REIT - Industrial
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
TRNO vs REXR vs PLD vs EGP
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
REIT - Industrial
REIT - Industrial
REIT - Industrial
TRNO vs REXR vs PLD vs EGP — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | REIT - Industrial | REIT - Industrial | REIT - Industrial | REIT - Industrial |
| Market Cap | $7.02B | $8.60B | $132.71B | $10.91B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $490M | $996M | $8.74B | $737M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $424M | $212M | $3.21B | $293M |
| Gross Margin | 57.0% | 61.7% | 67.7% | 36.1% |
| Operating Margin | 30.5% | 54.1% | 47.0% | 40.3% |
| Forward P/E | 48.5x | 31.0x | 41.6x | 35.9x |
| Total Debt | $943M | $3.50B | $31.49B | $1.75B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $25M | $166M | $1.32B | $1M |
TRNO vs REXR vs PLD vs EGP — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Terreno Realty Corp… (TRNO) | 100 | 129.1 | +29.1% |
| Rexford Industrial … (REXR) | 100 | 91.0 | -9.0% |
| Prologis, Inc. (PLD) | 100 | 156.2 | +56.2% |
| EastGroup Propertie… (EGP) | 100 | 174.6 | +74.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: TRNO vs REXR vs PLD vs EGP
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
TRNO carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 15 yrs, beta 0.69, yield 3.0%
- Rev growth 24.5%, EPS growth 104.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 19.9%
- PEG 1.37 vs PLD's 3.84
- 24.5% FFO/revenue growth vs PLD's 2.2%
REXR is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if defensive is your priority.
- Beta 0.88, yield 4.9%, current ratio 7.16x
- 4.9% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs TRNO's 3.0%
PLD is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +40.7% vs REXR's +12.7%
EGP is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 285.4% 10Y total return vs PLD's 265.6%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.52, Low D/E 50.1%, current ratio 0.85x
- Beta 0.52 vs REXR's 0.88
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 24.5% FFO/revenue growth vs PLD's 2.2% | |
| Value | PEG 1.37 vs 3.84 | |
| Quality / Margins | 86.5% margin vs REXR's 21.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.52 vs REXR's 0.88 | |
| Dividends | 4.9% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs TRNO's 3.0% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +40.7% vs REXR's +12.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 8.0% ROA vs REXR's 1.6%, ROIC 3.0% vs 2.4% |
TRNO vs REXR vs PLD vs EGP — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
TRNO vs REXR vs PLD vs EGP — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
EGP leads in 2 of 6 categories
REXR leads 1 • TRNO leads 1 • PLD leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — TRNO and PLD each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PLD is the larger business by revenue, generating $8.7B annually — 17.8x TRNO's $490M. TRNO is the more profitable business, keeping 86.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to REXR's 21.3%. On growth, TRNO holds the edge at +12.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $490M | $996M | $8.7B | $737M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $274M | $840M | $6.7B | $517M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $424M | $212M | $3.2B | $293M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $228M | $209M | $5.2B | $418M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +57.0% | +61.7% | +67.7% | +36.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +30.5% | +54.1% | +47.0% | +40.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +86.5% | +21.3% | +36.7% | +39.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +46.5% | +21.0% | +59.3% | +56.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +12.7% | -0.9% | +8.7% | +10.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +40.4% | -2.2% | -24.1% | +55.3% |
Valuation Metrics
REXR leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 16.9x trailing earnings, TRNO trades at a 60% valuation discount to REXR's 42.1x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), TRNO offers better value at 0.48x vs REXR's 3.82x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $7.0B | $8.6B | $132.7B | $10.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $7.9B | $11.9B | $162.9B | $12.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 16.86x | 42.13x | 35.64x | 41.67x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 48.54x | 30.97x | 41.56x | 35.93x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.48x | 3.82x | 3.30x | 3.46x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 25.29x | 17.14x | 23.28x | 25.10x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 14.74x | 8.58x | 16.18x | 15.12x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.64x | 0.95x | 2.32x | 3.10x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 33.69x | 41.24x | 27.02x | 26.94x |
Profitability & Efficiency
TRNO leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
TRNO delivers a 10.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $10 in annual profit, vs $2 for REXR. TRNO carries lower financial leverage with a 0.23x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to PLD's 0.54x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), EGP scores 6/9 vs PLD's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +10.4% | +2.3% | +5.6% | +8.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +8.0% | +1.6% | +3.3% | +5.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +3.0% | +2.4% | +3.8% | +4.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +4.0% | +3.1% | +4.8% | +5.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.23x | 0.40x | 0.54x | 0.50x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $918M | $3.3B | $30.2B | $1.8B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $25M | $166M | $1.3B | $1M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $943M | $3.5B | $31.5B | $1.8B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 13.27x | 3.09x | 5.27x | 8.68x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
EGP leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in EGP five years ago would be worth $14,790 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $7,980 for REXR. Over the past 12 months, PLD leads with a +40.7% total return vs REXR's +12.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors EGP at 8.6% vs REXR's -10.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +12.9% | -6.1% | +11.6% | +13.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +20.9% | +12.7% | +40.7% | +26.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +16.0% | -27.0% | +21.3% | +28.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +17.2% | -20.2% | +39.8% | +47.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +235.0% | +138.8% | +265.6% | +285.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +5.1% | -10.0% | +6.6% | +8.6% |
Risk & Volatility
EGP leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
EGP is the less volatile stock with a 0.52 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than REXR's 0.88 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. EGP currently trades 99.5% from its 52-week high vs REXR's 81.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.69x | 0.88x | 0.73x | 0.52x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $67.55 | $44.38 | $145.44 | $203.98 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $53.00 | $32.14 | $103.02 | $159.37 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +97.8% | +81.6% | +98.3% | +99.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 51.3 | 51.0 | 53.1 | 58.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 533K | 2.4M | 3.1M | 335K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — TRNO and REXR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: TRNO as "Buy", REXR as "Hold", PLD as "Buy", EGP as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 17.3% upside for REXR (target: $43) vs 0.9% for EGP (target: $205). For income investors, REXR offers the higher dividend yield at 4.90% vs PLD's 2.62%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $69.60 | $42.50 | $144.43 | $204.73 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 32 | 21 | 42 | 33 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +3.0% | +4.9% | +2.6% | +2.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 15 | 1 | 11 | 7 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.98 | $1.77 | $3.74 | $5.67 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +2.9% | +0.0% | 0.0% |
EGP leads in 2 of 6 categories (Total Returns, Risk & Volatility). REXR leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
TRNO vs REXR vs PLD vs EGP: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is TRNO or REXR or PLD or EGP a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Terreno Realty Corporation (TRNO) is the stronger pick with 24.
5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 2. 2% for Prologis, Inc. (PLD). Terreno Realty Corporation (TRNO) offers the better valuation at 16. 9x trailing P/E (48. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Terreno Realty Corporation (TRNO) a "Buy" — based on 32 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — TRNO or REXR or PLD or EGP?
On trailing P/E, Terreno Realty Corporation (TRNO) is the cheapest at 16.
9x versus Rexford Industrial Realty, Inc. at 42. 1x. On forward P/E, Rexford Industrial Realty, Inc. is actually cheaper at 31. 0x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Terreno Realty Corporation wins at 1. 37x versus Prologis, Inc. 's 3. 84x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — TRNO or REXR or PLD or EGP?
Over the past 5 years, EastGroup Properties, Inc.
(EGP) delivered a total return of +47. 9%, compared to -20. 2% for Rexford Industrial Realty, Inc. (REXR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: EGP returned +285. 4% versus REXR's +138. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — TRNO or REXR or PLD or EGP?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), EastGroup Properties, Inc.
(EGP) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 52β versus Rexford Industrial Realty, Inc. 's 0. 88β — meaning REXR is approximately 68% more volatile than EGP relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Terreno Realty Corporation (TRNO) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 23% versus 54% for Prologis, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — TRNO or REXR or PLD or EGP?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Terreno Realty Corporation (TRNO) is pulling ahead at 24.
5% versus 2. 2% for Prologis, Inc. (PLD). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Terreno Realty Corporation grew EPS 104. 2% year-over-year, compared to -28. 3% for Rexford Industrial Realty, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, TRNO leads at 19. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — TRNO or REXR or PLD or EGP?
Terreno Realty Corporation (TRNO) is the more profitable company, earning 84.
6% net margin versus 21. 1% for Rexford Industrial Realty, Inc. — meaning it keeps 84. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PLD leads at 53. 8% versus 37. 9% for REXR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — REXR leads at 77. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is TRNO or REXR or PLD or EGP more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Terreno Realty Corporation (TRNO) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 37x versus Prologis, Inc. 's 3. 84x. A PEG below 1. 5 suggests fair-to-attractive pricing relative to expected growth. On forward earnings alone, Rexford Industrial Realty, Inc. (REXR) trades at 31. 0x forward P/E versus 48. 5x for Terreno Realty Corporation — 17. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for REXR: 17. 3% to $42. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — TRNO or REXR or PLD or EGP?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Rexford Industrial Realty, Inc. (REXR) offers the highest yield at 4. 9%, versus 2. 6% for Prologis, Inc. (PLD).
09Is TRNO or REXR or PLD or EGP better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, EastGroup Properties, Inc.
(EGP) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 52), 2. 8% yield, +285. 4% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (EGP: +285. 4%, REXR: +138. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between TRNO and REXR and PLD and EGP?
Both stocks operate in the Real Estate sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: TRNO is a small-cap high-growth stock; REXR is a small-cap income-oriented stock; PLD is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; EGP is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.