Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

TOON vs CURI vs FUBO vs NFLX vs DIS

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
TOON
Kartoon Studios Inc.

Entertainment

Communication ServicesAMEX • US
Market Cap$30M
5Y Perf.-96.9%
CURI
CuriosityStream Inc.

Broadcasting

Communication ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$184M
5Y Perf.-67.9%
FUBO
fuboTV Inc.

Broadcasting

Communication ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$317M
5Y Perf.-92.2%
NFLX
Netflix, Inc.

Entertainment

Communication ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$374.00B
5Y Perf.+110.3%
DIS
The Walt Disney Company

Entertainment

Communication ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$192.60B
5Y Perf.-7.3%

TOON vs CURI vs FUBO vs NFLX vs DIS — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
TOON logoTOON
CURI logoCURI
FUBO logoFUBO
NFLX logoNFLX
DIS logoDIS
IndustryEntertainmentBroadcastingBroadcastingEntertainmentEntertainment
Market Cap$30M$184M$317M$374.00B$192.60B
Revenue (TTM)$39M$72M$2.72B$45.18B$97.26B
Net Income (TTM)$-25M$-6M$156M$10.98B$11.22B
Gross Margin26.2%56.6%11.1%48.5%37.2%
Operating Margin-32.5%-10.2%-2.6%29.5%15.5%
Forward P/E89.7x24.8x16.5x
Total Debt$17M$12M$670M$14.46B$44.88B
Cash & Equiv.$8M$18M$452M$9.03B$5.70B

TOON vs CURI vs FUBO vs NFLX vs DISLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

TOON
CURI
FUBO
NFLX
DIS
StockMay 20May 26Return
Kartoon Studios Inc. (TOON)1003.1-96.9%
CuriosityStream Inc. (CURI)10032.1-67.9%
fuboTV Inc. (FUBO)1007.8-92.2%
Netflix, Inc. (NFLX)100210.3+110.3%
The Walt Disney Com… (DIS)10092.7-7.3%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: TOON vs CURI vs FUBO vs NFLX vs DIS

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: NFLX leads in 3 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for profitability and margin quality and capital preservation and lower volatility. The Walt Disney Company is the stronger pick specifically for valuation and capital efficiency and recent price momentum and sentiment. CURI and FUBO also each lead in at least one category. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
TOON
Kartoon Studios Inc.
The Communication Services Pick

Among these 5 stocks, TOON doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: communication services exposure
CURI
CuriosityStream Inc.
The Income Pick

CURI ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.

  • Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 1.44, yield 12.2%
  • Lower volatility, beta 1.44, Low D/E 30.0%, current ratio 1.23x
  • Beta 1.44, yield 12.2%, current ratio 1.23x
  • 12.2% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs DIS's 0.9%, (3 stocks pay no dividend)
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
FUBO
fuboTV Inc.
The Growth Play

FUBO is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.

  • Rev growth 67.7%, EPS growth 96.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 39.2%
  • 67.7% revenue growth vs TOON's -26.1%
Best for: growth exposure
NFLX
Netflix, Inc.
The Long-Run Compounder

NFLX carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding.

  • 8.8% 10Y total return vs DIS's 11.8%
  • 24.3% margin vs TOON's -64.1%
  • Beta 0.39 vs FUBO's 1.77
  • 19.8% ROA vs TOON's -37.5%, ROIC 29.8% vs -20.6%
Best for: long-term compounding
DIS
The Walt Disney Company
The Value Play

DIS is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if value and momentum is your priority.

  • Lower P/E (16.5x vs 24.8x)
  • +7.7% vs FUBO's -65.6%
Best for: value and momentum
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthFUBO logoFUBO67.7% revenue growth vs TOON's -26.1%
ValueDIS logoDISLower P/E (16.5x vs 24.8x)
Quality / MarginsNFLX logoNFLX24.3% margin vs TOON's -64.1%
Stability / SafetyNFLX logoNFLXBeta 0.39 vs FUBO's 1.77
DividendsCURI logoCURI12.2% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs DIS's 0.9%, (3 stocks pay no dividend)
Momentum (1Y)DIS logoDIS+7.7% vs FUBO's -65.6%
Efficiency (ROA)NFLX logoNFLX19.8% ROA vs TOON's -37.5%, ROIC 29.8% vs -20.6%

TOON vs CURI vs FUBO vs NFLX vs DIS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

TOONKartoon Studios Inc.
FY 2024
Production Services
64.3%$18M
Content Distribution
34.6%$10M
License
1.1%$298,000
CURICuriosityStream Inc.
FY 2025
Trade And Barter Transactions
100.0%$18,000
FUBOfuboTV Inc.
FY 2024
Subscription and Circulation
92.4%$1.5B
Advertising
7.1%$115M
Service, Other
0.5%$7M
NFLXNetflix, Inc.
FY 2024
Streaming
100.0%$39.0B
DISThe Walt Disney Company
FY 2025
Admission
20.7%$11.7B
Advertising
19.6%$11.1B
Retail and wholesale sales of merchandise, food and beverage
17.0%$9.6B
Resort and vacations
16.3%$9.2B
Other Revenue
8.3%$4.7B
License
6.8%$3.9B
TV/SVOD distribution licensing
6.7%$3.8B
Other (1)
4.6%$2.6B

TOON vs CURI vs FUBO vs NFLX vs DIS — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLNFLXLAGGINGDIS

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

NFLX leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

DIS is the larger business by revenue, generating $97.3B annually — 2489.7x TOON's $39M. NFLX is the more profitable business, keeping 24.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to TOON's -64.1%. On growth, FUBO holds the edge at +2.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricTOON logoTOONKartoon Studios I…CURI logoCURICuriosityStream I…FUBO logoFUBOfuboTV Inc.NFLX logoNFLXNetflix, Inc.DIS logoDISThe Walt Disney C…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$39M$72M$2.7B$45.2B$97.3B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$9M$14M-$14M$30.1B$20.5B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$25M-$6M$156M$11.0B$11.2B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$14M$13M-$81M$9.5B$7.1B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+26.2%+56.6%+11.1%+48.5%+37.2%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-32.5%-10.2%-2.6%+29.5%+15.5%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-64.1%-9.0%+5.7%+24.3%+11.5%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-36.7%+18.1%-3.0%+20.9%+7.3%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+13.3%+35.8%+2.5%+17.6%+6.5%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-168.7%-31.2%+81.8%+31.1%-29.8%
NFLX leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

FUBO leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 15.9x trailing earnings, DIS trades at a 55% valuation discount to NFLX's 34.9x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, DIS's 12.1x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than CURI's 24.2x.

MetricTOON logoTOONKartoon Studios I…CURI logoCURICuriosityStream I…FUBO logoFUBOfuboTV Inc.NFLX logoNFLXNetflix, Inc.DIS logoDISThe Walt Disney C…
Market CapShares × price$30M$184M$317M$374.0B$192.6B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$39M$179M$534M$379.4B$231.8B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-1.19x-28.55x-44.88x34.89x15.87x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.89.71x24.80x16.53x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate1.06x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple24.22x12.61x12.10x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue0.91x2.57x0.12x8.28x2.04x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share0.68x4.36x0.12x14.32x1.72x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF14.24x39.53x19.11x
FUBO leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

NFLX leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

NFLX delivers a 41.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $41 in annual profit, vs $-104 for TOON. FUBO carries lower financial leverage with a 0.25x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to NFLX's 0.54x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), DIS scores 8/9 vs FUBO's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricTOON logoTOONKartoon Studios I…CURI logoCURICuriosityStream I…FUBO logoFUBOfuboTV Inc.NFLX logoNFLXNetflix, Inc.DIS logoDISThe Walt Disney C…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-104.2%-13.1%+16.2%+41.3%+9.8%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-37.5%-8.2%+8.1%+19.8%+5.6%
ROICReturn on invested capital-20.6%-12.2%-3.3%+29.8%+6.9%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-28.9%-13.6%-4.1%+30.5%+8.5%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–945478
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.46x0.30x0.25x0.54x0.39x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$9M-$6M$218M$5.4B$39.2B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$8M$18M$452M$9.0B$5.7B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$17M$12M$670M$14.5B$44.9B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-38.89x10.35x17.33x9.95x
NFLX leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

Evenly matched — CURI and NFLX and DIS each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in NFLX five years ago would be worth $17,519 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $399 for TOON. Over the past 12 months, DIS leads with a +7.7% total return vs FUBO's -65.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CURI at 54.7% vs TOON's -36.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricTOON logoTOONKartoon Studios I…CURI logoCURICuriosityStream I…FUBO logoFUBOfuboTV Inc.NFLX logoNFLXNetflix, Inc.DIS logoDISThe Walt Disney C…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-11.2%-14.4%-65.3%-3.0%-2.8%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+0.4%-23.1%-65.6%-23.6%+7.7%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-74.8%+270.5%-51.7%+166.5%+8.0%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-96.0%-70.2%-94.8%+75.2%-39.8%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-98.7%-63.2%-90.3%+875.3%+11.8%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-36.8%+54.7%-21.6%+38.6%+2.6%
Evenly matched — CURI and NFLX and DIS each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — NFLX and DIS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

NFLX is the less volatile stock with a 0.39 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FUBO's 1.77 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. DIS currently trades 87.2% from its 52-week high vs FUBO's 19.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricTOON logoTOONKartoon Studios I…CURI logoCURICuriosityStream I…FUBO logoFUBOfuboTV Inc.NFLX logoNFLXNetflix, Inc.DIS logoDISThe Walt Disney C…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.49x1.44x1.77x0.39x0.90x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$0.93$7.15$56.64$134.12$124.69
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$0.53$2.81$2.48$75.01$92.19
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+69.1%+43.9%+19.0%+65.8%+87.2%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10050.043.038.035.364.4
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded208K349K1.9M44.0M9.1M
Evenly matched — NFLX and DIS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

CURI leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: CURI as "Buy", FUBO as "Hold", NFLX as "Buy", DIS as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 299.3% upside for FUBO (target: $43) vs 16.9% for CURI (target: $4). For income investors, CURI offers the higher dividend yield at 12.16% vs DIS's 0.92%.

MetricTOON logoTOONKartoon Studios I…CURI logoCURICuriosityStream I…FUBO logoFUBOfuboTV Inc.NFLX logoNFLXNetflix, Inc.DIS logoDISThe Walt Disney C…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyHoldBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$3.67$43.00$116.29$139.50
# AnalystsCovering analysts9149963
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+12.2%+0.9%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises21
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.38$1.00
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%0.0%0.0%+2.4%+1.8%
CURI leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

NFLX leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). FUBO leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.

Best OverallNetflix, Inc. (NFLX)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

TOON vs CURI vs FUBO vs NFLX vs DIS: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is TOON or CURI or FUBO or NFLX or DIS a better buy right now?

For growth investors, fuboTV Inc.

(FUBO) is the stronger pick with 67. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -26. 1% for Kartoon Studios Inc. (TOON). The Walt Disney Company (DIS) offers the better valuation at 15. 9x trailing P/E (16. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate CuriosityStream Inc. (CURI) a "Buy" — based on 9 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — TOON or CURI or FUBO or NFLX or DIS?

On trailing P/E, The Walt Disney Company (DIS) is the cheapest at 15.

9x versus Netflix, Inc. at 34. 9x. On forward P/E, The Walt Disney Company is actually cheaper at 16. 5x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — TOON or CURI or FUBO or NFLX or DIS?

Over the past 5 years, Netflix, Inc.

(NFLX) delivered a total return of +75. 2%, compared to -96. 0% for Kartoon Studios Inc. (TOON). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NFLX returned +875. 3% versus TOON's -98. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — TOON or CURI or FUBO or NFLX or DIS?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Netflix, Inc.

(NFLX) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 39β versus fuboTV Inc. 's 1. 77β — meaning FUBO is approximately 354% more volatile than NFLX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, fuboTV Inc. (FUBO) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 25% versus 54% for Netflix, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — TOON or CURI or FUBO or NFLX or DIS?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), fuboTV Inc.

(FUBO) is pulling ahead at 67. 7% versus -26. 1% for Kartoon Studios Inc. (TOON). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: The Walt Disney Company grew EPS 151. 8% year-over-year, compared to 27. 6% for Netflix, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, TOON leads at 60. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — TOON or CURI or FUBO or NFLX or DIS?

Netflix, Inc.

(NFLX) is the more profitable company, earning 24. 3% net margin versus -63. 6% for Kartoon Studios Inc. — meaning it keeps 24. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NFLX leads at 29. 5% versus -52. 1% for TOON. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CURI leads at 56. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is TOON or CURI or FUBO or NFLX or DIS more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, The Walt Disney Company (DIS) trades at 16.

5x forward P/E versus 89. 7x for CuriosityStream Inc. — 73. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FUBO: 299. 3% to $43. 00.

08

Which pays a better dividend — TOON or CURI or FUBO or NFLX or DIS?

In this comparison, CURI (12.

2% yield), DIS (0. 9% yield) pay a dividend. TOON, FUBO, NFLX do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is TOON or CURI or FUBO or NFLX or DIS better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Netflix, Inc.

(NFLX) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 39), +875. 3% 10Y return). fuboTV Inc. (FUBO) carries a higher beta of 1. 77 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (NFLX: +875. 3%, FUBO: -90. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between TOON and CURI and FUBO and NFLX and DIS?

Both stocks operate in the Communication Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: TOON is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CURI is a small-cap high-growth stock; FUBO is a small-cap high-growth stock; NFLX is a large-cap high-growth stock; DIS is a mid-cap deep-value stock. CURI, DIS pay a dividend while TOON, FUBO, NFLX do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

TOON

Quality Business

  • Sector: Communication Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 6%
  • Gross Margin > 15%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

CURI

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Communication Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 17%
  • Gross Margin > 33%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

FUBO

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Communication Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 124%
  • Net Margin > 5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

NFLX

High-Growth Quality Leader

  • Sector: Communication Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 8%
  • Net Margin > 14%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

DIS

Stable Dividend Mega-Cap

  • Sector: Communication Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Net Margin > 6%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform TOON and CURI and FUBO and NFLX and DIS on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(TOON: 13.3% · CURI: 35.8%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.