Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
TNYA vs EDIT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
TNYA vs EDIT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $184M | $297M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $0.00 |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-91M | $-160M |
| Total Debt | $11M | $18M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $101M | $147M |
TNYA vs EDIT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jul 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tenaya Therapeutics… (TNYA) | 100 | 6.5 | -93.5% |
| Editas Medicine, In… (EDIT) | 100 | 7.4 | -92.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: TNYA vs EDIT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
TNYA has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- EPS growth 55.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 2.80, Low D/E 8.8%, current ratio 6.84x
- 11.8% revenue growth vs EDIT's -100.0%
EDIT is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and long-term compounding.
- beta 2.52
- -90.0% 10Y total return vs TNYA's -94.5%
- Beta 2.52, current ratio 3.54x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 11.8% revenue growth vs EDIT's -100.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 2.52 vs TNYA's 2.80 | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +127.8% vs TNYA's +88.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -70.0% ROA vs EDIT's -74.2% |
TNYA vs EDIT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
TNYA vs EDIT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
EDIT leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TNYA and EDIT operate at a comparable scale, with $0 and $0 in trailing revenue.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $0 |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$93M | $0 |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$91M | -$160M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$69M | -$166M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | — |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | — |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | — |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | -151.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +57.1% | +105.5% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — TNYA and EDIT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $184M | $297M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $94M | $168M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -1.44x | -1.68x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | — |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.05x | 9.85x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
TNYA leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
TNYA delivers a -85.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-85 in annual profit, vs $-5 for EDIT. TNYA carries lower financial leverage with a 0.09x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to EDIT's 0.66x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), TNYA scores 4/9 vs EDIT's 1/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -85.2% | -5.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -70.0% | -74.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -103.2% | — |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -79.3% | — |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 1 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.09x | 0.66x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$90M | -$129M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $101M | $147M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $11M | $18M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
EDIT leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in EDIT five years ago would be worth $888 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $553 for TNYA. Over the past 12 months, EDIT leads with a +127.8% total return vs TNYA's +88.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors EDIT at -32.0% vs TNYA's -49.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +15.4% | +47.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +88.6% | +127.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -86.7% | -68.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -94.5% | -91.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -94.5% | -90.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -49.0% | -32.0% |
Risk & Volatility
EDIT leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
EDIT is the less volatile stock with a 2.52 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than TNYA's 2.80 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. EDIT currently trades 66.7% from its 52-week high vs TNYA's 36.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.79x | 2.45x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $2.35 | $4.54 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.36 | $1.29 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +36.1% | +66.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 57.3 | 57.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 4.2M | 1.6M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates TNYA as "Buy" and EDIT as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 174.6% upside for TNYA (target: $2) vs 65.0% for EDIT (target: $5).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $2.33 | $5.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 6 | 25 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
EDIT leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). TNYA leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 1 tied.
TNYA vs EDIT: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is TNYA or EDIT a better buy right now?
Analysts rate Tenaya Therapeutics, Inc.
(TNYA) a "Buy" — based on 6 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — TNYA or EDIT?
Over the past 5 years, Editas Medicine, Inc.
(EDIT) delivered a total return of -91. 1%, compared to -94. 5% for Tenaya Therapeutics, Inc. (TNYA). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: EDIT returned -89. 7% versus TNYA's -93. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — TNYA or EDIT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Editas Medicine, Inc.
(EDIT) is the lower-risk stock at 2. 45β versus Tenaya Therapeutics, Inc. 's 2. 79β — meaning TNYA is approximately 14% more volatile than EDIT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Tenaya Therapeutics, Inc. (TNYA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 9% versus 66% for Editas Medicine, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — TNYA or EDIT?
On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Tenaya Therapeutics, Inc.
grew EPS 55. 0% year-over-year, compared to 37. 5% for Editas Medicine, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — TNYA or EDIT?
Tenaya Therapeutics, Inc.
(TNYA) is the more profitable company, earning 0. 0% net margin versus 0. 0% for Editas Medicine, Inc. — meaning it keeps 0. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TNYA leads at 0. 0% versus 0. 0% for EDIT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TNYA leads at 0. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — TNYA or EDIT?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is TNYA or EDIT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Editas Medicine, Inc.
(EDIT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding. Tenaya Therapeutics, Inc. (TNYA) carries a higher beta of 2. 79 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (EDIT: -89. 7%, TNYA: -93. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between TNYA and EDIT?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.