TLSI's -14.2%
IRTC is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 379.3% 10Y total return vs INVA's 94.9%
INVA carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.13
- Lower volatility, beta 0.13, Low D/E 22.9%, current ratio 14.64x
- Beta 0.13, current ratio 14.64x
- Better valuation composite
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 53.4% revenue growth vs ANGO's -3.8% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 118.9% margin vs TLSI's -86.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.13 vs NVCR's 2.20, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +28.5% vs TLSI's -14.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 32.4% ROA vs TLSI's -110.7% |
TLSI vs NVCR vs ANGO vs IRTC vs INVA — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
TLSI vs NVCR vs ANGO vs IRTC vs INVA — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
INVA leads in 5 of 6 categories
TLSI leads 0 • NVCR leads 0 • ANGO leads 0 • IRTC leads 0
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
INVA leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
IRTC is the larger business by revenue, generating $788M annually — 17.4x TLSI's $45M. INVA is the more profitable business, keeping 118.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to TLSI's -86.9%. On growth, TLSI holds the edge at +59.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $45M | $674M | $307M | $788M | $424M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$26M | -$165M | -$5M | -$6M | $86M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$39M | -$173M | -$28M | -$28M | $504M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$19M | -$48M | -$9M | $19M | $181M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +84.6% | +75.2% | +53.7% | +71.0% | +76.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -59.7% | -27.2% | -9.4% | -3.3% | +14.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -86.9% | -25.7% | -9.0% | -3.5% | +118.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -41.9% | -7.1% | -3.0% | +2.4% | +42.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +59.8% | +12.3% | +9.0% | +25.7% | +10.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +48.8% | -100.0% | +42.3% | +55.7% | +4.0% |
Valuation Metrics
INVA leads this category, winning 2 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $140M | $1.9B | $469M | $4.1B | $1.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $154M | $2.1B | $413M | $4.6B | $1.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -2.42x | -13.80x | -13.58x | -89.83x | 6.91x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — | — | 11.91x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | 0.67x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | — | — | 8.10x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.09x | 2.92x | 1.60x | 5.49x | 4.55x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 5.51x | 2.52x | 26.16x | 1.65x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | 118.84x | 9.88x |
Profitability & Efficiency
INVA leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
INVA delivers a 46.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $46 in annual profit, vs $-51 for NVCR. INVA carries lower financial leverage with a 0.23x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to IRTC's 4.79x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), IRTC scores 6/9 vs TLSI's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | -50.8% | -15.7% | -20.6% | +46.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -110.7% | -16.5% | -10.3% | -2.8% | +32.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | -16.4% | -22.9% | -5.2% | +14.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -143.4% | -28.9% | -18.6% | -4.4% | +12.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.85x | — | 4.79x | 0.23x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $14M | $187M | -$56M | $495M | -$282M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $20M | $103M | $56M | $236M | $551M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $34M | $290M | $0 | $731M | $269M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -9.61x | -96.80x | -258.19x | -1.48x | 63.45x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
INVA leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in INVA five years ago would be worth $19,437 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $875 for NVCR. Over the past 12 months, ANGO leads with a +28.5% total return vs TLSI's -14.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors INVA at 25.0% vs NVCR's -37.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -26.9% | +28.3% | -11.1% | -28.7% | +14.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -14.2% | +1.1% | +28.5% | -8.3% | +21.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -56.7% | -75.7% | +25.8% | -2.1% | +95.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -54.0% | -91.3% | -53.3% | +56.1% | +94.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -57.6% | +30.3% | -9.2% | +379.3% | +94.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -24.4% | -37.6% | +7.9% | -0.7% | +25.0% |
Risk & Volatility
INVA leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
INVA is the less volatile stock with a 0.13 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NVCR's 2.20 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. INVA currently trades 90.7% from its 52-week high vs TLSI's 56.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.36x | 2.20x | 1.32x | 0.93x | 0.13x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $7.95 | $20.06 | $13.99 | $212.00 | $25.15 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $3.42 | $9.82 | $8.36 | $112.31 | $16.52 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +56.1% | +83.9% | +80.6% | +58.9% | +90.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 55.2 | 69.8 | 54.0 | 44.1 | 39.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 167K | 1.5M | 395K | 524K | 621K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: TLSI as "Buy", NVCR as "Buy", ANGO as "Hold", IRTC as "Buy", INVA as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 135.4% upside for TLSI (target: $11) vs 46.4% for ANGO (target: $17).
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Hold | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $10.50 | $33.50 | $16.50 | $193.67 | $37.67 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 2 | 15 | 11 | 19 | 10 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | — | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.3% | 0.0% | +0.4% | 0.0% | +0.2% |
INVA leads in 5 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Valuation Metrics.
TLSI vs NVCR vs ANGO vs IRTC vs INVA: Key Questions Answered
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is TLSI or NVCR or ANGO or IRTC or INVA a better buy right now?
For growth investors, TriSalus Life Sciences, Inc.
(TLSI) is the stronger pick with 53. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -3. 8% for AngioDynamics, Inc. (ANGO). Innoviva, Inc. (INVA) offers the better valuation at 6. 9x trailing P/E (11. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate TriSalus Life Sciences, Inc. (TLSI) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — TLSI or NVCR or ANGO or IRTC or INVA?
Over the past 5 years, Innoviva, Inc.
(INVA) delivered a total return of +94. 4%, compared to -91. 3% for NovoCure Limited (NVCR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: IRTC returned +379. 3% versus TLSI's -57. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — TLSI or NVCR or ANGO or IRTC or INVA?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Innoviva, Inc.
(INVA) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 13β versus NovoCure Limited's 2. 20β — meaning NVCR is approximately 1648% more volatile than INVA relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Innoviva, Inc. (INVA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 23% versus 5% for iRhythm Technologies, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — TLSI or NVCR or ANGO or IRTC or INVA?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), TriSalus Life Sciences, Inc.
(TLSI) is pulling ahead at 53. 4% versus -3. 8% for AngioDynamics, Inc. (ANGO). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Innoviva, Inc. grew EPS 816. 7% year-over-year, compared to -47. 2% for TriSalus Life Sciences, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, TLSI leads at 53. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — TLSI or NVCR or ANGO or IRTC or INVA?
Innoviva, Inc.
(INVA) is the more profitable company, earning 63. 8% net margin versus -154. 3% for TriSalus Life Sciences, Inc. — meaning it keeps 63. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: INVA leads at 38. 5% versus -59. 7% for TLSI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TLSI leads at 84. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is TLSI or NVCR or ANGO or IRTC or INVA more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for TLSI: 135.
4% to $10. 50.
07Which pays a better dividend — TLSI or NVCR or ANGO or IRTC or INVA?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
08Is TLSI or NVCR or ANGO or IRTC or INVA better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Innoviva, Inc.
(INVA) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 13)). NovoCure Limited (NVCR) carries a higher beta of 2. 20 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (INVA: +94. 9%, NVCR: +30. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between TLSI and NVCR and ANGO and IRTC and INVA?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: TLSI is a small-cap high-growth stock; NVCR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ANGO is a small-cap quality compounder stock; IRTC is a small-cap high-growth stock; INVA is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.