Railroads
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
TRN vs GNSS vs SPOK vs GBX
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Hardware, Equipment & Parts
Medical - Healthcare Information Services
Railroads
TRN vs GNSS vs SPOK vs GBX — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Railroads | Hardware, Equipment & Parts | Medical - Healthcare Information Services | Railroads |
| Market Cap | $2.93B | $90M | $225M | $1.56B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $2.06B | $51M | $103M | $3.06B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $255M | $-15M | $11M | $185M |
| Gross Margin | 27.0% | 43.2% | 91.4% | 17.3% |
| Operating Margin | 16.6% | -22.1% | 13.2% | 9.4% |
| Forward P/E | 18.8x | — | 16.4x | 16.0x |
| Total Debt | $5.44B | $21M | $7M | $1.84B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $201M | $8M | $25M | $326M |
TRN vs GNSS vs SPOK vs GBX — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Trinity Industries,… (TRN) | 100 | 183.5 | +83.5% |
| Genasys Inc. (GNSS) | 100 | 43.7 | -56.3% |
| Spok Holdings, Inc. (SPOK) | 100 | 105.5 | +5.5% |
| The Greenbrier Comp… (GBX) | 100 | 237.6 | +137.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: TRN vs GNSS vs SPOK vs GBX
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
TRN is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding is your priority.
- 261.3% 10Y total return vs GBX's 130.7%
- 12.4% margin vs GNSS's -29.2%
- +57.0% vs SPOK's -26.7%
GNSS is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 69.8%, EPS growth 44.4%, 3Y rev CAGR -9.0%
- 69.8% revenue growth vs TRN's -30.0%
SPOK carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 5 yrs, beta 0.42, yield 11.9%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.42, Low D/E 4.7%, current ratio 1.18x
- Beta 0.42, yield 11.9%, current ratio 1.18x
- Beta 0.42 vs TRN's 0.97, lower leverage
GBX is the clearest fit if your priority is value.
- Lower P/E (16.0x vs 16.4x)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 69.8% revenue growth vs TRN's -30.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (16.0x vs 16.4x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 12.4% margin vs GNSS's -29.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.42 vs TRN's 0.97, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 11.9% yield, 5-year raise streak, vs TRN's 3.2%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +57.0% vs SPOK's -26.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 5.2% ROA vs GNSS's -22.0%, ROIC 11.3% vs -56.7% |
TRN vs GNSS vs SPOK vs GBX — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
TRN vs GNSS vs SPOK vs GBX — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
GBX leads in 1 of 6 categories
SPOK leads 1 • TRN leads 1 • GNSS leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — TRN and GNSS and SPOK each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GBX is the larger business by revenue, generating $3.1B annually — 60.2x GNSS's $51M. TRN is the more profitable business, keeping 12.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to GNSS's -29.2%. On growth, GNSS holds the edge at +145.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $2.1B | $51M | $103M | $3.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $646M | -$9M | $17M | $413M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $255M | -$15M | $11M | $185M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$283M | -$3M | $26M | $123M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +27.0% | +43.2% | +91.4% | +17.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +16.6% | -22.1% | +13.2% | +9.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +12.4% | -29.2% | +10.3% | +6.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -13.7% | -5.3% | +24.7% | +4.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -16.0% | +145.9% | -100.0% | -19.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +15.4% | +78.0% | -64.0% | -33.7% |
Valuation Metrics
GBX leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 7.9x trailing earnings, GBX trades at a 45% valuation discount to SPOK's 14.4x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, GBX's 6.7x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than TRN's 12.3x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2.9B | $90M | $225M | $1.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $8.2B | $104M | $206M | $3.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 12.01x | -5.00x | 14.44x | 7.94x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 18.79x | — | 16.41x | 16.01x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | 0.23x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 12.31x | — | 8.91x | 6.69x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.36x | 2.22x | 1.61x | 0.48x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.65x | 41.58x | 1.56x | 0.93x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | 8.91x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
SPOK leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
TRN delivers a 21.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $21 in annual profit, vs $-8 for GNSS. SPOK carries lower financial leverage with a 0.05x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to GNSS's 9.85x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), TRN scores 8/9 vs GNSS's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +21.3% | -8.2% | +7.3% | +10.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +3.0% | -22.0% | +5.2% | +4.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +4.1% | -56.7% | +11.3% | +7.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +4.7% | -68.2% | +12.1% | +9.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 8 | 3 | 6 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 4.75x | 9.85x | 0.05x | 1.06x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $5.2B | $13M | -$18M | $1.5B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $201M | $8M | $25M | $326M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $5.4B | $21M | $7M | $1.8B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.29x | -31.66x | — | 3.87x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
TRN leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in SPOK five years ago would be worth $16,194 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,328 for GNSS. Over the past 12 months, TRN leads with a +57.0% total return vs SPOK's -26.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors GBX at 26.6% vs GNSS's -11.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +38.3% | -8.3% | -14.3% | +8.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +57.0% | +2.6% | -26.7% | +20.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +88.1% | -31.3% | +13.4% | +102.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +40.2% | -66.7% | +61.9% | +14.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +261.3% | +14.9% | +13.3% | +130.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +23.4% | -11.8% | +4.3% | +26.6% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — TRN and SPOK each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SPOK is the less volatile stock with a 0.42 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than TRN's 0.97 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. TRN currently trades 98.3% from its 52-week high vs SPOK's 56.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.97x | 0.87x | 0.42x | 0.97x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $37.27 | $2.70 | $19.31 | $59.19 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $22.38 | $1.40 | $9.96 | $38.23 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +98.3% | +74.1% | +56.1% | +85.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 64.1 | 59.9 | 36.7 | 50.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 575K | 95K | 185K | 405K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — TRN and SPOK each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: TRN as "Hold", SPOK as "Hold", GBX as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 38.5% upside for SPOK (target: $15) vs -4.5% for TRN (target: $35). For income investors, SPOK offers the higher dividend yield at 11.95% vs GBX's 2.44%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | — | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $35.00 | — | $15.00 | $49.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 25 | — | 1 | 24 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +3.2% | — | +11.9% | +2.4% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 15 | 1 | 5 | 12 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.19 | — | $1.29 | $1.23 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +2.4% | 0.0% | +1.3% | +1.5% |
GBX leads in 1 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics). SPOK leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 3 tied.
TRN vs GNSS vs SPOK vs GBX: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is TRN or GNSS or SPOK or GBX a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Genasys Inc.
(GNSS) is the stronger pick with 69. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -30. 0% for Trinity Industries, Inc. (TRN). The Greenbrier Companies, Inc. (GBX) offers the better valuation at 7. 9x trailing P/E (16. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate The Greenbrier Companies, Inc. (GBX) a "Buy" — based on 24 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — TRN or GNSS or SPOK or GBX?
On trailing P/E, The Greenbrier Companies, Inc.
(GBX) is the cheapest at 7. 9x versus Spok Holdings, Inc. at 14. 4x. On forward P/E, The Greenbrier Companies, Inc. is actually cheaper at 16. 0x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — TRN or GNSS or SPOK or GBX?
Over the past 5 years, Spok Holdings, Inc.
(SPOK) delivered a total return of +61. 9%, compared to -66. 7% for Genasys Inc. (GNSS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TRN returned +261. 3% versus SPOK's +13. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — TRN or GNSS or SPOK or GBX?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Spok Holdings, Inc.
(SPOK) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 42β versus Trinity Industries, Inc. 's 0. 97β — meaning TRN is approximately 131% more volatile than SPOK relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Spok Holdings, Inc. (SPOK) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 5% versus 10% for Genasys Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — TRN or GNSS or SPOK or GBX?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Genasys Inc.
(GNSS) is pulling ahead at 69. 8% versus -30. 0% for Trinity Industries, Inc. (TRN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Trinity Industries, Inc. grew EPS 86. 0% year-over-year, compared to 2. 7% for Spok Holdings, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, TRN leads at 2. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — TRN or GNSS or SPOK or GBX?
Trinity Industries, Inc.
(TRN) is the more profitable company, earning 11. 7% net margin versus -44. 4% for Genasys Inc. — meaning it keeps 11. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TRN leads at 16. 6% versus -41. 2% for GNSS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SPOK leads at 78. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is TRN or GNSS or SPOK or GBX more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, The Greenbrier Companies, Inc.
(GBX) trades at 16. 0x forward P/E versus 18. 8x for Trinity Industries, Inc. — 2. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SPOK: 38. 5% to $15. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — TRN or GNSS or SPOK or GBX?
In this comparison, SPOK (11.
9% yield), TRN (3. 2% yield), GBX (2. 4% yield) pay a dividend. GNSS does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is TRN or GNSS or SPOK or GBX better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Spok Holdings, Inc.
(SPOK) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 42), 11. 9% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (SPOK: +13. 3%, GNSS: +14. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between TRN and GNSS and SPOK and GBX?
These companies operate in different sectors (TRN (Industrials) and GNSS (Technology) and SPOK (Healthcare) and GBX (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: TRN is a small-cap deep-value stock; GNSS is a small-cap high-growth stock; SPOK is a small-cap deep-value stock; GBX is a small-cap deep-value stock. TRN, SPOK, GBX pay a dividend while GNSS does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.