Medical - Devices
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
TMDX vs NVCR
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Medical - Instruments & Supplies
TMDX vs NVCR — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Medical - Devices | Medical - Instruments & Supplies |
| Market Cap | $2.52B | $1.92B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $636M | $674M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $172M | $-173M |
| Gross Margin | 59.1% | 75.2% |
| Operating Margin | 14.9% | -27.2% |
| Forward P/E | 29.9x | — |
| Total Debt | $470M | $290M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $488M | $103M |
TMDX vs NVCR — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| TransMedics Group, … (TMDX) | 100 | 551.9 | +451.9% |
| NovoCure Limited (NVCR) | 100 | 25.0 | -75.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: TMDX vs NVCR
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
TMDX carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- beta 1.59
- Rev growth 37.1%, EPS growth 382.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 86.4%
- 226.0% 10Y total return vs NVCR's 30.3%
NVCR is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +1.1% vs TMDX's -23.9%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 37.1% revenue growth vs NVCR's 8.3% | |
| Quality / Margins | 27.0% margin vs NVCR's -25.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.59 vs NVCR's 2.20 | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +1.1% vs TMDX's -23.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 15.8% ROA vs NVCR's -16.5%, ROIC 18.8% vs -16.4% |
TMDX vs NVCR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
TMDX vs NVCR — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TMDX leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NVCR and TMDX operate at a comparable scale, with $674M and $636M in trailing revenue. TMDX is the more profitable business, keeping 27.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to NVCR's -25.7%. On growth, TMDX holds the edge at +21.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $636M | $674M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $115M | -$165M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $172M | -$173M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $151M | -$48M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +59.1% | +75.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +14.9% | -27.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +27.0% | -25.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +23.8% | -7.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +21.2% | +12.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -71.4% | -100.0% |
Valuation Metrics
NVCR leads this category, winning 3 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2.5B | $1.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $2.5B | $2.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 14.97x | -13.80x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 29.86x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 18.42x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 4.16x | 2.92x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 6.25x | 5.51x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 18.86x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
TMDX leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
TMDX delivers a 41.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $42 in annual profit, vs $-51 for NVCR. NVCR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.85x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to TMDX's 0.99x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), TMDX scores 7/9 vs NVCR's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +41.9% | -50.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +15.8% | -16.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +18.8% | -16.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +12.6% | -28.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.99x | 0.85x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$19M | $187M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $488M | $103M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $470M | $290M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 33.15x | -96.80x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
TMDX leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in TMDX five years ago would be worth $30,074 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $875 for NVCR. Over the past 12 months, NVCR leads with a +1.1% total return vs TMDX's -23.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TMDX at 0.9% vs NVCR's -37.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -40.6% | +28.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -23.9% | +1.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +2.8% | -75.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +200.7% | -91.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +226.0% | +30.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +0.9% | -37.6% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — TMDX and NVCR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
TMDX is the less volatile stock with a 1.59 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NVCR's 2.20 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NVCR currently trades 83.9% from its 52-week high vs TMDX's 46.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.59x | 2.20x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $156.00 | $20.06 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $70.00 | $9.82 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +46.7% | +83.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 21.8 | 69.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.1M | 1.5M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates TMDX as "Buy" and NVCR as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 99.0% upside for NVCR (target: $34) vs 98.6% for TMDX (target: $145).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $144.75 | $33.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 12 | 15 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.0% | 0.0% |
TMDX leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). NVCR leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
TMDX vs NVCR: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is TMDX or NVCR a better buy right now?
For growth investors, TransMedics Group, Inc.
(TMDX) is the stronger pick with 37. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 8. 3% for NovoCure Limited (NVCR). TransMedics Group, Inc. (TMDX) offers the better valuation at 15. 0x trailing P/E (29. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate TransMedics Group, Inc. (TMDX) a "Buy" — based on 12 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — TMDX or NVCR?
Over the past 5 years, TransMedics Group, Inc.
(TMDX) delivered a total return of +200. 7%, compared to -91. 3% for NovoCure Limited (NVCR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TMDX returned +226. 0% versus NVCR's +30. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — TMDX or NVCR?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), TransMedics Group, Inc.
(TMDX) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 59β versus NovoCure Limited's 2. 20β — meaning NVCR is approximately 39% more volatile than TMDX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, NovoCure Limited (NVCR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 85% versus 99% for TransMedics Group, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — TMDX or NVCR?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), TransMedics Group, Inc.
(TMDX) is pulling ahead at 37. 1% versus 8. 3% for NovoCure Limited (NVCR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: TransMedics Group, Inc. grew EPS 382. 2% year-over-year, compared to 21. 8% for NovoCure Limited. Over a 3-year CAGR, TMDX leads at 86. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — TMDX or NVCR?
TransMedics Group, Inc.
(TMDX) is the more profitable company, earning 31. 4% net margin versus -20. 8% for NovoCure Limited — meaning it keeps 31. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TMDX leads at 17. 9% versus -23. 5% for NVCR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NVCR leads at 74. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is TMDX or NVCR more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for NVCR: 99.
0% to $33. 50.
07Which pays a better dividend — TMDX or NVCR?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
08Is TMDX or NVCR better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, TransMedics Group, Inc.
(TMDX) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+226. 0% 10Y return). NovoCure Limited (NVCR) carries a higher beta of 2. 20 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (TMDX: +226. 0%, NVCR: +30. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between TMDX and NVCR?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: TMDX is a small-cap high-growth stock; NVCR is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.