Trucking
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
TOPP vs BTBT vs MARA vs ATXG
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Financial - Capital Markets
Financial - Capital Markets
Integrated Freight & Logistics
TOPP vs BTBT vs MARA vs ATXG — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Trucking | Financial - Capital Markets | Financial - Capital Markets | Integrated Freight & Logistics |
| Market Cap | $20M | $580M | $4.92B | $3M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $17M | $164M | $907M | $4M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-7M | $137M | $-1.31B | $-7M |
| Gross Margin | 3.0% | 61.9% | -47.7% | 14.7% |
| Operating Margin | -48.7% | 16.8% | -90.6% | -49.4% |
| Forward P/E | — | 9.0x | — | — |
| Total Debt | $1M | $14M | $3.65B | $22M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1M | $95M | $547M | $325K |
TOPP vs BTBT vs MARA vs ATXG — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jan 25 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Toppoint Holdings I… (TOPP) | 100 | 53.8 | -46.2% |
| Bit Digital, Inc. (BTBT) | 100 | 57.1 | -42.9% |
| Marathon Digital Ho… (MARA) | 100 | 70.6 | -29.4% |
| Addentax Group Corp. (ATXG) | 100 | 51.1 | -48.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: TOPP vs BTBT vs MARA vs ATXG
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
TOPP is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.49
- Lower volatility, beta 0.49, Low D/E 17.0%, current ratio 3.23x
- Beta 0.49 vs BTBT's 3.41
BTBT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and bank quality.
- Rev growth 264.6%, EPS growth 225.0%
- NIM 0.1% vs MARA's 0.1%
- 264.6% NII/revenue growth vs ATXG's -18.9%
- Better valuation composite
MARA is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- -50.7% 10Y total return vs BTBT's -61.0%
- -9.4% vs ATXG's -55.0%
ATXG is the clearest fit if your priority is defensive.
- Beta 1.48, current ratio 7.54x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 264.6% NII/revenue growth vs ATXG's -18.9% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 17.3% margin vs ATXG's -202.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.49 vs BTBT's 3.41 | |
| Dividends | 0.3% yield; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | -9.4% vs ATXG's -55.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 19.0% ROA vs TOPP's -63.3%, ROIC 6.5% vs -88.0% |
TOPP vs BTBT vs MARA vs ATXG — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
TOPP vs BTBT vs MARA vs ATXG — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
BTBT leads in 2 of 6 categories
ATXG leads 1 • MARA leads 1 • TOPP leads 1 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BTBT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MARA is the larger business by revenue, generating $907M annually — 244.7x ATXG's $4M. BTBT is the more profitable business, keeping 17.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ATXG's -2.0%. On growth, TOPP holds the edge at +10.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $17M | $164M | $907M | $4M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$7M | $166M | $627M | -$947,630 |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$7M | $137M | -$1.3B | -$7M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$2M | -$448M | -$312M | -$1M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +3.0% | +61.9% | -47.7% | +14.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -48.7% | +16.8% | -90.6% | -49.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -44.4% | +17.3% | -144.6% | -2.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -12.9% | -65.3% | -34.4% | -34.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +10.4% | — | — | -7.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +2.8% | -4.8% | -136.8% |
Valuation Metrics
ATXG leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $20M | $580M | $4.9B | $3M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $20M | $498M | $8.0B | $25M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -2.41x | 9.00x | -3.51x | -0.40x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 8.32x | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.18x | 3.54x | 5.42x | 0.70x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.06x | 0.55x | 1.32x | 0.09x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | 4.72x |
Profitability & Efficiency
BTBT leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
BTBT delivers a 21.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $21 in annual profit, vs $-79 for TOPP. BTBT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.03x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MARA's 1.05x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BTBT scores 6/9 vs MARA's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -78.6% | +21.4% | -30.5% | -31.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -63.3% | +19.0% | -17.1% | -19.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -88.0% | +6.5% | -9.0% | -2.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -117.2% | +8.5% | -12.1% | -3.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 6 | 3 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.17x | 0.03x | 1.05x | 1.03x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $262,454 | -$81M | $3.1B | $22M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1M | $95M | $547M | $324,953 |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1M | $14M | $3.6B | $22M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -21.36x | — | 4.73x | -3.67x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
MARA leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in MARA five years ago would be worth $4,651 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $45 for ATXG. Over the past 12 months, MARA leads with a -9.4% total return vs ATXG's -55.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MARA at 11.5% vs ATXG's -65.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +17.3% | -11.8% | +30.6% | -10.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -34.0% | -13.5% | -9.4% | -55.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -73.6% | -21.1% | +38.7% | -95.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -73.6% | -82.8% | -53.5% | -99.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -73.6% | -61.0% | -50.7% | -99.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -35.8% | -7.6% | +11.5% | -65.0% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — TOPP and MARA each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
TOPP is the less volatile stock with a 0.49 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BTBT's 3.41 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MARA currently trades 55.2% from its 52-week high vs ATXG's 18.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.49x | 3.41x | 3.10x | 1.48x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $3.86 | $4.55 | $23.45 | $27.90 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.67 | $1.25 | $6.66 | $0.37 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +25.6% | +39.6% | +55.2% | +18.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 70.0 | 62.2 | 65.7 | 45.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 19K | 18.6M | 47.5M | 157K |
Analyst Outlook
TOPP leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: BTBT as "Buy", MARA as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 177.8% upside for BTBT (target: $5) vs 24.7% for MARA (target: $16). BTBT is the only dividend payer here at 0.31% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | — |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $5.00 | $16.13 | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 2 | 19 | — |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.3% | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 0 | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.01 | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +1.0% | 0.0% |
BTBT leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). ATXG leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
TOPP vs BTBT vs MARA vs ATXG: Key Questions Answered
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is TOPP or BTBT or MARA or ATXG a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Bit Digital, Inc.
(BTBT) is the stronger pick with 264. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -18. 9% for Addentax Group Corp. (ATXG). Bit Digital, Inc. (BTBT) offers the better valuation at 9. 0x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Bit Digital, Inc. (BTBT) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — TOPP or BTBT or MARA or ATXG?
Over the past 5 years, Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc.
(MARA) delivered a total return of -53. 5%, compared to -99. 6% for Addentax Group Corp. (ATXG). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MARA returned -50. 7% versus ATXG's -99. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — TOPP or BTBT or MARA or ATXG?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Toppoint Holdings Inc.
(TOPP) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 49β versus Bit Digital, Inc. 's 3. 41β — meaning BTBT is approximately 597% more volatile than TOPP relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Bit Digital, Inc. (BTBT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 105% for Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — TOPP or BTBT or MARA or ATXG?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Bit Digital, Inc.
(BTBT) is pulling ahead at 264. 6% versus -18. 9% for Addentax Group Corp. (ATXG). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Bit Digital, Inc. grew EPS 225. 0% year-over-year, compared to -36. 0% for Toppoint Holdings Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, TOPP leads at -8. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — TOPP or BTBT or MARA or ATXG?
Bit Digital, Inc.
(BTBT) is the more profitable company, earning 17. 3% net margin versus -144. 6% for Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc. — meaning it keeps 17. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BTBT leads at 16. 8% versus -90. 6% for MARA. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BTBT leads at 61. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — TOPP or BTBT or MARA or ATXG?
In this comparison, BTBT (0.
3% yield) pays a dividend. TOPP, MARA, ATXG do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
07Is TOPP or BTBT or MARA or ATXG better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Toppoint Holdings Inc.
(TOPP) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 49)). Bit Digital, Inc. (BTBT) carries a higher beta of 3. 41 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (TOPP: -73. 6%, BTBT: -61. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between TOPP and BTBT and MARA and ATXG?
These companies operate in different sectors (TOPP (Industrials) and BTBT (Financial Services) and MARA (Financial Services) and ATXG (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: TOPP is a small-cap quality compounder stock; BTBT is a small-cap high-growth stock; MARA is a small-cap high-growth stock; ATXG is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.