TRST vs CHMG

For growth investors, TrustCo Bank Corp NY (TRST) is the stronger pick with 5.

8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -6. 5% for Chemung Financial Corporation (CHMG). TrustCo Bank Corp NY (TRST) offers the better valuation at 14. 9x trailing P/E (16. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate TrustCo Bank Corp NY (TRST) a "Hold" — based on 3 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, TrustCo Bank Corp NY (TRST) is the cheapest at 14.

9x versus Chemung Financial Corporation at 22. 0x. On forward P/E, Chemung Financial Corporation is actually cheaper at 9. 6x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

Over the past 5 years, Chemung Financial Corporation (CHMG) delivered a total return of +70.

4%, compared to +46. 5% for TrustCo Bank Corp NY (TRST). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CHMG returned +198. 0% versus TRST's +97. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Chemung Financial Corporation (CHMG) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

73β versus TrustCo Bank Corp NY's 0. 75β — meaning TRST is approximately 3% more volatile than CHMG relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Chemung Financial Corporation (CHMG) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 2% versus 28% for TrustCo Bank Corp NY — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), TrustCo Bank Corp NY (TRST) is pulling ahead at 5.

8% versus -6. 5% for Chemung Financial Corporation (CHMG). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: TrustCo Bank Corp NY grew EPS 26. 5% year-over-year, compared to -36. 9% for Chemung Financial Corporation. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

TrustCo Bank Corp NY (TRST) is the more profitable company, earning 22.

0% net margin versus 10. 8% for Chemung Financial Corporation — meaning it keeps 22. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TRST leads at 29. 2% versus 14. 2% for CHMG. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TRST leads at 67. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

On forward earnings alone, Chemung Financial Corporation (CHMG) trades at 9.

6x forward P/E versus 16. 9x for TrustCo Bank Corp NY — 7. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis.

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

TrustCo Bank Corp NY (TRST) offers the highest yield at 3. 1%, versus 1. 9% for Chemung Financial Corporation (CHMG).

For long-horizon retirement investors, Chemung Financial Corporation (CHMG) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

73), 1. 9% yield, +198. 0% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CHMG: +198. 0%, TRST: +97. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: TRST is a small-cap deep-value stock; CHMG is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.