Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
TRST vs ICE
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Financial - Data & Stock Exchanges
TRST vs ICE — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Financial - Data & Stock Exchanges |
| Market Cap | $861M | $86.89B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $278M | $12.64B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $61M | $3.30B |
| Gross Margin | 67.1% | 61.9% |
| Operating Margin | 29.2% | 38.7% |
| Forward P/E | 16.9x | 19.1x |
| Total Debt | $193M | $20.28B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $51M | $837M |
TRST vs ICE — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| TrustCo Bank Corp NY (TRST) | 100 | 154.3 | +54.3% |
| Intercontinental Ex… (ICE) | 100 | 157.7 | +57.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: TRST vs ICE
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
TRST is the clearest fit if your priority is value and dividends.
- Lower P/E (16.9x vs 19.1x)
- 3.1% yield, 8-year raise streak, vs ICE's 1.3%
- +60.7% vs ICE's -11.3%
ICE carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 14 yrs, beta 0.33, yield 1.3%
- Rev growth 7.5%, EPS growth 20.7%
- 222.9% 10Y total return vs TRST's 96.9%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 7.5% NII/revenue growth vs TRST's 5.8% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (16.9x vs 19.1x) | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.2% vs TRST's 0.4% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.33 vs TRST's 0.75 | |
| Dividends | 3.1% yield, 8-year raise streak, vs ICE's 1.3% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +60.7% vs ICE's -11.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.2% vs TRST's 0.4% |
TRST vs ICE — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
TRST vs ICE — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ICE leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ICE is the larger business by revenue, generating $12.6B annually — 45.4x TRST's $278M. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 26.1% (ICE) to 22.0% (TRST).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $278M | $12.6B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $90M | $6.5B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $61M | $3.3B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $46M | $4.3B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +67.1% | +61.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +29.2% | +38.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +22.0% | +26.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +16.4% | +33.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +44.1% | +23.1% |
Valuation Metrics
TRST leads this category, winning 6 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 15.0x trailing earnings, TRST trades at a 44% valuation discount to ICE's 26.6x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), ICE offers better value at 2.99x vs TRST's 4.13x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $861M | $86.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.0B | $106.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 14.96x | 26.59x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 16.94x | 19.14x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 4.13x | 2.99x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 11.18x | 16.47x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.09x | 6.88x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.30x | 3.02x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 18.83x | 20.26x |
Profitability & Efficiency
ICE leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ICE delivers a 11.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $12 in annual profit, vs $9 for TRST. TRST carries lower financial leverage with a 0.28x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ICE's 0.70x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ICE scores 9/9 vs TRST's 7/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +8.9% | +11.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.0% | +2.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +7.2% | +7.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +2.8% | +9.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 9 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.28x | 0.70x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $142M | $19.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $51M | $837M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $193M | $20.3B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.90x | 6.53x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
TRST leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in TRST five years ago would be worth $14,782 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $14,243 for ICE. Over the past 12 months, TRST leads with a +60.7% total return vs ICE's -11.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TRST at 23.6% vs ICE's 14.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +18.7% | -3.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +60.7% | -11.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +88.9% | +48.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +47.8% | +42.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +96.9% | +222.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +23.6% | +14.0% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — TRST and ICE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ICE is the less volatile stock with a 0.33 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than TRST's 0.75 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. TRST currently trades 99.7% from its 52-week high vs ICE's 81.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.75x | 0.33x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $48.76 | $189.35 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $30.17 | $143.17 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +99.7% | +81.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 62.0 | 42.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 113K | 3.1M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — TRST and ICE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates TRST as "Hold" and ICE as "Buy". For income investors, TRST offers the higher dividend yield at 3.10% vs ICE's 1.26%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $195.71 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 3 | 36 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +3.1% | +1.3% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 8 | 14 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.51 | $1.93 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +4.4% | +1.6% |
ICE leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). TRST leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns). 2 tied.
TRST vs ICE: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is TRST or ICE a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Intercontinental Exchange, Inc.
(ICE) is the stronger pick with 7. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 5. 8% for TrustCo Bank Corp NY (TRST). TrustCo Bank Corp NY (TRST) offers the better valuation at 15. 0x trailing P/E (16. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. (ICE) a "Buy" — based on 36 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — TRST or ICE?
On trailing P/E, TrustCo Bank Corp NY (TRST) is the cheapest at 15.
0x versus Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. at 26. 6x. On forward P/E, TrustCo Bank Corp NY is actually cheaper at 16. 9x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. wins at 2. 15x versus TrustCo Bank Corp NY's 4. 67x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — TRST or ICE?
Over the past 5 years, TrustCo Bank Corp NY (TRST) delivered a total return of +47.
8%, compared to +42. 4% for Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. (ICE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ICE returned +222. 9% versus TRST's +96. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — TRST or ICE?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Intercontinental Exchange, Inc.
(ICE) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 33β versus TrustCo Bank Corp NY's 0. 75β — meaning TRST is approximately 130% more volatile than ICE relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, TrustCo Bank Corp NY (TRST) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 28% versus 70% for Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — TRST or ICE?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Intercontinental Exchange, Inc.
(ICE) is pulling ahead at 7. 5% versus 5. 8% for TrustCo Bank Corp NY (TRST). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: TrustCo Bank Corp NY grew EPS 26. 5% year-over-year, compared to 20. 7% for Intercontinental Exchange, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — TRST or ICE?
Intercontinental Exchange, Inc.
(ICE) is the more profitable company, earning 26. 1% net margin versus 22. 0% for TrustCo Bank Corp NY — meaning it keeps 26. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ICE leads at 38. 7% versus 29. 2% for TRST. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TRST leads at 67. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is TRST or ICE more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. (ICE) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 2. 15x versus TrustCo Bank Corp NY's 4. 67x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, TrustCo Bank Corp NY (TRST) trades at 16. 9x forward P/E versus 19. 1x for Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. — 2. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis.
08Which pays a better dividend — TRST or ICE?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
TrustCo Bank Corp NY (TRST) offers the highest yield at 3. 1%, versus 1. 3% for Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. (ICE).
09Is TRST or ICE better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Intercontinental Exchange, Inc.
(ICE) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 33), 1. 3% yield, +222. 9% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (ICE: +222. 9%, TRST: +96. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between TRST and ICE?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: TRST is a small-cap deep-value stock; ICE is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.