Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
TNYA vs RCKT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
TNYA vs RCKT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $184M | $398M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $0.00 |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-91M | $-223M |
| Total Debt | $11M | $25M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $101M | $78M |
TNYA vs RCKT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jul 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tenaya Therapeutics… (TNYA) | 100 | 5.5 | -94.5% |
| Rocket Pharmaceutic… (RCKT) | 100 | 10.2 | -89.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: TNYA vs RCKT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
TNYA has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- EPS growth 55.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 2.80, Low D/E 8.8%, current ratio 6.84x
- 11.8% revenue growth vs RCKT's 10.5%
RCKT is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and long-term compounding.
- beta 1.31
- -91.3% 10Y total return vs TNYA's -94.5%
- Beta 1.31, current ratio 6.38x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 11.8% revenue growth vs RCKT's 10.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.31 vs TNYA's 2.80 | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +88.6% vs RCKT's -45.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -67.5% ROA vs TNYA's -70.0%, ROIC -63.2% vs -103.2% |
TNYA vs RCKT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TNYA leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TNYA and RCKT operate at a comparable scale, with $0 and $0 in trailing revenue.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $0 |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$93M | -$232M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$91M | -$223M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$69M | -$190M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | — |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | — |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | — |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +57.1% | +38.7% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — TNYA and RCKT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $184M | $398M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $94M | $345M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -1.44x | -1.83x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | — |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.05x | 1.47x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — TNYA and RCKT each lead in 4 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
RCKT delivers a -80.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-80 in annual profit, vs $-85 for TNYA. TNYA carries lower financial leverage with a 0.09x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to RCKT's 0.09x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), TNYA scores 4/9 vs RCKT's 1/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -85.2% | -80.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -70.0% | -67.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -103.2% | -63.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -79.3% | -58.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 1 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.09x | 0.09x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$90M | -$53M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $101M | $78M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $11M | $25M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
RCKT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in RCKT five years ago would be worth $838 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $553 for TNYA. Over the past 12 months, TNYA leads with a +88.6% total return vs RCKT's -45.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors RCKT at -44.4% vs TNYA's -49.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +15.4% | +6.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +88.6% | -45.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -86.7% | -82.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -94.5% | -91.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -94.5% | -91.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -49.0% | -44.4% |
Risk & Volatility
RCKT leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
RCKT is the less volatile stock with a 1.31 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than TNYA's 2.80 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. RCKT currently trades 49.7% from its 52-week high vs TNYA's 36.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.80x | 1.31x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $2.35 | $7.39 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.36 | $2.19 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +36.1% | +49.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 57.3 | 54.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 4.2M | 3.5M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates TNYA as "Buy" and RCKT as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 174.6% upside for TNYA (target: $2) vs 36.2% for RCKT (target: $5).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $2.33 | $5.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 6 | 19 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
RCKT leads in 2 of 6 categories (Total Returns, Risk & Volatility). TNYA leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 2 tied.
TNYA vs RCKT: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is TNYA or RCKT a better buy right now?
Analysts rate Tenaya Therapeutics, Inc.
(TNYA) a "Buy" — based on 6 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — TNYA or RCKT?
Over the past 5 years, Rocket Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(RCKT) delivered a total return of -91. 6%, compared to -94. 5% for Tenaya Therapeutics, Inc. (TNYA). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: RCKT returned -91. 3% versus TNYA's -94. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — TNYA or RCKT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Rocket Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(RCKT) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 31β versus Tenaya Therapeutics, Inc. 's 2. 80β — meaning TNYA is approximately 113% more volatile than RCKT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Tenaya Therapeutics, Inc. (TNYA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 9% versus 9% for Rocket Pharmaceuticals, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — TNYA or RCKT?
On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Tenaya Therapeutics, Inc.
grew EPS 55. 0% year-over-year, compared to 26. 4% for Rocket Pharmaceuticals, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — TNYA or RCKT?
Tenaya Therapeutics, Inc.
(TNYA) is the more profitable company, earning 0. 0% net margin versus 0. 0% for Rocket Pharmaceuticals, Inc. — meaning it keeps 0. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TNYA leads at 0. 0% versus 0. 0% for RCKT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TNYA leads at 0. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — TNYA or RCKT?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is TNYA or RCKT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Rocket Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(RCKT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding. Tenaya Therapeutics, Inc. (TNYA) carries a higher beta of 2. 80 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (RCKT: -91. 3%, TNYA: -94. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between TNYA and RCKT?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.