Engineering & Construction
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
TPC vs STRL vs PWR vs PRIM vs ROAD
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Engineering & Construction
Engineering & Construction
Engineering & Construction
Engineering & Construction
TPC vs STRL vs PWR vs PRIM vs ROAD — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Engineering & Construction | Engineering & Construction | Engineering & Construction | Engineering & Construction | Engineering & Construction |
| Market Cap | $4.37B | $25.92B | $111.76B | $5.68B | $7.90B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $5.69B | $2.88B | $29.99B | $7.49B | $3.26B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $126M | $347M | $1.12B | $248M | $127M |
| Gross Margin | 11.7% | 22.8% | 13.6% | 10.4% | 15.7% |
| Operating Margin | 4.0% | 17.0% | 5.8% | 4.9% | 8.6% |
| Forward P/E | 23.9x | 50.1x | 53.5x | 20.2x | 49.8x |
| Total Debt | $471M | $350M | $1.19B | $1.28B | $1.69B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $770M | $391M | $440M | $541M | $156M |
TPC vs STRL vs PWR vs PRIM vs ROAD — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tutor Perini Corpor… (TPC) | 100 | 789.0 | +689.0% |
| Sterling Infrastruc… (STRL) | 100 | 9334.8 | +9234.8% |
| Quanta Services, In… (PWR) | 100 | 2016.8 | +1916.8% |
| Primoris Services C… (PRIM) | 100 | 627.9 | +527.9% |
| Construction Partne… (ROAD) | 100 | 793.7 | +693.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: TPC vs STRL vs PWR vs PRIM vs ROAD
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Among these 5 stocks, TPC doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
STRL carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding.
- 184.3% 10Y total return vs PWR's 31.2%
- 12.0% margin vs TPC's 2.2%
- +370.9% vs ROAD's +51.9%
- 13.7% ROA vs TPC's 2.5%, ROIC 38.9% vs 15.8%
PWR is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.32, Low D/E 13.2%, current ratio 1.14x
- Beta 1.32 vs STRL's 2.89, lower leverage
- 0.1% yield, 7-year raise streak, vs PRIM's 0.3%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
PRIM ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability and valuation efficiency.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 1.37, yield 0.3%
- PEG 1.10 vs PWR's 3.10
- Beta 1.37, yield 0.3%, current ratio 1.26x
- Lower P/E (20.2x vs 49.8x), PEG 1.10 vs 2.66
ROAD is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 54.2%, EPS growth 40.5%, 3Y rev CAGR 29.3%
- 54.2% revenue growth vs STRL's 17.7%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 54.2% revenue growth vs STRL's 17.7% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (20.2x vs 49.8x), PEG 1.10 vs 2.66 | |
| Quality / Margins | 12.0% margin vs TPC's 2.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.32 vs STRL's 2.89, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 0.1% yield, 7-year raise streak, vs PRIM's 0.3%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +370.9% vs ROAD's +51.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 13.7% ROA vs TPC's 2.5%, ROIC 38.9% vs 15.8% |
TPC vs STRL vs PWR vs PRIM vs ROAD — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
TPC vs STRL vs PWR vs PRIM vs ROAD — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
STRL leads in 3 of 6 categories
PRIM leads 1 • TPC leads 0 • PWR leads 0 • ROAD leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
STRL leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PWR is the larger business by revenue, generating $30.0B annually — 10.4x STRL's $2.9B. STRL is the more profitable business, keeping 12.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to TPC's 2.2%. On growth, STRL holds the edge at +91.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $5.7B | $2.9B | $30.0B | $7.5B | $3.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $263M | $575M | $2.4B | $437M | $405M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $126M | $347M | $1.1B | $248M | $127M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $703M | $440M | $1.7B | $165M | $191M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +11.7% | +22.8% | +13.6% | +10.4% | +15.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +4.0% | +17.0% | +5.8% | +4.9% | +8.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +2.2% | +12.0% | +3.7% | +3.3% | +3.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +12.4% | +15.3% | +5.6% | +2.2% | +5.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +11.5% | +91.6% | +26.3% | -5.4% | +34.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -9.4% | +141.4% | +51.0% | -60.5% | +111.4% |
Valuation Metrics
PRIM leads this category, winning 6 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 20.9x trailing earnings, PRIM trades at a 81% valuation discount to PWR's 109.5x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), PRIM offers better value at 1.14x vs PWR's 6.35x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $4.4B | $25.9B | $111.8B | $5.7B | $7.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $4.1B | $25.9B | $112.5B | $6.4B | $9.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 54.87x | 90.06x | 109.53x | 20.88x | 76.35x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 23.90x | 50.13x | 53.49x | 20.22x | 49.85x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 2.03x | 6.35x | 1.14x | 4.08x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 14.46x | 52.67x | 45.32x | 12.69x | 24.32x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.79x | 10.41x | 3.94x | 0.75x | 2.81x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 3.50x | 23.63x | 12.51x | 3.42x | 8.53x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 7.71x | 71.47x | 68.95x | 16.69x | 51.53x |
Profitability & Efficiency
STRL leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
STRL delivers a 32.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $32 in annual profit, vs $10 for TPC. PWR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.13x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ROAD's 1.85x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), TPC scores 7/9 vs PWR's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +10.0% | +32.3% | +13.0% | +15.2% | +13.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +2.5% | +13.7% | +4.8% | +5.6% | +3.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +15.8% | +38.9% | +11.8% | +13.6% | +10.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +12.1% | +28.5% | +11.3% | +16.3% | +12.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 6 | 4 | 5 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.37x | 0.32x | 0.13x | 0.76x | 1.85x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$299M | -$41M | $748M | $735M | $1.5B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $770M | $391M | $440M | $541M | $156M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $471M | $350M | $1.2B | $1.3B | $1.7B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 9.14x | 27.17x | 6.27x | 21.02x | 4.34x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
STRL leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in STRL five years ago would be worth $372,159 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $32,936 for PRIM. Over the past 12 months, STRL leads with a +370.9% total return vs ROAD's +51.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors STRL at 171.4% vs PRIM's 63.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +19.6% | +164.7% | +69.4% | -19.7% | +25.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +177.8% | +370.9% | +128.4% | +53.5% | +51.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +1416.8% | +1898.6% | +341.7% | +333.3% | +403.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +411.8% | +3621.6% | +642.0% | +229.4% | +346.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +327.2% | +18426.4% | +3118.4% | +387.5% | +1061.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +147.5% | +171.4% | +64.1% | +63.0% | +71.3% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — STRL and PWR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
PWR is the less volatile stock with a 1.32 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than STRL's 2.89 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. STRL currently trades 95.0% from its 52-week high vs PRIM's 51.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.61x | 2.89x | 1.32x | 1.37x | 1.57x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $99.45 | $888.95 | $788.72 | $205.50 | $151.00 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $25.36 | $172.69 | $320.56 | $67.15 | $88.88 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +83.3% | +95.0% | +94.4% | +51.0% | +93.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 45.3 | 76.3 | 73.6 | 33.2 | 60.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 566K | 494K | 1.1M | 1.1M | 509K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — PWR and PRIM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: TPC as "Buy", STRL as "Buy", PWR as "Buy", PRIM as "Buy", ROAD as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 57.1% upside for PRIM (target: $165) vs -68.0% for TPC (target: $27). PRIM is the only dividend payer here at 0.30% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $26.50 | $574.50 | $665.29 | $164.63 | $137.33 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 13 | 9 | 35 | 23 | 9 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.1% | — | +0.1% | +0.3% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 1 | 7 | 2 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.06 | — | $0.40 | $0.32 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.3% | +0.1% | +0.2% | +0.3% |
STRL leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). PRIM leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
TPC vs STRL vs PWR vs PRIM vs ROAD: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is TPC or STRL or PWR or PRIM or ROAD a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Construction Partners, Inc.
(ROAD) is the stronger pick with 54. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 17. 7% for Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. (STRL). Primoris Services Corporation (PRIM) offers the better valuation at 20. 9x trailing P/E (20. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Tutor Perini Corporation (TPC) a "Buy" — based on 13 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — TPC or STRL or PWR or PRIM or ROAD?
On trailing P/E, Primoris Services Corporation (PRIM) is the cheapest at 20.
9x versus Quanta Services, Inc. at 109. 5x. On forward P/E, Primoris Services Corporation is actually cheaper at 20. 2x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Primoris Services Corporation wins at 1. 10x versus Quanta Services, Inc. 's 3. 10x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — TPC or STRL or PWR or PRIM or ROAD?
Over the past 5 years, Sterling Infrastructure, Inc.
(STRL) delivered a total return of +36. 2%, compared to +229. 4% for Primoris Services Corporation (PRIM). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: STRL returned +184. 3% versus TPC's +327. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — TPC or STRL or PWR or PRIM or ROAD?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Quanta Services, Inc.
(PWR) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 32β versus Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. 's 2. 89β — meaning STRL is approximately 119% more volatile than PWR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Quanta Services, Inc. (PWR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 13% versus 185% for Construction Partners, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — TPC or STRL or PWR or PRIM or ROAD?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Construction Partners, Inc.
(ROAD) is pulling ahead at 54. 2% versus 17. 7% for Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. (STRL). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Tutor Perini Corporation grew EPS 148. 2% year-over-year, compared to 12. 8% for Quanta Services, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ROAD leads at 29. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — TPC or STRL or PWR or PRIM or ROAD?
Sterling Infrastructure, Inc.
(STRL) is the more profitable company, earning 11. 7% net margin versus 1. 5% for Tutor Perini Corporation — meaning it keeps 11. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: STRL leads at 16. 6% versus 4. 2% for TPC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — STRL leads at 22. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is TPC or STRL or PWR or PRIM or ROAD more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Primoris Services Corporation (PRIM) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 10x versus Quanta Services, Inc. 's 3. 10x. A PEG below 1. 5 suggests fair-to-attractive pricing relative to expected growth. On forward earnings alone, Primoris Services Corporation (PRIM) trades at 20. 2x forward P/E versus 53. 5x for Quanta Services, Inc. — 33. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PRIM: 57. 1% to $164. 63.
08Which pays a better dividend — TPC or STRL or PWR or PRIM or ROAD?
In this comparison, PRIM (0.
3% yield) pays a dividend. TPC, STRL, PWR, ROAD do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is TPC or STRL or PWR or PRIM or ROAD better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Construction Partners, Inc.
(ROAD) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+1061% 10Y return). Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. (STRL) carries a higher beta of 2. 89 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (ROAD: +1061%, STRL: +184. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between TPC and STRL and PWR and PRIM and ROAD?
Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.