Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
TRST vs CHMG vs NBTB vs NFBK
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
TRST vs CHMG vs NBTB vs NFBK — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $858M | $331M | $2.35B | $588M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $278M | $140M | $867M | $251M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $61M | $15M | $169M | $39M |
| Gross Margin | 67.1% | 64.2% | 72.1% | 49.1% |
| Operating Margin | 29.2% | 14.2% | 25.3% | 16.1% |
| Forward P/E | 16.9x | 9.6x | 10.8x | 10.4x |
| Total Debt | $193M | $5M | $327M | $760M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $51M | $23M | $185M | $168M |
TRST vs CHMG vs NBTB vs NFBK — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| TrustCo Bank Corp NY (TRST) | 100 | 153.7 | +53.7% |
| Chemung Financial C… (CHMG) | 100 | 272.1 | +172.1% |
| NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) | 100 | 143.9 | +43.9% |
| Northfield Bancorp,… (NFBK) | 100 | 128.7 | +28.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: TRST vs CHMG vs NBTB vs NFBK
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
TRST is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +60.3% vs NBTB's +9.0%
CHMG is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 198.0% 10Y total return vs NBTB's 102.2%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.73, Low D/E 1.9%, current ratio 0.13x
- NIM 3.2% vs NFBK's 2.0%
- Beta 0.73 vs NFBK's 1.00, lower leverage
NBTB is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and valuation efficiency is your priority.
- Dividend streak 12 yrs, beta 0.89, yield 3.2%
- PEG 1.53 vs TRST's 4.66
- Beta 0.89, yield 3.2%, current ratio 1.60x
- Lower P/E (10.8x vs 16.9x), PEG 1.53 vs 4.66
NFBK carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 13.9%, EPS growth -16.3%
- 13.9% NII/revenue growth vs CHMG's -6.5%
- Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs CHMG's 0.5% (lower = leaner)
- Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs CHMG's 0.5%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 13.9% NII/revenue growth vs CHMG's -6.5% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (10.8x vs 16.9x), PEG 1.53 vs 4.66 | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs CHMG's 0.5% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.73 vs NFBK's 1.00, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 3.2% yield, 12-year raise streak, vs NFBK's 3.7% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +60.3% vs NBTB's +9.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs CHMG's 0.5% |
TRST vs CHMG vs NBTB vs NFBK — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
TRST vs CHMG vs NBTB vs NFBK — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
NBTB leads in 2 of 6 categories
CHMG leads 1 • TRST leads 0 • NFBK leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — TRST and NBTB each lead in 2 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NBTB is the larger business by revenue, generating $867M annually — 6.2x CHMG's $140M. TRST is the more profitable business, keeping 22.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CHMG's 10.8%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $278M | $140M | $867M | $251M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $90M | $22M | $241M | $61M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $61M | $15M | $169M | $39M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $46M | $47M | $225M | $42M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +67.1% | +64.2% | +72.1% | +49.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +29.2% | +14.2% | +25.3% | +16.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +22.0% | +10.8% | +19.5% | +11.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +16.4% | +1.4% | +25.2% | +11.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +44.1% | +29.8% | +39.5% | +68.8% |
Valuation Metrics
NBTB leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 13.5x trailing earnings, NBTB trades at a 39% valuation discount to CHMG's 22.0x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), NBTB offers better value at 1.92x vs TRST's 4.11x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $858M | $331M | $2.4B | $588M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1000M | $314M | $2.5B | $1.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 14.90x | 22.01x | 13.53x | 19.54x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 16.87x | 9.64x | 10.80x | 10.42x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 4.11x | — | 1.92x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 11.14x | 15.73x | 10.35x | 24.19x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.08x | 2.37x | 2.71x | 2.34x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.29x | 1.30x | 1.21x | 0.83x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 18.75x | 163.62x | 10.75x | 19.64x |
Profitability & Efficiency
NBTB leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
NBTB delivers a 9.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $10 in annual profit, vs $5 for NFBK. CHMG carries lower financial leverage with a 0.02x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to NFBK's 1.08x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), TRST scores 7/9 vs CHMG's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +8.9% | +6.3% | +9.5% | +5.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.0% | +0.5% | +1.1% | +0.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +7.2% | +5.0% | +7.9% | +2.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +2.8% | +5.6% | +2.4% | +2.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 3 | 7 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.28x | 0.02x | 0.17x | 1.08x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $142M | -$18M | $142M | $592M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $51M | $23M | $185M | $168M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $193M | $5M | $327M | $760M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.90x | 0.44x | 1.05x | 0.46x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CHMG leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CHMG five years ago would be worth $17,043 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $10,018 for NFBK. Over the past 12 months, TRST leads with a +60.3% total return vs NBTB's +9.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CHMG at 27.7% vs NBTB's 15.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +18.2% | +27.0% | +9.3% | +26.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +60.3% | +54.5% | +9.0% | +31.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +88.2% | +108.2% | +54.1% | +65.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +46.5% | +70.4% | +29.9% | +0.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +97.2% | +198.0% | +102.2% | +20.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +23.5% | +27.7% | +15.5% | +18.3% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — CHMG and NFBK each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CHMG is the less volatile stock with a 0.73 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NFBK's 1.00 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.75x | 0.73x | 0.89x | 1.00x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $49.11 | $70.83 | $46.92 | $14.21 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $30.17 | $43.20 | $39.20 | $9.90 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +98.6% | +97.3% | +96.1% | +99.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 64.5 | 67.4 | 57.3 | 57.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 112K | 10K | 236K | 258K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — NBTB and NFBK each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: TRST as "Hold", CHMG as "Hold", NBTB as "Hold", NFBK as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 3.1% upside for NFBK (target: $15) vs -27.4% for CHMG (target: $50). For income investors, NFBK offers the higher dividend yield at 3.73% vs CHMG's 1.91%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $50.00 | $46.00 | $14.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 3 | 7 | 10 | 9 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +3.1% | +1.9% | +3.2% | +3.7% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 8 | 0 | 12 | 10 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.51 | $1.31 | $1.43 | $0.52 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +4.4% | 0.0% | +0.4% | +3.2% |
NBTB leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). CHMG leads in 1 (Total Returns). 3 tied.
TRST vs CHMG vs NBTB vs NFBK: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is TRST or CHMG or NBTB or NFBK a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Northfield Bancorp, Inc.
(NFBK) is the stronger pick with 13. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -6. 5% for Chemung Financial Corporation (CHMG). NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) offers the better valuation at 13. 5x trailing P/E (10. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate TrustCo Bank Corp NY (TRST) a "Hold" — based on 3 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — TRST or CHMG or NBTB or NFBK?
On trailing P/E, NBT Bancorp Inc.
(NBTB) is the cheapest at 13. 5x versus Chemung Financial Corporation at 22. 0x. On forward P/E, Chemung Financial Corporation is actually cheaper at 9. 6x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: NBT Bancorp Inc. wins at 1. 53x versus TrustCo Bank Corp NY's 4. 66x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — TRST or CHMG or NBTB or NFBK?
Over the past 5 years, Chemung Financial Corporation (CHMG) delivered a total return of +70.
4%, compared to +0. 2% for Northfield Bancorp, Inc. (NFBK). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CHMG returned +198. 0% versus NFBK's +20. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — TRST or CHMG or NBTB or NFBK?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Chemung Financial Corporation (CHMG) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
73β versus Northfield Bancorp, Inc. 's 1. 00β — meaning NFBK is approximately 35% more volatile than CHMG relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Chemung Financial Corporation (CHMG) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 2% versus 108% for Northfield Bancorp, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — TRST or CHMG or NBTB or NFBK?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Northfield Bancorp, Inc.
(NFBK) is pulling ahead at 13. 9% versus -6. 5% for Chemung Financial Corporation (CHMG). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: TrustCo Bank Corp NY grew EPS 26. 5% year-over-year, compared to -36. 9% for Chemung Financial Corporation. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — TRST or CHMG or NBTB or NFBK?
TrustCo Bank Corp NY (TRST) is the more profitable company, earning 22.
0% net margin versus 10. 8% for Chemung Financial Corporation — meaning it keeps 22. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TRST leads at 29. 2% versus 14. 2% for CHMG. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NBTB leads at 72. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is TRST or CHMG or NBTB or NFBK more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 53x versus TrustCo Bank Corp NY's 4. 66x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, Chemung Financial Corporation (CHMG) trades at 9. 6x forward P/E versus 16. 9x for TrustCo Bank Corp NY — 7. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for NFBK: 3. 1% to $14. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — TRST or CHMG or NBTB or NFBK?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Northfield Bancorp, Inc. (NFBK) offers the highest yield at 3. 7%, versus 1. 9% for Chemung Financial Corporation (CHMG).
09Is TRST or CHMG or NBTB or NFBK better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Chemung Financial Corporation (CHMG) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
73), 1. 9% yield, +198. 0% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CHMG: +198. 0%, NFBK: +20. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between TRST and CHMG and NBTB and NFBK?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: TRST is a small-cap deep-value stock; CHMG is a small-cap quality compounder stock; NBTB is a small-cap deep-value stock; NFBK is a small-cap income-oriented stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.