Marine Shipping
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
TORO vs GLBS vs SBLK vs TOPS vs SHIP
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Marine Shipping
Marine Shipping
Marine Shipping
Marine Shipping
TORO vs GLBS vs SBLK vs TOPS vs SHIP — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Marine Shipping | Marine Shipping | Marine Shipping | Marine Shipping | Marine Shipping |
| Market Cap | $104M | $45M | $3.09B | $10M | $342M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $21M | $44M | $1.04B | $123M | $153M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $5M | $-2M | $84M | $1M | $15M |
| Gross Margin | 18.1% | 26.5% | 33.0% | 59.5% | 45.4% |
| Operating Margin | -26.5% | 5.4% | 13.6% | 36.5% | 23.4% |
| Forward P/E | 5.0x | — | 8.0x | 2.0x | 6.9x |
| Total Debt | $0.00 | $109M | $1.07B | $251M | $290M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $37M | $27M | $500M | $8M | $63M |
TORO vs GLBS vs SBLK vs TOPS vs SHIP — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Mar 23 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Toro Corp. (TORO) | 100 | 202.6 | +102.6% |
| Globus Maritime Lim… (GLBS) | 100 | 196.4 | +96.4% |
| Star Bulk Carriers … (SBLK) | 100 | 126.9 | +26.9% |
| Top Ships Inc. (TOPS) | 100 | 20.8 | -79.2% |
| Seanergy Maritime H… (SHIP) | 100 | 320.4 | +220.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: TORO vs GLBS vs SBLK vs TOPS vs SHIP
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
TORO has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in income & stability.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 1.83, yield 1.5%
- 26.0% margin vs GLBS's -4.0%
- +328.6% vs TOPS's -61.1%
GLBS is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if sleep-well-at-night and defensive is your priority.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.50, Low D/E 62.1%, current ratio 2.74x
- Beta 0.50, current ratio 2.74x
- 26.8% revenue growth vs TORO's -71.5%
- Beta 0.50 vs TORO's 1.83
SBLK is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 9.8% 10Y total return vs TORO's 110.4%
TOPS is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 3.8%, EPS growth 108.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 15.2%
- Lower P/E (2.0x vs 6.9x)
SHIP ranks third and is worth considering specifically for dividends and efficiency.
- 2.9% yield, vs TORO's 1.5%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
- 2.5% ROA vs GLBS's -0.6%, ROIC 6.1% vs 0.7%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 26.8% revenue growth vs TORO's -71.5% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (2.0x vs 6.9x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 26.0% margin vs GLBS's -4.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.50 vs TORO's 1.83 | |
| Dividends | 2.9% yield, vs TORO's 1.5%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +328.6% vs TOPS's -61.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 2.5% ROA vs GLBS's -0.6%, ROIC 6.1% vs 0.7% |
TORO vs GLBS vs SBLK vs TOPS vs SHIP — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
TORO vs GLBS vs SBLK vs TOPS vs SHIP — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
TOPS leads in 2 of 6 categories
SHIP leads 2 • TORO leads 0 • GLBS leads 0 • SBLK leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TOPS leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SBLK is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.0B annually — 49.4x TORO's $21M. TORO is the more profitable business, keeping 26.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to GLBS's -4.0%. On growth, TOPS holds the edge at +100.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $21M | $44M | $1.0B | $123M | $153M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$540,732 | $16M | $311M | $66M | $68M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $5M | -$2M | $84M | $1M | $15M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$92M | $2M | $209M | -$63M | -$6M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +18.1% | +26.5% | +33.0% | +59.5% | +45.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -26.5% | +5.4% | +13.6% | +36.5% | +23.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +26.0% | -4.0% | +8.1% | +1.2% | +9.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -4.4% | +5.2% | +20.0% | -50.9% | -4.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +18.2% | +54.8% | -2.7% | +100.0% | +18.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +141.9% | +58.3% | -3.2% | +84.4% |
Valuation Metrics
TOPS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 2.0x trailing earnings, TOPS trades at a 95% valuation discount to SBLK's 36.7x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, TOPS's 5.0x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than SBLK's 11.9x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $104M | $45M | $3.1B | $10M | $342M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $67M | $128M | $3.7B | $254M | $570M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 5.00x | -26.04x | 36.73x | 2.02x | 16.05x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | 8.00x | — | 6.93x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 0.75x | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 7.55x | 11.87x | 4.97x | 7.38x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 4.65x | 1.02x | 2.97x | 0.12x | 2.16x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.29x | 0.26x | 1.26x | 0.07x | 1.18x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 7.20x | — | 14.73x | 0.59x | 20.11x |
Profitability & Efficiency
SHIP leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
SHIP delivers a 5.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $5 in annual profit, vs $-1 for GLBS. SBLK carries lower financial leverage with a 0.44x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to TOPS's 1.74x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), GLBS scores 6/9 vs SHIP's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +1.4% | -1.0% | +3.4% | +0.8% | +5.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.4% | -0.6% | +2.2% | +0.3% | +2.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -1.9% | +0.7% | +3.2% | +5.3% | +6.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -1.8% | +0.9% | +4.0% | +6.9% | +7.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 6 | 5 | 4 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.62x | 0.44x | 1.74x | 1.03x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$37M | $83M | $572M | $244M | $228M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $37M | $27M | $500M | $8M | $63M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $109M | $1.1B | $251M | $290M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -8.11x | 0.76x | 2.08x | 1.91x | 1.68x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
SHIP leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in TORO five years ago would be worth $21,039 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $56 for TOPS. Over the past 12 months, TORO leads with a +328.6% total return vs TOPS's -61.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SHIP at 56.3% vs TOPS's -37.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +50.6% | +32.5% | +40.3% | -53.6% | +79.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +328.6% | +101.8% | +83.1% | -61.1% | +207.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +132.1% | +126.8% | +60.6% | -75.2% | +282.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +110.4% | -50.5% | +79.1% | -99.4% | +65.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +110.4% | -99.9% | +977.3% | -100.0% | -99.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +32.4% | +31.4% | +17.1% | -37.2% | +56.3% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — GLBS and SBLK each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
GLBS is the less volatile stock with a 0.50 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than TORO's 1.83 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SBLK currently trades 98.6% from its 52-week high vs TOPS's 19.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.83x | 0.50x | 0.73x | 0.54x | 1.21x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $8.50 | $2.44 | $27.20 | $11.47 | $16.77 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.77 | $0.99 | $14.79 | $2.11 | $5.37 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +64.1% | +90.2% | +98.6% | +19.2% | +96.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 51.8 | 53.2 | 72.8 | 24.7 | 62.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 566K | 87K | 1.4M | 210K | 258K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — TORO and SHIP each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: SBLK as "Buy", SHIP as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 8.2% upside for SBLK (target: $29) vs 4.9% for SHIP (target: $17). For income investors, SHIP offers the higher dividend yield at 2.85% vs SBLK's 1.11%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | — | Buy | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — | $29.00 | — | $17.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | — | 24 | — | 3 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.5% | — | +1.1% | — | +2.9% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.08 | — | $0.30 | — | $0.46 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +3.6% | 0.0% | +3.2% | +100.0% | 0.0% |
TOPS leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). SHIP leads in 2 (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). 2 tied.
TORO vs GLBS vs SBLK vs TOPS vs SHIP: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is TORO or GLBS or SBLK or TOPS or SHIP a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Globus Maritime Limited (GLBS) is the stronger pick with 26.
8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -71. 5% for Toro Corp. (TORO). Top Ships Inc. (TOPS) offers the better valuation at 2. 0x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Star Bulk Carriers Corp. (SBLK) a "Buy" — based on 24 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — TORO or GLBS or SBLK or TOPS or SHIP?
On trailing P/E, Top Ships Inc.
(TOPS) is the cheapest at 2. 0x versus Star Bulk Carriers Corp. at 36. 7x. On forward P/E, Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp. is actually cheaper at 6. 9x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — TORO or GLBS or SBLK or TOPS or SHIP?
Over the past 5 years, Toro Corp.
(TORO) delivered a total return of +110. 4%, compared to -99. 4% for Top Ships Inc. (TOPS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SBLK returned +977. 3% versus TOPS's -100. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — TORO or GLBS or SBLK or TOPS or SHIP?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Globus Maritime Limited (GLBS) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
50β versus Toro Corp. 's 1. 83β — meaning TORO is approximately 262% more volatile than GLBS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Star Bulk Carriers Corp. (SBLK) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 44% versus 174% for Top Ships Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — TORO or GLBS or SBLK or TOPS or SHIP?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Globus Maritime Limited (GLBS) is pulling ahead at 26.
8% versus -71. 5% for Toro Corp. (TORO). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Top Ships Inc. grew EPS 108. 8% year-over-year, compared to -504. 3% for Globus Maritime Limited. Over a 3-year CAGR, TOPS leads at 15. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — TORO or GLBS or SBLK or TOPS or SHIP?
Toro Corp.
(TORO) is the more profitable company, earning 112. 6% net margin versus -4. 0% for Globus Maritime Limited — meaning it keeps 112. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TOPS leads at 32. 4% versus -24. 8% for TORO. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TOPS leads at 43. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is TORO or GLBS or SBLK or TOPS or SHIP more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp.
(SHIP) trades at 6. 9x forward P/E versus 8. 0x for Star Bulk Carriers Corp. — 1. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SBLK: 8. 2% to $29. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — TORO or GLBS or SBLK or TOPS or SHIP?
In this comparison, SHIP (2.
9% yield), TORO (1. 5% yield), SBLK (1. 1% yield) pay a dividend. GLBS, TOPS do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is TORO or GLBS or SBLK or TOPS or SHIP better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Star Bulk Carriers Corp.
(SBLK) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 73), 1. 1% yield, +977. 3% 10Y return). Toro Corp. (TORO) carries a higher beta of 1. 83 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (SBLK: +977. 3%, TORO: +110. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between TORO and GLBS and SBLK and TOPS and SHIP?
Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: TORO is a small-cap deep-value stock; GLBS is a small-cap high-growth stock; SBLK is a small-cap quality compounder stock; TOPS is a small-cap deep-value stock; SHIP is a small-cap deep-value stock. TORO, SBLK, SHIP pay a dividend while GLBS, TOPS do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.