Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

TORO vs GLBS vs SBLK vs TOPS vs SHIP

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
TORO
Toro Corp.

Marine Shipping

IndustrialsNASDAQ • CY
Market Cap$104M
5Y Perf.+102.6%
GLBS
Globus Maritime Limited

Marine Shipping

IndustrialsNASDAQ • GR
Market Cap$45M
5Y Perf.+96.4%
SBLK
Star Bulk Carriers Corp.

Marine Shipping

IndustrialsNASDAQ • GR
Market Cap$3.09B
5Y Perf.+26.9%
TOPS
Top Ships Inc.

Marine Shipping

IndustrialsNASDAQ • GR
Market Cap$10M
5Y Perf.-79.2%
SHIP
Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp.

Marine Shipping

IndustrialsNASDAQ • GR
Market Cap$342M
5Y Perf.+220.4%

TORO vs GLBS vs SBLK vs TOPS vs SHIP — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
TORO logoTORO
GLBS logoGLBS
SBLK logoSBLK
TOPS logoTOPS
SHIP logoSHIP
IndustryMarine ShippingMarine ShippingMarine ShippingMarine ShippingMarine Shipping
Market Cap$104M$45M$3.09B$10M$342M
Revenue (TTM)$21M$44M$1.04B$123M$153M
Net Income (TTM)$5M$-2M$84M$1M$15M
Gross Margin18.1%26.5%33.0%59.5%45.4%
Operating Margin-26.5%5.4%13.6%36.5%23.4%
Forward P/E5.0x8.0x2.0x6.9x
Total Debt$0.00$109M$1.07B$251M$290M
Cash & Equiv.$37M$27M$500M$8M$63M

TORO vs GLBS vs SBLK vs TOPS vs SHIPLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

TORO
GLBS
SBLK
TOPS
SHIP
StockMar 23May 26Return
Toro Corp. (TORO)100202.6+102.6%
Globus Maritime Lim… (GLBS)100196.4+96.4%
Star Bulk Carriers … (SBLK)100126.9+26.9%
Top Ships Inc. (TOPS)10020.8-79.2%
Seanergy Maritime H… (SHIP)100320.4+220.4%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: TORO vs GLBS vs SBLK vs TOPS vs SHIP

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: TORO and GLBS are tied at the top with 2 categories each (5-stock set) — the right choice depends on your priorities. Globus Maritime Limited is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and capital preservation and lower volatility. SHIP and TOPS also each lead in at least one category. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
TORO
Toro Corp.
The Income Pick

TORO has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in income & stability.

  • Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 1.83, yield 1.5%
  • 26.0% margin vs GLBS's -4.0%
  • +328.6% vs TOPS's -61.1%
Best for: income & stability
GLBS
Globus Maritime Limited
The Defensive Pick

GLBS is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if sleep-well-at-night and defensive is your priority.

  • Lower volatility, beta 0.50, Low D/E 62.1%, current ratio 2.74x
  • Beta 0.50, current ratio 2.74x
  • 26.8% revenue growth vs TORO's -71.5%
  • Beta 0.50 vs TORO's 1.83
Best for: sleep-well-at-night and defensive
SBLK
Star Bulk Carriers Corp.
The Long-Run Compounder

SBLK is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.

  • 9.8% 10Y total return vs TORO's 110.4%
Best for: long-term compounding
TOPS
Top Ships Inc.
The Growth Play

TOPS is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.

  • Rev growth 3.8%, EPS growth 108.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 15.2%
  • Lower P/E (2.0x vs 6.9x)
Best for: growth exposure
SHIP
Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp.
The Income Pick

SHIP ranks third and is worth considering specifically for dividends and efficiency.

  • 2.9% yield, vs TORO's 1.5%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
  • 2.5% ROA vs GLBS's -0.6%, ROIC 6.1% vs 0.7%
Best for: dividends and efficiency
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthGLBS logoGLBS26.8% revenue growth vs TORO's -71.5%
ValueTOPS logoTOPSLower P/E (2.0x vs 6.9x)
Quality / MarginsTORO logoTORO26.0% margin vs GLBS's -4.0%
Stability / SafetyGLBS logoGLBSBeta 0.50 vs TORO's 1.83
DividendsSHIP logoSHIP2.9% yield, vs TORO's 1.5%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
Momentum (1Y)TORO logoTORO+328.6% vs TOPS's -61.1%
Efficiency (ROA)SHIP logoSHIP2.5% ROA vs GLBS's -0.6%, ROIC 6.1% vs 0.7%

TORO vs GLBS vs SBLK vs TOPS vs SHIP — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

TOROToro Corp.
FY 2024
Voyage Charter
100.0%$1M
GLBSGlobus Maritime Limited

Segment breakdown not available.

SBLKStar Bulk Carriers Corp.

Segment breakdown not available.

TOPSTop Ships Inc.
FY 2021
Time Charter Contracts
100.0%$56M
Time Charter - Related Parties
0.0%$0
Voyage Charter
0.0%$0
SHIPSeanergy Maritime Holdings Corp.
FY 2021
Time Charter
81.5%$125M
Spot Charter
18.5%$28M

TORO vs GLBS vs SBLK vs TOPS vs SHIP — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLTOPSLAGGINGSBLK

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

TOPS leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

SBLK is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.0B annually — 49.4x TORO's $21M. TORO is the more profitable business, keeping 26.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to GLBS's -4.0%. On growth, TOPS holds the edge at +100.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricTORO logoTOROToro Corp.GLBS logoGLBSGlobus Maritime L…SBLK logoSBLKStar Bulk Carrier…TOPS logoTOPSTop Ships Inc.SHIP logoSHIPSeanergy Maritime…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$21M$44M$1.0B$123M$153M
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$540,732$16M$311M$66M$68M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$5M-$2M$84M$1M$15M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$92M$2M$209M-$63M-$6M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+18.1%+26.5%+33.0%+59.5%+45.4%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-26.5%+5.4%+13.6%+36.5%+23.4%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+26.0%-4.0%+8.1%+1.2%+9.7%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-4.4%+5.2%+20.0%-50.9%-4.2%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+18.2%+54.8%-2.7%+100.0%+18.6%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+141.9%+58.3%-3.2%+84.4%
TOPS leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

TOPS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 2.0x trailing earnings, TOPS trades at a 95% valuation discount to SBLK's 36.7x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, TOPS's 5.0x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than SBLK's 11.9x.

MetricTORO logoTOROToro Corp.GLBS logoGLBSGlobus Maritime L…SBLK logoSBLKStar Bulk Carrier…TOPS logoTOPSTop Ships Inc.SHIP logoSHIPSeanergy Maritime…
Market CapShares × price$104M$45M$3.1B$10M$342M
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$67M$128M$3.7B$254M$570M
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS5.00x-26.04x36.73x2.02x16.05x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.8.00x6.93x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate0.75x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple7.55x11.87x4.97x7.38x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue4.65x1.02x2.97x0.12x2.16x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share0.29x0.26x1.26x0.07x1.18x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF7.20x14.73x0.59x20.11x
TOPS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

SHIP leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

SHIP delivers a 5.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $5 in annual profit, vs $-1 for GLBS. SBLK carries lower financial leverage with a 0.44x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to TOPS's 1.74x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), GLBS scores 6/9 vs SHIP's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricTORO logoTOROToro Corp.GLBS logoGLBSGlobus Maritime L…SBLK logoSBLKStar Bulk Carrier…TOPS logoTOPSTop Ships Inc.SHIP logoSHIPSeanergy Maritime…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+1.4%-1.0%+3.4%+0.8%+5.3%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+1.4%-0.6%+2.2%+0.3%+2.5%
ROICReturn on invested capital-1.9%+0.7%+3.2%+5.3%+6.1%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-1.8%+0.9%+4.0%+6.9%+7.1%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–936543
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.62x0.44x1.74x1.03x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$37M$83M$572M$244M$228M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$37M$27M$500M$8M$63M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$0$109M$1.1B$251M$290M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-8.11x0.76x2.08x1.91x1.68x
SHIP leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

SHIP leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in TORO five years ago would be worth $21,039 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $56 for TOPS. Over the past 12 months, TORO leads with a +328.6% total return vs TOPS's -61.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SHIP at 56.3% vs TOPS's -37.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricTORO logoTOROToro Corp.GLBS logoGLBSGlobus Maritime L…SBLK logoSBLKStar Bulk Carrier…TOPS logoTOPSTop Ships Inc.SHIP logoSHIPSeanergy Maritime…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+50.6%+32.5%+40.3%-53.6%+79.9%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+328.6%+101.8%+83.1%-61.1%+207.0%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+132.1%+126.8%+60.6%-75.2%+282.1%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+110.4%-50.5%+79.1%-99.4%+65.6%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+110.4%-99.9%+977.3%-100.0%-99.7%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+32.4%+31.4%+17.1%-37.2%+56.3%
SHIP leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — GLBS and SBLK each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

GLBS is the less volatile stock with a 0.50 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than TORO's 1.83 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SBLK currently trades 98.6% from its 52-week high vs TOPS's 19.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricTORO logoTOROToro Corp.GLBS logoGLBSGlobus Maritime L…SBLK logoSBLKStar Bulk Carrier…TOPS logoTOPSTop Ships Inc.SHIP logoSHIPSeanergy Maritime…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.83x0.50x0.73x0.54x1.21x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$8.50$2.44$27.20$11.47$16.77
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$1.77$0.99$14.79$2.11$5.37
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+64.1%+90.2%+98.6%+19.2%+96.6%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10051.853.272.824.762.9
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded566K87K1.4M210K258K
Evenly matched — GLBS and SBLK each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — TORO and SHIP each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: SBLK as "Buy", SHIP as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 8.2% upside for SBLK (target: $29) vs 4.9% for SHIP (target: $17). For income investors, SHIP offers the higher dividend yield at 2.85% vs SBLK's 1.11%.

MetricTORO logoTOROToro Corp.GLBS logoGLBSGlobus Maritime L…SBLK logoSBLKStar Bulk Carrier…TOPS logoTOPSTop Ships Inc.SHIP logoSHIPSeanergy Maritime…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$29.00$17.00
# AnalystsCovering analysts243
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+1.5%+1.1%+2.9%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises20000
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.08$0.30$0.46
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+3.6%0.0%+3.2%+100.0%0.0%
Evenly matched — TORO and SHIP each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

TOPS leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). SHIP leads in 2 (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). 2 tied.

Best OverallTop Ships Inc. (TOPS)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

TORO vs GLBS vs SBLK vs TOPS vs SHIP: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is TORO or GLBS or SBLK or TOPS or SHIP a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Globus Maritime Limited (GLBS) is the stronger pick with 26.

8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -71. 5% for Toro Corp. (TORO). Top Ships Inc. (TOPS) offers the better valuation at 2. 0x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Star Bulk Carriers Corp. (SBLK) a "Buy" — based on 24 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — TORO or GLBS or SBLK or TOPS or SHIP?

On trailing P/E, Top Ships Inc.

(TOPS) is the cheapest at 2. 0x versus Star Bulk Carriers Corp. at 36. 7x. On forward P/E, Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp. is actually cheaper at 6. 9x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — TORO or GLBS or SBLK or TOPS or SHIP?

Over the past 5 years, Toro Corp.

(TORO) delivered a total return of +110. 4%, compared to -99. 4% for Top Ships Inc. (TOPS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SBLK returned +977. 3% versus TOPS's -100. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — TORO or GLBS or SBLK or TOPS or SHIP?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Globus Maritime Limited (GLBS) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

50β versus Toro Corp. 's 1. 83β — meaning TORO is approximately 262% more volatile than GLBS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Star Bulk Carriers Corp. (SBLK) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 44% versus 174% for Top Ships Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — TORO or GLBS or SBLK or TOPS or SHIP?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Globus Maritime Limited (GLBS) is pulling ahead at 26.

8% versus -71. 5% for Toro Corp. (TORO). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Top Ships Inc. grew EPS 108. 8% year-over-year, compared to -504. 3% for Globus Maritime Limited. Over a 3-year CAGR, TOPS leads at 15. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — TORO or GLBS or SBLK or TOPS or SHIP?

Toro Corp.

(TORO) is the more profitable company, earning 112. 6% net margin versus -4. 0% for Globus Maritime Limited — meaning it keeps 112. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TOPS leads at 32. 4% versus -24. 8% for TORO. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TOPS leads at 43. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is TORO or GLBS or SBLK or TOPS or SHIP more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp.

(SHIP) trades at 6. 9x forward P/E versus 8. 0x for Star Bulk Carriers Corp. — 1. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SBLK: 8. 2% to $29. 00.

08

Which pays a better dividend — TORO or GLBS or SBLK or TOPS or SHIP?

In this comparison, SHIP (2.

9% yield), TORO (1. 5% yield), SBLK (1. 1% yield) pay a dividend. GLBS, TOPS do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is TORO or GLBS or SBLK or TOPS or SHIP better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Star Bulk Carriers Corp.

(SBLK) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 73), 1. 1% yield, +977. 3% 10Y return). Toro Corp. (TORO) carries a higher beta of 1. 83 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (SBLK: +977. 3%, TORO: +110. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between TORO and GLBS and SBLK and TOPS and SHIP?

Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: TORO is a small-cap deep-value stock; GLBS is a small-cap high-growth stock; SBLK is a small-cap quality compounder stock; TOPS is a small-cap deep-value stock; SHIP is a small-cap deep-value stock. TORO, SBLK, SHIP pay a dividend while GLBS, TOPS do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

TORO

High-Growth Quality Leader

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 9%
  • Net Margin > 15%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

GLBS

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 27%
  • Gross Margin > 15%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

SBLK

Stable Dividend Mega-Cap

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 5%
  • Dividend Yield > 0.5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

TOPS

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 49%
  • Gross Margin > 35%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

SHIP

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 9%
  • Net Margin > 5%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform TORO and GLBS and SBLK and TOPS and SHIP on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(TORO: 18.2% · GLBS: 54.8%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.