Asset Management
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
TONX vs GLXY vs MSTR vs COIN vs MARA
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Financial - Capital Markets
Software - Application
Financial - Data & Stock Exchanges
Financial - Capital Markets
TONX vs GLXY vs MSTR vs COIN vs MARA — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Asset Management | Financial - Capital Markets | Software - Application | Financial - Data & Stock Exchanges | Financial - Capital Markets |
| Market Cap | $206M | $117.66B | $62.64B | $53.12B | $4.92B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $895K | $61.36B | $490M | $7.18B | $907M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $76M | $40M | $-12.36B | $801M | $-1.31B |
| Gross Margin | 75.0% | 1.9% | 68.1% | 74.6% | -47.7% |
| Operating Margin | -13.0% | 0.9% | 94.2% | 20.0% | -90.6% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | 3.5x | 81.0x | — |
| Total Debt | $464K | $5.33B | $8.28B | $7.83B | $3.65B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $8M | $1.45B | $2.30B | $11.29B | $547M |
TONX vs GLXY vs MSTR vs COIN vs MARA — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 25 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| TON Strategy Co. (TONX) | 100 | 45.0 | -55.0% |
| Galaxy Digital (GLXY) | 100 | 166.6 | +66.6% |
| Strategy Inc (MSTR) | 100 | 50.8 | -49.2% |
| Coinbase Global, In… (COIN) | 100 | 81.6 | -18.4% |
| Marathon Digital Ho… (MARA) | 100 | 91.6 | -8.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: TONX vs GLXY vs MSTR vs COIN vs MARA
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
TONX carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 13.2%, EPS growth 100.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 2.03, Low D/E 2.9%, current ratio 3.84x
- NIM 4.5% vs MARA's 0.1%
- 13.2% NII/revenue growth vs MSTR's 3.0%
GLXY ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.
- +32.6% vs MSTR's -54.7%
MSTR is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 2.56, yield 0.7%
- 9.0% 10Y total return vs GLXY's 32.6%
- Beta 2.56, yield 0.7%, current ratio 5.62x
- Better valuation composite
COIN is the clearest fit if your priority is quality.
- 17.6% margin vs MSTR's -25.2%
Among these 5 stocks, MARA doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 13.2% NII/revenue growth vs MSTR's 3.0% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 17.6% margin vs MSTR's -25.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 2.03 vs GLXY's 3.69, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 0.7% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs GLXY's 0.0%, (3 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +32.6% vs MSTR's -54.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 42.1% ROA vs MSTR's -19.4%, ROIC -79.4% vs -9.9% |
TONX vs GLXY vs MSTR vs COIN vs MARA — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
TONX vs GLXY vs MSTR vs COIN vs MARA — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
TONX leads in 2 of 6 categories
MSTR leads 2 • GLXY leads 0 • COIN leads 0 • MARA leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — TONX and MSTR each lead in 2 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GLXY is the larger business by revenue, generating $61.4B annually — 68553.8x TONX's $895,000. COIN is the more profitable business, keeping 17.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to MSTR's -25.2%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $895,000 | $61.4B | $490M | $7.2B | $907M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$30M | $609M | $480M | $202M | $627M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $76M | $40M | -$12.4B | $801M | -$1.3B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$15M | $55M | $7.6B | $2.8B | -$312M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +75.0% | +1.9% | +68.1% | +74.6% | -47.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -13.0% | +0.9% | +94.2% | +20.0% | -90.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -11.5% | -0.4% | -25.2% | +17.6% | -144.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -10.2% | -2.4% | +15.5% | +33.8% | -34.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | +11.9% | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +158.4% | -4.7% | -132.0% | -7.2% | -4.8% |
Valuation Metrics
TONX leads this category, winning 2 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, COIN's 30.6x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than GLXY's 199.5x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $206M | $117.7B | $62.6B | $53.1B | $4.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $199M | $121.5B | $68.6B | $49.7B | $8.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -209.20x | -57.04x | -12.32x | 45.20x | -3.51x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | 3.50x | 81.00x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | 0.90x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 199.52x | — | 30.59x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 229.91x | 1.92x | 131.25x | 7.40x | 5.42x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.13x | 38.77x | 1.08x | 3.91x | 1.32x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | 21.89x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
TONX leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
TONX delivers a 44.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $44 in annual profit, vs $-31 for MARA. TONX carries lower financial leverage with a 0.03x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to GLXY's 1.76x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), TONX scores 6/9 vs GLXY's 1/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +44.2% | +1.5% | -24.1% | +5.7% | -30.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +42.1% | +0.4% | -19.4% | +2.8% | -17.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -79.4% | +9.2% | -9.9% | +5.7% | -9.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -116.5% | +16.2% | -12.6% | +8.1% | -12.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.03x | 1.76x | 0.16x | 0.53x | 1.05x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$7M | $3.9B | $6.0B | -$3.5B | $3.1B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $8M | $1.4B | $2.3B | $11.3B | $547M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $464,000 | $5.3B | $8.3B | $7.8B | $3.6B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 45245.50x | 9.71x | 9.05x | 16.97x | 4.73x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
MSTR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in MSTR five years ago would be worth $32,939 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4 for TONX. Over the past 12 months, GLXY leads with a +32.6% total return vs MSTR's -54.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MSTR at 85.3% vs TONX's -77.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +51.0% | +22.1% | +19.4% | -15.0% | +30.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -38.0% | +32.6% | -54.7% | -2.6% | -9.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -98.9% | +32.6% | +536.5% | +246.2% | +38.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | +32.6% | +229.4% | -31.4% | -53.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | +32.6% | +896.8% | -38.7% | -50.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -77.9% | +9.9% | +85.3% | +51.3% | +11.5% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — TONX and GLXY each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
TONX is the less volatile stock with a 2.03 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than GLXY's 3.69 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. GLXY currently trades 65.8% from its 52-week high vs TONX's 12.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.03x | 3.69x | 2.56x | 3.13x | 3.10x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $29.77 | $45.92 | $457.22 | $444.65 | $23.45 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.75 | $16.43 | $104.17 | $139.36 | $6.66 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +12.2% | +65.8% | +41.0% | +45.2% | +55.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 69.1 | 63.1 | 62.7 | 50.7 | 65.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 419K | 5.4M | 18.7M | 10.8M | 47.5M |
Analyst Outlook
MSTR leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: TONX as "Buy", GLXY as "Buy", MSTR as "Buy", COIN as "Buy", MARA as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 62.1% upside for MSTR (target: $304) vs 18.8% for COIN (target: $239). MSTR is the only dividend payer here at 0.69% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $37.43 | $304.00 | $239.00 | $16.13 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 2 | 11 | 29 | 37 | 19 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.0% | +0.7% | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 1 | 1 | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.01 | $1.30 | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +1.5% | +1.0% |
TONX leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). MSTR leads in 2 (Total Returns, Analyst Outlook). 2 tied.
TONX vs GLXY vs MSTR vs COIN vs MARA: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is TONX or GLXY or MSTR or COIN or MARA a better buy right now?
For growth investors, TON Strategy Co.
(TONX) is the stronger pick with 1321% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 3. 0% for Strategy Inc (MSTR). Coinbase Global, Inc. (COIN) offers the better valuation at 45. 2x trailing P/E (81. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate TON Strategy Co. (TONX) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — TONX or GLXY or MSTR or COIN or MARA?
On forward P/E, Strategy Inc is actually cheaper at 3.
5x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — TONX or GLXY or MSTR or COIN or MARA?
Over the past 5 years, Strategy Inc (MSTR) delivered a total return of +229.
4%, compared to -100. 0% for TON Strategy Co. (TONX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MSTR returned +896. 8% versus TONX's -100. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — TONX or GLXY or MSTR or COIN or MARA?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), TON Strategy Co.
(TONX) is the lower-risk stock at 2. 03β versus Galaxy Digital's 3. 69β — meaning GLXY is approximately 81% more volatile than TONX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, TON Strategy Co. (TONX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 176% for Galaxy Digital — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — TONX or GLXY or MSTR or COIN or MARA?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), TON Strategy Co.
(TONX) is pulling ahead at 1321% versus 3. 0% for Strategy Inc (MSTR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: TON Strategy Co. grew EPS 100. 0% year-over-year, compared to -314. 5% for Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — TONX or GLXY or MSTR or COIN or MARA?
Coinbase Global, Inc.
(COIN) is the more profitable company, earning 17. 6% net margin versus -1154. 1% for TON Strategy Co. — meaning it keeps 17. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: COIN leads at 20. 0% versus -1301. 0% for TONX. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TONX leads at 75. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is TONX or GLXY or MSTR or COIN or MARA more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Strategy Inc (MSTR) trades at 3.
5x forward P/E versus 81. 0x for Coinbase Global, Inc. — 77. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for MSTR: 62. 1% to $304. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — TONX or GLXY or MSTR or COIN or MARA?
In this comparison, MSTR (0.
7% yield) pays a dividend. TONX, GLXY, COIN, MARA do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is TONX or GLXY or MSTR or COIN or MARA better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Strategy Inc (MSTR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (0.
7% yield, +896. 8% 10Y return). TON Strategy Co. (TONX) carries a higher beta of 2. 03 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (MSTR: +896. 8%, TONX: -100. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between TONX and GLXY and MSTR and COIN and MARA?
These companies operate in different sectors (TONX (Financial Services) and GLXY (Financial Services) and MSTR (Technology) and COIN (Financial Services) and MARA (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: TONX is a small-cap high-growth stock; GLXY is a mid-cap high-growth stock; MSTR is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; COIN is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; MARA is a small-cap high-growth stock. MSTR pays a dividend while TONX, GLXY, COIN, MARA do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.