Leisure
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
TRON vs MSTR vs COIN vs MARA
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Software - Application
Financial - Data & Stock Exchanges
Financial - Capital Markets
TRON vs MSTR vs COIN vs MARA — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Leisure | Software - Application | Financial - Data & Stock Exchanges | Financial - Capital Markets |
| Market Cap | $27M | $60.05B | $50.96B | $4.83B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $4M | $490M | $7.18B | $907M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $12M | $-12.36B | $801M | $-1.31B |
| Gross Margin | 23.0% | 68.1% | 74.6% | -47.7% |
| Operating Margin | -67.5% | 94.2% | 20.0% | -90.6% |
| Forward P/E | — | 2.4x | 66.1x | — |
| Total Debt | $500K | $8.28B | $7.83B | $3.65B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1M | $2.30B | $11.29B | $547M |
TRON vs MSTR vs COIN vs MARA — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Aug 23 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tron Inc. (TRON) | 100 | 123.7 | +23.7% |
| Strategy Inc (MSTR) | 100 | 503.0 | +403.0% |
| Coinbase Global, In… (COIN) | 100 | 242.4 | +142.4% |
| Marathon Digital Ho… (MARA) | 100 | 101.0 | +1.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: TRON vs MSTR vs COIN vs MARA
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
TRON carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- beta 2.09
- Rev growth -25.2%, EPS growth -37.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 17.4%
- Lower volatility, beta 2.09, Low D/E 9.5%, current ratio 3.41x
- Beta 2.09, current ratio 3.41x
MSTR is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding is your priority.
- 8.6% 10Y total return vs COIN's -41.2%
- Lower P/E (2.4x vs 66.1x)
- 0.7% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend
COIN lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
MARA is the clearest fit if your priority is growth.
- 38.2% NII/revenue growth vs TRON's -25.2%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 38.2% NII/revenue growth vs TRON's -25.2% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (2.4x vs 66.1x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 269.6% margin vs MSTR's -25.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 2.09 vs COIN's 3.17, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 0.7% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +473.6% vs MSTR's -54.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 4.9% ROA vs MSTR's -19.4%, ROIC -116.5% vs -9.9% |
TRON vs MSTR vs COIN vs MARA — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
TRON vs MSTR vs COIN vs MARA — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
MSTR leads in 2 of 6 categories
TRON leads 1 • COIN leads 1 • MARA leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TRON leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
COIN is the larger business by revenue, generating $7.2B annually — 1611.0x TRON's $4M. TRON is the more profitable business, keeping 2.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to MSTR's -25.2%. On growth, TRON holds the edge at +26.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $4M | $490M | $7.2B | $907M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$3M | $480M | $202M | $627M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $12M | -$12.4B | $801M | -$1.3B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$2M | $7.6B | $2.8B | -$312M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +23.0% | +68.1% | +74.6% | -47.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -67.5% | +94.2% | +20.0% | -90.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +2.7% | -25.2% | +17.6% | -144.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -49.2% | +15.5% | +33.8% | -34.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +26.0% | +11.9% | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +136.4% | -132.0% | -7.2% | -4.8% |
Valuation Metrics
MSTR leads this category, winning 3 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $27M | $60.1B | $51.0B | $4.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $26M | $66.0B | $47.5B | $7.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -6.22x | -11.81x | 43.36x | -3.44x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 2.37x | 66.07x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 0.86x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | 29.25x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 6.20x | 125.83x | 7.10x | 5.32x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 5.05x | 1.04x | 3.75x | 1.30x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | 21.00x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
COIN leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
COIN delivers a 5.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $6 in annual profit, vs $-31 for MARA. TRON carries lower financial leverage with a 0.09x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MARA's 1.05x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), COIN scores 4/9 vs TRON's 2/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +5.0% | -24.1% | +5.7% | -30.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +4.9% | -19.4% | +2.8% | -17.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -116.5% | -9.9% | +5.7% | -9.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -92.1% | -12.6% | +8.1% | -12.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.09x | 0.16x | 0.53x | 1.05x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$852,373 | $6.0B | -$3.5B | $3.1B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1M | $2.3B | $11.3B | $547M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $500,000 | $8.3B | $7.8B | $3.6B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 394.84x | 9.05x | 16.97x | 4.73x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
MSTR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in MSTR five years ago would be worth $28,983 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,054 for MARA. Over the past 12 months, TRON leads with a +473.6% total return vs MSTR's -54.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MSTR at 82.7% vs TRON's -22.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +69.1% | +14.4% | -18.4% | +28.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +473.6% | -54.2% | -1.8% | -4.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -53.8% | +510.2% | +232.1% | +36.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -53.8% | +189.8% | -26.8% | -59.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -53.8% | +855.6% | -41.2% | -51.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -22.7% | +82.7% | +49.2% | +10.8% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — TRON and MARA each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
TRON is the less volatile stock with a 2.09 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than COIN's 3.17 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MARA currently trades 54.2% from its 52-week high vs TRON's 18.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.09x | 2.59x | 3.17x | 3.11x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $12.80 | $457.22 | $444.65 | $23.45 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.39 | $104.17 | $139.36 | $6.66 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +18.0% | +39.3% | +43.4% | +54.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 54.3 | 68.8 | 53.9 | 69.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.2M | 18.8M | 10.8M | 47.6M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: MSTR as "Buy", COIN as "Buy", MARA as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 56.2% upside for MSTR (target: $281) vs -66.1% for TRON (target: $1). MSTR is the only dividend payer here at 0.72% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $0.78 | $280.83 | $243.33 | $16.13 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 29 | 37 | 19 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.7% | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 1 | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $1.30 | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +1.6% | +1.0% |
MSTR leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns). TRON leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 1 tied.
TRON vs MSTR vs COIN vs MARA: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is TRON or MSTR or COIN or MARA a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc.
(MARA) is the stronger pick with 38. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -25. 2% for Tron Inc. (TRON). Coinbase Global, Inc. (COIN) offers the better valuation at 43. 4x trailing P/E (66. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Strategy Inc (MSTR) a "Buy" — based on 29 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — TRON or MSTR or COIN or MARA?
On forward P/E, Strategy Inc is actually cheaper at 2.
4x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — TRON or MSTR or COIN or MARA?
Over the past 5 years, Strategy Inc (MSTR) delivered a total return of +189.
8%, compared to -59. 5% for Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc. (MARA). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MSTR returned +855. 6% versus TRON's -53. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — TRON or MSTR or COIN or MARA?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Tron Inc.
(TRON) is the lower-risk stock at 2. 09β versus Coinbase Global, Inc. 's 3. 17β — meaning COIN is approximately 52% more volatile than TRON relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Tron Inc. (TRON) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 9% versus 105% for Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — TRON or MSTR or COIN or MARA?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc.
(MARA) is pulling ahead at 38. 2% versus -25. 2% for Tron Inc. (TRON). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Tron Inc. grew EPS -37. 0% year-over-year, compared to -314. 5% for Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, TRON leads at 17. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — TRON or MSTR or COIN or MARA?
Coinbase Global, Inc.
(COIN) is the more profitable company, earning 17. 6% net margin versus -844. 8% for Strategy Inc — meaning it keeps 17. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: COIN leads at 20. 0% versus -1140. 8% for MSTR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — COIN leads at 74. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is TRON or MSTR or COIN or MARA more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Strategy Inc (MSTR) trades at 2.
4x forward P/E versus 66. 1x for Coinbase Global, Inc. — 63. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for MSTR: 56. 2% to $280. 83.
08Which pays a better dividend — TRON or MSTR or COIN or MARA?
In this comparison, MSTR (0.
7% yield) pays a dividend. TRON, COIN, MARA do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is TRON or MSTR or COIN or MARA better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Strategy Inc (MSTR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (0.
7% yield, +855. 6% 10Y return). Tron Inc. (TRON) carries a higher beta of 2. 09 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (MSTR: +855. 6%, TRON: -53. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between TRON and MSTR and COIN and MARA?
These companies operate in different sectors (TRON (Consumer Cyclical) and MSTR (Technology) and COIN (Financial Services) and MARA (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: TRON is a small-cap quality compounder stock; MSTR is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; COIN is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; MARA is a small-cap high-growth stock. MSTR pays a dividend while TRON, COIN, MARA do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.