TMC
TMC the metals company Inc.
Industrial Materials
Market Cap$2.36B
5Y Perf.+86.9%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
TMC vs LITM
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
LITM
Snow Lake Resources Ltd.
Industrial Materials
Market Cap$10M
5Y Perf.-98.0%
TMC vs LITM — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | TMC | LITM |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Industrial Materials | Industrial Materials |
| Market Cap | $2.36B | $10M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $0.00 |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-296M | $-5M |
| Total Debt | $12M | $0.00 |
| Cash & Equiv. | $3M | $13M |
TMC vs LITM — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
TMC
LITM
| Stock | Nov 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| TMC the metals comp… (TMC) | 100 | 186.9 | +86.9% |
| Snow Lake Resources… (LITM) | 100 | 2.0 | -98.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: TMC vs LITM
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: TMC and LITM are tied at the top with 2 categories each — the right choice depends on your priorities. Snow Lake Resources Ltd. is the stronger pick specifically for profitability and margin quality and operational efficiency and capital deployment. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
TMC
TMC the metals company Inc.
The Income Pick
TMC has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in income & stability and growth exposure.
- beta 2.37
- EPS growth -146.3%
- -39.4% 10Y total return vs LITM's -98.8%
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
LITM
Snow Lake Resources Ltd.
The Quality Compounder
LITM is the clearest fit if your priority is quality and efficiency.
- 0.0% margin vs TMC's -3.9%
- -8.3% ROA vs TMC's -168.3%
Best for: quality and efficiency
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Quality / Margins | LITM | 0.0% margin vs TMC's -3.9% |
| Stability / Safety | TMC | Beta 2.37 vs LITM's 3.12 |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | TMC | +95.9% vs LITM's -42.3% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | LITM | -8.3% ROA vs TMC's -168.3% |
TMC vs LITM — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLTMCLAGGINGLITM
LITMSnow Lake Resources L…
2leads
TMCTMC the metals compan…
3leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs LITMMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
LITM1/1
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
TMC1/1
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
LITM5/6
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
TMC6/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
TMC2/2
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
—
—
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
LITM leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TMC and LITM operate at a comparable scale, with $0 and $0 in trailing revenue.
| Metric | TMCTMC the metals co… | LITMSnow Lake Resourc… |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $0 |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$111M | -$7M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$296M | -$5M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$45M | -$10,052 |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | — |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | — |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | — |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -8.0% | +74.3% |
LITM leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Valuation Metrics
TMC leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | TMCTMC the metals co… | LITMSnow Lake Resourc… |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2.4B | $10M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $2.4B | -$3M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -22.80x | -0.91x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | — |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 0.22x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
TMC leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Profitability & Efficiency
LITM leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), LITM scores 3/9 vs TMC's 2/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | TMCTMC the metals co… | LITMSnow Lake Resourc… |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | -10.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -168.3% | -8.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | -24.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -3.5% | -23.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $8M | -$13M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $3M | $13M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $12M | $0 |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -105.76x | -2316.54x |
LITM leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
TMC leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in TMC five years ago would be worth $6,057 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $124 for LITM. Over the past 12 months, TMC leads with a +95.9% total return vs LITM's -42.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TMC at 95.3% vs LITM's -62.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | TMCTMC the metals co… | LITMSnow Lake Resourc… |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -15.9% | -36.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +95.9% | -42.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +645.1% | -94.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -39.4% | -98.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -39.4% | -98.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +95.3% | -62.3% |
TMC leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
TMC leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
TMC is the less volatile stock with a 2.37 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than LITM's 3.12 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. TMC currently trades 50.2% from its 52-week high vs LITM's 28.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | TMCTMC the metals co… | LITMSnow Lake Resourc… |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.37x | 3.12x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $11.35 | $7.43 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $2.81 | $1.89 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +50.2% | +28.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 63.5 | 45.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 5.5M | 264K |
TMC leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
| Metric | TMCTMC the metals co… | LITMSnow Lake Resourc… |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | — |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $12.00 | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 2 | — |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +1.3% |
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway
TMC leads in 3 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns). LITM leads in 2 (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency).
Best OverallTMC the metals company Inc. (TMC)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
TMC vs LITM: Frequently Asked Questions
7 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is TMC or LITM a better buy right now?
Analysts rate TMC the metals company Inc.
(TMC) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — TMC or LITM?
Over the past 5 years, TMC the metals company Inc.
(TMC) delivered a total return of -39. 4%, compared to -98. 8% for Snow Lake Resources Ltd. (LITM). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TMC returned -39. 4% versus LITM's -98. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — TMC or LITM?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), TMC the metals company Inc.
(TMC) is the lower-risk stock at 2. 37β versus Snow Lake Resources Ltd. 's 3. 12β — meaning LITM is approximately 31% more volatile than TMC relative to the S&P 500.
04Which has better profit margins — TMC or LITM?
TMC the metals company Inc.
(TMC) is the more profitable company, earning 0. 0% net margin versus 0. 0% for Snow Lake Resources Ltd. — meaning it keeps 0. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TMC leads at 0. 0% versus 0. 0% for LITM. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TMC leads at 0. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
05Which pays a better dividend — TMC or LITM?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
06Is TMC or LITM better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, TMC the metals company Inc.
(TMC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding. Snow Lake Resources Ltd. (LITM) carries a higher beta of 3. 12 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (TMC: -39. 4%, LITM: -98. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
07What are the main differences between TMC and LITM?
Both stocks operate in the Basic Materials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.