Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

TOPS vs SBLK vs SHIP vs CTRM vs PSHG

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
TOPS
Top Ships Inc.

Marine Shipping

IndustrialsNASDAQ • GR
Market Cap$10M
5Y Perf.-99.7%
SBLK
Star Bulk Carriers Corp.

Marine Shipping

IndustrialsNASDAQ • GR
Market Cap$3.09B
5Y Perf.+426.7%
SHIP
Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp.

Marine Shipping

IndustrialsNASDAQ • GR
Market Cap$342M
5Y Perf.-17.4%
CTRM
Castor Maritime Inc.

Marine Shipping

IndustrialsNASDAQ • CY
Market Cap$78M
5Y Perf.-92.3%
PSHG
Performance Shipping Inc.

Marine Shipping

IndustrialsNASDAQ • GR
Market Cap$71M
5Y Perf.-98.2%

TOPS vs SBLK vs SHIP vs CTRM vs PSHG — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
TOPS logoTOPS
SBLK logoSBLK
SHIP logoSHIP
CTRM logoCTRM
PSHG logoPSHG
IndustryMarine ShippingMarine ShippingMarine ShippingMarine ShippingMarine Shipping
Market Cap$10M$3.09B$342M$78M$71M
Revenue (TTM)$123M$1.04B$153M$68M$80M
Net Income (TTM)$1M$84M$15M$-44M$52M
Gross Margin59.5%33.0%45.4%23.8%55.4%
Operating Margin36.5%13.6%23.4%-62.2%63.7%
Forward P/E2.0x8.0x6.9x2.3x1.7x
Total Debt$251M$1.07B$290M$111M$48M
Cash & Equiv.$8M$500M$63M$88M$70M

TOPS vs SBLK vs SHIP vs CTRM vs PSHGLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

TOPS
SBLK
SHIP
CTRM
PSHG
StockMay 20May 26Return
Top Ships Inc. (TOPS)1000.3-99.7%
Star Bulk Carriers … (SBLK)100526.7+426.7%
Seanergy Maritime H… (SHIP)10082.6-17.4%
Castor Maritime Inc. (CTRM)1007.7-92.3%
Performance Shippin… (PSHG)1001.8-98.2%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: TOPS vs SBLK vs SHIP vs CTRM vs PSHG

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: PSHG leads in 3 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. Top Ships Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and capital preservation and lower volatility. SHIP and CTRM also each lead in at least one category. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
TOPS
Top Ships Inc.
The Growth Play

TOPS is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.

  • Rev growth 3.8%, EPS growth 108.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 15.2%
  • 3.8% revenue growth vs CTRM's -32.1%
  • Beta 0.54 vs CTRM's 1.22
Best for: growth exposure
SBLK
Star Bulk Carriers Corp.
The Long-Run Compounder

SBLK is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.

  • 9.8% 10Y total return vs CTRM's -99.0%
Best for: long-term compounding
SHIP
Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp.
The Momentum Pick

SHIP ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.

  • +207.0% vs TOPS's -61.1%
Best for: momentum
CTRM
Castor Maritime Inc.
The Income Pick

CTRM is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.

  • Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 1.22, yield 3.2%
  • 3.2% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs SBLK's 1.1%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
Best for: income & stability
PSHG
Performance Shipping Inc.
The Defensive Pick

PSHG carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for sleep-well-at-night and defensive.

  • Lower volatility, beta 0.68, Low D/E 17.3%, current ratio 5.29x
  • Beta 0.68, yield 2.6%, current ratio 5.29x
  • Lower P/E (1.7x vs 2.3x)
  • 65.4% margin vs CTRM's -65.4%
Best for: sleep-well-at-night and defensive
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthTOPS logoTOPS3.8% revenue growth vs CTRM's -32.1%
ValuePSHG logoPSHGLower P/E (1.7x vs 2.3x)
Quality / MarginsPSHG logoPSHG65.4% margin vs CTRM's -65.4%
Stability / SafetyTOPS logoTOPSBeta 0.54 vs CTRM's 1.22
DividendsCTRM logoCTRM3.2% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs SBLK's 1.1%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
Momentum (1Y)SHIP logoSHIP+207.0% vs TOPS's -61.1%
Efficiency (ROA)PSHG logoPSHG9.4% ROA vs CTRM's -6.3%, ROIC 13.3% vs 0.2%

TOPS vs SBLK vs SHIP vs CTRM vs PSHG — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

TOPSTop Ships Inc.
FY 2021
Time Charter Contracts
100.0%$56M
Time Charter - Related Parties
0.0%$0
Voyage Charter
0.0%$0
SBLKStar Bulk Carriers Corp.

Segment breakdown not available.

SHIPSeanergy Maritime Holdings Corp.
FY 2021
Time Charter
81.5%$125M
Spot Charter
18.5%$28M
CTRMCastor Maritime Inc.
FY 2024
Asset Management Segment
100.0%$1M
PSHGPerformance Shipping Inc.
FY 2024
Voyage charters
100.0%$982,000

TOPS vs SBLK vs SHIP vs CTRM vs PSHG — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLTOPSLAGGINGSBLK

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

Evenly matched — TOPS and PSHG each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

SBLK is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.0B annually — 15.4x CTRM's $68M. PSHG is the more profitable business, keeping 65.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CTRM's -65.4%. On growth, TOPS holds the edge at +100.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricTOPS logoTOPSTop Ships Inc.SBLK logoSBLKStar Bulk Carrier…SHIP logoSHIPSeanergy Maritime…CTRM logoCTRMCastor Maritime I…PSHG logoPSHGPerformance Shipp…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$123M$1.0B$153M$68M$80M
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$66M$311M$68M-$27M$64M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$1M$84M$15M-$44M$52M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$63M$209M-$6M-$58M-$35M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+59.5%+33.0%+45.4%+23.8%+55.4%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+36.5%+13.6%+23.4%-62.2%+63.7%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+1.2%+8.1%+9.7%-65.4%+65.4%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-50.9%+20.0%-4.2%-86.1%-44.4%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+100.0%-2.7%+18.6%+10.2%-19.0%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-3.2%+58.3%+84.4%-94.1%-70.5%
Evenly matched — TOPS and PSHG each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

TOPS leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 1.7x trailing earnings, PSHG trades at a 95% valuation discount to SBLK's 36.7x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, PSHG's 0.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than SBLK's 11.9x.

MetricTOPS logoTOPSTop Ships Inc.SBLK logoSBLKStar Bulk Carrier…SHIP logoSHIPSeanergy Maritime…CTRM logoCTRMCastor Maritime I…PSHG logoPSHGPerformance Shipp…
Market CapShares × price$10M$3.1B$342M$78M$71M
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$254M$3.7B$570M$102M$48M
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS2.02x36.73x16.05x2.32x1.69x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.8.00x6.93x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate0.75x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple4.97x11.87x7.38x5.86x0.86x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue0.12x2.97x2.16x1.18x0.81x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share0.07x1.26x1.18x0.13x0.26x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF0.59x14.73x20.11x5.69x
TOPS leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

PSHG leads this category, winning 9 of 9 comparable metrics.

PSHG delivers a 16.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $16 in annual profit, vs $-8 for CTRM. PSHG carries lower financial leverage with a 0.17x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to TOPS's 1.74x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SBLK scores 5/9 vs SHIP's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricTOPS logoTOPSTop Ships Inc.SBLK logoSBLKStar Bulk Carrier…SHIP logoSHIPSeanergy Maritime…CTRM logoCTRMCastor Maritime I…PSHG logoPSHGPerformance Shipp…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+0.8%+3.4%+5.3%-8.0%+16.5%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+0.3%+2.2%+2.5%-6.3%+9.4%
ROICReturn on invested capital+5.3%+3.2%+6.1%+0.2%+13.3%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+6.9%+4.0%+7.1%+0.2%+14.0%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–945345
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage1.74x0.44x1.03x0.18x0.17x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$244M$572M$228M$23M-$23M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$8M$500M$63M$88M$70M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$251M$1.1B$290M$111M$48M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense1.91x2.08x1.68x-4.80x19.08x
PSHG leads this category, winning 9 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

SHIP leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in SBLK five years ago would be worth $17,911 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $56 for TOPS. Over the past 12 months, SHIP leads with a +207.0% total return vs TOPS's -61.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SHIP at 56.3% vs TOPS's -37.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricTOPS logoTOPSTop Ships Inc.SBLK logoSBLKStar Bulk Carrier…SHIP logoSHIPSeanergy Maritime…CTRM logoCTRMCastor Maritime I…PSHG logoPSHGPerformance Shipp…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-53.6%+40.3%+79.9%-4.7%-17.4%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-61.1%+83.1%+207.0%-4.7%+14.6%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-75.2%+60.6%+282.1%-69.4%+141.3%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-99.4%+79.1%+65.6%-88.4%-97.3%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-100.0%+977.3%-99.7%-99.0%-99.8%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-37.2%+17.1%+56.3%-32.6%+34.1%
SHIP leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — TOPS and SBLK each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

TOPS is the less volatile stock with a 0.54 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CTRM's 1.22 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SBLK currently trades 98.6% from its 52-week high vs TOPS's 19.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricTOPS logoTOPSTop Ships Inc.SBLK logoSBLKStar Bulk Carrier…SHIP logoSHIPSeanergy Maritime…CTRM logoCTRMCastor Maritime I…PSHG logoPSHGPerformance Shipp…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.54x0.73x1.21x1.22x0.68x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$11.47$27.20$16.77$2.65$2.58
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$2.11$14.79$5.37$1.66$1.40
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+19.2%+98.6%+96.6%+76.1%+70.2%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10024.772.862.955.549.3
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded210K1.4M258K52K139K
Evenly matched — TOPS and SBLK each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

CTRM leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: SBLK as "Buy", SHIP as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 8.2% upside for SBLK (target: $29) vs 4.9% for SHIP (target: $17). For income investors, CTRM offers the higher dividend yield at 3.19% vs SBLK's 1.11%.

MetricTOPS logoTOPSTop Ships Inc.SBLK logoSBLKStar Bulk Carrier…SHIP logoSHIPSeanergy Maritime…CTRM logoCTRMCastor Maritime I…PSHG logoPSHGPerformance Shipp…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$29.00$17.00
# AnalystsCovering analysts243
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+1.1%+2.9%+3.2%+2.6%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises00010
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.30$0.46$0.06$0.05
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+100.0%+3.2%0.0%0.0%0.0%
CTRM leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

TOPS leads in 1 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics). PSHG leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 2 tied.

Best OverallTop Ships Inc. (TOPS)Leads 1 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

TOPS vs SBLK vs SHIP vs CTRM vs PSHG: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is TOPS or SBLK or SHIP or CTRM or PSHG a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Top Ships Inc.

(TOPS) is the stronger pick with 3. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -32. 1% for Castor Maritime Inc. (CTRM). Performance Shipping Inc. (PSHG) offers the better valuation at 1. 7x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Star Bulk Carriers Corp. (SBLK) a "Buy" — based on 24 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — TOPS or SBLK or SHIP or CTRM or PSHG?

On trailing P/E, Performance Shipping Inc.

(PSHG) is the cheapest at 1. 7x versus Star Bulk Carriers Corp. at 36. 7x. On forward P/E, Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp. is actually cheaper at 6. 9x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — TOPS or SBLK or SHIP or CTRM or PSHG?

Over the past 5 years, Star Bulk Carriers Corp.

(SBLK) delivered a total return of +79. 1%, compared to -99. 4% for Top Ships Inc. (TOPS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SBLK returned +977. 3% versus TOPS's -100. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — TOPS or SBLK or SHIP or CTRM or PSHG?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Top Ships Inc.

(TOPS) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 54β versus Castor Maritime Inc. 's 1. 22β — meaning CTRM is approximately 125% more volatile than TOPS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Performance Shipping Inc. (PSHG) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 17% versus 174% for Top Ships Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — TOPS or SBLK or SHIP or CTRM or PSHG?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Top Ships Inc.

(TOPS) is pulling ahead at 3. 8% versus -32. 1% for Castor Maritime Inc. (CTRM). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Top Ships Inc. grew EPS 108. 8% year-over-year, compared to -73. 9% for Star Bulk Carriers Corp.. Over a 3-year CAGR, PSHG leads at 33. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — TOPS or SBLK or SHIP or CTRM or PSHG?

Performance Shipping Inc.

(PSHG) is the more profitable company, earning 50. 0% net margin versus 5. 8% for Top Ships Inc. — meaning it keeps 50. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PSHG leads at 47. 8% versus 2. 3% for CTRM. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PSHG leads at 57. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is TOPS or SBLK or SHIP or CTRM or PSHG more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp.

(SHIP) trades at 6. 9x forward P/E versus 8. 0x for Star Bulk Carriers Corp. — 1. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SBLK: 8. 2% to $29. 00.

08

Which pays a better dividend — TOPS or SBLK or SHIP or CTRM or PSHG?

In this comparison, CTRM (3.

2% yield), SHIP (2. 9% yield), PSHG (2. 6% yield), SBLK (1. 1% yield) pay a dividend. TOPS does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is TOPS or SBLK or SHIP or CTRM or PSHG better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Star Bulk Carriers Corp.

(SBLK) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 73), 1. 1% yield, +977. 3% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (SBLK: +977. 3%, CTRM: -99. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between TOPS and SBLK and SHIP and CTRM and PSHG?

Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: TOPS is a small-cap deep-value stock; SBLK is a small-cap quality compounder stock; SHIP is a small-cap deep-value stock; CTRM is a small-cap deep-value stock; PSHG is a small-cap deep-value stock. SBLK, SHIP, CTRM, PSHG pay a dividend while TOPS does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

TOPS

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 49%
  • Gross Margin > 35%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

SBLK

Stable Dividend Mega-Cap

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 5%
  • Dividend Yield > 0.5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

SHIP

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 9%
  • Net Margin > 5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

CTRM

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Gross Margin > 14%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

PSHG

Dividend Mega-Cap Quality

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 39%
  • Dividend Yield > 1.0%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform TOPS and SBLK and SHIP and CTRM and PSHG on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(TOPS: 100.0% · SBLK: -2.7%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(TOPS: 2.0x · SBLK: 36.7x)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.