Travel Services
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
TOUR vs BKNG
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Travel Services
TOUR vs BKNG — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Travel Services | Travel Services |
| Market Cap | $23M | $132.72B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $541M | $27.69B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $30M | $6.15B |
| Gross Margin | 64.1% | 100.0% |
| Operating Margin | 2.4% | 34.3% |
| Forward P/E | 5.1x | 16.3x |
| Total Debt | $111M | $19.29B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $218M | $17.20B |
TOUR vs BKNG — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tuniu Corporation (TOUR) | 100 | 60.9 | -39.1% |
| Booking Holdings In… (BKNG) | 100 | 261.2 | +161.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: TOUR vs BKNG
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
TOUR is the clearest fit if your priority is defensive.
- Beta 0.88, yield 18.9%, current ratio 2.04x
- Lower P/E (5.1x vs 16.3x)
- 18.9% yield, vs BKNG's 0.9%
BKNG carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 0.74, yield 0.9%
- Rev growth 13.4%, EPS growth -4.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 16.3%
- 250.7% 10Y total return vs TOUR's -92.1%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 13.4% revenue growth vs TOUR's 9.5% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (5.1x vs 16.3x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 22.2% margin vs TOUR's 5.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.74 vs TOUR's 0.88 | |
| Dividends | 18.9% yield, vs BKNG's 0.9% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | -16.8% vs TOUR's -23.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 21.1% ROA vs TOUR's 1.6% |
TOUR vs BKNG — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
TOUR vs BKNG — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BKNG leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BKNG is the larger business by revenue, generating $27.7B annually — 51.2x TOUR's $541M. BKNG is the more profitable business, keeping 22.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to TOUR's 5.6%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $541M | $27.7B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $24M | $10.2B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $30M | $6.2B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $0 | $9.0B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +64.1% | +100.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +2.4% | +34.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +5.6% | +22.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -20.7% | +32.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +15.3% | +16.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | 0.0% | +2.4% |
Valuation Metrics
TOUR leads this category, winning 3 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 5.1x trailing earnings, TOUR trades at a 80% valuation discount to BKNG's 25.9x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, TOUR's 4.7x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than BKNG's 13.4x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $23M | $132.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $7M | $134.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 5.11x | 25.87x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 16.32x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.16x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 4.73x | 13.41x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.27x | 4.93x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.16x | — |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 14.61x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — TOUR and BKNG each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BKNG scores 6/9 vs TOUR's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +3.0% | — |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.6% | +21.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +1.1% | — |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +1.0% | +75.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.12x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$106M | $2.1B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $218M | $17.2B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $111M | $19.3B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 9.63x | 7.21x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
BKNG leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in BKNG five years ago would be worth $18,762 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,024 for TOUR. Over the past 12 months, BKNG leads with a -16.8% total return vs TOUR's -23.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors BKNG at 18.3% vs TOUR's -24.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +2.3% | -19.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -23.1% | -16.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -56.7% | +65.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -69.8% | +87.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -92.1% | +250.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -24.3% | +18.3% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — TOUR and BKNG each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
BKNG is the less volatile stock with a 0.74 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than TOUR's 0.88 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. TOUR currently trades 60.2% from its 52-week high vs BKNG's 3.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.88x | 0.74x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $10.10 | $5129.83 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.68 | $150.62 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +60.2% | +3.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 38.6 | 42.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 27K | 8.7M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — TOUR and BKNG each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
For income investors, TOUR offers the higher dividend yield at 18.90% vs BKNG's 0.89%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $231.72 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 71 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +18.9% | +0.9% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $7.82 | $1.53 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +33.4% | +4.9% |
BKNG leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). TOUR leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 3 tied.
TOUR vs BKNG: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is TOUR or BKNG a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Booking Holdings Inc.
(BKNG) is the stronger pick with 13. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 9. 5% for Tuniu Corporation (TOUR). Tuniu Corporation (TOUR) offers the better valuation at 5. 1x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Booking Holdings Inc. (BKNG) a "Buy" — based on 71 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — TOUR or BKNG?
On trailing P/E, Tuniu Corporation (TOUR) is the cheapest at 5.
1x versus Booking Holdings Inc. at 25. 9x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — TOUR or BKNG?
Over the past 5 years, Booking Holdings Inc.
(BKNG) delivered a total return of +87. 6%, compared to -69. 8% for Tuniu Corporation (TOUR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BKNG returned +250. 7% versus TOUR's -92. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — TOUR or BKNG?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Booking Holdings Inc.
(BKNG) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 74β versus Tuniu Corporation's 0. 88β — meaning TOUR is approximately 19% more volatile than BKNG relative to the S&P 500.
05Which is growing faster — TOUR or BKNG?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Booking Holdings Inc.
(BKNG) is pulling ahead at 13. 4% versus 9. 5% for Tuniu Corporation (TOUR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Booking Holdings Inc. grew EPS -4. 2% year-over-year, compared to -57. 8% for Tuniu Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, TOUR leads at 45. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — TOUR or BKNG?
Booking Holdings Inc.
(BKNG) is the more profitable company, earning 20. 1% net margin versus 5. 4% for Tuniu Corporation — meaning it keeps 20. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BKNG leads at 34. 5% versus 1. 8% for TOUR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BKNG leads at 100. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Which pays a better dividend — TOUR or BKNG?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Tuniu Corporation (TOUR) offers the highest yield at 18. 9%, versus 0. 9% for Booking Holdings Inc. (BKNG).
08Is TOUR or BKNG better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Booking Holdings Inc.
(BKNG) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 74), 0. 9% yield, +250. 7% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (BKNG: +250. 7%, TOUR: -92. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between TOUR and BKNG?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: TOUR is a small-cap deep-value stock; BKNG is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.