Staffing & Employment Services
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
TNET vs INSP vs PAYX vs NVCR vs ADP
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Medical - Devices
Staffing & Employment Services
Medical - Instruments & Supplies
Staffing & Employment Services
TNET vs INSP vs PAYX vs NVCR vs ADP — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Staffing & Employment Services | Medical - Devices | Staffing & Employment Services | Medical - Instruments & Supplies | Staffing & Employment Services |
| Market Cap | $1.98B | $1.31B | $33.84B | $1.92B | $86.20B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $4.94B | $915M | $6.03B | $674M | $21.60B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $159M | $131M | $1.60B | $-173M | $4.35B |
| Gross Margin | 17.7% | 85.8% | 73.4% | 75.2% | 47.5% |
| Operating Margin | 5.5% | 5.6% | 37.1% | -27.2% | 19.2% |
| Forward P/E | 10.1x | 24.5x | 17.2x | — | 19.4x |
| Total Debt | $979M | $32M | $5.02B | $290M | $9.07B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1.98B | $105M | $1.63B | $103M | $3.35B |
TNET vs INSP vs PAYX vs NVCR vs ADP — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| TriNet Group, Inc. (TNET) | 100 | 79.8 | -20.2% |
| Inspire Medical Sys… (INSP) | 100 | 55.9 | -44.1% |
| Paychex, Inc. (PAYX) | 100 | 130.4 | +30.4% |
| NovoCure Limited (NVCR) | 100 | 25.0 | -75.0% |
| Automatic Data Proc… (ADP) | 100 | 146.1 | +46.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: TNET vs INSP vs PAYX vs NVCR vs ADP
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
TNET ranks third and is worth considering specifically for value.
- Better valuation composite
INSP has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 13.6%, EPS growth 179.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 30.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.27, Low D/E 4.1%, current ratio 6.08x
- 13.6% revenue growth vs TNET's -0.9%
- 15.2% ROA vs NVCR's -16.5%, ROIC 6.0% vs -16.4%
PAYX is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if defensive is your priority.
- Beta 0.39, yield 4.2%, current ratio 1.28x
- 26.4% margin vs NVCR's -25.7%
- 4.2% yield, 14-year raise streak, vs ADP's 2.7%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
NVCR is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +1.1% vs INSP's -70.9%
ADP is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 37 yrs, beta 0.37, yield 2.7%
- 192.5% 10Y total return vs TNET's 147.4%
- PEG 1.64 vs PAYX's 2.01
- Beta 0.37 vs NVCR's 2.20
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 13.6% revenue growth vs TNET's -0.9% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 26.4% margin vs NVCR's -25.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.37 vs NVCR's 2.20 | |
| Dividends | 4.2% yield, 14-year raise streak, vs ADP's 2.7%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +1.1% vs INSP's -70.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 15.2% ROA vs NVCR's -16.5%, ROIC 6.0% vs -16.4% |
TNET vs INSP vs PAYX vs NVCR vs ADP — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
TNET vs INSP vs PAYX vs NVCR vs ADP — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
PAYX leads in 1 of 6 categories
TNET leads 1 • INSP leads 1 • ADP leads 1 • NVCR leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PAYX leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ADP is the larger business by revenue, generating $21.6B annually — 32.0x NVCR's $674M. PAYX is the more profitable business, keeping 26.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to NVCR's -25.7%. On growth, PAYX holds the edge at +18.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $4.9B | $915M | $6.0B | $674M | $21.6B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $372M | $62M | $2.6B | -$165M | $4.6B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $159M | $131M | $1.6B | -$173M | $4.3B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $330M | $97M | $2.1B | -$48M | $5.2B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +17.7% | +85.8% | +73.4% | +75.2% | +47.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +5.5% | +5.6% | +37.1% | -27.2% | +19.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +3.2% | +14.3% | +26.4% | -25.7% | +20.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +6.7% | +10.6% | +34.1% | -7.1% | +23.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -5.1% | +1.6% | +18.3% | +12.3% | +7.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +10.5% | -5.0% | -3.5% | -100.0% | +10.5% |
Valuation Metrics
TNET leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 9.3x trailing earnings, INSP trades at a 57% valuation discount to ADP's 21.5x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), ADP offers better value at 1.81x vs PAYX's 2.41x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2.0B | $1.3B | $33.8B | $1.9B | $86.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $976M | $1.2B | $37.2B | $2.1B | $91.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 13.57x | 9.32x | 20.58x | -13.80x | 21.45x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 10.07x | 24.46x | 17.15x | — | 19.39x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 2.41x | — | 1.81x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 2.77x | 19.11x | 15.40x | — | 15.59x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.39x | 1.44x | 6.07x | 2.92x | 4.19x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 38.12x | 1.74x | 8.27x | 5.51x | 14.14x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 6.46x | 16.73x | 19.23x | — | 18.07x |
Profitability & Efficiency
INSP leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
TNET delivers a 179.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $180 in annual profit, vs $-51 for NVCR. INSP carries lower financial leverage with a 0.04x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to TNET's 18.13x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ADP scores 8/9 vs NVCR's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +179.7% | +18.0% | +41.1% | -50.8% | +68.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +4.4% | +15.2% | +9.7% | -16.5% | +6.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | +6.0% | +30.9% | -16.4% | +47.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +23.2% | +6.7% | +30.1% | -28.9% | +50.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 7 | 5 | 5 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 18.13x | 0.04x | 1.22x | 0.85x | 1.46x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$1.0B | -$73M | $3.4B | $187M | $5.7B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $2.0B | $105M | $1.6B | $103M | $3.3B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $979M | $32M | $5.0B | $290M | $9.1B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 5.20x | 418.58x | 10.38x | -96.80x | 13.33x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ADP leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ADP five years ago would be worth $12,329 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $875 for NVCR. Over the past 12 months, NVCR leads with a +1.1% total return vs INSP's -70.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ADP at 2.6% vs INSP's -45.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -24.0% | -50.6% | -12.2% | +28.3% | -14.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -45.7% | -70.9% | -34.4% | +1.1% | -27.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -50.1% | -83.9% | -0.3% | -75.7% | +8.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -44.6% | -76.6% | +10.7% | -91.3% | +23.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +147.4% | +82.4% | +135.4% | +30.3% | +192.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -20.7% | -45.6% | -0.1% | -37.6% | +2.6% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — NVCR and ADP each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ADP is the less volatile stock with a 0.37 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NVCR's 2.20 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NVCR currently trades 83.9% from its 52-week high vs INSP's 27.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.83x | 1.27x | 0.39x | 2.20x | 0.37x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $86.78 | $163.35 | $161.24 | $20.06 | $329.93 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $33.60 | $44.41 | $85.45 | $9.82 | $188.16 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +49.4% | +27.9% | +58.5% | +83.9% | +64.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 51.3 | 31.6 | 48.0 | 69.8 | 52.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 433K | 1.1M | 3.9M | 1.5M | 3.4M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — PAYX and ADP each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: TNET as "Hold", INSP as "Hold", PAYX as "Hold", NVCR as "Buy", ADP as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 100.4% upside for INSP (target: $91) vs 16.3% for ADP (target: $249). For income investors, PAYX offers the higher dividend yield at 4.25% vs TNET's 2.53%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold | Hold | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $68.50 | $91.33 | $112.14 | $33.50 | $249.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 14 | 27 | 30 | 15 | 36 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.5% | — | +4.2% | — | +2.7% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | — | 14 | — | 37 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.08 | — | $4.00 | — | $5.87 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +9.3% | +13.3% | +0.3% | 0.0% | +1.5% |
PAYX leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). TNET leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
TNET vs INSP vs PAYX vs NVCR vs ADP: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is TNET or INSP or PAYX or NVCR or ADP a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Inspire Medical Systems, Inc.
(INSP) is the stronger pick with 13. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -0. 9% for TriNet Group, Inc. (TNET). Inspire Medical Systems, Inc. (INSP) offers the better valuation at 9. 3x trailing P/E (24. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate NovoCure Limited (NVCR) a "Buy" — based on 15 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — TNET or INSP or PAYX or NVCR or ADP?
On trailing P/E, Inspire Medical Systems, Inc.
(INSP) is the cheapest at 9. 3x versus Automatic Data Processing, Inc. at 21. 5x. On forward P/E, TriNet Group, Inc. is actually cheaper at 10. 1x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Automatic Data Processing, Inc. wins at 1. 64x versus Paychex, Inc. 's 2. 01x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — TNET or INSP or PAYX or NVCR or ADP?
Over the past 5 years, Automatic Data Processing, Inc.
(ADP) delivered a total return of +23. 3%, compared to -91. 3% for NovoCure Limited (NVCR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ADP returned +192. 5% versus NVCR's +30. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — TNET or INSP or PAYX or NVCR or ADP?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Automatic Data Processing, Inc.
(ADP) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 37β versus NovoCure Limited's 2. 20β — meaning NVCR is approximately 488% more volatile than ADP relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Inspire Medical Systems, Inc. (INSP) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 4% versus 18% for TriNet Group, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — TNET or INSP or PAYX or NVCR or ADP?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Inspire Medical Systems, Inc.
(INSP) is pulling ahead at 13. 6% versus -0. 9% for TriNet Group, Inc. (TNET). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Inspire Medical Systems, Inc. grew EPS 179. 4% year-over-year, compared to -7. 9% for TriNet Group, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, INSP leads at 30. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — TNET or INSP or PAYX or NVCR or ADP?
Paychex, Inc.
(PAYX) is the more profitable company, earning 29. 7% net margin versus -20. 8% for NovoCure Limited — meaning it keeps 29. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PAYX leads at 39. 6% versus -23. 5% for NVCR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — INSP leads at 85. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is TNET or INSP or PAYX or NVCR or ADP more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Automatic Data Processing, Inc. (ADP) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 64x versus Paychex, Inc. 's 2. 01x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, TriNet Group, Inc. (TNET) trades at 10. 1x forward P/E versus 24. 5x for Inspire Medical Systems, Inc. — 14. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for INSP: 100. 4% to $91. 33.
08Which pays a better dividend — TNET or INSP or PAYX or NVCR or ADP?
In this comparison, PAYX (4.
2% yield), ADP (2. 7% yield), TNET (2. 5% yield) pay a dividend. INSP, NVCR do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is TNET or INSP or PAYX or NVCR or ADP better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Automatic Data Processing, Inc.
(ADP) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 37), 2. 7% yield, +192. 5% 10Y return). NovoCure Limited (NVCR) carries a higher beta of 2. 20 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (ADP: +192. 5%, NVCR: +30. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between TNET and INSP and PAYX and NVCR and ADP?
These companies operate in different sectors (TNET (Industrials) and INSP (Healthcare) and PAYX (Industrials) and NVCR (Healthcare) and ADP (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: TNET is a small-cap deep-value stock; INSP is a small-cap deep-value stock; PAYX is a mid-cap income-oriented stock; NVCR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ADP is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. TNET, PAYX, ADP pay a dividend while INSP, NVCR do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.