Financial - Capital Markets
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
TOP vs LSPD vs FUTU vs PAR
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Software - Application
Financial - Capital Markets
Software - Application
TOP vs LSPD vs FUTU vs PAR — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Financial - Capital Markets | Software - Application | Financial - Capital Markets | Software - Application |
| Market Cap | $29M | $1.34B | $51.52B | $617M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $3M | $1.19B | $13.59B | $476M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $2M | $-693M | $7.91B | $-76M |
| Gross Margin | 7.4% | 39.6% | 82.0% | 40.1% |
| Operating Margin | -167.2% | -58.5% | 48.7% | -13.5% |
| Forward P/E | — | 20.0x | 1.5x | 28.3x |
| Total Debt | $271K | $17M | $8.55B | $402M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $12M | $558M | $11.69B | $80M |
TOP vs LSPD vs FUTU vs PAR — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 22 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| TOP Financial Group… (TOP) | 100 | 3.1 | -96.9% |
| Lightspeed Commerce… (LSPD) | 100 | 43.8 | -56.2% |
| Futu Holdings Limit… (FUTU) | 100 | 277.5 | +177.5% |
| PAR Technology Corp… (PAR) | 100 | 39.9 | -60.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: TOP vs LSPD vs FUTU vs PAR
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
TOP is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 1.01
- Lower volatility, beta 1.01, Low D/E 0.8%, current ratio 3.44x
- Beta 1.01, current ratio 3.44x
- Beta 1.01 vs FUTU's 2.04, lower leverage
LSPD plays a supporting role in this comparison — it may shine differently against other peers.
FUTU carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 35.8%, EPS growth 27.2%
- 8.8% 10Y total return vs PAR's 167.3%
- 35.8% NII/revenue growth vs TOP's -58.6%
- Lower P/E (1.5x vs 28.3x)
PAR lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 35.8% NII/revenue growth vs TOP's -58.6% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (1.5x vs 28.3x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 40.1% margin vs TOP's -179.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.01 vs FUTU's 2.04, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +45.1% vs PAR's -75.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 4.6% ROA vs LSPD's -41.3%, ROIC 14.8% vs -36.8% |
TOP vs LSPD vs FUTU vs PAR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
TOP vs LSPD vs FUTU vs PAR — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
FUTU leads in 3 of 6 categories
PAR leads 1 • TOP leads 0 • LSPD leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FUTU leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FUTU is the larger business by revenue, generating $13.6B annually — 4082.0x TOP's $3M. FUTU is the more profitable business, keeping 40.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to TOP's -179.3%. On growth, PAR holds the edge at +19.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $3M | $1.2B | $13.6B | $476M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $6M | -$562M | $10.0B | -$27M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $2M | -$693M | $7.9B | -$76M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $8M | $31M | $0 | -$29M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +7.4% | +39.6% | +82.0% | +40.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -167.2% | -58.5% | +48.7% | -13.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -179.3% | -58.0% | +40.1% | -16.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -4.3% | +2.6% | +2.3% | -6.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +11.5% | — | +19.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -112.2% | -41.2% | +112.0% | +36.1% |
Valuation Metrics
PAR leads this category, winning 2 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $29M | $1.3B | $51.5B | $617M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $17M | $801M | $51.1B | $940M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -4.84x | -2.25x | 29.18x | -7.16x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 20.04x | 1.53x | 28.32x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 0.30x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | 58.89x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 8.62x | 1.25x | 29.69x | 1.36x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.82x | 0.90x | 5.67x | 0.73x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | 13.09x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
FUTU leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
FUTU delivers a 26.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $26 in annual profit, vs $-46 for LSPD. TOP carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to PAR's 0.49x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FUTU scores 4/9 vs TOP's 0/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +5.4% | -46.1% | +26.4% | -9.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +3.6% | -41.3% | +4.6% | -5.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -11.0% | -36.8% | +14.8% | -4.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -13.6% | -33.9% | +25.1% | -5.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 2 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.01x | 0.01x | 0.31x | 0.49x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$12M | -$541M | -$3.1B | $323M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $12M | $558M | $11.7B | $80M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $270,866 | $17M | $8.6B | $402M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | -510.59x | — | -21.71x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
FUTU leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in FUTU five years ago would be worth $11,495 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $456 for TOP. Over the past 12 months, FUTU leads with a +45.1% total return vs PAR's -75.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors FUTU at 53.6% vs TOP's -59.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -23.3% | -16.7% | -17.4% | -58.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -32.0% | +0.3% | +45.1% | -75.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -93.1% | -33.0% | +262.2% | -49.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -95.4% | -84.4% | +15.0% | -80.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -95.4% | -70.3% | +875.5% | +167.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -59.0% | -12.5% | +53.6% | -20.2% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — TOP and FUTU each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
TOP is the less volatile stock with a 1.01 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FUTU's 2.04 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. FUTU currently trades 71.5% from its 52-week high vs PAR's 20.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.01x | 1.58x | 2.04x | 1.54x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $3.33 | $14.34 | $202.53 | $72.15 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.61 | $8.37 | $99.20 | $11.59 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +23.3% | +68.2% | +71.5% | +20.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 44.8 | 53.2 | 65.0 | 47.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 822K | 831K | 1.4M | 1.9M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: LSPD as "Buy", FUTU as "Buy", PAR as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 67.0% upside for PAR (target: $25) vs 25.8% for LSPD (target: $12).
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $12.30 | $224.80 | $25.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 15 | 12 | 11 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | — | — | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +9.9% | 0.0% | +1.1% |
FUTU leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). PAR leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
TOP vs LSPD vs FUTU vs PAR: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is TOP or LSPD or FUTU or PAR a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Futu Holdings Limited (FUTU) is the stronger pick with 35.
8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -58. 6% for TOP Financial Group Limited (TOP). Futu Holdings Limited (FUTU) offers the better valuation at 29. 2x trailing P/E (1. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Lightspeed Commerce Inc. (LSPD) a "Buy" — based on 15 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — TOP or LSPD or FUTU or PAR?
On forward P/E, Futu Holdings Limited is actually cheaper at 1.
5x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — TOP or LSPD or FUTU or PAR?
Over the past 5 years, Futu Holdings Limited (FUTU) delivered a total return of +15.
0%, compared to -95. 4% for TOP Financial Group Limited (TOP). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FUTU returned +875. 5% versus TOP's -95. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — TOP or LSPD or FUTU or PAR?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), TOP Financial Group Limited (TOP) is the lower-risk stock at 1.
01β versus Futu Holdings Limited's 2. 04β — meaning FUTU is approximately 102% more volatile than TOP relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, TOP Financial Group Limited (TOP) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 49% for PAR Technology Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — TOP or LSPD or FUTU or PAR?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Futu Holdings Limited (FUTU) is pulling ahead at 35.
8% versus -58. 6% for TOP Financial Group Limited (TOP). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Futu Holdings Limited grew EPS 27. 2% year-over-year, compared to -1392. 9% for PAR Technology Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, LSPD leads at 25. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — TOP or LSPD or FUTU or PAR?
Futu Holdings Limited (FUTU) is the more profitable company, earning 40.
1% net margin versus -179. 3% for TOP Financial Group Limited — meaning it keeps 40. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FUTU leads at 48. 7% versus -167. 2% for TOP. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FUTU leads at 82. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is TOP or LSPD or FUTU or PAR more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Futu Holdings Limited (FUTU) trades at 1.
5x forward P/E versus 28. 3x for PAR Technology Corporation — 26. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PAR: 67. 0% to $25. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — TOP or LSPD or FUTU or PAR?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is TOP or LSPD or FUTU or PAR better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, TOP Financial Group Limited (TOP) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1.
01)). Lightspeed Commerce Inc. (LSPD) carries a higher beta of 1. 58 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (TOP: -95. 4%, LSPD: -70. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between TOP and LSPD and FUTU and PAR?
These companies operate in different sectors (TOP (Financial Services) and LSPD (Technology) and FUTU (Financial Services) and PAR (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: TOP is a small-cap quality compounder stock; LSPD is a small-cap high-growth stock; FUTU is a mid-cap high-growth stock; PAR is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.