TOPP
Toppoint Holdings Inc.
Trucking
Market Cap$20M
5Y Perf.-46.2%
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
TOPP vs CODA vs MNDO vs ATXG
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
CODA
Coda Octopus Group, Inc.
Aerospace & Defense
Market Cap$136M
5Y Perf.+50.4%
MNDO
MIND C.T.I. Ltd
Software - Application
Market Cap$20M
5Y Perf.-52.4%
ATXG
Addentax Group Corp.
Integrated Freight & Logistics
Market Cap$3M
5Y Perf.-48.9%
TOPP vs CODA vs MNDO vs ATXG — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | TOPP | CODA | MNDO | ATXG |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Trucking | Aerospace & Defense | Software - Application | Integrated Freight & Logistics |
| Market Cap | $20M | $136M | $20M | $3M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $17M | $28M | $19M | $4M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-7M | $4M | $3M | $-7M |
| Gross Margin | 3.0% | 66.3% | 51.0% | 14.7% |
| Operating Margin | -48.7% | 17.4% | 10.7% | -49.4% |
| Forward P/E | — | 22.8x | 7.6x | — |
| Total Debt | $1M | $395K | $929K | $22M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1M | $29M | $8M | $325K |
TOPP vs CODA vs MNDO vs ATXG — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
TOPP
CODA
MNDO
ATXG
| Stock | Jan 25 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Toppoint Holdings I… (TOPP) | 100 | 53.8 | -46.2% |
| Coda Octopus Group,… (CODA) | 100 | 150.4 | +50.4% |
| MIND C.T.I. Ltd (MNDO) | 100 | 47.6 | -52.4% |
| Addentax Group Corp. (ATXG) | 100 | 51.1 | -48.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: TOPP vs CODA vs MNDO vs ATXG
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: MNDO leads in 4 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and capital preservation and lower volatility. Coda Octopus Group, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
TOPP
Toppoint Holdings Inc.
The Income Pick
TOPP is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.49
Best for: income & stability
CODA
Coda Octopus Group, Inc.
The Growth Play
CODA is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Rev growth 30.7%, EPS growth 15.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 6.1%
- 8.6% 10Y total return vs MNDO's 65.7%
- 30.7% revenue growth vs ATXG's -18.9%
- 14.8% margin vs ATXG's -202.0%
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
MNDO
MIND C.T.I. Ltd
The Defensive Pick
MNDO carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.05, Low D/E 4.0%, current ratio 3.83x
- Beta 0.05, yield 22.0%, current ratio 3.83x
- Lower P/E (7.6x vs 22.8x)
- Beta 0.05 vs ATXG's 1.48, lower leverage
Best for: sleep-well-at-night and defensive
ATXG
Addentax Group Corp.
The Secondary Option
ATXG lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
Best for: industrials exposure
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | CODA | 30.7% revenue growth vs ATXG's -18.9% |
| Value | MNDO | Lower P/E (7.6x vs 22.8x) |
| Quality / Margins | CODA | 14.8% margin vs ATXG's -202.0% |
| Stability / Safety | MNDO | Beta 0.05 vs ATXG's 1.48, lower leverage |
| Dividends | MNDO | 22.0% yield; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | CODA | +78.9% vs ATXG's -55.0% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | MNDO | 8.6% ROA vs TOPP's -63.3%, ROIC 8.6% vs -88.0% |
TOPP vs CODA vs MNDO vs ATXG — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FY 2024
FY 2025
FY 2025
FY 2024
TOPP vs CODA vs MNDO vs ATXG — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLCODALAGGINGMNDO
Who Leads Where
CODA leads in 3 of 6 categories
ATXG leads 1 • TOPP leads 1 • MNDO leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓MNDOMIND C.T.I. Ltd
0leads
ATXGAddentax Group Corp.
1leads
TOPPToppoint Holdings Inc.
1leads
CODACoda Octopus Group, I…
3leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs TOPPvs ATXGMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
CODA6/6
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
ATXG3/5
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
CODA6/9
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
CODA6/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
Tied
—
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
TOPP1/1
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CODA leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CODA is the larger business by revenue, generating $28M annually — 7.6x ATXG's $4M. CODA is the more profitable business, keeping 14.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ATXG's -2.0%. On growth, CODA holds the edge at +28.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | TOPPToppoint Holdings… | CODACoda Octopus Grou… | MNDOMIND C.T.I. Ltd | ATXGAddentax Group Co… |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $17M | $28M | $19M | $4M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$7M | $6M | $2M | -$947,630 |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$7M | $4M | $3M | -$7M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$2M | $7M | $4M | -$1M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +3.0% | +66.3% | +51.0% | +14.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -48.7% | +17.4% | +10.7% | -49.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -44.4% | +14.8% | +13.4% | -2.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -12.9% | +24.6% | +20.9% | -34.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +10.4% | +28.8% | -6.0% | -7.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +3.0% | -23.4% | -136.8% |
CODA leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
ATXG leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 7.6x trailing earnings, MNDO trades at a 77% valuation discount to CODA's 32.7x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, MNDO's 5.5x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than CODA's 18.3x.
| Metric | TOPPToppoint Holdings… | CODACoda Octopus Grou… | MNDOMIND C.T.I. Ltd | ATXGAddentax Group Co… |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $20M | $136M | $20M | $3M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $20M | $108M | $13M | $25M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -2.41x | 32.73x | 7.62x | -0.40x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 22.85x | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 7.64x | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 18.25x | 5.51x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.18x | 5.14x | 1.04x | 0.70x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.06x | 2.34x | 0.89x | 0.09x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 22.60x | 5.09x | 4.72x |
ATXG leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CODA leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MNDO delivers a 11.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $12 in annual profit, vs $-79 for TOPP. CODA carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ATXG's 1.03x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CODA scores 7/9 vs TOPP's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | TOPPToppoint Holdings… | CODACoda Octopus Grou… | MNDOMIND C.T.I. Ltd | ATXGAddentax Group Co… |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -78.6% | +7.2% | +11.9% | -31.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -63.3% | +6.6% | +8.6% | -19.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -88.0% | +11.2% | +8.6% | -2.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -117.2% | +8.1% | +7.8% | -3.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 7 | 4 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.17x | 0.01x | 0.04x | 1.03x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $262,454 | -$28M | -$7M | $22M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1M | $29M | $8M | $324,953 |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1M | $394,932 | $929,000 | $22M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -21.36x | — | — | -3.67x |
CODA leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CODA leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CODA five years ago would be worth $15,586 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $45 for ATXG. Over the past 12 months, CODA leads with a +78.9% total return vs ATXG's -55.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CODA at 11.0% vs ATXG's -65.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | TOPPToppoint Holdings… | CODACoda Octopus Grou… | MNDOMIND C.T.I. Ltd | ATXGAddentax Group Co… |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +17.3% | +27.3% | -15.4% | -10.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -34.0% | +78.9% | -31.7% | -55.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -73.6% | +36.8% | -25.3% | -95.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -73.6% | +55.9% | -35.4% | -99.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -73.6% | +861.1% | +65.7% | -99.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -35.8% | +11.0% | -9.2% | -65.0% |
CODA leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — CODA and MNDO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MNDO is the less volatile stock with a 0.05 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ATXG's 1.48 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CODA currently trades 70.1% from its 52-week high vs ATXG's 18.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | TOPPToppoint Holdings… | CODACoda Octopus Grou… | MNDOMIND C.T.I. Ltd | ATXGAddentax Group Co… |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.49x | 0.99x | 0.05x | 1.48x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $3.86 | $17.28 | $1.54 | $27.90 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.67 | $5.98 | $0.98 | $0.37 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +25.6% | +70.1% | +64.3% | +18.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 70.0 | 48.3 | 27.4 | 45.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 19K | 255K | 38K | 157K |
Evenly matched — CODA and MNDO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
TOPP leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
MNDO is the only dividend payer here at 22.05% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | TOPPToppoint Holdings… | CODACoda Octopus Grou… | MNDOMIND C.T.I. Ltd | ATXGAddentax Group Co… |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | — | — |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $14.00 | — | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 1 | — | — |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +22.0% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 0 | 0 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $0.22 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.6% | 0.0% |
TOPP leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway
CODA leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). ATXG leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
Best OverallCoda Octopus Group, Inc. (CODA)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
TOPP vs CODA vs MNDO vs ATXG: Key Questions Answered
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is TOPP or CODA or MNDO or ATXG a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Coda Octopus Group, Inc.
(CODA) is the stronger pick with 30. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -18. 9% for Addentax Group Corp. (ATXG). MIND C. T. I. Ltd (MNDO) offers the better valuation at 7. 6x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Coda Octopus Group, Inc. (CODA) a "Buy" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — TOPP or CODA or MNDO or ATXG?
On trailing P/E, MIND C.
T. I. Ltd (MNDO) is the cheapest at 7. 6x versus Coda Octopus Group, Inc. at 32. 7x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — TOPP or CODA or MNDO or ATXG?
Over the past 5 years, Coda Octopus Group, Inc.
(CODA) delivered a total return of +55. 9%, compared to -99. 6% for Addentax Group Corp. (ATXG). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CODA returned +861. 1% versus ATXG's -99. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — TOPP or CODA or MNDO or ATXG?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), MIND C.
T. I. Ltd (MNDO) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 05β versus Addentax Group Corp. 's 1. 48β — meaning ATXG is approximately 2767% more volatile than MNDO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Coda Octopus Group, Inc. (CODA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 103% for Addentax Group Corp. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — TOPP or CODA or MNDO or ATXG?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Coda Octopus Group, Inc.
(CODA) is pulling ahead at 30. 7% versus -18. 9% for Addentax Group Corp. (ATXG). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Coda Octopus Group, Inc. grew EPS 15. 6% year-over-year, compared to -36. 0% for Toppoint Holdings Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, CODA leads at 6. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — TOPP or CODA or MNDO or ATXG?
Coda Octopus Group, Inc.
(CODA) is the more profitable company, earning 15. 5% net margin versus -121. 8% for Addentax Group Corp. — meaning it keeps 15. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CODA leads at 17. 1% versus -44. 6% for TOPP. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CODA leads at 66. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Which pays a better dividend — TOPP or CODA or MNDO or ATXG?
In this comparison, MNDO (22.
0% yield) pays a dividend. TOPP, CODA, ATXG do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
08Is TOPP or CODA or MNDO or ATXG better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, MIND C.
T. I. Ltd (MNDO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 05), 22. 0% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (MNDO: +65. 7%, ATXG: -99. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between TOPP and CODA and MNDO and ATXG?
These companies operate in different sectors (TOPP (Industrials) and CODA (Industrials) and MNDO (Technology) and ATXG (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: TOPP is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CODA is a small-cap high-growth stock; MNDO is a small-cap deep-value stock; ATXG is a small-cap quality compounder stock. MNDO pays a dividend while TOPP, CODA, ATXG do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
Revenue Growth>
%
(TOPP: 10.4% · CODA: 28.8%)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.