Personal Products & Services
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
TRNR vs HIMS vs NFLX vs PTON
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Medical - Equipment & Services
Entertainment
Leisure
TRNR vs HIMS vs NFLX vs PTON — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Personal Products & Services | Medical - Equipment & Services | Entertainment | Leisure |
| Market Cap | $2M | $6.63B | $374.00B | $2.32B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $10M | $2.35B | $45.18B | $2.45B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-20M | $128M | $10.98B | $23M |
| Gross Margin | -0.8% | 69.7% | 48.5% | 52.0% |
| Operating Margin | -228.0% | 4.6% | 29.5% | 5.5% |
| Forward P/E | — | 51.5x | 24.8x | 36.5x |
| Total Debt | $12M | $1.12B | $14.46B | $1.98B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $138K | $229M | $9.03B | $1.04B |
TRNR vs HIMS vs NFLX vs PTON — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Apr 23 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Interactive Strengt… (TRNR) | 100 | 0.0 | -100.0% |
| Hims & Hers Health,… (HIMS) | 100 | 221.4 | +121.4% |
| Netflix, Inc. (NFLX) | 100 | 267.5 | +167.5% |
| Peloton Interactive… (PTON) | 100 | 63.7 | -36.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: TRNR vs HIMS vs NFLX vs PTON
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
TRNR is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 459.3%, EPS growth 1.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 155.4%
- 459.3% revenue growth vs PTON's -7.8%
HIMS lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
NFLX carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- beta 0.39
- 8.8% 10Y total return vs HIMS's 161.9%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.39, Low D/E 54.3%, current ratio 1.19x
- Beta 0.39, current ratio 1.19x
PTON is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- -18.9% vs TRNR's -98.6%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 459.3% revenue growth vs PTON's -7.8% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (24.8x vs 51.5x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 24.3% margin vs TRNR's -202.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.39 vs TRNR's 2.40, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | -18.9% vs TRNR's -98.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 19.8% ROA vs TRNR's -32.5%, ROIC 29.8% vs -188.2% |
TRNR vs HIMS vs NFLX vs PTON — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
TRNR vs HIMS vs NFLX vs PTON — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
NFLX leads in 4 of 6 categories
TRNR leads 0 • HIMS leads 0 • PTON leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NFLX leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NFLX is the larger business by revenue, generating $45.2B annually — 4623.3x TRNR's $10M. NFLX is the more profitable business, keeping 24.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to TRNR's -2.0%. On growth, TRNR holds the edge at +139.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $10M | $2.3B | $45.2B | $2.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$16M | $164M | $30.1B | $156M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$20M | $128M | $11.0B | $23M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$59M | $73M | $9.5B | $401M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | -0.8% | +69.7% | +48.5% | +52.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -2.3% | +4.6% | +29.5% | +5.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -2.0% | +5.5% | +24.3% | +0.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -6.1% | +3.1% | +20.9% | +16.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +139.1% | +28.4% | +17.6% | +1.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +73.5% | -27.3% | +31.1% | +150.0% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — TRNR and NFLX and PTON each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 34.9x trailing earnings, NFLX trades at a 31% valuation discount to HIMS's 50.3x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, NFLX's 12.6x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than PTON's 60.9x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2M | $6.6B | $374.0B | $2.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $13M | $7.5B | $379.4B | $3.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.00x | 50.32x | 34.89x | -18.87x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 51.51x | 24.80x | 36.47x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 1.06x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 42.68x | 12.61x | 60.85x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.34x | 2.82x | 8.28x | 0.93x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.00x | 12.25x | 14.32x | — |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 89.61x | 39.53x | 7.16x |
Profitability & Efficiency
NFLX leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
NFLX delivers a 41.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $41 in annual profit, vs $-145 for TRNR. NFLX carries lower financial leverage with a 0.54x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to HIMS's 2.07x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), TRNR scores 7/9 vs HIMS's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -144.9% | +23.7% | +41.3% | — |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -32.5% | +6.0% | +19.8% | +1.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -188.2% | +10.7% | +29.8% | -3.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -22.8% | +10.9% | +30.5% | -2.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 4 | 7 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.65x | 2.07x | 0.54x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $12M | $892M | $5.4B | $937M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $138,000 | $229M | $9.0B | $1.0B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $12M | $1.1B | $14.5B | $2.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -0.76x | — | 17.33x | 1.52x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
NFLX leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in HIMS five years ago would be worth $23,764 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $0 for TRNR. Over the past 12 months, PTON leads with a -18.9% total return vs TRNR's -98.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NFLX at 38.6% vs TRNR's -99.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -90.1% | -23.2% | -3.0% | -7.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -98.6% | -51.0% | -23.6% | -18.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | +116.6% | +166.5% | -30.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | +137.6% | +75.2% | -93.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | +161.9% | +875.3% | -78.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -99.0% | +29.4% | +38.6% | -11.2% |
Risk & Volatility
NFLX leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
NFLX is the less volatile stock with a 0.39 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than TRNR's 2.40 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NFLX currently trades 65.8% from its 52-week high vs TRNR's 0.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.40x | 2.40x | 0.39x | 1.89x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $126.00 | $70.43 | $134.12 | $9.20 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.61 | $13.74 | $75.01 | $3.65 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +0.7% | +36.4% | +65.8% | +61.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 33.2 | 54.5 | 35.3 | 57.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 192K | 34.9M | 44.0M | 13.1M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: HIMS as "Hold", NFLX as "Buy", PTON as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 31.8% upside for NFLX (target: $116) vs 15.6% for HIMS (target: $30).
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $29.67 | $116.29 | $7.10 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 19 | 99 | 40 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +1.4% | +2.4% | 0.0% |
NFLX leads in 4 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Profitability & Efficiency. 1 category is tied.
TRNR vs HIMS vs NFLX vs PTON: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is TRNR or HIMS or NFLX or PTON a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Interactive Strength Inc.
(TRNR) is the stronger pick with 459. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -7. 8% for Peloton Interactive, Inc. (PTON). Netflix, Inc. (NFLX) offers the better valuation at 34. 9x trailing P/E (24. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Netflix, Inc. (NFLX) a "Buy" — based on 99 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — TRNR or HIMS or NFLX or PTON?
On trailing P/E, Netflix, Inc.
(NFLX) is the cheapest at 34. 9x versus Hims & Hers Health, Inc. at 50. 3x. On forward P/E, Netflix, Inc. is actually cheaper at 24. 8x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — TRNR or HIMS or NFLX or PTON?
Over the past 5 years, Hims & Hers Health, Inc.
(HIMS) delivered a total return of +137. 6%, compared to -100. 0% for Interactive Strength Inc. (TRNR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NFLX returned +875. 3% versus TRNR's -100. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — TRNR or HIMS or NFLX or PTON?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Netflix, Inc.
(NFLX) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 39β versus Interactive Strength Inc. 's 2. 40β — meaning TRNR is approximately 517% more volatile than NFLX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Netflix, Inc. (NFLX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 54% versus 2% for Hims & Hers Health, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — TRNR or HIMS or NFLX or PTON?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Interactive Strength Inc.
(TRNR) is pulling ahead at 459. 3% versus -7. 8% for Peloton Interactive, Inc. (PTON). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Peloton Interactive, Inc. grew EPS 80. 1% year-over-year, compared to -3. 8% for Hims & Hers Health, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, TRNR leads at 155. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — TRNR or HIMS or NFLX or PTON?
Netflix, Inc.
(NFLX) is the more profitable company, earning 24. 3% net margin versus -649. 3% for Interactive Strength Inc. — meaning it keeps 24. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NFLX leads at 29. 5% versus -542. 5% for TRNR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — HIMS leads at 59. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is TRNR or HIMS or NFLX or PTON more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Netflix, Inc.
(NFLX) trades at 24. 8x forward P/E versus 51. 5x for Hims & Hers Health, Inc. — 26. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for NFLX: 31. 8% to $116. 29.
08Which pays a better dividend — TRNR or HIMS or NFLX or PTON?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is TRNR or HIMS or NFLX or PTON better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Netflix, Inc.
(NFLX) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 39), +875. 3% 10Y return). Interactive Strength Inc. (TRNR) carries a higher beta of 2. 40 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (NFLX: +875. 3%, TRNR: -100. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between TRNR and HIMS and NFLX and PTON?
These companies operate in different sectors (TRNR (Consumer Cyclical) and HIMS (Healthcare) and NFLX (Communication Services) and PTON (Consumer Cyclical)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: TRNR is a small-cap high-growth stock; HIMS is a small-cap high-growth stock; NFLX is a large-cap high-growth stock; PTON is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.