Oil & Gas Midstream
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
TRGP vs XOM
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Oil & Gas Integrated
TRGP vs XOM — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Oil & Gas Midstream | Oil & Gas Integrated |
| Market Cap | $53.60B | $629.60B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $17.49B | $323.90B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $1.65B | $28.84B |
| Gross Margin | 22.3% | 21.7% |
| Operating Margin | 18.5% | 10.5% |
| Forward P/E | 24.6x | 15.0x |
| Total Debt | $17.43B | $43.54B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $166M | $10.68B |
TRGP vs XOM — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Targa Resources Cor… (TRGP) | 100 | 1394.6 | +1294.6% |
| Exxon Mobil Corpora… (XOM) | 100 | 326.7 | +226.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: TRGP vs XOM
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
TRGP carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 3.1%, EPS growth 48.4%, 3Y rev CAGR -7.5%
- 5.9% 10Y total return vs XOM's 107.4%
- 3.1% revenue growth vs XOM's -4.5%
XOM is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 26 yrs, beta -0.15, yield 2.7%
- Lower volatility, beta -0.15, Low D/E 16.3%, current ratio 1.15x
- Beta -0.15, yield 2.7%, current ratio 1.15x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 3.1% revenue growth vs XOM's -4.5% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (15.0x vs 24.6x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 9.4% margin vs XOM's 8.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Lower D/E ratio (16.3% vs 5.5%) | |
| Dividends | 2.7% yield; 26-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +61.3% vs XOM's +45.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 6.8% ROA vs XOM's 6.4%, ROIC 13.3% vs 8.6% |
TRGP vs XOM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
TRGP vs XOM — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TRGP leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
XOM is the larger business by revenue, generating $323.9B annually — 18.5x TRGP's $17.5B. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 9.4% (TRGP) to 8.9% (XOM). On growth, TRGP holds the edge at +8.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $17.5B | $323.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $4.7B | $59.9B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $1.7B | $28.8B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $643M | $23.6B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +22.3% | +21.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +18.5% | +10.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +9.4% | +8.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +3.7% | +7.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +8.1% | -1.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +25.9% | -11.0% |
Valuation Metrics
XOM leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 22.2x trailing earnings, XOM trades at a 24% valuation discount to TRGP's 29.3x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, XOM's 11.1x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than TRGP's 14.3x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $53.6B | $629.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $70.9B | $662.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 29.28x | 22.17x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 24.59x | 15.00x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 14.28x | 11.05x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.13x | 1.94x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 16.77x | 2.40x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 13.68x | 26.66x |
Profitability & Efficiency
TRGP leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
TRGP delivers a 58.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $58 in annual profit, vs $11 for XOM. XOM carries lower financial leverage with a 0.16x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to TRGP's 5.45x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), TRGP scores 6/9 vs XOM's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +58.2% | +10.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +6.8% | +6.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +13.3% | +8.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +16.7% | +8.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 5.45x | 0.16x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $17.3B | $32.9B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $166M | $10.7B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $17.4B | $43.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 3.85x | 69.44x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
TRGP leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in TRGP five years ago would be worth $70,425 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $27,178 for XOM. Over the past 12 months, TRGP leads with a +61.3% total return vs XOM's +45.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TRGP at 53.8% vs XOM's 13.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +34.8% | +22.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +61.3% | +45.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +263.9% | +46.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +604.3% | +171.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +589.6% | +107.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +53.8% | +13.7% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — TRGP and XOM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
XOM is the less volatile stock with a -0.15 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than TRGP's 0.29 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. TRGP currently trades 95.2% from its 52-week high vs XOM's 84.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.29x | -0.15x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $261.95 | $176.41 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $144.14 | $101.19 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +95.2% | +84.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 66.9 | 53.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.3M | 18.8M |
Analyst Outlook
XOM leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates TRGP as "Buy" and XOM as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 8.0% upside for XOM (target: $160) vs -4.7% for TRGP (target: $238). XOM is the only dividend payer here at 2.69% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $237.70 | $160.43 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 33 | 55 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +2.7% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 3 | 26 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $4.00 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +3.2% |
TRGP leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). XOM leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook). 1 tied.
TRGP vs XOM: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is TRGP or XOM a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Targa Resources Corp.
(TRGP) is the stronger pick with 3. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -4. 5% for Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM). Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM) offers the better valuation at 22. 2x trailing P/E (15. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Targa Resources Corp. (TRGP) a "Buy" — based on 33 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — TRGP or XOM?
On trailing P/E, Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM) is the cheapest at 22.
2x versus Targa Resources Corp. at 29. 3x. On forward P/E, Exxon Mobil Corporation is actually cheaper at 15. 0x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — TRGP or XOM?
Over the past 5 years, Targa Resources Corp.
(TRGP) delivered a total return of +604. 3%, compared to +171. 8% for Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TRGP returned +589. 6% versus XOM's +107. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — TRGP or XOM?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM) is the lower-risk stock at -0.
15β versus Targa Resources Corp. 's 0. 29β — meaning TRGP is approximately -302% more volatile than XOM relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 16% versus 5% for Targa Resources Corp. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — TRGP or XOM?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Targa Resources Corp.
(TRGP) is pulling ahead at 3. 1% versus -4. 5% for Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Targa Resources Corp. grew EPS 48. 4% year-over-year, compared to -14. 5% for Exxon Mobil Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, XOM leads at -6. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — TRGP or XOM?
Targa Resources Corp.
(TRGP) is the more profitable company, earning 10. 8% net margin versus 8. 9% for Exxon Mobil Corporation — meaning it keeps 10. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TRGP leads at 20. 1% versus 10. 5% for XOM. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TRGP leads at 26. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is TRGP or XOM more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM) trades at 15.
0x forward P/E versus 24. 6x for Targa Resources Corp. — 9. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for XOM: 8. 0% to $160. 43.
08Which pays a better dividend — TRGP or XOM?
In this comparison, XOM (2.
7% yield) pays a dividend. TRGP does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is TRGP or XOM better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.
15), 2. 7% yield, +107. 4% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (XOM: +107. 4%, TRGP: +589. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between TRGP and XOM?
Both stocks operate in the Energy sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
XOM pays a dividend while TRGP does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.